SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
 número69Metáforas económicas en la prensa peruana escrita: un estudio de la sección Opinión» en el semanario Hildebrandt en sus Trece¿Chancón o empollón?, ¿trome o genio?...: el español de Perú y el español de España índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Boletín de la Academia Peruana de la Lengua

versión impresa ISSN 0567-6002versión On-line ISSN 2708-2644

Resumen

CANAVOSIO, Andrea de los Ángeles; CAD, Ana Cecilia  y  SALINAS, Julieta. Assessment Criteria in Academic Writing in English: Rater Sessions and reliability. Bol. Acad. peru. leng. [online]. 2021, n.69, pp.265-295. ISSN 0567-6002.  http://dx.doi.org/10.46744/bapl.202101.010.

The assessment of foreign language writing is a complex and manifold process, which entails that this field of research be approached from different perspectives. This paper arises from the need to research the teaching criteria when assessing writing in a foreign language (English) in a university context. This research is part of a larger biannual research project called «Criteria for the assessment of foreign language (English) writing at the higher level» (supported by the Secretariat of Science and Technology of the National University of Córdoba, Argentina). In this particular work, we will analyze the data collected in a meeting at which nine teachers explained how they scored five written essays under summative assessment. We believe that this analysis will foster reflection on the selection, weighting and uniformity of assessment criteria to be applied in the future.

Palabras clave : reliability; academic writing in EFL; assessment criteria; undergraduate level; raters’ perceptions.

        · resumen en Español | Francés     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )