SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 número3Prevalencia de trematodos y nematodos en asnos comercializados en la Plaza Pecuaria Iscoconga de la provincia de Cajamarca, PerúEvaluación de alfacipermetrina para el control de ácaros en gallinas ponedoras en condiciones de laboratorio índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú

versão impressa ISSN 1609-9117

Resumo

CARDENAS CAMACHO, Jessica et al. Evaluation of stool diagnosis techniques for Toxocara canis. Rev. investig. vet. Perú [online]. 2021, vol.32, n.3, e18861. ISSN 1609-9117.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v32i3.18861.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the sensitivity of four coprodiagnostic techniques to quantitatively determine the presence of Toxocara canis eggs in fresh canine stool samples. For this, eggs were extracted from the uterus of adult female T. canis obtained from canine puppies. Eight concentrations of eggs were used (10, 50, 75, 100, 250, 500, 750 and 1 000 eggs per gram of faeces epg), being considered as the gold standard to determine the degree of precision of the Kato-Katz, McMaster, Improved Modified McMaster and Faust techniques. Three repetitions were used per technique and per concentration. The sensitivity of each test was performed by arithmetic calculation and ROC curve (95% CI), comparing them with the gold standard by means of a nonparametric test of the Wilcoxon signed ranges (p<0.05). The Faust technique detected T. canis eggs regardless of concentration, but in statistical inequality with the gold standard (p<0.001 to p<0.0001). The Kato-Katz technique did not show significant differences with the gold standard, but it was unable to detect the presence of T. canis eggs in 10 and 50 epg concentration, while the improved modified McMaster technique showed similarity with the gold standard in 100 and 250 epg. The McMaster method detected eggs from 100 epg, obtaining epg values below the gold standard (p<0.05 and p<0.001). Sensitivities of 74.72% (95% CI 72.93-80.22) were obtained for the Kato-Katz technique and between 30 and 40% (95% CI 26.71-48.29) for the other tests. It is concluded that the Kato-Katz technique obtained a better performance showing a constant quantitative diagnostic sensitivity when compared with other routine quantitative stool diagnosis techniques in veterinary laboratories for T. canis eggs in fresh dog faeces samples.

Palavras-chave : toxocariasis; zoonoses; public health; nematode; endoparasite; neglected diseases.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )