SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue84The Miskito divers case: A living laboratory to audit the adaptability of the Inter-American Human Rights SystemConscientious objection and abortion in Chile author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Derecho PUCP

Print version ISSN 0251-3420

Abstract

RIOS CARRILLO, Piero. Is there a place for arbitration within the reparations system practiced by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights?. Derecho [online]. 2020, n.84, pp.69-97. ISSN 0251-3420.  http://dx.doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.003.

This work addresses the role which arbitration could occupy within the reparations system developed by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights when solving contentious disputes. In that sense, the only two precedents in which the Court entertained the possibility of considering arbitration as an alternative means for the determination of reparations shall be described: Garrido and Baigorria vs. Argentina and Chaparro Alvarez and Lapo Iñiguez vs. Ecuador. From the analysis of these two precedents, the author will try to: (a) Identify and characterize the different approaches taken by the Court in each case; (b) evaluate whether these two approaches are consistent with the relevant international human rights law and the general principles of arbitration; and (c) point out how and when arbitration can be used as an alternative mechanism to determine the reparations in a case concerning human rights violations.

Keywords : Arbitration; human rights; reparations; Inter-American Court of Human Rights; Inter-American System of Human Rights.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )