SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 número4Investigación de la implementación en geriatría: una oportunidad para construir un envejecimiento saludableSíndromes clínicos en la infección aguda y crónica de la COVID-19 en población nativa y residente de altura durante la primera y segunda ola índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Horizonte Médico (Lima)

versão impressa ISSN 1727-558X

Horiz. Med. vol.23 no.4 Lima out./dic. 2023  Epub 18-Dez-2023

http://dx.doi.org/10.24265/horizmed.2023.v23n4.01 

Articles

Factors associated with adherence to drug therapy among patients with diabetes without hypertension

Hasalia Diaz Santiago1  , Family Medicine Residency
http://orcid.org/0009-0008-1819-9392

Daniel Marcial Cruz2  , Family physician
http://orcid.org/0009-0009-2409-5044

Liliana Galicia-Rodríguez*  3  , Master’s degree in Health Administration
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5140-8434

Enrique Villarreal-Ríos3  , Family physician
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5455-2383

Concepción Julián López4  , Family physician
http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8581-6617

Jesús Elizarrarás-Rivas5  , Pediatrician
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3416-0267

1Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (Mexican Social Security Institute), Unidad de Medicina Familiar N.° 1 (Family Medicine Unit No. 1). Oaxaca, Mexico.

2Hospital General de Zona N.° 1 (General Hospital of Zone No. 1), Oaxaca, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Oaxaca, Mexico.

3Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Unidad de Investigación en Epidemiología y Servicios de Salud Querétaro (Epidemiology and Health Services Research Unit Querétaro). Querétaro, Mexico.

4Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Unidad de Medicina Familiar N.° 21 (Family Medicine Unit No. 21). Oaxaca, Mexico.

5Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social, Coordinación de Investigación en Salud Oaxaca (Coordination of Health Research Oaxaca). Oaxaca, Mexico.

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To identify the factors associated with adherence to drug therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without hypertension.

Materials and methods:

A cross-sectional, analytical study conducted with patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without hypertension, divided into an adherent group (n = 145) and a non-adherent group (n = 49), determined by the 4-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4). The associated factors were sex, cohabitation, schooling, occupation, age in 10-year groups and diabetes progression time grouped in less than 1 year, from 1 to 5 years, from 6 to 10 years and more than 10 years. The statistical analysis plan included the chi-square test.

Results:

The factors associated with adherence to drug therapy were identified as sex (p = 0.045), cohabitation (p = 0.045), age (p = 0.001) and disease progression time (p = 0.001). Schooling was not identified as a factor associated with adherence to drug therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (p = 0.289). The older the patient with diabetes, the lower the adherence to drug therapy; the cut-off point was 60 years of age, after which the percentage in the non-adherent group was higher than in the adherent group (p = 0.001). The longer the diabetes progression time, the lower the probability of adherence; in the non-adherent group the percentage of patients with more than 10 years of disease progression was 67.3 % and in the adherent group the percentage was 33.8 % (p = 0.001).

Conclusions:

The factors associated with adherence to drug therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without hypertension were identified

Keywords: Medication Adherence; Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2; Essential Hypertension

Introduction

For patients with diabetes mellitus, preventing complications depends on the drug therapy and lifestyle; in this process, adherence to drug therapy is important 1-7.

Adherence to drug therapy has several definitions, all of which coincide in the degree of patient behavior and consistency with the drug therapy, nutrition therapy or lifestyle treatment prescribed by the healthcare provider 8-11.

Non-adherence to drug therapy is a multidimensional phenomenon in which several factors are involved, including those related to the patient, disease, treatment, socioeconomic factors and factors associated with the healthcare system 8,10-17.

Non-adherence to drug therapy increases the risk of morbidity and mortality, reduces quality of life and increases healthcare costs. Among patients with chronic diseases, adherence accounts for 25 % to 50 % in developed countries, and due to the lack of resources and unequal access to health services, this gap is greater in less developed countries 11,14,18,19.

Non-adherence has been defined as the difficulty in initiating a treatment, temporarily stopping a treatment, missing doses, taking the medication at the wrong time, and changing the lifestyle to improve body and mood, medication or prescribed treatment 10,14,17,20-22.

Non-adherence to drug therapy may arise from drug shortage, change of dosage, inadequate prescription, poor doctor-patient relationship and drug schedule change; consequently, poor health status and health deterioration are generated 9,10,23-28.

There are several tools to assess adherence, including the Self-Efficacy for Appropriate Medication Use Scale (SEAMS), the Culig questionnaire, the Adherence to Refills and Medications Scale (ARMS) and the 4-item Morisky Medication Adherence Scale (MMAS-4) 8,18,29-32.

The MMAS-4 has been used in various pathologies and languages; includes four short questions; and is easy to understand, inexpensive and easy to interpret. It provides information on the most frequent causes of non-adherence and a patient is considered non-adherent when at least one of the criteria is not met 8,18,29,32-34.

In this context, the present article aims to identify the factors associated with adherence to drug therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without hypertension.

Materials and methods

Study design and population

A cross-sectional, analytical study conducted with patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus without hypertension, treated in a social security institution in the city of Oaxaca, Mexico, from June to October 2022.

Variables and measurements

The study variables included sex, cohabitation, schooling, occupation, age in 10-year groups and diabetes progression time grouped in less than 1 year, from 1 to 5 years, from 6 to 10 years and more than 10 years.

The comparison groups consisted of an adherent group and a non-adherent group. Adherence to drug therapy was determined with the MMAS-4, which includes four items with a yes or no response.

Did you ever forget to take your medications for your disease?

Do you forget to take your medications at the prescribed time?

When you feel well, do you stop taking your medication?

If your medication made you feel sick, do you stop taking it?

A patient was considered adherent is he/she answered a negative response (no) to all four items. In addition, the study included patients over 20 years of age with a diagnosis of type 2 diabetes mellitus assigned to a family medicine unit and excluded patients with retinopathy, chronic kidney disease as well as neurocognitive and behavioral disorders.

The sample size was calculated using a percentage formula for two groups with a 95 % confidence interval, for a rejection α zone of the null hypothesis (Z = 1.64) and power of the test β of 80 % (Z = 0.84). Moreover, it was determined that patients older than 60 years accounted for 70 % (p₀ = 0.70) and 25 % (p₁ = 0.25) in the non-adherent and adherent groups, respectively. The calculated sample size was 49 non-adherent patients and 145 adherent patients, i.e., a ratio of 1 to 3.

Consecutive sampling, a non-probability sampling technique, was used based on the list of patients who were treated at the family medicine unit.

Statistical analysis

The statistical analysis plan included percentages and the chi-square test.

Ethical considerations

The project was registered and accepted by the ethics and research committee of the health institution. The patients were selected from the waiting room of the family medicine outpatient department and were invited to participate in the research; once they accepted, they were asked to sign an informed consent form and then were interviewed.

Results

An association between sex and adherence to drug therapy was identified: 59.3 % and 42.9 % were females in the adherent and non-adherent groups, respectively (p = 0.045). Cohabitation was identified as a factor associated with adherence to drug therapy: 77.2 % and 57.1 % of adherent and non-adherent patients lived with a partner, respectively (p = 0.007). The information is shown in Table 1.

Table 1 Association of sex and cohabitation with adherence to drug therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 

Non-adherent Adherent
Characteristics Percentages Chi-square p
Sex
Male 57.14 40.68 4 0.045
Female 42.85 59.31
Cohabitation
No 42.85 22.75 7.36 0.007
Yes 57.14 77.24

Schooling was not identified as a factor associated with adherence to drug therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (p = 0.289). Employees accounted for 43.4 % and 20.4% in the adherent and non-adherent groups, respectively; 16.8 % and 26.5 % were engaged in household activities in the adherent and non-adherent groups, respectively (p = 0.025). Table 2 shows this information.

Table 2 Association of schooling and occupation with adherence to drug therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 

Non-adherent Adherent
Characteristics Percentages Chi-square p
Schooling
None 6.12 1.37 5.18 0.289
Primary 22.44 20.68
Secondary 24.48 18.62
Bachelor’s degree 18.36 19.31
Professional title 28.57 40
Occupation
Employee 20.4 43.35 11.15 0.025
Household activities 26.53 16.78
Trader 8.16 12.58
Construction worker 6.12 4.19
Other 38.77 23.07

The older the patient with diabetes, the lower his/her adherence to drug therapy. The cut-off point is age 60; after this age, the percentage in the non-adherent group is higher than in the adherent group (p = 0.001). Table 3 shows this information.

Table 3 Association of age with adherence to drug therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 

Non-adherent Adherent
Age in years Percentages Chi-square p
20 to 39 6.12 13.79 16.8 0.001
40 to 59 26.53 46.89
60 to 74 32.65 27.58
75 and older 34.69 11.72

The longer the progression time of diabetes, the lower the probability of adherence. The percentage of patients with more than 10 years of progression is 67.3 % and 33.8 % in the non-adherent and adherent groups, respectively (p = 0.001). Table 4 shows this information.

Table 4 Association of progression time with adherence to drug therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus 

Non-adherent Adherent
Progression time Percentages Chi-square p
1 to 11 months 0 4.82 17.71 0.001
1 to 5 years 10.2 20
6 to 10 years 22.44 41.37
More than 10 years 67.34 33.79

Discussion

To manage diabetes, metabolic control is essential due to the complications that can occur in the short or long term. It has been pointed out that low glucose levels can delay chronic complications and that the degree of control depends, to a large extent, on adherence to drug therapy and non-drug therapy. This research addresses the factors associated with adherence to drug therapy among patients with diabetes and without hypertension: a population that is assumed to behave differently because they suffer both pathologies, which is the reason for its importance 1,2,8,9.

It is true that there are different methods for measuring adherence, but it is also true that the one used in this study is the most widely accepted method for assessing adherence when researching chronic degenerative diseases. The MMAS-4 is inexpensive, practical and easy to answer; moreover, it has high specificity and a high positive predictive value. Therefore, its use can be considered a strength of the research 8,18,29,32-34.

The female sex has a higher prevalence of adherence to drug therapy, which has been described in other articles. In this regard, it could be assumed that discipline and adherence to current norms, conditions that may favor adherence to drug therapy, are characteristics of the female sex 2,11,12,15.

Cohabitation is identified as a factor associated with adherence, which has been pointed out by other authors. In this regard, it could be assumed that the dynamics and established roles of cohabitation allow greater support for adherence to drug therapy 10,14.

In adults, the 40 to 59 age range is a factor associated with adequate adherence to drug therapy; on the other hand, the group of young and older adults is identified as a factor associated with non-adherence. The argument to explain this behavior does not seem to be clear; however, it opens two possibilities: the first, in the context of research to identify risk factors, and the second, around the type of support required by this population to achieve adherence, which is evidently a modifiable factor susceptible to specific programs that can have a favorable impact on patients and health systems 15.

The time of treatment initiation is identified as an associated factor: 10 years is the reference time; nevertheless, after that point, adherence is lost. In this regard, it could be pointed out that the patient’s behavior is the consequence of a state of denial after having the disease for a long time and realizing that the therapy will not eliminate the disease or modify its course. This is important because it could be assumed that the medical advice related to the course of the disease could be beneficial for adherence to drug therapy; however, this is an issue that will have to be demonstrated 8,10-12,14,15.

In conclusion, the factors associated with adherence to drug therapy among patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus include sex, cohabitation, age and the disease progression time.

REFERENCES

1. Ramirez MC, Anlehu A, Rodriguez A. Factores que influyen en el comportamiento de adherencia del paciente con diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Horiz Sanitario. 2019;18(3):383-92. [ Links ]

2. Asociacion Latinoamericana de Diabetes. Guias ALAD sobre el diagnostico, control y tratamiento de la diabetes Mellitus tipo 2 con medicina basada en evidencia [Internet]. Permanyer Mexico. Mexico: Comite Editorial de la Revista ALAD; 2019 [citado 12 de julio de 2023]. 1-119 p. Disponible en: https://www.revistaalad.com/guias/5600AX191_guias_alad_2019.pdf [ Links ]

3. Reed J, Bain S, Kanamarlapudi V. A review of current trends with type 2 diabetes epidemiology, aetiology, pathogenesis, treatments and future perspectives. Diabetes, Metab Syndr Obes Targets Ther. 2021;14:3567-602. [ Links ]

4. American Diabetes Association. 9. Pharmacologic approaches to glycemic treatment: Standards of medical care in diabetes-2020. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(Suppl 1):S98-110. [ Links ]

5. Pascacio-Vera GD, Ascencio-Zarazua GE, Cruz-Leon A, Guzman-Priego CG. Adherencia al tratamiento y conocimiento de la enfermedad en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Salud Tab. 2016;22(1-2):2331. [ Links ]

6. Ivers NM, Jiang M, Alloo J, Singer A, Ngui D, Casey CG, et al. Diabetes Canada 2018 clinical practice guidelines. Can Fam Physician. 2019;65(1):14-24. [ Links ]

7. Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social. Diagnostico y tratamiento de la enfermedad hemolitica por isoinmunizacion a RH en el recien nacido [Internet]. Mexico; 2018. 1-60 p. Disponible en: https://www.imss.gob.mx/sites/all/statics/guiasclinicas/373GER.pdfLinks ]

8. Munoz D, Olarte MT, Salamanca E. Grado de adherencia terapeutica en pacientes en unidades de cuidados intensivos. Enfermeria Glob. 2021;20(1):1-22. [ Links ]

9. Orozco-Beltran D, Mata-Cases M, Artola S, Conthe P, Mediavilla J, Miranda C. Abordaje de la adherencia en diabetes mellitus tipo 2: situacion actual y propuesta de posibles soluciones. Atencion Primaria, 2016;48(6):406-20. [ Links ]

10. Angelucci-Bastidas L, Rondon-Bernard JE. Adherencia al tratamiento en diabetes tipo 2: Un modelo de regresion logistica. Caracas 20172018. Med UIS. 2021;34(2):29-39. [ Links ]

11. Ramos Y, Morejon R, Gomez M, Suarez ME, Rangel C, Cabrera Y. Adherencia terapeutica en pacientes con diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Finlay. 2017;7(2):89-98. [ Links ]

12. Barroso ML, Mora A, Sierra E. Adherencia terapeutica en los pacientes sometidos a intervencionismo coronario percutaneo primario. Enferm Cardiol. 2021;(82):46-51. [ Links ]

13. Grupo de trabajo uso adecuado del medicamento en diabetes. Recomendaciones para la seleccion del tratamiento farmacologico en diabetes mellitus tipo 2 [Internet]. Andalucia: Escuela Andaluza de Salud Publica; 2020 p. 1-16. Disponible en: https://www.semergenandalucia.org/docs/noticias/mellitosTipo2.pdf [ Links ]

14. Reyes-Flores E, Trejo-Alvarez R, Arguijo-Abrego S, Jimenez-Gomez A, Castillo-Castro A, Hernandez-Silva A, et al. Adherencia terapeutica: conceptos, determinantes y nuevas estrategias. Rev Med Hondur. 2016;84(3/4):125-32. [ Links ]

15. Zenteno-Lopez MA, Tzontehua-Tzontehua I, Gil-Londono E, Contreras-Arroyo S, Galicia-Aguilar R. Continuidad de cuidados para la adherencia terapeutica en la persona con diabetes tipo 2. Enferm Univ. 2016;13(2):130-7. [ Links ]

16. Zhou X, Siegel KR, Ng BP, Jawanda S, Proia KK, Zhang X, et al. Costeffectiveness of diabetes prevention interventions targeting highrisk individuals and whole populations: A systematic review. Diabetes Care. 2020;43(7):1593-616. [ Links ]

17. Ipingbemi AE, Erhun WO, Adisa R. Pharmacist-led intervention in treatment non-adherence and associated direct costs of management among ambulatory patients with type 2 diabetes in southwestern Nigeria. BMC Health Serv Res. 2021;21(1):1000. [ Links ]

18. Martinez-Dominguez IG, Martinez-Sanchez ML, Lopera-Valle JS, Vargas-Grisales N. La importancia de la adherencia terapeutica. Rev Venez Endocrinol Metab. 2016;14(2):107-16. [ Links ]

19. Rincon-Romero MK, Torres-Contreras C, Corredor-Pardo KA. Adherencia terapeutica en personas con diabetes mellitus tipo 2. Rev Cienc Cuid. 2017;14(1):40-59. [ Links ]

20. Organizacion Mundial de la Salud. Adherencia a los tratamientos a largo plazo: Pruebas para la accion [Internet]. Washington, D.C.: OMS; 2004. 1-198 p. Disponible en: https://iris.paho.org/bitstream/handle/10665.2/41182/adherencia-largo-plazo.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=yLinks ]

21. Basto-Abreu A, Barrientos-Gutierrez T, Rojas-Martinez R, AguilarSalinas CA, Lopez-Olmedo N, De la Cruz-Gongora V, et al. Prevalencia de diabetes y descontrol glucemico en Mexico: resultados de la Ensanut 2016. Salud Publica Mex. 2020;62(1):50-9. [ Links ]

22. Rojas-Martinez R, Basto-Abreu A, Aguilar-Salinas CA, Zarate-Rojas E, Villalpando S, Barrientos-Gutierrez T. Prevalencia de diabetes por diagnostico medico previo en Mexico. Salud Publica Mex. 2018;60(3):224-32. [ Links ]

23. Sociedad Espanola de Farmacia Hospitalaria. Lo que debes saber sobre la adherencia al tratamiento [Internet]. Espana; 2017. 1-194 p. Disponible en: https://www.sefh.es/bibliotecavirtual/Adherencia2017/libro_ADHERENCIA.pdfLinks ]

24. Farias-Vilchez BA, Bardales D. Conocimientos sobre diabetes mellitus tipo 2 y adherencia al tratamiento en pacientes del hospital Reategui, Piura, Peru. Acta Med Peru. 2021;38(1):34-41. [ Links ]

25. Pfizer. La adherencia al tratamiento: cumplimiento y constancia para mejorar la calidad de vida [Internet]. Madrid: Pfizer; p. 1-11. Report No.: 3. Disponible en: http://envejecimiento.csic.es/documentos/documentos/pfizer-adherencia-01.pdfLinks ]

26. Mora GR, Verdecia K, Rodriguez TM, Del Pino BN, Guerra C. Therapeutic adherence in patient with noncommunicable chronic diseases. RCMGI. 2017;33(3):270-80. [ Links ]

27. Dang BN, Westbrook RA, Njue SM, Giordano TP. Building trust and rapport early in the new doctor-patient relationship: a longitudinal qualitative study. BMC Medical Education. 2017;17(1):32. [ Links ]

28. Zaldivar Y, Fuentes HC, Garcia ME. Contradicciones sociales en la formacion de valores desde la relacion medico-paciente-familia en profesionales de las ciencias medicas. MEDISAN. 2021;25(1):238-50. [ Links ]

29. Limaylla ML, Ramos NJ. Metodos indirectos de valoracion del cumplimiento terapeutico. Cien Investig. 2016;19(2):95-101. [ Links ]

30. Lopez-Romero LA, Romero-Guevara SL, Parra DI, Rojas-Sanchez LZ. Adherencia al tratamiento: concepto y medicion. Hacia Promoc Salud. 2016;21(1):117-37. [ Links ]

31. Pages-Puigdemont N, Valverde-Merino MI. Metodos para medir la adherencia terapeutica. Ars Pharm.2018;59(3):163-72. [ Links ]

32. Rodriguez MA, Garcia-Jimenez E, Amariles P, Rodriguez A, Faus JM. Revision de tests de medicion del cumplimiento terapeutico utilizados en la practica clinica. Aten Primaria. 2008;40(8):413-8. [ Links ]

33. Fundacion redGDPS. Adherencia terapeutica en personas con diabetes. En: Guia de diabetes tipo 2 para clinicos: recomendaciones de la redGDPS [Internet]. 1.ï¿1/2 ed. Espana: redGDPS; 2018. p. 220-5. Disponible en: https://www.redgdps.org/gestor/upload/colecciones/220_guiadm2_capGuia%20DM2_web.pdf [ Links ]

34. American Diabetes Association. Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes-2022 Abridged for Primary Care Providers. Clinical Diabetes. 2022;40(1):10-38. [ Links ]

Funding sources: The article was funded by the authors.

Received: June 22, 2023; Revised: July 14, 2023; Accepted: August 12, 2023

Corresponding author: Liliana Galicia Rodríguez Address: Av. 5 de febrero s/n Esq. Zaragoza. Col. Centro. Arteaga de Querétaro, Querétaro, México. Telephone: 442-409 0616 Email: lilianagalicia@hotmail.com

Author contributions: The authors were responsible for developing, executing and reviewing the research article.

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons