SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 número1Administraciones públicas en TikTok. Comunicación, narrativa y frecuencia de publicación de los perfiles de los ministerios de EspañaAutoría en la cobertura de la guerra en Ucrania: El trabajo de redacción prima sobre las crónicas de corresponsales índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista de Comunicación

versión impresa ISSN 1684-0933versión On-line ISSN 2227-1465

Resumen

ANGEL, Adriana; WOLFE, Anna Wiederhold  y  LA PASTINA, Antonio. Approaches and Agency in Communication for Development and Social Change in the Americas. Revista de Comunicación [online]. 2024, vol.23, n.1, pp.53-74.  Epub 24-Mayo-2024. ISSN 1684-0933.  http://dx.doi.org/10.26441/rc23.1-2024-3449.

In a constantly evolving world, it is crucial to examine how different social agents approach social change. Within the communication field, this concept is inherently tied to the tradition of Communication for Development and Social Change (CDSC). This tradition has developed regionally, with significant contributions from Latin American scholars, and with less prominence from North American authors, who have been accused of unilaterally imposing development models. In this context, two questions originate our study: What are the relationships of continuity and disruption that characterize the predominant trends and approaches in the conceptualization and practice of social change in AngloAmerica and Latin America? And how do academic perspectives relate to concrete experiences of social change in the field of CDSC in the Americas? To address these questions, we conducted a scoping review that allows us to compare the understanding of social change among Anglo-American and Latin American scholars, as well as their ability to implement these ideas as agents of change. The results lead us to discuss three relationships of continuity and disruption between two communities of practice in the Americas: First, Latin American scholars associate social change with media communication and diversity in the symbolic representation of communities, while Anglo-Americans link it to social justice and political activism. Second, both groups blur the distinction between development and social change by operationalizing both in terms of community well-being and prosperity. Finally, we identify a rupture in the disciplinary organization of CDSC field in both regions.

Palabras clave : social change; development; communication; Angloamerica; Latin Ameica; recognition; redistribution; scoping review.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )