SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue87Supervision in alternative punishment: Origin, fertilization and resistances author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Derecho PUCP

Print version ISSN 0251-3420

Abstract

LETELIER CIBIE, Pablo. Weighting Competing Considerations: Civilian and Common Law Approaches to the Problem of the Link between the Parties in Unjust Enrichment Claims. Derecho [online]. 2021, n.87, pp.9-33. ISSN 0251-3420.  http://dx.doi.org/10.18800/derechopucp.202102.001.

This article seeks to demonstrate that considering the French approach to the general action in unjustified enrichment may help English law to deal with the difficulties raised by indirect enrichment cases. To do so, it introduces the problem of the link between the parties in English law and compares the German and French approaches to this problem. It is suggested that the cases where the general action in unjustified enrichment has been recognized by French case law are useful to identify a set of considerations that might allow deciding indirect enrichment cases without relying on abstract notions intended to be applied in every possible scenario.

Keywords : Comparative law; unjust enrichment; restitution; indirect enrichment; actio de in rem verso.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )