Resumen

SZLEZAK, Thomas Alexander. Reflection of the living discourse: ¿What is a Platonic dialogue and what does it pretend?. arete [online]. 2009, vol.21, n.1, pp.87-110. ISSN 1016-913X.

Plato’s word in the Phaedrus about the written logos as an "image" of the living logos of the man who knows (cf. Phaedrus, 276a8-9) has to be referred to his own dialogues: the "man who knows" is the dialectician, who "knows the truth" (cf. ibid., 278c4-5) thanks to the insights he has gained by way of his use of the Theory of Ideas. There are three things, according to Plato, which can be achieved only by the living logos of "the man who knows": his logos can give answers to new questions, can choose the right sort of recipient and remain silent to those who have nothing to do with philosophy, and, in case it should be attacked, it can help its argument with "things of higher importance" (cf. ibid., 275d4-276a9, 278c4-e3). An analyse of these views and concepts of Plato in their context shows that the conventional interpretation, current since almost 200 years, according to which the written Platonic dialogue can do the same three things as the "man who knows", is contrary to the wording of Plato’s "Criticism of Writing" and incompatible with its sense. This result leads to a new orientation regarding the hermeneutics of the Platonic dialogue. We have to acknowledge that Plato did not mean his dialogues (each one by itself, and their entirety as a whole) to be autarchic of self-sufficient literary entities. The dialogues point consistently beyond themselves to Plato’s oral teaching.

Palabras clave : Plato’s Criticism of Writing (Phaedrus, 274b-278e); Plato’s philosophical art of writing; the modern theory of the Platonic dialogue (19th and 20th century); Plato’s oral teaching; esoterism in Plato.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )