SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.18 issue2The transmedia storytelling applied to corporate communicationAlgorithms and the News: Social Media Platforms as News Publishers and Distributors author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista de Comunicación

Print version ISSN 1684-0933On-line version ISSN 2227-1465

Abstract

TUNON NAVARRO, Jorge; OLEART, Álvaro  and  BOUZA GARCIA, Luis. European Actors and Disinformation: the dispute between fact-checking, alternative agendas and geopolitics. Revista de Comunicación [online]. 2019, vol.18, n.2, pp.245-260. ISSN 1684-0933.  http://dx.doi.org/10.26441/rc18.2-2019-a12.

The Brexit referendum is a good example of the particular vulnerability of the European project when fighting disinformation. Therefore, EU institutions have developed a series of initiatives throughout 2018 to define a European strategy to counter disinformation that emphasizes the responsibility of social networks in reporting false content. In addition, given the weakness of the European public sphere, the European institutions support the creation of European networks of fact checkers. This strategy implies the denunciation of lies, rather than the promotion of alternative interpretive frames, which authors like Lakoff (2004) consider an error from a framing point of view. Empirically, we demonstrate through an analysis of the main networks of actors on this matter (academics, foundations, think tanks, media, social network platforms and fact checkers) that there is a dispute to define the best way to combat disinformation at the European level.

Keywords : disinformation; framing; fact-checking; european networks; Brexit; European Union.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )