SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.47 issue86Socioeconomic and contextual factors associated with low academic performance of Peruvian students in PISA 2015Measuring decent work in self-managed cooperatives: application in Costa Rica author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Apuntes

Print version ISSN 0252-1865

Abstract

SCHMIDT, Gregory D. Are open or closed lists better for women?: comparing Lima and the provinces in Peru. Apuntes [online]. 2020, vol.47, n.86, pp.155-181. ISSN 0252-1865.  http://dx.doi.org/10.21678/apuntes.86.930.

This article reviews the longstanding debate in the literature on electoral systems regarding the relative merits of open and closed lists for the election of women, describes the very different systems used in congressional and municipal elections in Peru, and examines gendered disparities between Lima and the provinces. A series of empirical comparisons demonstrates that the type of list is not of great importance in the capital, but that female candidates fare better under closed lists in the provinces, where the socioeconomic context and political culture are less supportive of women.

Keywords : Women in politics; proportional representation; electoral system; elections; Peru.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )