SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.43 número1Utilidad del aprendizaje en línea con YouTube para los endoscopistas gastrointestinales junior: ¿Una práctica gratificante o disuasoria?Comparación de dos tipos de clasificación en dispepsia funcional; distrés postprandial o dolor epigástrico vs. un análisis multidimensional por conglomerados utilizando aprendizaje no supervisado índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista de Gastroenterología del Perú

versión impresa ISSN 1022-5129

Resumen

RUIZ-REBOLLO, María Lourdes et al. Recurrent acute pancreatitis is not uncommon in our clinical setting. Rev. gastroenterol. Perú [online]. 2023, vol.43, n.1, pp.31-37.  Epub 11-Abr-2023. ISSN 1022-5129.  http://dx.doi.org/10.47892/rgp.2023.431.1412.

Data on recurrent episodes of acute pancreatitis (RAP) are scarce. The aim of the study was to evaluate our rate of RAP and risks factors. This is a retrospective, single-center, study of consecutive patients admitted for AP and followed-up. Patients with more than one AP attack (RAP) were compared with patients with only a single AP episode (SAP) Clinical, demographic, outcome measures and severity were studied. 561 patients were included and follow-up over a mean 67.63 months’ time. Our rate of RAP was 18,9%. Most patients suffered form only one episode of RAP (93%). Etiology of RAP episodes was mainly biliary (67%). On univariate analysis younger age (p 0.004), absence of high blood pressure (p 0.013) and absent of SIRS (p 0.022) were associated with recurrence of AP. On multivariate analysis only younger age was related to RAP (OR 1.015 95%IC 1.00-1.029). There were no statistical differences in outcome measures between both cohorts. RAP had a milder course in terms of severity (SAP 19% moderately severe/severe versus 9% in SAP). Almost 70% of the biliary RAP patients did not have a cholecystectomy performed. In this subset of patients, age OR 0.964 (95%IC 0.946-0.983), cholecystectomy OR 0.075 (95%IC 0.189-0.030) and cholecystectomy plus ERCP OR 0.190 (95%IC 0.219-0.055) were associated with absent of RAP. The rate of RAP in our series was 18,9%. Younger age was the only risk factor associated. Biliary etiology accounts for a large proportion of our RAP which could have been prevented with cholecystectomy or cholecystectomy plus ERCP.

Palabras clave : Pancreatitis; Recurrence; Cholecystectomy.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Inglés     · Inglés ( pdf )