SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.31 issue4Orthopedic screws manufactured from lyophilized bovine bone: a procedure for implantationSperm DNA fragmentation index of alpaca (Vicugna pacos) using the sperm chromatin dispersion test author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

Share


Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú

Print version ISSN 1609-9117

Abstract

G, Juan Pérez et al. Comparison of single-trait and multi-trait animal models to estimate components of (Co) variance and genetic growth parameters in the bovine breed Costeño con Cuernos. Rev. investig. vet. Perú [online]. 2020, vol.31, n.4, e17380. ISSN 1609-9117.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v34i1.17380.

The study aimed to estimate the components of (co) variance and genetic parameters for growth traits as birth weight (BW), weaning weight (WW) and weight at 16 months of age (W16) of calves of the creole breed Costeño con Cuernos, born between 1989 and 2011 in a herd located in the northeast of Colombia. For this, 3060, 2594 and 1990 BW, WW and W16 records were analyzed, respectively. Single-trait (UNI) and multi-trait (MT) models were used. Six variants were evaluated with the UNI model, in all cases the random effect of the animal was included and the rest of the models alternated the maternal effect, the effect of the permanent environment and the relationship between the direct and maternal effect. Goodness of fit was determined using the information criteria ofAkaike(AIC), Bayesiana(BIC) and LogL.ForBWandWW models involving direct, maternal, and permanent maternal environment effects showed the best fit, and for W16 the best fit model was the one that only considered the direct effect. The heritability values of the UNI and MT models were similar for BW (0.14 and 0.16, respectively). For WW and W16, the MT model, in relation to the UNI, increased h2 a by 42% (0.27 vs. 0.19; 0.31 vs. 0.21, respectively), as well as h2 T for WW by 34% (0.31 vs. 0.23). The genetic variability found allows the application of a selection process and it is recommended to use the multi-trait models for the genetic evaluation of the herd.

Keywords : genetic parameters; direct effect; maternal effects; variance components; creole cattle.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )