SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número84El caso de los buzos miskitos: un laboratorio vivo para auditar la adaptabilidad del Sistema Interamericano de Derechos HumanosObjeción de conciencia y aborto en Chile índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Derecho PUCP

versão impressa ISSN 0251-3420

Resumo

RIOS CARRILLO, Piero. Is there a place for arbitration within the reparations system practiced by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights?. Derecho [online]. 2020, n.84, pp.69-97. ISSN 0251-3420.  http://dx.doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202001.003.

This work addresses the role which arbitration could occupy within the reparations system developed by the Inter-American Court of Human Rights when solving contentious disputes. In that sense, the only two precedents in which the Court entertained the possibility of considering arbitration as an alternative means for the determination of reparations shall be described: Garrido and Baigorria vs. Argentina and Chaparro Alvarez and Lapo Iñiguez vs. Ecuador. From the analysis of these two precedents, the author will try to: (a) Identify and characterize the different approaches taken by the Court in each case; (b) evaluate whether these two approaches are consistent with the relevant international human rights law and the general principles of arbitration; and (c) point out how and when arbitration can be used as an alternative mechanism to determine the reparations in a case concerning human rights violations.

Palavras-chave : Arbitration; human rights; reparations; Inter-American Court of Human Rights; Inter-American System of Human Rights.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )