Services on Demand
Journal
Article
Indicators
- Cited by SciELO
Related links
- Similars in SciELO
Share
Horizonte Médico (Lima)
Print version ISSN 1727-558X
Horiz. Med. vol.23 no.3 Lima July/Set. 2023 Epub Sep 13, 2023
http://dx.doi.org/10.24265/horizmed.2023.v23n3.12
Review article
Negative outcomes and mortality in the frail elderly undergoing major surgery: which risk factors have the greatest impact?
1Universidad de Antioquia, School of Medicine, Medellín, Colombia.
2Universidad Nacional de Bogotá, School of Medicine, Colombia.
3Universidad Simón Bolívar, School of Medicine, Barranquilla, Colombia.
4Universidad Libre, School of Medicine, Cali, Colombia.
5Universidad del Sinú, School of Medicine, Cartagena, Colombia.
6Universidad Metropolitana, School of Medicine, Barranquilla, Colombia.
7Universitat Ramon Llull, Facultat de Ciències de la Salut Blanquerna (Blanquerna School of Health Sciences), Barcelona, Spain.
The elderly, often frail, are patients susceptible to numerous complications, both immediate and in the short, medium and long term, following surgical interventions. Depending on their comorbidities, a comprehensive approach should be taken to achieve the best condition of the organs prior to surgery and attempt to maintain it during and after the intervention. Considering the statistical strength of negative outcomes, specifically mortality in elderly patients undergoing major surgery, is truly a challenge. This even extends to other fields such as bioethics, raising a dilemma about dysthanasia when resorting to certain risky interventions in those with a fearful life prognosis. Recently, interesting evidence estimating the incidence, mortality risk and factors associated with negative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing major surgery has been published, suggesting possible modifications in decision-making algorithms for future clinical practice guidelines in surgery. The objective of this review is to analyze updated evidence on which risk factors would have the greatest impact on negative outcomes and mortality in elderly patients undergoing major surgery. A literature search was conducted using the search terms "Major Surgery" and "Elderly," in addition to synonyms, in the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and MEDLINE databases. In general surgery and subspecialties, it is very complex to determine precise risk factors that can be extrapolated to all surgical scenarios due to the complexity and specificity of certain organs and procedures. Evidence has found that frail adults undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer, liver metastasis, lung cancer, pancreatic disease and esophageal cancer have the longest hospital stays, and overall mortality is higher in those undergoing oncologic surgery. However, both physical and mental integrity are associated with worse outcomes, and surgical prehabilitation could positively impact this situation by improving functional reserve and post-surgical recovery time.
Keywords: Mortality; Aged; Surgical Procedures, Operative; Risk Factors
Introduction
With the advancement of science and technology, emergency and essential surgical care and outcomes have become important measures to assess the performance of healthcare practice in this field 1-3. Based on social determinants of health and on health outcomes— morbidity, mortality, functional ability, life expectancy and health cost—according to international organizations and institutions regarding comprehensive healthcare, surgical decision-making should be solid enough to favorably weigh up these outcomes and obtain the greatest benefit for the patient 4-6. For this purpose, it is necessary to know and have higher-quality evidence supporting the performance of an intervention, particularly in subgroups at higher risk 7.
The elderly, often frail, are patients susceptible to several immediate and short-, medium- and long-term complications, following surgical interventions 7-9. Depending on their comorbidities, a comprehensive approach should be taken to achieve the best condition of the organs prior to surgery and attempt to maintain it during and after the intervention 10. Despite there is not an absolute and definite definition of major surgery, it is presumed that it comprises all complex surgical interventions with high risk of complications, which involve the invasion of the organs with vital functions (generally located within the head, and the thoracic and abdominal cavities) and last at least 90 minutes 11,12. Considering the statistical strength of negative outcomes, specifically mortality in elderly patients undergoing major surgery, is truly a challenge. This even extends to other fields such as bioethics, raising a dilemma about dysthanasia when resorting to certain risky interventions with fearful life prognosis.
Recently, interesting evidence estimating the incidence, mortality risk and factors associated with negative outcomes in elderly patients undergoing major surgery has been published, suggesting possible modifications in decision-making algorithms for future clinical practice guidelines in surgery 13-17. Considering that there is very little evidence about this topic and thorough analyses comparing the estimates of clinical risk factors in Spanish to be taken into account in Latin America, the objective of this review is to analyze updated evidence on which risk factors would have the greatest impact on negative outcomes and mortality in elderly patients undergoing major surgery.
Search strategy
A literature search was conducted using the search terms "Major Surgery" and "Elderly," in addition to synonyms, which were combined with the operators "AND" and "OR," in the PubMed, ScienceDirect, Web of Science and MEDLINE databases. The search included any article available in full text assessing the factors associated with negative outcomes and mortality in the elderly undergoing major surgery. However, original studies, systematic reviews and meta-analyses had priority. A total of 125 potentially noteworthy articles were identified, the title and abstract of which were reviewed; and finally, 74 were selected. Articles published up to 2023 were included. The estimates and calculations found were expressed in their original measures: frequencies, percentages, confidence intervals (CI), difference of means (DM), relative risk (RR), odds ratio (OR) or hazard ratio (HR).
Frailty in the elderly and its impact on surgical decision-making
Aging is a physiological process that involves different organ modifications, which make human beings more susceptible to complications and death 18-24. Currently, the prevalence of cardiometabolic, neurological and endocrine comorbidities as well as polypharmacy in elderly patients are extremely high. These conditions prevent adequate tolerance to some drugs, wound healing, movement, hygiene, recovery of functional ability, among many other key factors during the intra- and postoperative stage 18,20,21,25. All of this leads to the well-known frailty, which, in spite of being explained by some defined criteria, can be summed up as a clinical- biological syndrome with high vulnerability of the organs secondary to multi-organ dysregulation and decrease in physiological reserves 22-24, which is a common condition in the elderly with multimorbidity.
As previously mentioned, surgical decision-making is a complex process that depends on several factors, out of which the stability of the patient’s organs is one of the most important. Besides frailty, the association between certain conditions—mostly heart disease, polypharmacy, renal disease, neuropathy and pneumopathy—and negative outcomes is very strong in the elderly 26-32. Paradoxically, some authors have stated that this population has not been extensively studied through randomized controlled trials for general dissemination concerning different specialties, which represents a significant bias when trying to extrapolate results 18, despite the frail elderly are frequently seen in healthcare practice, particularly in low- and medium-income countries, where inequities in social determinants of health prevail. In general, frail subjects with polypharmacy are up to 5.3 (95 % CI: 2.3-12.5) and 2.3 (95 % CI: 1.2-4.4) times more likely to die and become disabled after going to the emergency room 21.
To understand the relevance of this syndrome regarding surgical outcomes, the role of physical prehabilitation and rehabilitation in postsurgical patients should be recognized. Recovery and maintenance of organ functionality are accompanied by their integrity and the body’s ability to perform the activities required to achieve this regulation 22,23. Nevertheless, in the frail elderly, who—at the molecular level—have a significant degree of mitochondrial dysfunction, cellular senescence and poor intercellular communication, this generates failures in the immune system, glucose metabolism and autonomic dysfunction, which makes prompt modulation of organs difficult and also generates disorders in the musculoskeletal, metabolic and stress response systems. This is a cyclic and negative physical frailty phenotype defined by fatigue, which leads to weight loss and weakness and, consequently, slow gait and low physical activity, thereby causing persistent fatigue, and the cycle repeats itself 22,23,24,29. Therefore, this type of patient is more susceptible to thromboembolic events because of immobility, a higher rate of surgical site or nosocomial infections because of impaired glucose metabolism and immune system, and disability because of difficulty in the rehabilitation process 29 (Figure 1). This would obviously be more severe in major surgery, which is more invasive and involves higher risk.
Therefore, surgery of frail patients must include a preoperative risk assessment and optimization process, besides considering the surgery suitability, combining some scales, e.g., the Rockwood clinical frailty scale 33 and the NELA (National Emergency Laparotomy Audit) model 34. If surgery is performed, intraoperative management should be optimized by avoiding hypothermia, using restrictive fluid therapy and anesthetic agents with wide therapeutic window, considering intensive monitoring and, during the postoperative period, by constantly evaluating and reevaluating organ stress until being sure that the functional recovery process can start (Figure 2). For this reason, some reviews have demonstrated that frailty in the elderly is a predictor of complications, long hospital stay and postoperative mortality 35-37. From this risk variability, some authors set forth surgical frailty phenotypes based on different domains, which have the potential to predict complications, hospital readmission and quality of life 38.
Much translational research is still needed to assess and determine the drugs, inputs, times, settings and other variables exerting more influence on this type of outcomes, apart from the optimization of low-resource scenarios, where it is not possible to perform a strict monitoring, to have the chance to choose the safest therapeutic scheme or to provide a comprehensive rehabilitation set with the best quality 39-41. Nevertheless, recognizing these factors allows the healthcare team to customize, without doubt, the context of frail elderly patients to obtain the best results.
Risk factors associated with negative outcomes and mortality in the elderly undergoing major surgery
In general surgery and subspecialties, it is very difficult to determine accurate risk factors that can be extrapolated to all surgical scenarios because of the complexity and specificity of some organs and procedures. It is evident that some subspecialties involve higher risks than others, which are even more critical in the frail elderly undergoing major surgery. Evidence has demonstrated that frail adults undergoing surgery for colorectal cancer, liver metastasis, lung cancer, pancreatic disease and esophageal cancer require the longest hospital stay. Morbidity is higher in patients undergoing surgery for colorectal and esophageal cancer and repair of an abdominal aortic aneurysm. Therefore, higher mortality has been reported particularly in cancer surgery 42. Also, despite heterogeneous results have been found (43,44), mortality trend in this subgroup has been associated with emergency surgeries and open surgery techniques 45. Other risk factors described for postsurgical morbidity and mortality 46-48 are the extension of the operative period, malnutrition, fractures caused by osteoporosis, and preoperative blood transfusion.
As to the 30-day survival data, some studies report that postoperative mortality risk increases by 10 % every year after 70 years of age and rises significantly if it is also associated with admission to the intensive care unit and use of inotropes or vasopressors 49. At the neurological level, the factors associated with the occurrence and prolonged persistence of delirium are diabetes mellitus, history of stroke, long-standing therapy with benzodiazepines, alcohol consumption and emergency surgical interventions—all of which could be explained by the lack of preoperative optimization 50-52. For more than 15 years approximately, frailty, based on the criteria and scales defining it, has had the potential to predict postoperative complications (OR 2.06; 95 % CI: 1.18-3.60), hospital stay (OR 1.69; 95 % CI: 1.28-2.23) and loss of functional ability to perform basic daily activities (OR 20.48; 95 CI %: 5.54- 75.68) 53. Even patients in prefrailty condition have shown a higher rate of complications compared to those who are not in such condition (34.7 % vs. 27.5 %; OR 1.78; 95 % CI: 1.04-3.05), and it is associated with a long hospital stay 54.
However, as previously mentioned, these estimates vary according to subspecialties. For example, in vascular surgery, prior studies have found a strong and directly proportional relationship between the loss of functional ability and the need for assistance or death within 30 days in the frail elderly (62 % vs. 22 %, OR 12.1; 95 % CI: 2.17-66.96; p < 0.01) 55. As to elective surgery, in this group of patients, the frequency of complications ranged between about 25 %, where cognitive impairment (OR 2.01; 95 % CI: 1.44-2.81), depression (OR 1.77; 95 % CI: 1.22-2.56) and history of smoking (OR 2.43; 95 % CI: 1.32-4.46) are predictors of postoperative complication 56,57. It should be noted that very recent evidence showed that cumulative risk of major surgery over a five-year period was higher in frail elderly patients compared to those who were not in such condition (incidence of 10.3 vs. 6.6 per 100 person-years) 14. Then, despite age is not an associated risk factor 58,59, in settings with inequities of social determinants of health—where aged patients do not have resources for a balanced diet, live in a polluted environment without access to potable water, with little or no education and an unhealthy lifestyle—a high prevalence of comorbidities is obviously expected due to the intake of hypercaloric diets and little exercise, among other variables. Thus, frailty syndrome is triggered, and negative outcomes occur when a surgical intervention is required. For this reason, studies to determine which factors have the greatest impact according to the sociodemographic and cultural settings, the health of the elderly in a community, the healthcare scenario, the surgical specialty involved and the capacity to optimize healthcare are needed.
Surgical prehabilitation in elderly adults: what impact does it have?
Based on the foregoing, it is evident that surgical prehabilitation is essential to control risk factors, but how essential?
A systematic review identified that, in effect, surgical prehabilitation in the frail elderly promoted positive postoperative outcomes. However, it was specified that, for such purpose, validated scales for surgical patients should be used and the approach included physical exercise, nutrition and psychological assessment, precisely to be able to reduce the intensity or remove factors from the psychosomatic axis 60. As to colorectal cancer, a slight decrease in the rate of postoperative complications in those who have, at least, two comorbidities (35.9 % vs. 45.5 %) has been found 61. Concerning oncologic patients, some authors state that it is imperative to make a transition from only assessment to optimization since rehabilitation is still more complex in these patients given that additional factors should be taken into account and, probably, some organs should be given more emphasis than others. Moreover, mental resilience, muscular strength and cardiorespiratory fitness are essential for the evolution and prognosis of frail elderly patients with oncologic pathology 62.
To date, most existing studies that have assessed surgical prehabilitation are related to the frail elderly with some type of gastrointestinal cancer 63 and, unfortunately, there is still a lack of higher-quality evidence of the cost-effectiveness relationship for better decision-making 61. PRAEP-GO (Pre-habilitation of elderly frail or pre-frail patients prior to elective surgery) trial is currently conducted. It seeks to assess the impact of prehabilitation on the frail elderly undergoing elective surgery regarding care dependence for 12 months, based on multidisciplinary management and decision-making 64. This is one of the best studies to date, which allows expanding the view of available evidence. Nevertheless, it should be concluded that prehabilitation does cause a favorable trend in functional recovery and reduction of complications and should be suggested to surgical teams.
Future perspectives
Taking care of the elderly at risk is a real challenge because it involves the close relationship with the end-of-life care and quality of life itself 65-67. Based on the foregoing, the Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean (ECLAC), the Inter-American Development Bank (IDB) and the United Nations (UN) have emphasized the promotion of strategies and plans that contribute to strengthen inclusion, care in the long term, quality of life and rights of older adults.
To date, innovative strategies to promote postsurgical care in different scenarios have been discussed 68,69. Nevertheless, knowing the current situation of health systems in Latin America and the Caribbean 70,71, it is presumed that it would be difficult to implement such care in the near future. Consequently, evidence about this subject should be spread, knowledge gaps should be accurately identified, and research studies should be formulated to answer possible difficult questions regarding the problems and allow applying the results in order to obtain serious results.
Conclusions
Frail elderly are people with inherent high surgical risk because of their systemic instability, the prognosis of which is seriously affected when undergoing major surgery, particularly as to their morbidity, dependence, quality of life and mortality. There are several factors associated with negative outcomes and mortality which depend on the surgical specialty involved and type of surgery performed. However, both physical and mental integrity are associated with worse outcomes, and surgical prehabilitation could positively impact on this situation since it improves functional reserves and postsurgical recovery time.
REFERENCES
1. Bickler SN, Weiser TG, Kassebaum N, Higashi H, Chang DC, Barendregt JJ, et al. Global Burden of Surgical Conditions. In: Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 1): Essential Surgery. The World Bank; 2015. [ Links ]
2. Prinja S, Nandi A, Horton S, Levin C, Laxminarayan R. Costs, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of selected surgical procedures and platforms. In: Disease Control Priorities, Third Edition (Volume 1): Essential Surgery. The World Bank; 2015. [ Links ]
3. Bendix P, Havens JM. The global burden of surgical disease. Curr Trauma Rep [Internet]. 2017;3(1):25-31. [ Links ]
4. Powell BL, Luckett R, Bekele A, Chao TE. Sex disparities in the global burden of surgical disease. World J Surg [Internet]. 2020;44(7):2139-43. [ Links ]
5. Gajewski J, Brugha R, Bijlmakers L. Global surgery priorities: A response to recent commentaries. Int J Health Policy Manag [Internet]. 2019;8(6):381-3. [ Links ]
6. Quene TM, Bust L, Louw J, Mwandri M, Chu KM. Global surgery is an essential component of global health. Surgeon [Internet]. 2022;20(1):9-15. [ Links ]
7. Alsaeed D, Davies N, Gilmartin JFM, Jamieson E, Kharicha K, Liljas AEM, et al. Older peopleï¿1/2s priorities in health and social care research and practice: a public engagement workshop. Res Involv Engagem [Internet]. 2016;2(1). [ Links ]
8. Akishita M, Ishii S, Kojima T, Kozaki K, Kuzuya M, Arai H, et al. Priorities of health care outcomes for the elderly. J Am Med Dir Assoc [Internet]. 2013;14(7):479-84. [ Links ]
9. Hunold KM, Pereira GF, Jones CW, Isaacs CG, Braz VA, Gadi SR, et al. Priorities of care among older adults in the emergency department: A cross-sectional study. Acad Emerg Med [Internet]. 2016;23(3):362-5. [ Links ]
10. World Health Organization. Integrated care for older people: guidelines on community-level interventions to manage declines in intrinsic capacity [Internet]. Disponible en: https://www.who.int/publications/i/item/9789241550109 [ Links ]
11. Newsome K, McKenny M, Elkbuli A. Major and minor surgery: Terms used for hundreds of years that have yet to be defined. Ann Med Surg (Lond) [Internet]. 2021;66(102409):102409. [ Links ]
12. Grounds RM, Rhodes A. Perioperative and intensive care management of the surgical patient. In: Core Topics in General and Emergency Surgery. Elsevier; 2014. [ Links ]
13. Masutani R, Pawar A, Lee H, Weissman JS, Kim DH. Outcomes of common major surgical procedures in older adults with and without dementia. JAMA Netw Open [Internet]. 2020;3(7):e2010395. [ Links ]
14. Becher RD, Vander Wyk B, Leo-Summers L, Desai MM, Gill TM. The incidence and cumulative risk of major surgery in older persons in the United States. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2023;277(1):87-92. [ Links ]
15. Stabenau HF, Becher RD, Gahbauer EA, Leo-Summers L, Allore HG, Gill TM. Functional trajectories before and after major surgery in older adults. Ann Surg [Internet]. 2018;268(6):911-7. [ Links ]
16. Baggett ND, Schulz K, Buffington A, Marka N, Hanlon BM, Zimmermann C, et al. Surgeon use of shared decision-making for older adults considering major surgery: A secondary analysis of a randomized clinical trial. JAMA Surg [Internet]. 2022;157(5):406-13. [ Links ]
17. Gill TM, Vander Wyk B, Leo-Summers L, Murphy TE, Becher RD. Population-based estimates of 1-year mortality after major surgery among community-living older US adults. JAMA Surg [Internet]. 2022;157(12):e225155. [ Links ]
18. Murad K, Kitzman DW. Frailty and multiple comorbidities in the elderly patient with heart failure: implications for management. Heart Fail Rev [Internet]. 2012;17(4-5):581-8. [ Links ]
19. Diez-Villanueva P, Salamanca J, Rojas A, Alfonso F. Importance of frailty and comorbidity in elderly patients with severe aortic stenosis. J Geriatr Cardiol [Internet]. 2017;14(6):379-82. [ Links ]
20. Van Dam CS, Labuschagne HA, van Keulen K, Kramers C, Kleipool EE, Hoogendijk EO, et al. Polypharmacy, comorbidity and frailty: a complex interplay in older patients at the emergency department. Eur Geriatr Med [Internet]. 2022;13(4):849-57. [ Links ]
21. Bonaga B, Sanchez-Jurado PM, Martinez-Reig M, Ariza G, RodriguezManas L, Gnjidic D, et al. Frailty, polypharmacy, and health outcomes in older adults: The frailty and dependence in Albacete study. J Am Med Dir Assoc [Internet]. 2018;19(1):46-52. [ Links ]
22. Fried LP, Cohen AA, Xue QL, Walston J, Bandeen-Roche K, Varadhan R. The physical frailty syndrome as a transition from homeostatic symphony to cacophony. Nat Aging [Internet]. 2021;1(1):36-46. [ Links ]
23. Fulop T, Larbi A, Witkowski JM, McElhaney J, Loeb M, Mitnitski A, et al. Aging, frailty and age-related diseases. Biogerontology [Internet]. 2010;11(5):547-63. [ Links ]
24. Cohen AA, Ferrucci L, Fulop T, Gravel D, Hao N, Kriete A, et al. A complex systems approach to aging biology. Nat Aging [Internet]. 2022;2(7):580-91. [ Links ]
25. Pandey A, Kitzman D, Reeves G. Frailty is intertwined with heart failure: Mechanisms, prevalence, prognosis, assessment, and management. JACC Heart Fail [Internet]. 2019;7(12):1001-11. [ Links ]
26. Giallauria F, Di Lorenzo A, Venturini E, Pacileo M, D'Andrea A, Garofalo U, et al. Frailty in acute and chronic coronary syndrome patients entering cardiac rehabilitation. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2021;10(8):1696. [ Links ]
27. Liu P, Li Y, Zhang Y, Mesbah SE, Ji T, Ma L. Frailty and hypertension in older adults: current understanding and future perspectives. Hypertens Res [Internet]. 2020;43(12):1352-60. [ Links ]
28. Pamoukdjian F, Laurent M, Martinez-Tapia C, Rolland Y, Paillaud E, Canoui-Poitrine F. Frailty parameters, morbidity and mortality in older adults with cancer: A structural equation modelling approach based on the fried phenotype. J Clin Med [Internet]. 2020;9(6):1826. [ Links ]
29. She Q, Chen B, Liu W, Li M, Zhao W, Wu J. Frailty pathogenesis, assessment, and management in older adults with COVID-19. Front Med (Lausanne) [Internet]. 2021;8:694367. [ Links ]
30. Rowe R, Iqbal J, Murali-krishnan R, Sultan A, Orme R, Briffa N, et al. Role of frailty assessment in patients undergoing cardiac interventions. Open Heart [Internet]. 2014;1(1):e000033. [ Links ]
31. Petermann-Rocha F, Pell JP, Celis-Morales C, Ho FK. Frailty, sarcopenia, cachexia and malnutrition as comorbid conditions and their associations with mortality: a prospective study from UK Biobank. J Public Health (Oxf) [Internet]. 2022;44(2):e172-80. [ Links ]
32. Halle-Smith JM, Naumann DN, Powell SL, Naumann LK, Griffiths EA. Improving outcomes for elderly patients following emergency surgery: A cutting-edge review. Curr Anesthesiol Rep [Internet]. 2021;11(4):396-404. [ Links ]
33. Rockwood K, Song X, MacKnight C, Bergman H, Hogan DB, McDowell I, et al. A global clinical measure of fitness and frailty in elderly people. CMAJ [Internet]. 2005;173(5):489-95. [ Links ]
34. Royal College of Anaesthetits. National Emergency Laparotomy Audit (NELA) [Internet]. Disponible en: https://rcoa.ac.uk/research/research-projects/national-emergency-laparotomy-audit-nela [ Links ]
35. Partridge JS, Harari D, Dhesi JK. Frailty in the older surgical patient: a review. Age Ageing [Internet]. 2012;41(2):142-7. [ Links ]
36. Lin HS, Watts JN, Peel NM, Hubbard RE. Frailty and post-operative outcomes in older surgical patients: a systematic review. BMC Geriatr [Internet]. 2016;16(1):157. [ Links ]
37. Richards SJG, Frizelle FA, Geddes JA, Eglinton TW, Hampton MB. Frailty in surgical patients. Int J Colorectal Dis [Internet]. 2018;33(12):1657-66. [ Links ]
38. Sadiq F, Kronzer VL, Wildes TS, McKinnon SL, Sharma A, Helsten DL, et al. Frailty phenotypes and relations with surgical outcomes: A latent class analysis. Anesth Analg [Internet]. 2018;127(4):1017-27. [ Links ]
39. Shem Tov L, Matot I. Frailty and anesthesia. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol [Internet]. 2017;30(3):409-17. [ Links ]
40. Yanagawa B, Graham MM, Afilalo J, Hassan A, Arora RC. Frailty as a risk predictor in cardiac surgery: Beyond the eyeball test. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg [Internet]. 2018;156(1):172-176.e2. [ Links ]
41. Dent E, Martin FC, Bergman H, Woo J, Romero-Ortuno R, Walston JD. Management of frailty: opportunities, challenges, and future directions. Lancet [Internet]. 2019;394(10206):1376-86. [ Links ]
42. Elfrink AKE, Alberga AJ, van Berge Henegouwen MI, Scheurs WH, van der Geest LGM, Verhagen HJM, et al. Outcomes after major surgical procedures in octogenarians: A nationwide cohort study. World J Surg [Internet]. 2022;46(10):2399-408. [ Links ]
43. Park JK, Kang J, Kim YW, Kim DI, Heo SH, Gil E, et al. Outcomes after elective open abdominal aortic aneurysm repair in octogenarians compared to younger patients in Korea. J Korean Med Sci [Internet]. 2021;36(47):e314. [ Links ]
44. Bufalari A, Giustozzi G, Burattini MF, Servili S, Bussotti C, Lucaroni E, et al. Rectal cancer surgery in the elderly: a multivariate analysis of outcome risk factors. J Surg Oncol [Internet]. 2006;93(3):173-80. [ Links ]
45. Deiner S, Westlake B, Dutton RP. Patterns of surgical care and complications in elderly adults. J Am Geriatr Soc [Internet]. 2014;62(5):829-35. [ Links ]
46. Turrentine FE, Wang H, Simpson VB, Jones RS. Surgical risk factors, morbidity, and mortality in elderly patients. J Am Coll Surg [Internet]. 2006;203(6):865-77. [ Links ]
47. Pelavski AD, De Miguel M, Alcaraz Garcia-Tejedor G, Villarino L, Lacasta A, Senas L, et al. Mortality, Geriatric, and Nongeriatric Surgical Risk Factors Among the Eldest Old: A Prospective Observational Study. Anesth Analg [Internet]. 2017;125(4):1329-36. [ Links ]
48. Partridge JS, Fuller M, Harari D, Taylor PR, Martin FC, Dhesi JK. Frailty and poor functional status are common in arterial vascular surgical patients and affect postoperative outcomes. Int J Surg [Internet]. 2015;18:57-63. [ Links ]
49. Story DA. Postoperative complications in elderly patients and their significance for long-term prognosis. Curr Opin Anaesthesiol [Internet]. 2008;21(3):375-9. [ Links ]
50. Karageorgos V, Mevorach L, Silvetti M, Bilotta F. Preoperative risk factors associated with increased incidence of postoperative delirium: Systematic review of qualified clinical studies. Geriatrics (Basel) [Internet]. 2023;8(1):24. [ Links ]
51. Gracie TJ, Caufield-Noll C, Wang NY, Sieber FE. The association of preoperative frailty and postoperative delirium: A meta-analysis. Anesth Analg [Internet]. 2021;133(2):314-23. [ Links ]
52. Watt J, Tricco AC, Talbot-Hamon C, Pham B, Rios P, Grudniewicz A, et al. Identifying older adults at risk of delirium following elective surgery: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Gen Intern Med [Internet]. 2018;33(4):500-9. [ Links ]
53. Makary MA, Segev DL, Pronovost PJ, Syin D, Bandeen-Roche K, Patel P, et al. Frailty as a predictor of surgical outcomes in older patients. J Am Coll Surg [Internet]. 2010;210(6):901-8. [ Links ]
54. Birkelbach O, Morgeli R, Spies C, Olbert M, Weiss B, Brauner M, et al. Routine frailty assessment predicts postoperative complications in elderly patients across surgical disciplines a retrospective observational study. BMC Anesthesiol [Internet]. 2019;19(1):204. [ Links ]
55. Donald GW, Ghaffarian AA, Isaac F, Kraiss LW, Griffin CL, Smith BK, et al. Preoperative frailty assessment predicts loss of independence after vascular surgery. J Vasc Surg [Internet]. 2018;68(5):1382-9. [ Links ]
56. Watt J, Tricco AC, Talbot-Hamon C, Pham B, Rios P, Grudniewicz A, et al. Identifying older adults at risk of harm following elective surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Med [Internet]. 2018;16(1):2. [ Links ]
57. Hartley P, Gibbins N, Saunders A, Alexander K, Conroy E, Dixon R, et al. The association between cognitive impairment and functional outcome in hospitalised older patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Age Ageing [Internet]. 2017;46(4):559-67. [ Links ]
58. Mayor S. Age is not a risk factor for complications after surgery in older patients, review finds. BMJ [Internet]. 2018;360:k187. [ Links ]
59. Liu X, Xue Z, Yu J, Li Z, Ma Z, Kang W, et al. Risk factors for postoperative infectious complications in elderly patients with gastric cancer. Cancer Manag Res [Internet]. 2020;12:4391-8. [ Links ]
60. Baimas-George M, Watson M, Elhage S, Parala-Metz A, Vrochides D, Davis BR. Prehabilitation in frail surgical patients: A systematic review. World J Surg [Internet]. 2020;44(11):3668-78. [ Links ]
61. Van der Hulst HC, Bastiaannet E, Portielje JEA, van der Bol JM, Dekker JWT. Can physical prehabilitation prevent complications after colorectal cancer surgery in frail older patients? Eur J Surg Oncol [Internet]. 2021;47(11):2830-40. [ Links ]
62. Carli F, Baldini G. From preoperative assessment to preoperative optimization of frail older patients. Eur J Surg Oncol [Internet]. 2021;47(3):519-23. [ Links ]
63. Sadlonova M, Katz NB, Jurayj JS, Flores L, Celano CM, von Arnim CAF, et al. Surgical prehabilitation in older and frail individuals: a scoping review. Int Anesthesiol Clin [Internet]. 2023;61(2):34-46. [ Links ]
64. Schaller SJ, Kiselev J, Loidl V, Quentin W, Schmidt K, Morgeli R, et al. Prehabilitation of elderly frail or pre-frail patients prior to elective surgery (PRAEP-GO): study protocol for a randomized, controlled, outcome assessor-blinded trial. Trials [Internet]. 2022;23(1):468. [ Links ]
65. Picon Jaimes YA, Orozco Chinome JE, Lozada ID, Moscote Salazar LR. Enfermedad, eutanasia y aborto: una reflexion desde la bioetica. Rev medica Risaralda [Internet]. 2021;27(1):4-9. [ Links ]
66. Picon-Jaimes YA, Lozada-Martinez ID, Orozco-Chinome JE, MontanaGomez LM, Bolano-Romero MP, Moscote-Salazar LR, et al. Euthanasia and assisted suicide: An in-depth review of relevant historical aspects. Ann Med Surg (Lond) [Internet]. 2022;75(103380):103380. [ Links ]
67. Rodriguez Gutierrez MM, Lozada Martinez ID, Moreno Lopez N, Vargas Arboleda DA, Nieto Garcia CE, Picon Jaimes YA, et al. Prevalence of sarcopenia in older adults in two retirement homes in Pereira, Colombia. Rev Fac Med Humana [Internet]. 2022;22(2):266-72. [ Links ]
68. Comision Economica para America Latina y el Caribe. Ageing in Latin America and the Caribbean: Inclusion and rights of older persons [Internet]. Disponible en: https://repositorio.cepal.org/bitstream/handle/11362/48568/4/S2201042_en.pdf [ Links ]
69. Inter-American Development Bank. Age with Care: Long-term Care in Latin America and the Caribbean [Internet]. Disponible en: https://publications.iadb.org/en/age-care-long-term-care-latin-americaand-caribbean [ Links ]
70. United Nations. Ageing in Latin America and the Caribbean: implications of past mortality [Internet]. Disponible en: https://www.un.org/development/desa/pd/sites/www.un.org.development.desa.pd/files/unpd_egm_200508_09_mceniry.pdf [ Links ]
71. Lozada-Martinez ID, Gonzalez-De La Hoz SX, Montano-Socarras D, Ovalle-Mulford FJ, Rashid R. Virtual hybrid hotel care model for the surgical patient: New goal of global academic surgery to improve global outcomes. Ann Med Surg (Lond) [Internet]. 2022;77(103529):103529. [ Links ]
72. Nunez-Gamez JA, Medina-Bravo PA, Pineros-Lopez NF, Contreras GA, Rosero-Burgos ME, Lozada-Martinez ID, et al. Global outcomes, surgical teams and COVID-19 pandemic: Will the same objectives of global surgery persist? Ann Med Surg (Lond) [Internet]. 2021;71(103002):103002. [ Links ]
73. Robledo LMG, Cano-Gutierrez C, Garcia EV. Healthcare for older people in Central and South America. Age Ageing [Internet]. 2022;51(5). [ Links ]
74. Ruano AL, Rodriguez D, Rossi PG, Maceira D. Understanding inequities in health and health systems in Latin America and the Caribbean: a thematic series. Int J Equity Health [Internet]. 2021;20(1):94. [ Links ]
Received: May 18, 2023; Revised: May 24, 2023; Accepted: June 12, 2023