SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.33 número1Efecto de diferentes condiciones y modos de aplicación sobre la fuerza de unión de los adhesivos a la dentinaComplicaciones de la técnica anestésica mandibular Spix en la clínica odontológica de la Universidad Andrés Bello índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista Estomatológica Herediana

versión impresa ISSN 1019-4355

Rev. Estomatol. Herediana vol.33 no.1 Lima ene./mar. 2023  Epub 31-Mar-2023

http://dx.doi.org/10.20453/reh.v33i1.4431 

Artículo original

Factors associated with oral health related-quality of life in preschoolers from an Andean community

Factores asociados a la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud bucal en preescolares de una comunidad andina

Aldrin A. Huamán Mendoza1 

Karen S. Pinedo Tellez2 

Carla Rodrigues de Almeida Silva3 

Yvette G. Tello Guerrero4 

Patricia Calle Lopez5 

Carmen R. García Rupaya2 

Freddy R. Valdez Jurado6 

1 Facultad de Odontología, Universidad de São Paulo. São Paulo, Brasil

2 Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Federico Villarreal. Lima, Perú

3 Departamento de Odontología, Universidad Federal de Rio Grande do Norte. Natal, Brasil

4 Departamento de Estomatología, Hospital Central de la Fuerza Aérea del Perú. Lima, Perú

5 Centro de Salud Paucarbamba, Microred Paucarbamba. Huancavelica, Perú

6 Facultad de Odontología, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Lima, Perú

ABSTRACT

Objective

: To analyze the oral health status and its relationship with the quality of life of Andean children of the community of Paucarbamba in Huancavelica, Peru.

Material and Methods

: The observational, cross-sectional, and correlational study was conducted on a sample of 120 children aged 3-5 years. Early childhood caries was considered using the dmft index. In addition, presence and type of malocclusion were assessed. The oral health-related quality of life was measured by The Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) questionnaire. Univariate and bivariate analysis were performed. Linear regression and Spearman correlation were conducted to identify the factors that most explained the ECOHIS score.

Results

: Multiple linear regression by least squares method did not consider gender, age, malocclusion, and simplified oral hygiene index as significant. This analysis only included dmft index as significant (p<0.05) to explicate the ECOHIS score. The estimated regression model was ECOHIS score = 11.67 + 0.79*dmft, in which the score increased by 0,79 for each unit obtained of the dmft index, and the dmft in a R2 = 30% (p<0.001) explained the variability of the ECOHIS score achieved.

Conclusions

: There is a negative impact of dental caries on the quality of life of preschool children and their families in an Andean community in Paucarbamba, Peru.

Keywords: Dental Caries; malocclusion; quality of life; Peru; oral health; health impact assessment

RESUMEN

Objetivo

: Analizar el estado de salud bucal y su relación con la calidad de vida de los preescolares de una comunidad andina y vulnerable del Perú.

Material y Métodos

: El estudio observacional, correlacional y transversal se realizó en una muestra de 120 niños de 3 a 5 años. La caries de la primera infancia se determinó mediante el índice ceod. También se consideró la presencia y el tipo de maloclusión. El cuestionario Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) midió la calidad de vida relacionada con la salud bucal. Los factores y variables orales se analizaron de manera univariada y bivariada. Se realizó un análisis de correlación de Spearman y regresión lineal para identificar los factores y en qué medida explicaban la puntuación del cuestionario.

Resultados

: El análisis de regresión lineal múltiple por el método de mínimos cuadrados solo incluyó como significativa (p <0,05) la contribución de ceod para explicar la puntuación del cuestionario, dejando de lado variables como el sexo, la edad, la maloclusión y el índice de higiene bucal simplificado. El modelo de regresión estimado fue Puntuación del Cuestionario = 11,67 + 0,79*ceod, donde la puntuación del cuestionario aumentó en 0,79 por cada unidad ganada de ceod, y la variabilidad de las puntuaciones obtenidas se explica por el ceod en un R2 = 30% (p<0,001).

Conclusiones

: Existe un impacto de la caries dental en la calidad de vida de los preescolares de uma comunidade andina del Perú y sus familias.

Palabras clave: Caries dental; maloclusión; calidad de vida; Perú; salud bucal; evaluación del impacto en la salud

INTRODUCTION

Oral diseases are considered a global public health challenge, especially in developing countries with higher public health spending 1. Early childhood caries (ECC) is defined as the presence of decayed, missing, or filled teeth in children under 6 years old. Furthermore, The World Health Organization (WHO) stated that ECC influences children’s health, their families, and in that way, society 2. ECC is also related to nutritional troubles due to difficulty in eating, drinking, and loss of appetite. Other negative manifestations include oral symptoms such as pain and discomfort, sleep disturbances, behavioral changes, word pronunciation problems, and decreased academic performance 3,4.

Malocclusion is a major oral health problem which is the morphological and functional imbalance of the stomatognathic system between bone, muscle, and teeth. This condition generates functional troubles in mastication and deglutition, dental occlusion, and phonation. Additionally, harmful psychological repercussion was reported because of dental aesthetic appearance 5.

Oral health problems during early childhood can have a negative impact on the child's quality of life and also on the family environment. Oral health is part of overall health and it is described in the concept of Oral Health-Related Quality of Life (OHRQoL). It represents the impact of oral conditions on functional, social, and psychological well-being 6.

In Latin America, the limitations of oral health prevention and promotion policies, the inequality in access to health care, and the lack of budget are directly related to the high oral disease rates. Additionally, OHRQoL differs according to socioeconomic status and educational levels 7. Correspondingly, the WHO affirmed that oral ailments and diseases often have a greater impact on poor and vulnerable people 2. This is the case of people from Huancavelica, located in the central Andean region of Peru. Here, a high percentage of the population is living in poverty. According to the 2017 technical report, Huancavelica reached poverty rates of 33.3% and 36.8%, according to the country's poverty threshold. Thereby, people, mainly children, from Huancavelica are considered a vulnerable population 8

Currently, there are several studies evaluating oral diseases/conditions and their relationship with OHRQoL. Nevertheless, the available literature can not be extrapolated to vulnerable individuals. Thus, it is important to conduct research aimed to assess the impact of OHRQoL and oral diseases/conditions focused on vulnerable populations. This study aimed to analyze the factors associated with OHRQoL in preschool children from the Andean community of Paucarbamba, Huancavelica, Peru.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The observational, correlational, and cross-sectional study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Regional Hospital of Huancavelica. The sample size was calculated using the formula for estimate a proportion with a 95% confidence interval (Z=1.96), a variance (S2) of 2.25, and a absolute error/precision (e) of 0.28 (data from a previous pilot test). Therefore, a total of at least 111 patients were required. The study was conducted on 120 preschool children from 3 to 5 years old attended at Paucarbamba Health Center, Huancavelica, Peru from January to May 2019. Previously, the parents/caregivers signed informed consent. The inclusion criteria were: Children who assent to participate with the consent of parents and caregivers who speak the Spanish language, which was collected during the anamnesis. Non-cooperative patients and/or patients with systemic diseases, such as anemia and chronic malnutrition, were excluded.

The evaluator (AAHM) was calibrated with an experienced specialist, considered the gold standard (YGTG) for the dmft index variable, obtaining excellent concordance for intra- and inter-examiner (Intraclass Correlation Coefficient = 0.885 and 0.821, respectively). Furthermore, the internal consistency of the Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) questionnaire was good (Cronbach's Alpha=0.806).

The OHRQoL of the children and their families was evaluated with the ECOHIS questionnaire, which was addressed to the children's guardians. It consists of 13 questions which were divided into four domains for the child impact section: symptoms, function, psychological, self-image, and social interaction; and two domains for the family impact section: parent distress and family function. Questions were measured using Likert scale, with scores of 0 = never, 1 = hardly ever, 2 = occasionally, 3 = often, 4 = very often, 5 = don't know. Total scores can range from 0 to 52, and a higher score indicates a greater impact on quality of life and, consequently, worse OHRQoL 9. The ECOHIS score, which represented the OHRQoL, was the dependent quantitative variable.

The independent variables were sex, age, dmft index, presence of malocclusions, and simplified oral hygiene index (OHI-S).

ECC was represented by the dmft index, which was a quantitative variable. In addition, the severity of ECC was classified according to Hallet et al., in dmft index 0 = healthy, dmft 1-5 = low severity, and dmft ≥ 6 = high severity 10. Malocclusion was considered a qualitative dichotomous variable (presence and absence); however, types of malocclusions were reported: overjet > 3mm, anterior crossbite, anterior open bite, bis to bis bite, and anterior deep bite (overbite > 40%) 11.

OHI-S proposed by Greene and Vermillion using dental plaque revealer (Plac Control®) was recorded on the dental surfaces: 5.5 vestibular (v), 5.1 (v), 6.5 (v), 7.5 lingual (l), 7.1 (v), and 8.5 (l) 12. Furthermore, the OHI-S was considered a quantitative variable and, additionally, was utilized to divide the clinical level of oral hygiene into good (OHI-S: 0.0 - 1.2), regular (OHI-S: 1.3 - 3.0), and bad (OHI-S: 3.1 - 6) 12.

The data obtained were stored and processed using STATA v16. Univariate and bivariate analyses were performed. The ECOHIS score was expressed as mean, median, and confidence intervals (95% CI). Spearman's correlation test was used due to the lack of normality in the OHRQoL (quantitative variable). A multiple linear regression model using the least squares method was used.

RESULTS

The sample (n=120) was distributed by gender, age, and oral diseases/conditions among patients such as malocclusions, the severity of ECC, and OHI-S. The female sex represented 51.7% of individuals. High severity of ECC was found in 69.2% of the participants. 50.8% of the children had some type of malocclusion and, among them, deep bite (27.5%) and bis to bis bite (15%) represented the highest percentages. The most common clinical level of oral hygiene was regular with 61.7% of patients (Table 1).

Table 1 Characteristics of children between 3 and 5 years old (n=120). 

CI: Confidence interval

Regarding the scores obtained from the ECOHIS questionnaire, no differences (p>0.05) ​​were found among categories grouped by gender, severity of ECC, presence, and type of malocclusion, and clinical level of oral hygiene (Table 2).

Table 2 Bivariate statistics comparing the average scores obtained from the ECOHIS of parents/caregivers of children between 3 and 5 years old by categories of adjustment variables (n=120). 

SD: Standard deviation; IQR: Interquartile range

Table 3 displays the responses to each item in the ECOHIS questionnaire, which were divided into the child and family impact assessment and were reported by the caregiver. Table 4 shows that the dmft index values and the ECOHIS score presented a positive and moderately significant relationship (95% CI, rho value: 0.47 - 0.70, p<0.001).

Table 3 ECOHIS responses of caregivers/parents (N=120). 

The least squares method for multiple regression considered the contribution of the dmft index as significant (p<0.05) to explain the ECOHIS score. Other variables did not show a significant association with impact on OHRQoL (Table 4). The estimated regression model was ECOHIS Score = 11.67+0.79*dmft, in which for each increase of a unit of dmft index, the ECOHIS score gained 0.79 points. The variability of the obtained score was explained by the dmft in R2=30% (p<0.001).

Table 4 Relationship between the dmft index values and the ECOHIS score. 

Rho: Spearman's correlation coefficient; R2: Coefficient of determination; CI: Confidence interval at 95%.

DISCUSSION

This study analyzed oral health status and its relationship with quality of life in 3- to 5-year-old children and their families from a vulnerable population of the Central Andean area of ​​Peru. It was observed that the ECC can significantly affect children´s OHRQoL owing to its consequences.

OHRQoL was measured using the ECOHIS questionnaire, which was developed by Pahel et al., and the latter demonstrated to have validity, internal consistency, and reliability 9. In addition, the validation and cross-cultural adaptation of this instrument for a population of Peru were established by Lopez et al. 11. Higher ECOHIS scores denote greater oral health impact or poorer OHRQoL. In the present study, the responses of the ECOHIS questionnaire were “never/hardly ever” (59.8%), “occasionally/often/very often” (39.6%), and “don't know” (0.6%); in comparison with the results shown by Pahel et al. of 90.2%, 8.5%, and 1.3% (9); and by Contaldo et al. of 77.7%, 20.8%, and 1.5%, respectively 13. Our findings showed a lower percentage of caregivers who answered "never/hardly ever" and "don't know", and a higher percentage who answered "occasionally/often/very often" compared to the other studies 9,13. This result was probably due to the different impact of dental caries in these Peruvian children or the different number of participants considered here.

The evaluated clinical parameters were the dmft index (ECC), malocclusions, and OHI-S. The prevalence of ECC (96.7%) in preschool children differed from those reported by the Peruvian Ministry of Health (MINSA) (59.1%) (14), probably, because the latter included both urban and rural populations, and here we assessed only rural children. Likewise, here, the ECC was found more frequently than in other studies: Rajab et al. with 76% of Jordanian preschool children 15, Contaldo et al. with 44.8 % of Italian preschool children 13, and compared to other Peruvian children with 76.5% 16. In the aforementioned studies, the dmft index was used. Furthermore, Pesaressi et al. employed the Caries Assessment Spectrum and Treatment (CAST) index in 3-year-old children from Lima, Peru, and a high prevalence was obtained (93.4%) 17. It was similar to our results.

Regarding the malocclusions, Lopez et al. obtained a lower prevalence (6.54%) than the result presented here (50.8%). The diversity of these findings may be due to the heterogeneity of the populations and the sample size of each study. Besides, in the latter study, they only assessed the presence or absence of malocclusion 16). In the present research, we additionally reported the types of malocclusions.

In this investigation, there was no association between the presence of malocclusion and OHRQoL. Similar results were reported by other studies 3,16. On the contrary, Firmino et al. reported that the anterior open bite was positively associated with OHRQoL but with an impact only on the family 18.

Considering oral hygiene, regular clinical level (OHI-S: 1.3 - 3.0) was the most common; contradicting the expected data of greater predisposition of patients with bad oral hygiene (OHI-S: 3.1 - 6), considering the high severity of ECC.

Some systematic reviews demonstrated that lower children’s age and gender (girls vs boys) were associated with a negative impact on OHRQoL among children 19,20. Nevertheless, in the present study, we did not obtain that association.

Overall, the expected results were that all variables (gender, age, dmft, presence of malocclusion, and OHI-S) were directly associated to OHRQoL in this population. The multifactorial analysis, which explained the variability of the ECOHIS score, showed a significant contribution only of the ECC, represented by the dmft index. Accordingly, various studies have shown that the impact on quality of life, using ECOHIS questionnaire, was associated with ECC 3,4,21-23. In addition, one systematic review showed that children with more dental caries were 1.66 times more likely to have poor OHRQoL (OR = 1.66, 95% CI = 1.43, 1.88) 19.

Regarding study limitations, the execution time limited the evaluation of clinical parameters such as the risk of caries, hypomineralization, dental trauma, and another type of tooth structural anomaly. Besides, the difficult geographical access and the lack of resources did not allow the evaluation of other health centers across the Region. Although the majority of the population here were Quechua speakers, most of them speak and/or understand Spanish. Caregivers who did not speak or understand the Spanish language were excluded from the study to avoid response bias.

In conclusion, there was an association between ECC and OHRQoL of the children and their families in an Andean Community in Paucarbamba, Peru. Furthermore, in the present study, there was not found any significant association between gender, age, malocclusion, OHI-S and the OHRQoL.

Considering that ECC impacted negatively on OHRQoL, better health promotion and prevention strategies are necessary, in order to achieve a real improvement in the quality of life of this vulnerable population. Reorganization of primary oral health care, expansion and qualification of specialized care, qualification of teachers and children caregivers regarding oral health education, and evaluate the feasibility of adding fluoride in the daily diet could be some of the possible solutions based on other national health policy 2,24,25

Finally, further studies should consider other factors such as geographic accessibility, poverty rates, educational level, and limited access to health information. Currently, there is no cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the ECOHIS questionnaire to the Quechua language and we strongly believe that future studies should center on that. In addition, more longitudinal clinical studies focused on vulnerable populations such as the one analyzed in this study are needed.

Acknowledgments:

To the team of the Paucarbamba Health Center for their collaboration in the development of this research work.

REFERENCES

1. Torres-Ramos G, Blanco-Victorio DJ, Anticona Huaynate C, Ricse-Cisneros R. Gastos de atención odontológica de niños con caries de infancia temprana, ocasionados a la familia y al Estado Peruano, representado por el Instituto Nacional de Salud del Niño. Rev Estomatológica Hered. 2015;25(1):36. [ Links ]

2. World Health Organization W. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2019. Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. Ending Childhood Dental Caries. 2019. 1-74 p. [ Links ]

3. Carminatti M, Lavra-Pinto B de, Franzon R, Rodrigues JA, Araújo FB de, Gomes E. Impacto da cárie dentária, maloclusão e hábitos orais na qualidade de vida relacionada à saúde oral em crianças préescolares. Audiol - Commun Res. 2017;22(0):1-8. [ Links ]

4. Antunes LAA, Ornellas G, Fraga RS, Antunes LS. Desfechos em saúde bucal: Associação de indicadores clínicos e sociodentais para avaliar cárie dentária em pré-escolares. Cienc e Saude Coletiva. 2018;23(2):491-500. [ Links ]

5. Mercado S, Mamani L, Mercado J, Tapia R. Malocclusion and Quality of Life in Adolescents. Kiru. 2018;15(2):94-8. [ Links ]

6. Vieira-Andrade RG, Siqueira MBL, Gomes GB, D'Avila S, Pordeus IA, Paiva SM, et al. Impact of traumatic dental injury on the quality of life of young children: A case-control study. Int Dent J. 2015;65(5):261-8. [ Links ]

7. Chaffee BW, Rodrigues PH, Kramer PF, Vítolo MR, Feldens CA. Oral health-related quality-of-life scores differ by socioeconomic status and caries experience. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2017;45(3):216-24. [ Links ]

8. INEI - Huancavelica. Resultados Definitivos. Censos económicos [Internet]. 2018;1060. Available from: https://www.inei.gob.pe/media/MenuRecursivo/publicaciones_digitales/Est/Lib1614/Links ]

9. Pahel BT, Rozier RG, Slade GD. Parental perceptions of children's oral health: The Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS). Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2007;5:1-10. [ Links ]

10. Hallett KB, O'Rourke PK. Pattern and severity of early childhood caries. Community Dent Oral Epidemiol. 2006;34(1):25-35. [ Links ]

11. López Ramos RP, García Rupaya CR, Villena- Sarmiento R, Bordoni NE. Cross cultural adaptation and validation of the Early Childhood Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS) in Peruvian preschoolers. Acta Odontol Latinoam. 2013;26(2):60-7. [ Links ]

12. GREENE JC, VERMILLION JR. the Simplified Oral Hygiene Index. J Am Dent Assoc. 1964;68(1):7-13. [ Links ]

13. Contaldo M, della Vella F, Raimondo E, Minervini G, Buljubasic M, Ogodescu A, et al. Early Childhood Oral Health Impact Scale (ECOHIS): Literature review and Italian validation. Int J Dent Hyg. 2020;18(4):396-402. [ Links ]

14. Ministerio de Salud (MINSA). Dirección General de Intervenciones Estratégicas de Salud Pública. Guía de práctica clínica para la prevención, diagnóstico y tratamiento de la caries dental en niñas y niños. Guía Técnica- MINSA [Internet]. 2017;1-41. Available from: https://cdn.www.gob.pe/uploads/document/file/322902/Guía_de_práctica_clínica_para_la_prevención__diagnóstico_y_tratamiento_de_la_caries_dental_en_niñas_y_niños__Guía_técnica20190621-17253-1sj2h61.pdfLinks ]

15. Rajab LD, Abdullah RB. Impact of Dental Caries on the Quality of Life of Preschool Children and Families in Amman, Jordan. Oral Heal Prev Dent. 2020;18(1):571-82. [ Links ]

16. López-Ramos RP, García-Rupaya CR. Calidad de vida y problemas bucales en preescolares de la provincia de Huaura, Lima. Rev Estomatológica Hered. 2014;23(3):139. [ Links ]

17. Pesaressi E, Villena RS, Frencken JE. Dental caries and oral health-related quality of life of 3-yearolds living in Lima, Peru. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2020;30(1):57-65. [ Links ]

18. Firmino RT, Gomes MC, Vieira-Andrade RG, Martins CC, Paiva SM, Granville-Garcia AF. Case-control study examining the impact of oral health problems on the quality of life of the families of preschoolers. Braz Oral Res. 2016;30(1):1-9. [ Links ]

19. Moghaddam LF, Vettore MV, Bayani A, Bayat A-H, Ahounbar E, Hemmat M, et al. The Association of Oral Health Status, demographic characteristics and socioeconomic determinants with Oral health-related quality of life among children: a systematic review and Meta-analysis. BMC Pediatr [Internet]. 2020 Dec 22;20(1):489. Available from: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/idh.12489 [ Links ]

20. Malele-Kolisa Y, Yengopal V, Igumbor J, Nqcobo CB, Ralephenya TRD. Systematic review of factors influencing oral health-related quality of life in children in Africa. African J Prim Heal Care Fam Med. 2019;11(1):1-12. [ Links ]

21. Corrêa-Faria P, Daher A, Freire M do CM, de Abreu MHNG, Bönecker M, Costa LR. Impact of untreated dental caries severity on the quality of life of preschool children and their families: a cross-sectional study. Qual Life Res [Internet]. 2018;27(12):3191-8. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11136-018-1966-5 [ Links ]

22. Lai SHF, Wong MLW, Wong HM, McGrath CPJ, Yiu CKY. Factors influencing the oral health-related quality of life among children with severe early childhood caries in Hong Kong. Int J Dent Hyg. 2019;17(4):350-8. [ Links ]

23. Mansoori S, Mehta A, Ansari MI. Factors associated with Oral Health Related Quality of Life of children with severe -Early Childhood Caries. J Oral Biol Craniofacial Res [Internet]. 2019;9(3):222- 5. Available from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jobcr.2019.05.005 [ Links ]

24. Brasil. Ministério da Saúde. Diretrizes da Política Nacional de Saúde Bucal. Ministério da Saúde [Internet]. 2004;16. Available from: http://189.28.128.100/dab/docs/publicacoes/geral/diretrizes_da_politica_nacional_de_saude_bucal.pdfLinks ]

25. Revision L. Policy on early childhood caries (ECC): Classifications, consequences, and preventive strategies. Pediatr Dent. 2018;40(6):60-2. [ Links ]

Study conducted at: Paucarbamba Health Center, Paucarbamba Micronetwork, Huancavelica, Peru.

Ethics approval: It had the authorization of the Ethics Committee of the Regional Hospital of Huancavelica.

Funding: No funds or grants were obtained from any source to conduct this research or write this manuscript.

Author contributions: All authors contributed to this manuscript.

Received: January 13, 2022; Accepted: October 04, 2022

Correspondence: Aldrin André Huamán Mendoza Rua Alberto Nascimento Junior 178, Jardim Bonfiglioli, São Paulo, Brazil, Zip code 05595040. aldrinhm@usp.br

Conflict of interest:

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License