SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.85 número1Expresión transcripcional de receptores tipo Toll y citoquinas proinflamatorias en macrófagos infectados con Leishmania braziliensis nativaInfradesnivel del segmento ST y neumotórax espontáneo izquierdo índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Anales de la Facultad de Medicina

versión impresa ISSN 1025-5583

Resumen

PEREZ-MORI, Arley et al. Use of antimicrobials in the intensive care unit of a Loreto public hospital. An. Fac. med. [online]. 2024, vol.85, n.1, pp.57-61.  Epub 31-Mar-2024. ISSN 1025-5583.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/anales.v85i1.26569.

Introduction.

Inappropriate use of antimicrobials in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU) contributes to bacterial resistance.

Objective.

The purpose of the present study was to measure the use and type of antimicrobials in patients hospitalized in the Intensive Care Unit of the Loreto Regional Hospital (HRL).

Methods.

Descriptive study. We reviewed 120 medical records in ICU-HRL patients from January to June 2023.

Results.

Most patients used antimicrobials (74.2%), indicated for septic shock (42.7%), 1 to 3 antimicrobials (93.2%), with therapy of 1 to 3 days (45%). Of the total number of antimicrobials used, the greatest proportion were bactericides 89 (90.4%), from the cephalosporin family (33.1%) and carbapenemics (23.5%); the most commonly used drugs were ceftriaxone (26.5%) and meropenem (21.1%) by the intravenous route (90.4%).

Conclusion.

The highest proportion of hospitalized patients use antimicrobials of the cephalosporin and carbapenemics family.

Palabras clave : Antibiotics; Anti-Infective Agents; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Intensive Care Units.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )