SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.30 issue3Adaptation of Co-Cr copings made by induction casting and selective laser melting in CAD/CAM with clinical scanningProsthodontic treatments in older adults performed in a specialized dental center between 2016 and 2018 author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Estomatológica Herediana

Print version ISSN 1019-4355

Abstract

SALVATIERRA SEVILLANO, Sheila Mariela; RODRIGUEZ CARPIO, Karolay Elizabeth; CASTILLO ANDAMAYO, Diana Esmeralda  and  QUINTANA DEL SOLAR, Martín Gilberto. Adaptation of Co-Cr copings made by induction casting and selective laser melting in CAD/CAM. Rev. Estomatol. Herediana [online]. 2020, vol.30, n.3, pp.164-175. ISSN 1019-4355.  http://dx.doi.org/10.20453/reh.v30i3.3819.

There are few studies comparing the fit of cobalt-chromium copings (Co-Cr) manufactured by induction centrifugal casting technique and selective laser melting (SLM) in CAD/CAM.

Objective:

The purpose of this study was to evaluate in vitro the marginal and internal fit of Co-Cr alloy unit copings on a chamfer termination line manufactured by induction centrifugal casting technique (CPCI) and selective laser melting (SLM) in CAD/CAM.

Material and methods:

Thirteen Co-Cr unit copings were made for each technique. Marginal and internal fit were evaluated with the replica technique. Each sample was cross sectioned in the vestibular-palatine and mesio-distal direction, then observed in a stereomicroscope at a 40X magnification and measured at the cervical, axial and occlusal areas.

Results:

The marginal discrepancy of Co-Cr copings manufactured by the SLM technique was 38.1 μm and for the CPCI technique it was 42.22 μm without significant differences (p > 0.05). The axial discrepancy for the copings manufactured by CPCI technique was 42.02 μm and for the SLM technique of 60.16 μm with significant difference (P < 0.05). The occlusal discrepancy for the copings made by the CPCI technique was 101.94 μm and for the SLM technique was 232.13 μm with significant difference (P < 0.05).

Conclusions:

The marginal adaptation was similar for CPCI and SLM techniques but without statistically significant differences. The internal adaptation was better for the CPCI technique than for the SLM technique with statistically significant differences.

Keywords : Adaptation; computer-aided design; lasers solid-state.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )