Resumen

BORGE, Bruno  y  AZAR, Roberto. The Nomological Realism vs. Antirealism Debate and the Inference to the Best Explanation. arete [online]. 2016, vol.28, n.2, pp.213-230. ISSN 1016-913X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.18800/arete.201602.001.

The dispute between nomological realists and anti-realists has been reflected in the formulation of various arguments and counterarguments that reach topics as diverse as modality, induction and the very scientific practice. In this context it is common to take the main realist argument -the nomological argument- for an instance of Inference to the Best Explanation, while Nomological Anti-realism is considered a skeptical alternative concerning natural laws, sustained by independent reasons. This paper aims to review that image of the Nomological Realism vs. Anti-realism debate in light of what we believe is an appropriate distinction between abduction and Inference to the Best Explanation.

Palabras clave : Nomological Realism; Natural Laws; Scientific Laws; Inference to the Best Explanation; Abduction.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )