SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.22 issue2Evaluation of sanky peel extract in the stability of llama meatStationary quality of water before the sustainable environmental cost relative to addition of biomarkers: Puno bay, Titicaca lake, Peru author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

Share


Revista de Investigaciones Altoandinas

On-line version ISSN 2313-2957

Abstract

PUMA-ISUIZA, Gustavo Gavino  and  NUNEZ-SAAVEDRA, Carlos. Comparison of the Flash Profile and the Napping®-UFP Techniques in the sensory characterization of hot-dog. Rev. investig. Altoandin. [online]. 2020, vol.22, n.2, pp.135-145. ISSN 2313-2957.  http://dx.doi.org/10.18271/ria.2020.601.

The similarity between the Flash Profile and the Napping®-Ultra Flash Profile (Napping®-UFP) techniques was evaluated using the vector correlation coefficient (Rv). For this purpose, two commercial hot-dog brands from the Lima market and two formulations obtained by Kansei Engineering were sensory characterized. In the Flash Profile, consumers generated and rated their own descriptors, which were processed using the generalized Procrustes analysis. In Napping®-UFP, consumers positioned and described the hot-dog samples on an A3 size sheet. The coordinates (x, y) of each sample and the descriptive terms were processed by multiple factor analysis. The consensus index (Rc = 61.2 %) and the overlap of the confidence ellipses in samples HD2.1 and HD2.2 showed that they did not have a significant sensory difference (p-value < 0.05). Finally, the Rv value (0.93) determined a high similarity between both sensory techniques.

Keywords : sausage; multiple factorial analysis; generalized Procrustes analysis; Kansei engineering.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )