SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 issue69Economic metaphors in the Peruvian print media: a study of the column "Opinion" in the weekly newspaper Hildebrandt en sus Trece¿Chancón or empollón?, trome or genius?...: the Peruvian Spanish and the Spanish of Spain author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Boletín de la Academia Peruana de la Lengua

Print version ISSN 0567-6002On-line version ISSN 2708-2644

Abstract

CANAVOSIO, Andrea de los Ángeles; CAD, Ana Cecilia  and  SALINAS, Julieta. Assessment Criteria in Academic Writing in English: Rater Sessions and reliability. Bol. Acad. peru. leng. [online]. 2021, n.69, pp.265-295. ISSN 0567-6002.  http://dx.doi.org/10.46744/bapl.202101.010.

The assessment of foreign language writing is a complex and manifold process, which entails that this field of research be approached from different perspectives. This paper arises from the need to research the teaching criteria when assessing writing in a foreign language (English) in a university context. This research is part of a larger biannual research project called «Criteria for the assessment of foreign language (English) writing at the higher level» (supported by the Secretariat of Science and Technology of the National University of Córdoba, Argentina). In this particular work, we will analyze the data collected in a meeting at which nine teachers explained how they scored five written essays under summative assessment. We believe that this analysis will foster reflection on the selection, weighting and uniformity of assessment criteria to be applied in the future.

Keywords : reliability; academic writing in EFL; assessment criteria; undergraduate level; raters’ perceptions.

        · abstract in Spanish | French     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )