SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 issue2The dignity of imagination: Alexander Baumgarten and the context of the birth of aestheticsBack to Husserl: Reclaiming the traditional philosophical context of the phenomenological ‘problem’ of the other: Leibniz’s Monadology author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Bookmark


Areté

Print version ISSN 1016-913X

Abstract

GARIAZZO, Matías. Etchemendy’s critique to formalism. arete [online]. 2011, vol.23, n.2, pp. 329-356. ISSN 1016-913X.

John Etchemendy claims that, given the failure of the Tarskian intuitive notion of logical consequence, there is no reason to consider formality as a necessary condition for this relationship. This paper critiques this argument. First, it seeks to show that Etchemendy’s critique to Tarskian analysis assumes two requisites of elucidatory success that cannot be held together reasonably. Secondly, it shows that, once the previous assumption is rejected, two arguments in favour of the extensional adequacy of the former argument actually support formalism. Finally, this paper reviews some well known pragmatic considerations in favour of formalism.

Keywords : analysis; logical consequence; formalism; model; Semantics.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · pdf in Spanish