SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.14 número4Nivel de satisfacción general y análisis de la relación médico paciente de los médicos en entrenamiento en las salas de hospitalización de medicina internaConocimientos sobre incontinencia urinaria en pacientes hospitalizados índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Medica Herediana

versión impresa ISSN 1018-130Xversión On-line ISSN 1729-214X

Resumen

MENDOZA TICONA, Carlos Alberto et al. Susceptibilidad antimicrobiana de Staphylococcus aureus sensible, con sensibilidad "BORDERLINE" y resistentes a la meticilina. Rev Med Hered [online]. 2003, vol.14, n.4, pp.181-185. ISSN 1018-130X.

Objective: To determine the susceptibility to different antibacterials of three categories of S. aureus according to its susceptibility to methicillin. Methods: 76 S. aureus strains that colonized patients and health workers were isolated from three Departments at Hospital Honorio Delgado in Arequipa, 36 of which were susceptible to methicillin (MSSA), 15 had borderline susceptibility (BORSA) and 25 where resistant to methicillin (MRSA). They underwent antibiogram for 14 antibacterials. Results: The only antibiotic to which all isolates were susceptible was vancomycin. MRSA were resistant to all betalactamics except imipenem that obtained 64% susceptibility. BORSA keep an 80% susceptibility to cephalotin and 100% to imipenem. The antibiotics cephalotin, imipenem, ciprofloxacine, cotrimoxazole, rifampicine, erithromycin, tetracycline, cloramphenicol, lincomycin and gentamycin had variable susceptibilities (p<0.01) among the three categories, a bigger proportion of MSSA were susceptible to these antibiotics, less for BORSA and lesser for MSSA. The multiresistant strains were more frequent in MRSA that in the other groups (p < 0.01). Conclusions: There are S. aureus strains in our environment with borderline susceptibility to methicillin. There are differences in the susceptibility to any antibacterials among the three groups of S. aureus; this differences can lead to a more rational antibacterial therapy. We should apply international recommendations for methicillin resistance detection in every strain isolation. : To determine the susceptibility to different antibacterials of three categories of S. aureus according to its susceptibility to methicillin. Methods: 76 S. aureus strains that colonized patients and health workers were isolated from three Departments at Hospital Honorio Delgado in Arequipa, 36 of which were susceptible to methicillin (MSSA), 15 had borderline susceptibility (BORSA) and 25 where resistant to methicillin (MRSA). They underwent antibiogram for 14 antibacterials. Results: The only antibiotic to which all isolates were susceptible was vancomycin. MRSA were resistant to all betalactamics except imipenem that obtained 64% susceptibility. BORSA keep an 80% susceptibility to cephalotin and 100% to imipenem. The antibiotics cephalotin, imipenem, ciprofloxacine, cotrimoxazole, rifampicine, erithromycin, tetracycline, cloramphenicol, lincomycin and gentamycin had variable susceptibilities (p<0.01) among the three categories, a bigger proportion of MSSA were susceptible to these antibiotics, less for BORSA and lesser for MSSA. The multiresistant strains were more frequent in MRSA that in the other groups (p < 0.01). Conclusions: There are S. aureus strains in our environment with borderline susceptibility to methicillin. There are differences in the susceptibility to any antibacterials among the three groups of S. aureus; this differences can lead to a more rational antibacterial therapy. We should apply international recommendations for methicillin resistance detection in every strain isolation.

Palabras clave : Staphylococcus aureus; methicillin resistance; borderline susceptibility; antibacterial susceptibility.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons