SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.80 número4Características clínico patológicas del cáncer de mama asociadas a la expresión del marcador celular Ki-67 en el Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, 2013-2017 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Anales de la Facultad de Medicina

versión impresa ISSN 1025-5583

Resumen

PEREIRA-RODRIGUEZ, Javier Eliecer et al. Hemodynamic changes and quality of life in patients with prostate cancer after a HIIT and MICT training: a randomized clinical trial (ONCO-EXE TRIAL). An. Fac. med. [online]. 2019, vol.80, n.4, pp.419-426. ISSN 1025-5583.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/anales.v80i4.16218.

Introduction. Prostate cancer is the most common in men and is the second cause of death. Exercise-based rehabilitation is effective and safe in mitigating cancer effects. Objective. To determine the hemodynamic changes and quality of life in prostate cancer after a high intensity training (HIIT) or continuous to moderate intensity (MICT). Methods. A randomized clinical trial with 249 patients with stage II prostate cancer divided into 3 groups (MICT, HIIT and control group) who were applied EORTC QLQ C-30 questionnaire for quality of life, echocardiogram, stress test, vital signs and FACT-Fatigue Scale. The training program lasted 36 sessions of 70 minutes, 3 times a week. Results. When comparing the post-training results of the hemodynamic variables, we managed to determine changes in the ejection fraction (GE1: 49.0 ± 5.6 vs 52.0 ± 5.4, GE2: 45.0 ± 5.3 vs 51.0 ± 3.2, GC: 48.0 ± 4.1 vs 48.0 ± 4.4 p<0.005), maximum heart rate (GE1: 155.0 ± 7.0 vs 159.0 ± 4.0, GE2: 156.0 ± 14.0 vs 168.0 ± 5.0, GC: 155.0 ± 7.0 vs 155 ± 6.0, p<0.005). As in the results for quality of life (GE1: 55.1 ± 10.3 vs 70.9 ± 10.2, GE2: 59.8 ± 9.9 vs 118.0 ± 14.6, GC: 60.2 ± 7.6 vs 62.3 ± 9.4, p<0.005). Conclusions. HIIT and MICT significantly improved the quality of life, fatigue, and all hemodynamic variables evaluated in the research. Greater benefits were demonstrated with HIIT. The usual care control group without physical training did not show significant changes.

Palabras clave : Prostatic Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Cardiac Rehabilitation; Exercise; Resistance Training; Clinical Trial.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons