SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.39 número2Factores de riesgo asociados a mortalidad en pacientes con neumonía por SARS-CoV-2 en un Hospital-I del Seguro Social, Perú-La LibertadTeleorientación en el servicio de oftalmología de un hospital público de mayo a agosto del 2020 durante la pandemia COVID-19 en el Perú índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Acta Médica Peruana

versión On-line ISSN 1728-5917

Resumen

ZEGARRA-MONTES, Luis et al. Feasibility and safety of transperineal prostate biopsy in the era of cognitive magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasound fusion in prostate cancer detection. Acta méd. Peru [online]. 2022, vol.39, n.2, pp.114-119.  Epub 17-Ago-2022. ISSN 1728-5917.  http://dx.doi.org/10.35663/amp.2022.392.2331.

Objective

: To describe the results of transperineal prostate biopsy by fusion of cognitive magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound in the detection of cancer.

Materials and methods

: A retrospective case series study conducted at the Delgado Clinic between July 2019 and October 2021. Patients with digital prostate examination and/or abnormal Prostatic Specific Antigen and prostate MRI images with category lesions were included PI-RADS 4 or 5. Excluding patients with coagulation disorders, rectal injuries, impossibility for abduction, comorbidities for anesthesia. We recorded clinical and demographic characteristics, prostate-specific antigen data, prostate volume, PI-RADS lesions, cancer rates, and complications. Results: 18 patients were evaluated, with a mean age of 69.33 ± 7.67 years. The mean prostate specific antigen was 14.94 ± 12.42 ng/mL. The mean prostate volume was 57.72 ± 28.68 cc. At the digital examination of the prostate, 16/18 (88.88%) patients had suspected cancer. Biopsies with 19 cores were performed in patients whose NMRmP had lesions with PI-RADS category 4 in 6/18 (33.33%), of which 3 were positive for Adenocarcinoma and another 3 were negative for cancer. Biopsy with 16 PIRADS 5 cores in 12/18 (66.67%) patients, all of which were positive for cancer. Acinar adenocarcinoma in 15/18 (83.33%) with Gleason 6 in 2/18 (11.11%) and Gleason ≥ 7 in 13/18 (72.22%) patients. Mild complications such as hematuria 1/18 (5.6%), terminal dysuria 8/18 (44.4%) and perineal discomfort 7/18 (38.8%) and none infectious.

Conclusions

: transperineal prostate biopsy by fusion of cognitive magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound is feasible, safe, with significant positivity rates and without infections.

Palabras clave : Biopsy/methods; Prostatic Neoplasms; Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy; Ultrasonography/methods.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )