SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.32 número5Heredabilidades para características de crecimiento a través de los años en la raza Blanco OrejinegroValoración del confort térmico de bovinos productores de carne en finalización intensiva en clima cálido índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

Compartilhar


Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú

versão impressa ISSN 1609-9117

Rev. investig. vet. Perú vol.32 no.5 Lima set./oct. 2021  Epub 27-Out-2021

http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v32i5.19248 

Primary Articles

Beak trimming and stocking densities for laying and performance traits and behavioral patterns in Japanese quails

Recorte de picos y densidades de población para los rasgos de puesta y rendimiento y patrones de comportamiento en codornices japonesas

Daniela Paz Aguiar1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9264-8511

Jean Kaique Valentim2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-8547-4149

Heder José D’Ávila Lima4 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8360-8227

Tatiana Marques Bittencourt1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2941-2039

Lorena Zullian Andreoti1 

Isabelli Dias Brito Pereira1 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4969-8791

Jonatan Mikhail Del Solar Velarde3 
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1626-5700

Joyce Zanella2 
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4515-3321

1 Department of Animal Science, Federal of Mato Grosso (UFMT), Cuiabá, Mato Grosso, Brazil

2 Universidade Federal da Grande Dourados, Department of Animal Science, MS, Dourados, Brazil

3 Universidade Federal de Sergipe-Campus São Cristovão-IF, Department of Animal Science, Brazil

4 Universidade Federal dos Vales do Jequitinhonha e Mucuri, Campus JK - MGT 367, Department of Animal Science, MG, Brazil

ABSTRACT

The present experiment was conducted to evaluate the productive performance, egg quality and behavioral patterns of Japanese quails (Coturnix coturnix japonica) with and without beak trimming submitted to two stocking densities. The study was conducted for 84 days. In total, 196 Japanese quails were randomly allocated to a 2 x 2 factorial scheme: submitted or not to beak trimming procedure and low (237.5 cm²/bird) and high stocking density (316.7 cm/bird) and its interaction. Eight replicates per treatment were used, totaling 32 experimental units. Collected data were submitted to analysis of variance and, means of parametric data were compared by Tukey test (p<0.05); otherwise nonparametric analysis of variance were applied for non-parametric data of quail behavior. Lower feed intake was observed in the high stocking density group (p<0.05) but did not affect other parameters (p>0.05). There was no interaction (p>0.05) between beak trimming and stocking density over performance and egg quality. Quails without beak trimming housed in higher density showed more aggressiveness and stress. Egg quality as well as performance parameters of Japanese quails are not affected by applying 316.7 cm2/bird density.

Key words: aggressiveness; coturniculture; egg laying performance; ethology; stocking density

RESUMEN

El presente experimento se realizó para evaluar el comportamiento productivo, la calidad del huevo y los patrones de comportamiento de las codornices japonesas (Coturnix coturnix japonica) con y sin corte del pico sometidas a dos densidades de población. El estudio se realizó durante 84 días. En total, 196 codornices japonesas fueron asignadas aleatoriamente a un esquema factorial 2 x 2: sometidas o no al procedimiento de corte del pico y baja (237.5 cm²/ave) y alta densidad de población (316.7 cm2/ave). Se utilizaron ocho réplicas por tratamiento, totalizando 32 unidades experimentales. Los datos recolectados se sometieron a análisis de varianza y, cuando hubo datos paramétricos, las medias se compararon mediante la prueba de Tukey (p<0.05); de lo contrario, para los datos no paramétricos del comportamiento de las codornices se aplicó un análisis de varianza no paramétrico. Se observó una menor ingesta de alimento en el grupo de alta densidad de población (p<0.05), pero no afectó otros parámetros (p>0.05). No hubo interacción significativa (p>0.05) entre el corte del pico y la densidad de población sobre el rendimiento y la calidad del huevo. Las codornices sin corte de pico alojadas en mayor densidad mostraron mayor agresividad y estrés. La calidad del huevo y los parámetros de rendimiento de las codornices japonesas no se vieron afectados por la aplicación de una densidad de 316.7 cm2/densidad de ave.

Palabras clave: agresividad; coturnicultura; rendimiento de puesta de huevos; etología; densidad de población

INTRODUCTION

Quail farming has shown a rapid development in recent years due several advantages such as fast growth, small areas to raise the birds, early sexual maturity, high egg production, low feed intake and high resistance to diseases. In order to reduce production costs, poultry industry increases birds stocking density as alternative to improve flock profitability (Lima et al., 2012).

In commercial poultry facilities, growing birds in cages on high density has become a common issue in management, aiming to reduce both stocking costs and equipment per bird. However, the area reduction per bird as well as feeders and drinkers, can cause stress problems due to bird’s competitive behavior (Janczak and Riber, 2015), which impact on feed consumption and, as consequence, in growth and productive performance traits.

Domestic quails still have many wild birds’ characteristics, and the confinement intensifies perverse behaviours such as aggressive pecking, leading to feather pecking and cannibalism, increasing mortality and affecting the flock viability (Pelicia et al., 2019). To prevent such losses, quail egg producers implement beak trimming management, which consists in cutting and cauterizing bird’s beak to avoid, besides some stress behaviours, feed waste (Gonçalvez et al., 2010).

Less aggressive techniques have been studied and upgraded in recent years (Pereira et al., 2015) to ensure better productive conditions (Janczak and Riber, 2015). The evaluation of the effect of beak trimming management associated with stocking density providing comfort for the animal is needed. Hence, the objective of this study was to evaluate performance, egg quality and behaviour of laying Japanese quails kept in different stocking densities associated with trimming management during lying phase.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The experiment was conducted at the Experimental Quail Farm of the Animal Science Department of Mato Grosso Federal University, in Santo Antônio do Leverger city during 84 days in three 28-day periods of measurements. The experimental protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee for the Use of Animals (CEUA) of the University, under protocol number 23108.187860/2016-11.

In total, 196 Japanese quails were randomly allocated to a 2 x 2 factorial scheme: submitted or not to beak trimming procedure and low (237.5 cm²/bird) and high stocking density (316.7 cm/bird) and its interaction. Eight replicates per treatment were used, totaling 32 experimental units. Beak trimming was performed at 30 weeks of age with hot blade beak trimmer, trimming 1/3 of the beak. The quails were housed in galvanized wire cages (experimental unit) measuring 50 x 38 x 21 cm (length x width x height). The quails received feed ad libitum, and water was offered three times a day (07:00, 13:00 and 17:00 h).

Lighting was provided for 16 hours per day during the whole experimental period. The light supply was controlled by a timer, which allows the lights to be turned on and off automatically during night, according to procedures used in commercial farms. Experimental diets (Table 1) were designed based on corn and soybean meal according nutritional requirements established by Rostagno et al. (2011).

Table 1 Calculated composition of expe- rimental diets 

*Vitamin-mineral supplement composition: Calcium (min) 80 g/kg, Calcium (max) 100 g/kg Phosphorus (min) 37 g/kg, Sodium (min) 20 g/kg, Methionine (min) 21.5 g/kg, Lysine (min) 18 g/kg, Vitamin A (min) 125000 IU/kg, Vitamin D3 (min) 25000 IU/kg, Vitamin E (min)312 IU/kg, Vitamin K3 (min) 20 mg/kg, Vitamin B1 (min) 20 mg/kg, Vitamin B2 (min) 62.5 mg/kg, Vitamin B6 (min) 37.5 mg/kg, Vitamin B 12 (min) 200 mcg/kg, Folic acid (min) 6.25 mg/kg, Pantothenic acid (min) 125 mg/kg, Biotin (min) 1.25 mg/kg, Choline (min) 1700 mg/kg, Niacin (min) 312 mg/kg, Copper (min) 125 mg/kg, Iron (min) 680 mg/kg, Iodine (min) 8.75 mg/kg, Manganese (min) 937 mg/kg, Selenium (min) 3.75 mg/kg, Zinc (min) 500 mg/kg, Fluorine (max) 370 mg/kg

Performance parameters

The traits assessed were egg production (%), marketable eggs (%), feed intake (g/ quail/day), feed conversion per egg mass (kg/ kg), feed conversion per dozen of eggs (kg/ eggs dozen), mortality and body weight gain (g) (WG). Egg production percentage (eggs/ bird/day) was obtained by the number of eggs produced, including broken, cracked, soft shells and shell-less eggs produced in each experimental period. Marketable eggs were total egg production minus whole broken, cracked, soft-shell and shell-less eggs.

Feed consumption was determined by the difference between the ration intake and leftovers, corrected by the number of dead birds at the end of each 28-day period. Feed conversion per egg mass was calculated as FCm = C/EW and feed conversion per eggs dozen was calculated as FCdz = C/DZ where C = consumption, DZ: dozen of eggs produced, and EW: Egg weight. Balances with capacity of 15 kg (Toledo 9094) were used to weigh birds, feed and leftovers.

Viability was calculated by the total number of alive birds minus total number of dead birds expressed in percentage, and body weight gain was the difference of body weight at the beginning and end of the experimental and expressed in g/bird/day.

Egg quality

At the end of the last three days of each experimental period, three eggs per repetition were collected per day (3 eggs x 3 days x 3 periods x 4 treatments x 8 replicates in each) totalling 864 eggs for quality analysis (broken, cracked, soft shells and shell-less eggs were excluded). Analyses for weight average, Haugh unit, specific gravity, albumen height and yolk, shell and albumen weight and percentages were performed.

The specific gravity was determined by immersing the eggs in saline solution, with density ranging from 1.070 to 1.095 g/cm³ (0.005 g/cm³ I.C.), using a calibrated densimeter (OM-5565, Incoterm). Albumen height was performed using a digital calliper (Starret 150 mm). The Haugh (Hu) unit was obtained using the Brant et al. (1951) formula:

where: H = height of the dense albumen (mm); G = gravitational constant with value of 32; W = egg weight (g).

The egg yolk was separated from albumen and weighted. Shell weight was registered after being washed and exposed to natural drying for 72 hours. Albumen weight was obtained by the difference between whole egg weight and yolk and shell weights.

Behaviour

The ethogram was designed through observations along the experimental period (Table 2). After the first 28-day experimental period where birds were observed from 06:00 to 18:00 h (12 h), twice completing 24 hours of observation with 10-minute intervals. The instantaneous focal sampling method was used, where an animal from each experimental repetition is pre-identified and immediately evaluated, in the proposed period, every 10 minutes. Behavioural data were collected from 432 behavioural observations (10 minutes each hour for 24 hours = 144 behavioural observations, and this was done in three periods) into each treatment and registered as (1) when the behaviour occurred and (0) when the current evaluated behaviour was not observed in instantaneous focal sampling, looking for birds with leisure, comfort, interaction with feathers, eating, drinking, panting, interaction with cage and aggressiveness. The number of quails expressing each behaviour was expressed in frequency of occurrence (%). Only one person evaluated the behaviour of birds to avoid subjective variations.

Table 2 Japanese quail’s ethogram related to beak trimming process, combined with different stocking densities in laying phase 

Performance and egg quality data were submitted to parametric analysis of variance with generalized linear model, and the means were compared by Tukey test at probability of 5%, when p<0.05, using Sisvar Program. For ethogram analysis, behavioural data were submitted for non-parametric analysis of variance in SAS® (v. 9.3) program, using a generalized hierarchical linear mixed model with the procedure GLIMMIX, considering response variable with binary distribution, where 1 indicated behaviour occurrence and 0 its absence in each quail.

The random effect considered the quail inside each treatment. Afterwards, if p<0.05 for fixed effects in the behavioural analysis, last square means were applied for post-hoc comparison between treatment percentages into each studied behaviour.

RESULTS

Feed consumption was affected by birds density (p<0.05; Table 3). Besides, there was no significant effect (p>0.05) of different densities, beak trimming and their interaction on quality eggs traits (Tables 3 and 4).

Table 3 Performance of Japanese quails in two cage densities and submitted or not to beak trimming procedure, during laying stage 

a,b,c Means followed by the same letter in a column do not differ significantly by Tukey test (p<0.05) LDBT= Low density and submitted to beak trimming; LDNBT= Low density and not submitted to beak trimming; HDBT= High density and submitted to beak trimming; HDNBT= High density and not submitted to beak trimming; CV: Coefficient of variation

C: Feed consumption (g/day); FCm: Feed conversion per mass (kg/kg); FCdz: Feed conversion per dozen eggs (g/dozen eggs); %Prod: Percentage of egg produced (%); ME: Marketable eggs (n); Via: Viability (%); WG: weight gain (g/day); * Descriptive analysis

Table 4 Japanese quails egg quality traits in two stocking densities and submitted or not 

LDBT= Low density and submitted to beak trimming; LDNBT= Low density and not submitted to beak trimming; HDBT= High density and submitted to beak trimming; HDNBT= High density and not submitted to beak trimming. Yolk (%); CV: Coefficient of variation

Alb (%): Albumen percentage; Gravity: Specific gravity (g/cm³); EggW: Egg weight (g); YW: yolk weight (g); SW: Shell weight (g). AW: Albumen weight (g)

Birds housed in higher density had less leisure, comfort, interaction with feathers, and eating time (p<0.05) when compared to quails housed in a lower density. Also, laying quails housed in high density showed higher interaction with cage and aggressiveness. Drinking and panting did not show differences between treatments (Table 4).

DISCUSSION

Quails housed in high density showed lower feed intake, probably due to the higher number of animals per area, leading to greater competition for space in the feeders (Castilho et al., 2015); however, despite lower feed consumption in the high-density treatments, there was no significant difference in egg production, feed conversion by mass and dozens of eggs produced. These corroborate results found by Soares et al. (2018) working with various densities of Japanese quails with lower consumption in cages with small area per animal in the feeder.

Research about stocking density and debeaking effects in cages showed improvement in egg production and lower decreased when increasing available area per bird (Oka et al., 2017). In the present study, because higher and lower densities did not affect (p>0.05) most performance parameters, egg quail production with density up to 237.5 cm²/bird could be recommended.

Table 5 Japanese quail behaviour (%) housed in different densities and whether submitted or not to beak trimming procedure, during laying stage (n=400 observations) 

a,b,c Means followed by the same letter in a row do not differ significantly by Tukey test (p<0.05). LDBT= Low density and submitted to beak trimming; LDNBT= Low density and not submitted to beak trimming; HDBT= High density and submitted to beak trimming; HDNBT= High density and not submitted to beak trimming

High densities might be practiced with some precautions because decreasing feeder, drinker and movement areas decrease feed intake and feed conversion index (Janczak & Riber, 2015; Cardoso et al., 2017), but in addition, muscle and skeletal development can be negatively affected, as well as osteoporosis incidence and higher mortality might occur (Rios et al., 2009). On this respect, El-Tarabany (2015) recommend that during lying phase, quails should be housed in cages with an area up to 107.64 cm2/bird to achieve optimal performance. In the present research, the areas used were much larger (237.5 and 316.7 cm2/bird).

Beak trimming showed no effects (p<0.05) on performance. Carruthers et al. (2012) argued that beak trimming management is common for rearing laying hens and quails preventing cannibalism, mortality, injuries associated with feather pecking among birds, as well as decline the productive performance with less feed waste (greater feed conversion).

Pizzolante et al. (2006) reported that there was no influence of age on trimming beaks, and it can be performed with either at 14 or 21 days. Vieira Filho et al. (2016) found better results for feed intake, egg weight and mass in six weeks old laying hens submitted to beak trimming procedure when compared to those at ten weeks of age. Araújo et al. (2005) did not observe effect of beak trimming in chickens at days 10, 64 and 84 of age over productive parameters in commercial laying hens. Struthers et al. (2019) reported that beak trimming procedure affects young birds being less traumatic because their better recovery capacity compared to older birds. However, the same authors argue some laborious issues manipulating young birds, due the reduced beak size. In the present study, quails had their beak trimmed at week 30 of age, in production stage, and this did not interfere on animal performance.

Egg quality was not affected by the variables under study, as appears in literature recommendations, such as egg weight around 9.05 g, percentage of albumen, yolk and shell around 61, 30 and 9%, respectively (Lima et al., 2012), however, it is necessary to analyse other aspects such as animal behaviour and how much these processes can influence throughout quail’s production cycle. Behavioural changes among animals are observed in response to changes of their physiological parameters, and these changes, can influence their welfare. Thus, behaviour observations are useful to find improvements for animal welfare (Gonçalves et al., 2017).

Quails housed in higher density environments had longer panting time and greater aggressiveness due the stress. Gonçalves et al. (2017) reports that birds gasping is one of the most effective signal of heat loss and, if the relative humidity is appropriate, most birds will be able to dissipate their metabolic heat through this mechanism.

Laganá et al. (2011) reported that the laying rate increases when birds are submitted to beak trimming due to lower mortality and lower pecking egg index because of less aggressive behaviour. In the present study, even with the frequency of more aggressive behaviour and lower feed consumption for birds not submitted to beak trimming and at higher densities, there was no interference in laying quail’s total performance.

REFERENCES

1. Araújo LF, Café MB, Leandro NSM, Junqueira OM, Araújo CSDS, Cunha MIRD, Silva CCD. 2005. Desempenho de poedeiras comerciais submetidas ou não a diferentes métodos de debicagem. Ciência Rural 35: 169-173. doi: 10.1590/S0103-84782005000100027 [ Links ]

2. Brant AW. 1951. Recommended standards for scoring and measuring opened egg quality. Food Tech 5: 356-367. [ Links ]

3. Cardoso SD, Faraco CB, de Sousa L, Pereira GDG. 2017. History and evolution of the European legislation on welfare and protection of companion animals. J Vet Behav 19: 64-68. doi: 10.1016/j.jveb.2017.01.006 [ Links ]

4. Carruthers C, Gabrush T, Schwean- Lardner K, Knezacek TD, Classen HL, Bennett C. 2012. On-farm survey of beak characteristics in White Leghorns as a result of hot blade trimming or infrared beak treatment. J Appl Poultry Res 21: 645-650. doi: 10.3382/JAPR.2011-00433 [ Links ]

5. Castilho VAR, Garcia RG, Lima NDS, Nunes KC, Caldara FR, Nääs IA, Barreto B, Jacob FG. 2015. Bem-estar de galinhas poedeiras em diferentes densidades de alojamento. Rev Bra Engen Biossist 9: 122-131. doi: 10.18011/bioeng2015v9n2p122-131 [ Links ]

6. El-Tarabany MS. 2016. Impact of temperature-humidity index on egglaying characteristics and related stress and immunity parameters of Japanese quails. Int J Biometeorol 60: 957-964. doi: 10.1007/s00484-015-1088-5 [ Links ]

7. Gonçalves FM, Gentilini FP, Anciuti MA, Lopes DCN, Peters MDP, Rutz F, Cardellino RA, et al. 2010. Administração de antibiótico em poedeiras semipesadas durante o processo de debicagem. Arch Zootec 59: 295-298. [ Links ]

8. Gonçalves SA, Ferreira RA, Pereira IG, de Oliveira CC, Amaral PIS, Garbossa CAP, da Silva Fonseca L. 2017. Behavioral and physiological responses of different genetic lines of free-range broiler raised on a semiintensive system. J Anim Behav Biometereol 5: 112-117. doi: 10.31893/2318-1265jabb.v5n4p112-117 [ Links ]

9. Janczak AM, Riber AB. 2015. Review of rearing-related factors affecting the welfare of laying hens. Poult Sci 94: 1454-1469. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev123 [ Links ]

10. Laganá C, Pizzolante CC, Togashi CK, Kakimoto SK, Saldanha ESPB, Alvares V. 2011. Influência de métodos de debicagem e do tipo de bebedouro no desempenho e na qualidade dos ovos de codornas japonesas. Rev Bras Zootec 40: 1217-1221. [ Links ]

11. Lima HJDA, Barreto SLT, Valeriano MH, Vieira DVG, Costa SL. 2012. Densidade inicial de alojamento de codornas japonesas na fase de postura. Gl Sci Technol 5: 186-193. [ Links ]

12. Oka CH, Bueno LGDF, Souza SRL, Balan JAO, Silva KM, Polycarpo GV, Iwayama LH. 2017. Performance of commercial laying hen submitted to different debeaking methods. Braz J Poultry Sci 19: 717-723. [ Links ]

13. Pelicia K, Garcia EA, Santos TA, Santos GC, Vieira Filho JA, Silva AP, Moreira J, et al. 2019. Beak trimming by infrared radiation of layers. Braz J Poultry Sci 21. doi: 10.1590/1806-9061-2017-0618 [ Links ]

14. Pereira DF, dos Santos Batista E, Sanches FT, Gabriel Filho LRA, de Freitas Bueno LG. 2015. Diferenças comportamentais de poedeiras em dife- rentes ambientes térmicos. Energia na Agric 30: 33-40. doi: 10.17224/EnergAgric.2015v30n1p33-40 [ Links ]

15. Pizzolante CC, Garcia EA, Saldanha EAPB, Laganá C, Batista L, Deodato A, Souza ALP. 2006. Beak-trimming methods and their effect on the performance of Japanese quail pullets (Coturnix japonica). Braz J Poultry Sci 8: 213-216. doi: 10.1590/S1516-635X2007000100003 [ Links ]

16. Rios RL, Bertechini AG, Carvalho JCC, Castro SF, Costa VA. 2009. Effect of cage density on the performance of 25-to 84-week-old laying hens. Braz J Poultry Sc 11: 257-262. doi: 10.1590/S1516-635X2009000400007 [ Links ]

17. Rostagno HS, Albino LFT, Donzele JL, Gomes PC, Oliveira RD, Lopes DC, et al. 2011. Tabelas brasileiras para aves e suínos. Composição de alimentos e exigências nutricionais. 2nd ed. Brasil: Univ. Federal de Vicosa. 186 p. [ Links ]

18. Soares DF, Pizzolante CC, Duarte K, Moraes JED, Budiño FE, Soares W, Kakimoto SK. 2018. Welfare indicators for laying Japanese quails caged at different densities. Anais Acad Bras Ciências 90: 3791-3797. doi: 10.1590/0001-3765201820180276 [ Links ]

19. Struthers S, Classen HL, Gomis S, Schwean-Lardner K. 2019. The effect of beak tissue sloughing and posttreatment beak shape on the productivity of infrared beak-treated layer pullets and hens. Poultry Sci 30: 3637-3646. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez230 [ Links ]

20. Vieira Filho JA, Garcia EA, Oba E, dos Santos TA, Silva AP, de Britto Molino A, et al.9 2016. Índice produtivo e qualidade de ovos de galinhas poedeiras submetidas a diferentes métodos de debicagem. Pes Agropec Bras 51: 759-765. doi: 10.1590/S0100-204X2016000600008 [ Links ]

Acknowledgements

0This study was financed in part by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CAPES) Finance Code 001.

Financing

Partially funded by the Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - Brasil (CA- PES) Finance Code 001

CORRESPONDENCE: EMAIL: kaique.tim@hotmail.com

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License