SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 issue2Concordance between panoramic radiography and cone beam computed tomography in the relationship of mandibular third molars with inferior dental canalValuation of the use of Podcasting for clinical education in the area of restorative dentistry author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Estomatológica Herediana

Print version ISSN 1019-4355

Abstract

CHAVEZ SANCHEZ, Elizabeth; JIMENEZ MENDOZA, Wilber; VALDERRAMA, Kelly Malpartida  and  CARRION, Carolina Soto. In vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements used as bridge and crown cement in fixed prostheses. Rev. Estomatol. Herediana [online]. 2020, vol.30, n.2, pp.94-107. ISSN 1019-4355.  http://dx.doi.org/10.20453/reh.v30i2.3761.

Objetive:

The purpose of the research was to evaluate the in vitro diametral tensile strength of five dental cements: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, four conventional adhesives and a chemically polymerized self-adhesive used as bridge cements and crowns in fixed dentures .

Materials and methods

: 100 specimens consisting of cements were prepared: BisCem, Duolink, Ketac Cem, Meron, Allcem, which were randomly divided into 5 groups of 20 specimens each group subject to photopolymerization and self-polymerization of 8mm in diameter and 5mm high, with an approximate distance of 2mm from the lamp for polymerization, a standardized high density polyethylene specimen was used, the type of sampling is not probabilistic. The specimens of each group were subjected to tensile testing using a universal testing machine (zwickiLine by Zwick / Roell), until the failure of the cement was achieved, subjected to a continuous force of 500 kg, with a fixed displacement speed of 1 cm / min

Results:

The average tensile strength of diametral tensile specimens of BisCem cement was 38.75 ± 11.56 MPa, Duolink cement was 64.30 MPa, Meron cement 57.14 MPa, Ketac Cem cement was 32.23 MPa, BisCem cement (38.753 MPa ) and Ketac Cem cement (39,233 MPa). Duolink dental cement is the one with the highest tensile strength of diametral specimens compared to Meron (57,137 MPa), which is similar. The tabulation and the analysis have been submitted to the Shapiro Wilk test, ANOVA analysis of variance and the Tuckey test. The values of each sample are normally distributed with significant differences between the studied groups.

Conclusions

: Duolink adhesive resin cement specimens showed a higher diametral tensile strength with better significant strength values unlike Ketac Cem, Allcem, Meron and BisCem cements.

Keywords : Dental cement; dental prothesis; cementation; dental crown.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )