SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.80 número4Características clínico patológicas del cáncer de mama asociadas a la expresión del marcador celular Ki-67 en el Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins, 2013-2017 índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Anales de la Facultad de Medicina

versão impressa ISSN 1025-5583

Resumo

PEREIRA-RODRIGUEZ, Javier Eliecer et al. Hemodynamic changes and quality of life in patients with prostate cancer after a HIIT and MICT training: a randomized clinical trial (ONCO-EXE TRIAL). An. Fac. med. [online]. 2019, vol.80, n.4, pp.419-426. ISSN 1025-5583.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/anales.v80i4.16218.

Introduction. Prostate cancer is the most common in men and is the second cause of death. Exercise-based rehabilitation is effective and safe in mitigating cancer effects. Objective. To determine the hemodynamic changes and quality of life in prostate cancer after a high intensity training (HIIT) or continuous to moderate intensity (MICT). Methods. A randomized clinical trial with 249 patients with stage II prostate cancer divided into 3 groups (MICT, HIIT and control group) who were applied EORTC QLQ C-30 questionnaire for quality of life, echocardiogram, stress test, vital signs and FACT-Fatigue Scale. The training program lasted 36 sessions of 70 minutes, 3 times a week. Results. When comparing the post-training results of the hemodynamic variables, we managed to determine changes in the ejection fraction (GE1: 49.0 ± 5.6 vs 52.0 ± 5.4, GE2: 45.0 ± 5.3 vs 51.0 ± 3.2, GC: 48.0 ± 4.1 vs 48.0 ± 4.4 p<0.005), maximum heart rate (GE1: 155.0 ± 7.0 vs 159.0 ± 4.0, GE2: 156.0 ± 14.0 vs 168.0 ± 5.0, GC: 155.0 ± 7.0 vs 155 ± 6.0, p<0.005). As in the results for quality of life (GE1: 55.1 ± 10.3 vs 70.9 ± 10.2, GE2: 59.8 ± 9.9 vs 118.0 ± 14.6, GC: 60.2 ± 7.6 vs 62.3 ± 9.4, p<0.005). Conclusions. HIIT and MICT significantly improved the quality of life, fatigue, and all hemodynamic variables evaluated in the research. Greater benefits were demonstrated with HIIT. The usual care control group without physical training did not show significant changes.

Palavras-chave : Prostatic Neoplasms; Quality of Life; Cardiac Rehabilitation; Exercise; Resistance Training; Clinical Trial.

        · resumo em Espanhol     · texto em Espanhol     · Espanhol ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo o conteúdo deste periódico, exceto onde está identificado, está licenciado sob uma Licença Creative Commons