SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 número2La construcción del esquema corporal infantil desde una perspectiva merleaupontyana: la propiocepción como fundamento del accouplement fenomenológicoLos principios de la fenomenología y la fenomenología de lo inaparente: aspectos del método en las filosofías de Michel Henry y Jean-Luc Marion índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Areté

versión impresa ISSN 1016-913X

Resumen

HURTADO BLANDON, Andrés Felipe. The Question of the Hegelian Monarch: Necessity for an Immanent Analisys. arete [online]. 2019, vol.31, n.2, pp.321-348. ISSN 1016-913X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.18800/arete.201902.003.

Among many aspects for which Hegel’s philosophy is known, his characterization and defense of a constitutional and hereditary monarchy in his Elements of the Philosophy of Right has been, undoubtedly, one of the most discussed issues. Considering the wide conflict between positions, approaches and interpretations, as well as the difficulty that many of Hegel’s assertions embody in this respect, it can be said that the problem about the true meaning of monarchy in his philosophy, is still unsolved in many aspects. The purpose of this text is not to reconstruct the main interpretations, but rather identify what are the perspectives or models of analysis, which have been at its base. This, in order to contrast them with Hegel’s methodological caveats in his work and justify, from there, the need to prioritize and give a better development to a perspective and specific way of addressing the issue. In the end, some methodological considerations and suggestions for such analysis will be offered, which could help to find new answers or elements of interpretation in this respect.

Palabras clave : monarchy; analysis perspectives; Hegel´s methodological caveats; Science of Logic.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons