|
Author guidelines
For queries relating to the status of your paper pre decision,
please contact the Editor or Journal Editorial Office. For
queries post acceptance, please contact the Supplier Project
Manager. These details can be found in the Editorial Team
section.
Author responsibilities
Our goal is to provide you with a professional and courteous
experience at each stage of the review and publication process.
There are also some responsibilities that sit with you as the
author. Our expectation is that you will:
-
Read and understand the below ‘Manuscript Requirements’
section prior to submission. Any submissions that fail to
adhere to the journal’s formatting standards will be
rejected
- Respond swiftly to any queries during the publication
process.
- Be accountable for all aspects of your work. This includes
investigating and resolving any questions about accuracy
or research integrity
- Treat communications between you and the journal editor as
confidential until an editorial decision has been made.
- Read about our research
ethics for authorship. These state that you
must:
- Include anyone who has made a
substantial and meaningful contribution to the submission
(anyone else involved in the paper should be listed in the
acknowledgements).
- Exclude anyone who hasn’t
contributed to the paper, or who has chosen not to be
associated with the research.
- In accordance with COPE’s position statement
on AI tools, Large Language Models cannot be
credited with authorship as they are incapable of
conceptualising a research design without human direction
and cannot be accountable for the integrity, originality,
and validity of the published work.
- If your article involves human participants, you must ensure
you have considered whether or not you require ethical
approval for your research, and include this information as
part of your submission. Find out more about informed
consent.
Research and publishing ethics
Our editors and employees work hard to ensure the content we
publish is ethically sound. To help us achieve that goal, we
closely follow the advice laid out in the guidelines and
flowcharts on the COPE (Committee on Publication
Ethics) website.
We have also developed our research
and publishing ethics guidelines. If you haven’t already
read these, we urge you to do so – they will help you avoid the
most common publishing ethics issues.
A few key points:
- Any manuscript you submit to this journal should be
original. That means it should not have been published before
in its current, or similar, form. Exceptions to this rule are
outlined in our pre-print
and conference paper policies. If any substantial
element of your paper has been previously published, you need
to declare this to the journal editor upon submission. Please
note, the journal editor may use Crossref Similarity Check to
check on the originality of submissions received. This service
compares submissions against a database of 49 million works
from 800 scholarly publishers.
- Your work should not have been submitted elsewhere and
should not be under consideration by any other publication.
- If you have a conflict of interest, you must declare it upon
submission; this allows the editor to decide how they would
like to proceed. Read about conflict of interest in our research
and publishing ethics guidelines.
- By submitting your work to Emerald, you are guaranteeing
that the work is not in infringement of any existing
copyright.
Third party copyright permissions
Prior to article submission, you need to ensure you’ve
applied for, and received, written permission to use any
material in your manuscript that has been created by a third
party. Please note, we are unable to publish any article
that still has permissions pending. The rights we
require are:
- Non-exclusive rights to reproduce the material in the
article or book chapter.
- Print and electronic rights.
- Worldwide English-language rights.
- To use the material for the life of the work. That means
there should be no time restrictions on its re-use e.g. a
one-year licence.
We are a member of the International Association of
Scientific, Technical, and Medical
Publishers (STM) and participate in the STM permissions guidelines,
a reciprocal free exchange of material with other STM
publishers. In some cases, this may mean that you don’t
need permission to re-use content. If so, please highlight
this at the submission stage.
Please take a few moments to read our guide
to publishing permissions to ensure you have met all
the requirements, so that we can process your submission without
delay.
Open access information
This is a sponsored open access journal, also referred to as
platinum open access. Because it is published in partnership
with an organisation, your article will be published open
access, but you will not have to pay an APC (article processing
charge) - publication is free. Your article will be published
with a Creative Commons CC BY 4.0 user
licence, which outlines how readers can reuse your work.
You can find out more about our open access routes and read our
FAQs on our open research page.
Find
out about open
Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines
We are a signatory of the Transparency and Openness
Promotion (TOP) Guidelines, a framework that supports the
reproducibility of research through the adoption of transparent
research practices. That means we encourage you to:
- Cite and fully reference all data, program code, and other
methods in your article.
- Include persistent identifiers, such as a Digital Object
Identifier (DOI), in references for datasets and program
codes. Persistent identifiers ensure future access to unique
published digital objects, such as a piece of text or
datasets. Persistent identifiers are assigned to datasets by
digital archives, such as institutional repositories and
partners in the Data Preservation Alliance for the Social
Sciences (Data-PASS).
- Follow appropriate international and national procedures
with respect to data protection, rights to privacy and other
ethical considerations, whenever you cite data. For further
guidance please refer to our research
and publishing ethics guidelines. For an example on how
to cite datasets, please refer to the references section
below.
Prepare your submission
Manuscript support services
We are pleased to partner with Editage, a
platform that connects you with relevant experts in language
support, translation, editing, visuals, consulting, and more.
After you’ve agreed a fee, they will work with you to enhance
your manuscript and get it submission-ready.
This is an optional service for authors who feel they need a
little extra support. It does not guarantee your work will be
accepted for review or publication.
Visit Editage
Manuscript requirements
Before you submit your manuscript, it’s important you read and
follow the guidelines below. You will also find some useful tips
in our structure your
journal submission how-to guide.
Format
|
Article files should be anonymous, provided in
Microsoft Word format, double-spaced pages, with 1
inch margins, and 12pt fonts (Times New Roman
preferred).
|
Article length / word count
|
Articles should be between 6000 and 8000 words
in length. This includes all text, for example, the
structured abstract, references, all text in tables,
and figures and appendices. The first submit can
include the figures and tables after the references in
a unique file. Please allow 280 words for each figure
or table.
|
Article title
|
A concisely worded title should be provided.
|
Author details
|
The names of all contributing authors should be added
to the ScholarOne submission; please list them in the
order in which you’d like them to be published. Each
contributing author will need their own ScholarOne
author account, from which we will extract the
following details:
- Author email address (institutional
mandatory).
- Author name. We will reproduce it exactly, so any
middle names and/or initials they want featured must
be included.
- Author affiliation. This should be where they were
based when the research for the paper was conducted.
In multi-authored papers, it’s important that ALL
authors that have made a significant contribution to
the paper are listed. Those who have provided support
but have not contributed to the research should be
featured in an acknowledgements section. You should
never include people who have not contributed to the
paper or who don’t want to be associated with the
research. Read about our research
ethics for authorship.
Lead authors require their own updated ORCiD. All
other authors are encouraged to provide an ORCiD.
The editor-in-chief will reject without review
manuscripts with authors without updated ORCiD or with
ORCiD that do not match the name.
|
Biographies and acknowledgements
|
If you want to include these items, save them in a
separate Microsoft Word document and upload the
file with your submission. Where they are included, a
brief professional biography of not more than 100
words should be supplied for each named author.
|
Research funding
|
Your article must reference all sources of external
research funding in the acknowledgements section. You
should describe the role of the funder or financial
sponsor in the entire research process, from study
design to submission.
|
Structured abstract
|
All submissions must include a structured abstract in
the first page of manuscript, following the format
outlined below.
These four sub-headings and their accompanying
explanations must always be included:
- Purpose
- Design/methodology/approach
- Findings
- Originality
The following three sub-headings are optional and can
be included, if applicable:
- Research limitations/implications
- Practical implications
- Social implications
You can find some useful tips in our write an
article abstract how-to guide.
The maximum length of your structured abstract should
be 250 words in total, including keywords and article
classification (see the sections below). Manuscripts
with other kind of abstract will be reject without
review.
|
Keywords
|
Your submission should include from 4 to 6
appropriate and short keywords that capture the
principal topics of the paper (i.e. main theory, main
model, outcome variable, main technic, among others).
Our Creating
an SEO-friendly manuscript how to guide contains
some practical guidance on choosing search-engine
friendly keywords.
Please note, while we will always try to use the
keywords you’ve suggested, the in-house editorial team
may replace some of them with matching terms to ensure
consistency across publications and improve your
article’s visibility.
In addition to keywords, authors must subsequently
include the JEL classification,
identifying the codes that are most focused on the
manuscript. For further information, please refer to
the American Economic Association guidance found here.
|
Article classification
|
During the submission process, you will be asked to
select a type for your paper; the options are listed
below. If you don’t see an exact match, please choose
the best fit:
- Research Paper
- Doctoral Dissertation
- Applied Research Paper
- Empirical Research Note
You will also be asked to select a category for your
paper. The options for this are listed below. If you
don’t see an exact match, please choose the best fit:
Research paper. Reports on any type of research
undertaken by the author(s), including:
- The construction or testing of a model or
framework
- Action research
- Testing of data, market research or surveys
- Empirical, scientific or clinical research
- Papers with a practical focus
All Research Papers are expected
to include the following sections: 1. Introduction,
2. Literature Review, 3. Method, 4. Results, 5.
Discussions, and 6. Conclusions.
Viewpoint. Covers any paper where content is
dependent on the author's opinion and interpretation.
This includes journalistic and magazine-style pieces.
Technical paper. Describes and evaluates
technical products, processes or services.
Conceptual paper. Focuses on developing
hypotheses and is usually discursive. Covers
philosophical discussions and comparative studies of
other authors’ work and thinking.
Case study. Describes actual interventions or
experiences within organizations. It can be subjective
and doesn’t generally report on research. Also covers
a description of a legal case or a hypothetical case
study used as a teaching exercise.
Literature review. This category should only be
used if the main purpose of the paper is to annotate
and/or critique the literature in a particular field.
It could be a selective bibliography providing advice
on information sources, or the paper may aim to cover
the main contributors to the development of a topic
and explore their different views.
General review. Provides an overview or
historical examination of some concept, technique or
phenomenon. Papers are likely to be more descriptive
or instructional (‘how to’ papers) than discursive.
|
Headings
|
All Research Papers are expected
to include the following sections: 1. Introduction,
2. Literature Review, 3. Method, 4. Results, 5.
Discussions, and 6. Conclusions.
The preferred format is for first level headings to be
in bold, and subsequent sub-headings to be in medium
italics.
|
Notes/endnotes
|
Notes or endnotes should only be used if absolutely
necessary. They should be identified in the text by
consecutive numbers enclosed in square brackets. These
numbers should then be listed, and explained, at the
end of the article.
|
Figures
|
All figures (charts, diagrams, line drawings,
webpages/screenshots, and photographic images) should
be submitted electronically. Both colour and black and
white files are accepted.
There are a few other important points to note:
- All figures should be supplied at the highest
resolution/quality possible with numbers and text
clearly legible.
- Acceptable formats are .ai, .eps, .jpeg, .bmp, and
.tif.
- Electronic figures created in other applications
should be supplied in their original formats and
should also be either copied and pasted into a blank
MS Word document, or submitted as a PDF file.
- All figures should be numbered consecutively with
Arabic numerals and have clear captions.
- All photographs should be numbered as Plate 1, 2,
3, etc. and have clear captions.
- All figure/table captions should include the
necessary credit line, acknowledgement, or
attribution if you have been given permission to use
the figure/table; if the figure/table is the
property of the author(s), this should be
acknowledged in the caption.
|
Tables
|
Tables should be typed and submitted in a separate
file to the main body of the article. The position of
each table should be clearly labelled in the main body
of the article with corresponding labels clearly shown
in the table file. Tables should be numbered
consecutively in Roman numerals (e.g. I, II, etc.).
Give each table a brief title. Ensure that any
superscripts or asterisks are shown next to the
relevant items and have explanations displayed as
footnotes to the table, figure or plate.
|
Supplementary files
|
Where tables, figures, appendices, and other
additional content are supplementary to the article
but not critical to the reader’s understanding of it,
you can choose to host these supplementary files
alongside your article on Insight, Emerald’s content
hosting platform, or on an institutional or personal
repository. All supplementary material must be
submitted prior to acceptance.
If you choose to host your supplementary
files on Insight, you must submit these as
separate files alongside your article. Files should be
clearly labelled in such a way that makes it clear
they are supplementary; Emerald recommends that the
file name is descriptive and that it follows the
format ‘Supplementary_material_appendix_1’ or
‘Supplementary tables’. All supplementary
material must be mentioned at the appropriate moment
in the main text of the article, there is no need to
include the content of the file but only the file
name. A link to the supplementary material
will be added to the article during production, and
the material will be made available alongside the main
text of the article at the point of EarlyCite
publication.
Please note that Emerald will not make any changes to
the material; it will not be copyedited, typeset, and
authors will not receive proofs. Emerald therefore
strongly recommends that you style all supplementary
material ahead of acceptance of the article.
Emerald Insight can host the following file types and
extensions:
- Adobe Acrobat (.pdf)
- MS Word document (.doc, .docx)
- MS Excel (.xls, xlsx)
- MS PowerPoint (.pptx)
- Image (.png, .jpeg, .gif)
- Plain ASCII text (.txt)
- PostScript (.ps)
- Rich Text Format (.rtf)
If you choose to use an institutional or
personal repository, you should ensure that
the supplementary material is hosted on the repository
ahead of submission, and then include a link only to
the repository within the article. It is the
responsibility of the submitting author to ensure that
the material is free to access and that it remains
permanently available.
Please note that extensive supplementary material may
be subject to peer review; this is at the discretion
of the journal Editor and dependent on the content of
the material (for example, whether including it would
support the reviewer making a decision on the article
during the peer review process).
|
References
|
All references in your manuscript must be formatted
using one of the recognised Harvard styles. You are
welcome to use the Harvard style Emerald has adopted –
we’ve provided a detailed guide below. Want to use a
different Harvard style? That’s fine, our typesetters
will make any necessary changes to your manuscript if
it is accepted. Please ensure you check all your
citations for completeness, accuracy and
consistency.
Emerald’s Harvard referencing style
References to other publications in your text should
be written as follows:
- Single author: (Adams, 2006)
- Two authors: (Adams and Brown, 2006)
- Three or more authors: (Adams et al.,
2006) Please note, ‘et al' should always be
written in italics.
A few other style points. These apply to both the
main body of text and your final list of references.
- When referring to pages in a publication, use
‘p.(page number)’ for a single page or ‘pp.(page
numbers)’ to indicate a page range.
- Page numbers should always be written out in full,
e.g. 175-179, not 175-9.
- Where a colon or dash appears in the title of an
article or book chapter, the letter that follows
that colon or dash should always be lower case.
- When citing a work with multiple editors, use the
abbreviation ‘Ed.s’.
At the end of your paper, please supply a reference
list in alphabetical order using the style guidelines
below. Where a DOI is available, this should be
included at the end of the reference.
|
For books
|
Surname, initials (year), title of book,
publisher, place of publication.
e.g. Harrow, R. (2005), No Place to Hide,
Simon & Schuster, New York, NY.
|
For book chapters
|
Surname, initials (year), "chapter title", editor's
surname, initials (Ed.), title of book,
publisher, place of publication, page numbers.
e.g. Calabrese, F.A. (2005), "The early pathways:
theory to practice – a continuum", Stankosky, M.
(Ed.), Creating the Discipline of Knowledge
Management, Elsevier, New York, NY, pp.15-20.
|
For journals
|
Surname, initials (year), "title of article", journal
name, volume issue, page numbers.
e.g. Capizzi, M.T. and Ferguson, R. (2005), "Loyalty
trends for the twenty-first century", Journal
of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp.72-80.
|
For published
conference proceedings
|
Surname, initials (year of publication), "title of
paper", in editor’s surname, initials (Ed.), title
of published proceeding which may include place and
date(s) held, publisher, place of publication,
page numbers.
e.g. Wilde, S. and Cox, C. (2008), “Principal factors
contributing to the competitiveness of tourism
destinations at varying stages of development”, in
Richardson, S., Fredline, L., Patiar A., & Ternel,
M. (Ed.s), CAUTHE 2008: Where the 'bloody
hell' are we?, Griffith University, Gold Coast,
Qld, pp.115-118.
|
For unpublished
conference proceedings
|
Surname, initials (year), "title of paper", paper
presented at [name of conference], [date of
conference], [place of conference], available at: URL
if freely available on the internet (accessed date).
e.g. Aumueller, D. (2005), "Semantic authoring and
retrieval within a wiki", paper presented at the
European Semantic Web Conference (ESWC), 29 May-1
June, Heraklion, Crete, available at: http://dbs.uni-leipzig.de/file/aumueller05wiksar.pdf (accessed
20 February 2007).
|
For working papers
|
Surname, initials (year), "title of article", working
paper [number if available], institution or
organization, place of organization, date.
e.g. Moizer, P. (2003), "How published academic
research can inform policy decisions: the case of
mandatory rotation of audit appointments", working
paper, Leeds University Business School, University of
Leeds, Leeds, 28 March.
|
For encyclopaedia entries
(with no author or editor)
|
Title of encyclopaedia (year), "title
of entry", volume, edition, title of encyclopaedia,
publisher, place of publication, page numbers.
e.g. Encyclopaedia Britannica (1926),
"Psychology of culture contact", Vol. 1, 13th ed.,
Encyclopaedia Britannica, London and New York, NY,
pp.765-771.
(for authored entries, please refer to book chapter
guidelines above)
|
For newspaper
articles (authored)
|
Surname, initials (year), "article title", newspaper,
date, page numbers.
e.g. Smith, A. (2008), "Money for old rope", Daily
News, 21 January, pp.1, 3-4.
|
For newspaper
articles (non-authored)
|
Newspaper (year), "article title",
date, page numbers.
e.g. Daily News (2008), "Small
change", 2 February, p.7.
|
For archival or other unpublished sources
|
Surname, initials (year), "title of document",
unpublished manuscript, collection name, inventory
record, name of archive, location of archive.
e.g. Litman, S. (1902), "Mechanism & Technique of
Commerce", unpublished manuscript, Simon Litman
Papers, Record series 9/5/29 Box 3, University of
Illinois Archives, Urbana-Champaign, IL.
|
For electronic sources
|
If available online, the full URL should be supplied
at the end of the reference, as well as the date that
the resource was accessed.
Surname, initials (year), “title of electronic
source”, available at: persistent URL (accessed date
month year).
e.g. Weida, S. and Stolley, K. (2013), “Developing
strong thesis statements”, available at: https://owl.english.purdue.edu/owl/resource/588/1/ (accessed
20 June 2018)
Standalone URLs, i.e. those without an author or
date, should be included either inside parentheses
within the main text, or preferably set as a note
(Roman numeral within square brackets within text
followed by the full URL address at the end of the
paper).
|
For data
|
Surname, initials (year), title of dataset,
name of data repository, available at: persistent URL,
(accessed date month year).
e.g. Campbell, A. and Kahn, R.L. (2015), American
National Election Study, 1948, ICPSR07218-v4,
Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social
Research (distributor), Ann Arbor, MI, available
at: https://doi.org/10.3886/ICPSR07218.v4 (accessed
20 June 2018)
|
Submit your manuscript
There are a number of key steps you should follow to ensure a
smooth and trouble-free submission.
Double check your manuscript
Before submitting your work, it is your responsibility to check
that the manuscript is complete, grammatically correct, and
without spelling or typographical errors. A few other important
points:
- Give the journal aims and scope a final read. Is your
manuscript definitely a good fit? If it isn’t, the editor may
decline it without peer review.
- Does your manuscript comply with our research
and publishing ethics guidelines?
- Have you cleared any necessary publishing
permissions?
- Have you followed all the formatting requirements laid out
in these author guidelines?
- Does the manuscript contain any information that might help
the reviewer identify you? This could compromise the
blind peer review process. A few tips:
- If you need to refer to your own work, use wording such
as ‘previous research has demonstrated’ not ‘our previous
research has demonstrated’.
- If you need to refer to your own, currently unpublished
work, don’t include this work in the reference list.
- Any acknowledgments or author biographies should be
uploaded as separate files.
- Carry out a final check to ensure that no author names
appear anywhere in the manuscript. This includes in
figures or captions.
You will find a helpful submission checklist on the
website Think.Check.Submit.
The submission process
All manuscripts should be submitted through our editorial
system by the corresponding author.
A separate author account is required for each journal you
submit to. If this is your first time submitting to this
journal, please choose the Create an
account or Register now option in the editorial
system. If you already have an Emerald login, you are welcome to
reuse the existing username and password here.
Please note, the next time you log into the system, you will be
asked for your username. This will be the email address you
entered when you set up your account.
Don't forget to add your ORCiD ID during the
submission process. It will be embedded in your published
article, along with a link to the ORCiD registry allowing others
to easily match you with your work.
Don’t have one yet? It only takes a few moments to register for a free ORCiD
identifier.
Visit the ScholarOne support centre for
further help and guidance.
What you can expect next
You will receive an automated email from the journal editor,
confirming your successful submission. It will provide you with
a manuscript number, which will be used in all future
correspondence about your submission. If you have any reason to
suspect the confirmation email you receive might be fraudulent,
please contact
our Rights team.
Post submission
Review and decision process
Each submission is checked by the editor. At this stage, they
may choose to decline or unsubmit your manuscript if it doesn’t
fit the journal aims and scope, or they feel the
language/manuscript quality is too low.
If they think it might be suitable for the publication, they
will send it to at least two independent referees for double
blind peer review. Once these reviewers have provided
their feedback, the editor may decide to accept your manuscript,
request minor or major revisions, or decline your work.
While all journals work to different timescales, the goal is
that the editor will inform you of their first decision within
60 days.
During this period, we will send you automated updates on the
progress of your manuscript via our submission system, or you
can log in to check on the current status of your paper.
Each time we contact you, we will quote the manuscript
number you were given at the point of submission. If you receive
an email that does not match these criteria, it could be
fraudulent and we recommend you email permissions@emeraldinsight.com.
If your submission is accepted
Copyright
All accepted authors are sent an email with a link to a licence
form. This should be checked for accuracy, for example
whether contact and affiliation details are up to date and your
name is spelled correctly, and then returned to us
electronically. If there is a reason why you can’t assign
copyright to us, you should discuss this with your journal
content editor. You will find their contact details on the
editorial team section above.
Proofing and typesetting
Once we have received your completed licence form, the article
will pass directly into the production process. We will carry
out editorial checks, copyediting, and typesetting and then
return proofs to you (if you are the corresponding author) for
your review. This is your opportunity to correct any
typographical errors, grammatical errors or incorrect author
details. We can’t accept requests to rewrite texts at this
stage.
When the page proofs are finalised, the fully typeset and
proofed version of record is published online. This is referred
to as the EarlyCite version. While an EarlyCite
article has yet to be assigned to a volume or issue, it does
have a digital object identifier (DOI) and is fully citable. It
will be compiled into an issue according to the journal’s issue
schedule, with papers being added by chronological date of
publication.
How to share your paper
Visit
our author rights page to find out how you can
reuse and share your work.
To find tips on increasing the visibility of your
published paper, read about how
to promote your work.
Correcting inaccuracies in your published paper
Sometimes errors are made during the research, writing and
publishing processes. When these issues arise, we have the
option of withdrawing the paper or introducing a correction
notice. Find out more about our article
withdrawal and correction policies.
Need to make a change to the author list? See our frequently
asked questions (FAQs) below.
Frequently asked questions
Is there a submission fee
for the journal?
|
The only time we will ever ask you for money to
publish in an Emerald journal is if you have chosen to
publish via the gold open access route. You will
be asked to pay an APC (article processing charge)
once your paper has been accepted (unless it is a
sponsored open access journal).
Read
about our APCs
At no other time will you be asked to contribute
financially towards your article’s publication. If you
haven’t chosen gold open access and you receive an
email which appears to be from Emerald, asking you for
payment to publish, please contact
our Rights team.
|
How can I become
a reviewer for a journal?
|
Please contact the editor for the journal, with a
copy of your CV. You will find their contact details
on the editorial team tab on this page.
|
Who do I contact if I want to find out which
volume and issue my accepted paper will appear in?
|
Typically, papers are added to an issue according to
their date of publication. If you would like to know
in advance which issue your paper will appear in,
please contact the content editor of the journal. You
will find their contact details on the editorial team
tab on this page. Once your paper has been published
in an issue, you will be notified by email.
|
Who do I contact if I have
a query about my submission?
|
Please email the journal editor – you will find their
contact details on the editorial team tab on this
page. If you ever suspect an email you’ve received
from Emerald might not be genuine, you are welcome to
verify it with the content editor for the journal,
whose contact details can be found on the editorial
team tab on this page. Alternatively, you can email our
Rights team.
|
Is my paper suitable
for the journal?
|
If you’ve read the aims and scope on the journal
landing page and are still unsure whether your paper
is suitable for the journal, please email the editor
and include your paper's title and structured
abstract. They will be able to advise on your
manuscript’s suitability. You will find their contact
details on the Editorial team tab on this page.
|
How do I make a change to the list of authors
once the manuscript has been submitted?
|
Authorship and the order in which the authors are
listed on the paper should be agreed prior to
submission. We have a right first time policy on this
and no changes can be made to the list once submitted.
If you have made an error in the submission process,
please email the Journal Editorial Office who will
look into your request – you will find their contact
details on the editorial team tab on this page.
|
|
|