SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 issue1Fichte and Heidegger: the Problematic Ontological Meaning of the WissenschaftslehreKierkegaard’s Critique of Hegel’s Conception of Freedom According to Cornelio Fabro’s Interpretation author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Areté

Print version ISSN 1016-913X

Abstract

GARGIULO, Teresa. The Doctrine of Incommensurability in Paul Feyerabend: An Objection Against a Particular Conception of Scientific Rationality. arete [online]. 2016, vol.28, n.1, pp.61-87. ISSN 1016-913X.

The doctrine of incommensurability has been the cause of many controversies and debates. In these discussions, the interpretation of this doctrine as an objection to objectivity, realism and scientific progress seems to be unanimous. However, this hermeneutical framework is too narrow to adequately understand Paul Feyerabend’s in formulating his doctrine of incommensurability. For he never intended to challenge these notions themselves, but only aimed at showing that the Neo-Positivist and Popperian Rationalist attempts to define them are futile. In addition, we argue that, in defining these notions, Paul Feyerabend’s conception of incommensurability avoids the apparatus developed by the Logical Positivists and Critical Rationalists. The goal of this article is to present his thesis of incommensurability as a challenge to a particular way of conceiving scientific rationality and its consequent notions of objectivity, progress and scientific realism.

Keywords : Feyerabend; incommensurability; demarcation criterion; metaphysicsscience relationship; Kuhn.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License