SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue79Neo-Constitutionalism and Legal ReasoningLegal formalism: a comparison between Jori and Schauer author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Derecho PUCP

Print version ISSN 0251-3420

Abstract

RODENAS, Ángeles. Challenges for Legal Philosophy in the 21st Century. Derecho [online]. 2017, n.79, pp.33-46. ISSN 0251-3420.  http://dx.doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.201702.002.

This paper shows a mismatch between a real and pressing demand for a philosophical analysis that allows us to explain the emergence of new phenomena in law, and the limited supply of theoretical tools to satisfy this demand by the traditional model of positivistic science of law. After an initial diagnosis of a mismatch between supply and demand, the resistance of legal positivism to accept practical rationality stands out as a core problem of the traditional model of positivistic science of law and the viability of this way of rationality is defended. The paper concludes with a proposal for the reinvention of the philosophy of law of the 21st century that incorporates new objectives and rethinks its method.

Keywords : argumentative theory of law; postpositivism; legal positivism; philosophy of law; legal method; ethical skepticism; law and morals.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License