SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.35 número2Reordenamiento vehicular y contaminación ambiental por material particulado (2,5 y 10), dióxido de azufre y dióxido de nitrógeno en Lima Metropolitana, PerúPercepciones sobre la educación intercultural y relación médico-paciente inmigrante en médicos de Chile índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica

versión impresa ISSN 1726-4634

Resumen

TORRES, Maritza et al. Comparison of anthropometric measures for aggregation of multiple risk factors in adults of Cuenca, Ecuador. Rev. perú. med. exp. salud publica [online]. 2018, vol.35, n.2, pp.198-204. ISSN 1726-4634.  http://dx.doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2018.352.2938.

Objective.The aim of this study is to compare the predictive capacity of different anthropometric indices in multiple risk factors aggregation (MRFA) determination in the adult population from Cuenca city, Ecuador. Materials and Methods. A cross-sectional descriptive study was performed with a random multi-stage sampling in 318 adult subjects who underwent a clinical, anthropometric and laboratory evaluation; being the abdominal circumference, body mass index (BMI) and waist height index (WHtR) evaluated. MRFA was defined as the presence of ≥2 components of the metabolic syndrome (excluding abdominal circumference). ROC curves were plotted to determine the area under the curve (AUC) for each index. Results. Of the 318 individuals, 54.1% (n=172) presented MRFA. According to ROC curves, the highest predictive capacity in women was observed with BMI and WHtR (AUC: 0.751 and 0.750, respectively), while in men abdominal circumference and WHtR showed a similar predictive power (AUC: 0.762). The multivariate analysis adjusted for sex and age showed that high WHtR (OR: 2.53, 95% CI: 1.12-5.71, p=0.026) was the best predictor of MRFA, followed by BMI (OR: 2.15, 95% CI: 1.19-3.88, p=0.010).Conclusions. The predictive capacity of the anthropometric indexes is influenced by gender; nevertheless the WHtR is the best predictor of MRFA in our population.

Palabras clave : Anthropometry; Indexes; Metabolism; Obesity; ROC curves.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License Todo el contenido de esta revista, excepto dónde está identificado, está bajo una Licencia Creative Commons