SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número especialThree Aspects of the Linguistic Communion (Koinōnia) in Plato’s Sophist: Articulation of Letters, Predication of Names and Accord (Homologia) of Logoi índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Areté

versión impresa ISSN 1016-913X

Resumen

WIITALA, Michael. The Koinōnia of Non-Being and Logos in the Sophist Account of Falsehood. arete [online]. 2022, vol.34, n.spe, pp.235-249. ISSN 1016-913X.  http://dx.doi.org/10.18800/arete.2022ext.013.

At Sophist 260e3-261a2, the Eleatic Stranger claims that in order to demonstrate that falsehood is, he and Theaetetus must first track down what speech (logos), opinion (doxa), and appearance (phantasia) are, and then observe the communion (koinōnia) that speech, opinion, and appearance have with non-being. The Stranger, however, never explicitly discusses the communion of speech, opinion, and appearance with non-being. Yet presumably their communion is implicit in his account of falsehood, given his claim that observing that communion is needed in order to demonstrate that falsehood is (260e5-a2). This essay seeks to make the communion that speech has with non-being explicit. I argue that speech has communion with non-being in that the things and actions speech combines together by means of nouns and verbs need not be combined in a way that reveals (δηλοῖ) how the being a given speech is about combines ontologically with other beings.

Palabras clave : Falsehood; false statement; non-being; truth; Plato; Sophist; koinōniai; logos.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )