SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 issue4Evaluation of four anaesthetics in freshwater baitfish (Cheirodon interruptus) (Ostariophysi: Characidae)Influence of Capsicum chinense oleoresin on the shelf life of vacuum-packed beef stored under refrigeration author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

Share


Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú

Print version ISSN 1609-9117

Abstract

VIEIRA NOBRE, Camila et al. Efficacy and safety of morphine and methadone as analgesics in a balanced anaesthetic protocol in rabbits. Rev. investig. vet. Perú [online]. 2022, vol.33, n.4, e23358.  Epub Aug 31, 2022. ISSN 1609-9117.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v33i4.23358.

The efficacy of preventive analgesia and the cardiopulmonary effects of morphine or methadone in rabbits undergoing experimental skin surgery were evaluated and compared. Thirty-six rabbits were randomly assigned to three experimental groups: Con- trol, Morphine, and Methadone. The rabbits received midazolam 1 mg/kg IM associated with: placebo (NaCl 0.9%) 0.05 ml/kg, methadone 0.5 mg/kg or morphine 0.5 mg/kg, depending on the experimental group. Anaesthesia was induced and maintained with isoflurane. Heart (HR) and respiratory (fR) rates, peripheral oxygen saturation (SpO2), mean arterial pressure (MAP), and body temperature were assessed every 10 minutes. Electrocardiographic examination was performed after sedation, in the trans and immediate postoperative period. After procedure, the control group received tramadol 5 mg/kg IV. Postoperative analgesia was assessed using the visual analogue scale (VAS) and Von- Frey filament stimulation responses. All variables were compared between groups by ANOVA or Friedman. Methadone and morphine caused an increase in MAP (p=0.0112) and a decrease in HR (p=0.0001). fR and SpO2 were reduced in the methadone group (p=0.0100). The response to Von-Frey filaments (p=0.6824) and VAS (p=0.7661) were similar between treatments, however, the control group presented a higher proportion of analgesic rescue (33%) compared to morphine (19%) and methadone (12%). Electrocardiographic variables were similar between treatments (p>0.05). In conclusion, preventive treatment with morphine or methadone was effective in controlling trans and postoperative pain in rabbits, and its cardiovascular effects were limited; however, methadone caused marked respiratory depression.

Keywords : analgesia; analgesic rescue; methadone; morphine; respiratory depression.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )