SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 issue2On why in philosophy examples matterFrom the bazaar to the family: a critical approach to rortyan political ‘idealizations’ author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Areté

Print version ISSN 1016-913X

Abstract

KALPOKAS, Daniel. Peirce, Wittgenstein and Davidson: anti-skeptic coincidences. arete [online]. 2008, vol.20, n.2, pp.217-232. ISSN 1016-913X.

This paper shows some similarities among Peirce’s, Wittgenstein’s and Davidson’s answers to skepticism. In each case, the response to Cartesian skepticism consist in pointing out the contradictory character of the skeptical doubt in itself. More specifically, those philosophers agree on the following points: (i) in order to face the challenge of skepticism we have to examine its bases without conceding the terms of the challenge; (ii) the skeptic cannot doubt without assuming some propositional contents as true. In this sense, the skeptic commits performative contradiction; (iii) in his challenge, the skeptic omits the practical dimension of language and knowledge. That is the source of his difficulties.

Keywords : Peirce; Wittgenstein; Davidson; Descartes; skepticism.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )