SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.41 issue4FINDRISC modified for Cuba as a tool for the detection of prediabetes and undiagnosed diabetes in cuban populationRapid spread of the emerging cosmopolitan genotype of dengue virus serotype 2, and expansion of dengue virus serotype 1 genotype V in Peru author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista Peruana de Medicina Experimental y Salud Publica

Print version ISSN 1726-4634

Rev. perú. med. exp. salud publica vol.41 no.4 Lima Oct./Dec. 2024  Epub Nov 26, 2024

http://dx.doi.org/10.17843/rpmesp.2024.414.13858 

Original article

Factors associated with the use of psychotropic drugs by students at a brazilian public university

Telma Regina Fares Gianjacomo1 

Pharmacist

master’s degree in Public Health

, conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, research, data curation, writing - original draft
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8931-3390

Camilo Molino Guidoni2 

Pharmacist

doctor in Pharmaceutical Sciences

, conceptualization, methodology, writing - review and editing, project management
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5844-143X

Renne Rodrigues3 

Pharmacist

doctor in Public Health

, methodology, validation, research, data curation, writing - review and editing
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1390-5901

Selma Maffei de Andrade1 

Nurse

doctor in Public Health

, conceptualization, methodology, writing - review and editing, project management
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6843-8330

Jéssica Vertuan Rufino1 

Pharmacist

doctor in Public Health

, methodology, research, data curation, writing - review and editing
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3039-1797

Edmarlon Girotto2 

Pharmacist

doctor in Public Health

, conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, writing - original draft, supervision
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9345-3348

1 Graduate Program in Public Health, State University of Londrina (UEL), Londrina-PR, Brazil.

2 Department of Pharmaceutical Sciences, State University of Londrina (UEL), Londrina-PR, Brazil.

3 Federal University of the Southern Border (UFFS), Chapecó Campus, Chapecó-SC, Brazil.

ABSTRACT

Objective.

To analyze the consumption of psychotropic drugs and their associated factors in university students, stratified by sex.

Materials and methods.

We conducted a cross-sectional study with undergraduate students of a public university in Brazil. The instrument was an online self-administered questionnaire. The outcome variable was the use of psychotropic drugs, based on the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system, and the exposure variables were socio-demographic, academic and health-related. The association between the exposure variables and the outcome was verified by calculating prevalence ratios and their 95% confidence intervals.

Results.

We found that 12.2% (n=396) of the 3238 participants used psychotropic drugs; most were women (78.3%). The prevalence of psychotropic drug use was higher among students with access to health insurance, diagnosis of depression and diagnosis of anxiety. It was also higher in the group of women who reported using illicit drugs in the last three months and in the group of men who reported being dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with their academic performance. We detected low frequency of psychotropic drug use among women who consume alcohol on a weekly basis.

Conclusions.

Our results show a higher frequency of psychotropic medication use in females, as well as in students with access to health insurance, diagnosis of depression and diagnosis of anxiety, regardless of sex.

Keywords: Medications; Psychotropic Drugs; Student Health; University; Brazil

KEY MESSAGES

Motivation for the study. College students are exposed to numerous stressful events, which predispose them to problems such as depression and anxiety, leading to increased consumption of psychotropic medications.

Main findings. The use of psychotropic medications was reported by 12.0% of students, being higher among those with access to health insurance and diagnosed with depression and anxiety, as well as among those who reported using illicit drugs and who were dissatisfied with their academic performance. We found lower consumption of psychotropic drugs among women who consumed alcoholic beverages.

Implications. The evidence from this study may support actions to promote not only rational drug use campaigns, but also measures to minimize and help students with the stress of academic life.

Keywords: Medications; Psychotropic Drugs; Student Health; University; Brazil

INTRODUCTION

Entering higher education is a transition that can cause stress, emotional imbalance, adaptation difficulties and a great impact on personal and academic life 1. Factors inherent to the academic process are pointed out as possible causes of health problems. During college, some students become vulnerable to the appearance of affective disorders, such as depression and anxiety 2. A systematic review with meta-analysis found that stress, low frequency of recreational activities, dissatisfaction with academic performance, and lack of emotional support in the academic environment are risk factors for mental health problems in undergraduate university students 3.

Recent research on the mental health of Chilean university students identified a significant proportion of students with mental health problems, estimating that 20-30% of this group is affected by anxiety, depression and stress. In addition, a notable gender disparity was reported, with a higher prevalence of depressive symptoms in women with 23.2%, compared to 13.4% in men 4. In this context, the mental health of college students has been a topic of interest in the literature 5. Studies reveal a high combined prevalence of depression and anxiety, among other mental health problems, in this population 6. Consequently, the use of psychotropic drugs among university students has increased, especially antidepressants, anxiolytics and psychostimulants, being also more frequent in women 7-9.

A study conducted among university students found a high prevalence of mental health disorders, with 30.4% of participants reporting the use of psychotropic medications, mainly for the treatment of anxiety (30%) and depression (22.8%). The study revealed that the use of psychotropic medications increases as students progress through their academic programs, particularly in the later years when academic pressure intensifies. In contrast, regular participation in physical activities and adherence to adequate sleep patterns were identified as protective factors against mental health disorders, underscoring the need for greater attention to the mental well-being of this demographic 10.

To better understand psychotropic medication use among students, it is necessary to consider the pressure of the academic environment, which contributes to stress and mental health impairment. In addition, it is essential to understand how individual factors, such as family background and resilience, interact with these stressors. It is also pertinent to analyze the relationship between psychotropic use and self-care behavior. A multidimensional approach that considers social and academic factors may help to develop more effective interventions to promote mental health among students 11,12.

However, solid research on this topic is scarce. Therefore, studies are needed to characterize the use of psychotropic drugs among university students and to correlate variables that help identify the groups most vulnerable to these drugs. In addition, some works have shown that the use of psychoactive drugs is higher in women, so it is important to evaluate the difference in the associated factors between male and female students 13,14. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate the use of psychotropic drugs in students of a public university in Paraná, Brazil, and to identify associated sociodemographic, academic and health factors, stratified by sex.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Study design, location, and population

This is a cross-sectional study, guided by the Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) guidelines 15, analyzing data from the project “GraduaUEL - Analysis of Health and Life Habits of Undergraduate Students at UEL”. The overall objective of GraduaUEL was to analyze aspects related to health, exposure to violence and life habits of undergraduate students. The study population is composed of students at the State University of Londrina (UEL), in Paraná, Brazil, over 18 years of age, regularly enrolled in the first semester of 2019 in one of the 51 undergraduate courses. At the time of the survey, 12,536 students were eligible to participate 16.

Pre-test and pilot study

The questionnaire prepared for this research was made available on the Google Forms® platform for students to complete. The questionnaire was divided into several thematic sections, covering general and academic characterization, life habits and sleep quality, medication use, experiences of violence, social support and resilience, mental health, and body satisfaction. To ensure its validity for application within the study population, the instrument was evaluated by experts in epidemiological research. A pre-test was conducted with 25 undergraduate students in the health area at a private institution in the city of Londrina, Brazil, to evaluate the clarity of the questions. In addition, a pilot study was conducted with 25 students from a federal institute of higher education in the region of Londrina, Paraná. This stage was conducted to verify the logistical conditions for data collection, such as response time and platform performance during simultaneous access.

Data collection

Data were collected between April and June 2019. During this period, the researchers promoted the study at UEL, in all undergraduate classes, providing the link to access the questionnaire. The research was also a widely promoted in social networks, local press and mass emails sent to the university community. The questionnaire was answered anonymously, and the option to complete the enrollment number was optional for future individual feedback. Participants were instructed to answer the questionnaire only once. In addition, before students consented to participate in the study, they were asked, on the initial page of the electronic questionnaire, whether they were enrolled in an undergraduate program. If the answer was “no,” the questionnaire options were not displayed. In cases where duplicate or triplicate responses were identified, only the first response was considered. When the enrollment number indicated that the students were graduate students, they were excluded from the study.

Outcome variable

The use of psychotropic medications was the outcome variable, and it was assessed by the following question: “Do you take any medication for continuous use?” If the answer was affirmative, the name of the medication, the person responsible for the prescription, and the period of use were requested. After data collection, the drug names were standardized to their generic name and categorized according to the World Health Organization’s Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical (ATC) classification system, considering the following subgroups as psychotropics: N05A (antipsychotics), N05B (anxiolytics), N05C (hypnotics and sedatives), N06A (antidepressants), N06B (psychostimulants and ADHD agents and nootropics) and N06D (antidementia drugs) 17. The drugs used were double-checked by different researchers and then analyzed with Epi Info software, version 3.5.1. In case of discrepancies, a third researcher made the necessary corrections.

Exposure variables

Sociodemographic, academic, lifestyle and health-related variables were used as exposure variables. The assessed sociodemographic variables were: age (years), marital status (with partner-married or in stable union; without partner-single, divorced or widowed), self-reported skin color (white; non-white-yellow, multiracial, black or indigenous) and access to health insurance (yes; no). The analyzed academic variables were: study shift (morning/afternoon; evening; night; full-time/LDE-Long-distance education), year of study (1st year; 2nd or 3rd year; 4th, 5th or 6th year) and satisfaction with the course, and academic performance (very satisfied/satisfied; neither satisfied nor dissatisfied; dissatisfied/very dissatisfied). Finally, the variables related to lifestyle and health habits were: self-reported physical and mental health status (very good/good; fair; poor/very poor), self-reported sleep quality (very good/good; poor/very poor), self-reported medical diagnosis of depression and anxiety (yes; no), alcohol consumption (never/once or twice/occasionally; weekly; daily or almost daily) and use of illicit substances in the last three months (yes; no or prefer not to answer). The selection of variables to be assessed as associated with psychotropic medication use was based on the literature, especially studies related to mental disorders 6,18, which serve as indicators for the use of psychotropic substances. The exception was academic variables, which were selected based on variables available in the research.

Statistical analysis

The data were analyzed using the Statistical Package for the Social Sciences (SPSS® version 19.0). In order to characterize the study population, a descriptive analysis was performed, presenting the frequencies of quantitative variables categorized by sex (male and female) 19. Mean age and standard deviation were also calculated for each sex independently. Poisson regression with robust variance was used to analyze the association between outcome and exposure variables, and to obtain prevalence ratios (PR) as a measure of association and 95% confidence intervals (95%CI). Crude (or bivariate) and adjusted analyses were performed, including all independent variables. All independent variables were included in the adjusted model, considering that, except for the academic variables, all are supported by the literature as being associated with mental disorders or psychotropic medication use. The significance level was 5% (p-value<0.05).

Ethical considerations

All research subjects agreed to participate in the study, as it was only possible to answer the questionnaire if they accepted the informed consent form. This study was approved by the Human Research Ethics Committee (CEP) of the UEL (CAAE no. 04456818.0.0000.5231).

RESULTS

A total of 3238 students were included according to the selection procedure shown in Figure 1. The majority of students participating in the study were self-reported white and unmarried. Males showed higher percentages of self-reported good physical health status, sleep quality, and mental health compared to females (Table 1).

Figure 1 Flow chart of the GraduaUEL study sample, 2019. 

Table 1 Description of academic variables, life habits and health conditions of university students, according to sex. GraduaUEL, 2019. 

Independent variables a Women Men
Total n=2221 Use of psychotropic drugs n=310 (78.3%) Total n=1017 Use of psychotropic drugs n=86 (21.7%)
n (%) n (%) n (%) n (%)
Age (mean ± standard deviation) 21.76 ± 4.37 22.55 ± 4.90 22.28 ± 4.67 22.17 ± 3.74
Marital status (n=3238)
With partner 1107 (49.8) 158 (14.2) 413 (40.6) 51 (8.4)
Without partner 1114 (50.2) 152 (13.7) 604 (59.4) 35 (8.5)
Self-reported skin color (n=3236)
White 1565 (70.5) 228 (14.6) 693 (68.1) 59 (8.5)
Non-white 654 (29.5) 82 (12.5) 324 (31.9) 27 (8.3)
Access to health insurance (n=3235)
No 1194 (53.8) 138 (11.6) 591 (58.2) 41 (6.9)
Yes 1025 (46.2) 171 (16.7) 425 (41.8) 45 (10.6)
Study time (n=3236)
Morning/afternoon 642 (28.9) 82 (12.8) 235 (23.1) 17 (7.2)
Night 582 (26.2) 83 (14.3) 337 (33.1) 21 (6.2)
Full-time/LDE (long-distance education) 995 (44.9) 145 (14.6) 445 (43.8) 48 (10.8)
Year of study (n=3226)
1st year 477 (21.5) 56 (11.7) 243 (24.0) 14 (5.8)
2nd or 3rd year 1004 (45.4) 133 (12.2) 473 (46.8) 46 (9.7)
4th, 5th or 6th year 733 (33.1) 129 (16.4) 296 (29.2) 26 (8.8)
Satisfaction with the course (n=3235)
Very satisfied/satisfied 1598 (72.0) 222 (13.9) 760 (74.8) 55 (7.2)
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 496 (22.4) 60 (12.1) 175 (17.2) 18 (10.3)
Dissatisfied/very dissatisfied 125 (5.6) 28 (22.4) 81 (8.0) 13 (16.0)
Satisfaction with academic performance (n=3236)
Very satisfied/satisfied 916 (41.2) 104 (11.4) 456 (44.9) 25 (5.5)
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 756 (34.1) 106 (14.0) 324 (31.9) 33 (10.2)
Dissatisfied/very dissatisfied 548 (24.7) 110 (18.2) 236 (23.2) 28 (11.9)
Self-reported physical health status (n=3238)
Very good/good 785 (35.3) 78 (9.9) 486 (47.8) 31 (6.4)
Regular 952 (42.9) 134 (14.1) 379 (37.3) 30 (7.9)
Bad/very bad 484 (21.8) 98 (20.2) 152 (14.9) 25 (16.4)
Self-reported mental health status (n=3238)
Very good/good 715 (32.2) 47 (6.6) 475 (46.7) 20 (4.2)
Regular 848 (38.2) 101 (11.9) 325 (32.0) 26 (8.0)
Bad/very bad 658 (29.6) 162 (24.9) 217 (21.3) 40 (18.4)
Self-reported sleep quality (n=3238)
Very good/good 1171 (52.7) 131 (11.2) 581 (57.1) 42 (7.2)
Bad/very bad 1050 (47.3) 179 (17.0) 436 (42.9) 44 (10.1)
Medical diagnosis of depression (n=3236)
No 1919 (86.5) 123 (6.4) 935 (91.9) 41 (4.4)
Yes 300 (13.5) 187 (62.3) 82 (8.1) 45 (54.9)
Medical diagnosis of anxiety (n=3236)
No 1444 (65.0) 50 (3.5) 799 (78.6) 19 (2.4)
Yes 777 (35.0) 260 (33.5) 218 (21.4) 67 (30.7)
Alcohol consumption in the last three months (n=3238)
Never/once or twice/monthly 1527 (68.8) 219 (14.3) 619 (60.9) 58 (9.4)
Weekly 647 (29.1) 81 (12.5) 362 (35.6) 21 (5.8)
Daily or almost daily 47 (2.1) 10 (21.3) 36 (3.5) 7 (19.4)
Illicit drug use in the last three months (n=3238)
No/prefer not to answer 1698 (76.5) 217 (12.8) 695 (68.3) 56 (8.1)
Yes 523 (23.5) 93 (17.8) 322 (31.7) 30 (9.3)

a The total number of respondents for some variables was different from the total number of participants (n=3238) due to missing answers to some questions.

Use of at least one psychotropic medication was reported by 12.2% (n=396), 78.3% in women (n=310) and 21.7 in men (n=86). When stratified by sex, 14.0% (310/2221) of women and 8.5% (86/1017) of men used a psychotropic medication. A total of 518 psychotropic medications were identified (average 1.31 per user), with a higher prevalence of antidepressant use, and among antidepressants, selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) were the most frequent (46.5%). According to generic name, the mostly used drugs were sertraline hydrochloride (15.4%), escitalopram oxalate (14.5%) and fluoxetine hydrochloride (9.7%) (Table 2).

Table 2 Distribution of psychotropic medications used by undergraduate students, according to generic name, GraduaUEL, 2019 (n=518). 

Generic name n %
Sertraline hydrochloride 80 15.4
Escitalopram oxalate 75 14.5
Fluoxetine hydrochloride 50 9.7
Bupropion 29 5.6
Venlafaxine Hydrochloride 27 5.2
Desvenlafaxine Succinate 26 5.0
Zolpidem hemitartrate 19 3.7
Paroxetine hydrochloride 18 3.5
Trazodone hydrochloride 18 3.5
Clonazepam 16 3.1
Methylphenidate Hydrochloride 16 3.1
Duloxetine Hydrochloride 11 2.1
Quetiapine hemifumarate 11 2.1
Alprazolam 8 1.5
Amitriptyline Hydrochloride 8 1.5
Fluvoxamine 8 1.5
Risperidone 8 1.5
Melatonin 7 1.4
Passiflora incarnata 7 1.4
Citalopram bromide 6 1.2
Hydroxyzine hydrochloride 5 1.0
Vortioxetine 5 1.0

In the adjusted analysis, for the group of women, we found a statistically significant association between the higher frequency of use of psychotropic medications, access to health insurance (PR=1.49; 95%CI: 1.25-1.78), diagnosis of depression (PR=4.60; 95%CI: 3.55-5.95), diagnosis of anxiety (PR=4.58; 95%CI: 3.23-6.49) and use of illicit drugs in the last three months (PR=1.25; 95%CI: 1.02-1.53). In contrast, psychotropic medication use was less frequent in those women who consumed alcohol on a weekly basis (PR=0.74; 95%CI: 0.60-0.90) (Table 3).

Table 3 Association between independent variables and psychotropic drug use (crude and adjusted analysis) among university students, according to sex. GraduaUEL, 2019. 

Independent variables Use of psychotropic drugs
Women Men
Crude analysis PR (95%CI) Adjusted analysis a PR (95%CI) Crude analysis PR (95%CI) Adjusted analysis a PR (95%CI)
Age, β (95%CI) 0.033 (1.02-1.05) 0.008 (0.99-1.03) -0.004 (0.96-1.03) -0.035 (0.92-1.02)
Marital status
With partner 1 1 1 1
Without partner 0.98 (0.79-1.20) 1.01 (0.84-1.21) 1.01 (0.67-1.52) 1.48 (0.99-2.24)
Self-reported skin color
Non-white 1 1 1 1
White 1.16 (0.92-1.48) 1.14 (0.93-1.39) 1.02 (0.66-1.58) 1.06 (0.74-1.53)
Access to health insurance
No 1 1 1 1
Yes 1.45 (1.17-1.78) 1.49 (1.25-1.78) 1.53 (1.02-2.29) 1.65 (1.15-2.36)
Study time
Morning/afternoon 1 1 1 1
Night 1.11 (0.83-1.48) 0.97 (0.76- 1.23) 0.87 (0.47-1.62) 0.80 (0.45- 1.41)
Full-time/LDE (long-distance education) 1.14 (0.89-1.47) 1.18 (0.95-1.47) 1.49 (0.88-2.54) 1.42 (0.84-2.41)
Year of study
1st year 1 1 1 1
2nd or 3rd year 1.12 (0.84-1.50) 0.97 (0.76-1.23) 1.69 (0.95-3.02) 1.65 (0.94-2.89)
4th, 5th or 6th year 1.39 (1.03-1.87) 1.18 (0.95-1.47) 1.53 (0.81-2.86) 1.60 (0.88-2.91)
Satisfaction with the course
Very satisfied/satisfied 1 1 1 1
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 0.86 (0.66-1.12) 0.77 (0.61-1) 1.41 (0.85-2.35) 1.11 (0.71-1.73)
Dissatisfied/very dissatisfied 1.62 (1.14-2.30) 0.81 (0.60-1.07) 2.23 (1.28-3.91) 1.28 (0.72-2.28)
Satisfaction with academic performance
Very satisfied/satisfied 1 1 1 1
Neither satisfied nor dissatisfied 1.24 (0.96-1.60) 0.92 (0.74-1.14) 1.86 (1.13-3.06) 1.38 (0.87-2.19)
Dissatisfied/very dissatisfied 1.62 (1.26-2.09) 1.05 (0.83-1.33) 2.15 (1.28-3.60) 1.77 (1.09-2.87)
Self-reported physical health status
Very good/good 1 1 1 1
Regular 1.41 (1.09-1.84) 1.08 (0.85-1.36) 1.23 (0.76-1.99) 0.72 (0.44-1.17)
Bad/very bad 2.02 (1.53-2.66) 0.95 (0.74-1.24) 2.55 (1.55-4.18) 1.14 (0.63-2.06)
Self-reported physical health status
Very good/good 1 1 1 1
Regular 1.77 (1.27-2.46) 1.14 (0.83-1.55) 1.89 (1.07-3.32) 0.91 (0.49-1,69)
Bad/very bad 3.72 (2.73-5.05) 1.28 (0.93-1.74) 4.33 (2.60-7.23) 1.12 (0.68-1.85)
Self-reported sleep quality
Very good/good 1 1 1 1
Bad/very bad 1.53 (1.24-1.88) 0.94 (0.78-1.12) 1.39 (0.93-2.09) 0.98 (0.66-1.46)
Diagnosis of depression
No 1 1 1 1
Yes 9.82 (8.01-11.91) 4.60 (3.55-5.95) 12.44 (8.69-17.79) 4.49 (2.81-7.16)
Anxiety diagnosis
No 1 1 1 1
Yes 9.58 (7.17-12.81) 4.58 (3.23-6.49) 12.83 (7.88-20.87) 7.68 (4.25-13.89)
Alcohol consumption in the last three months
Never/once or twice/monthly 1 1 1 1
Weekly 0.87 (0.69-1.11) 0.74 (0.60-0.90) 0.62 (0.39-1.01) 0.64 (0.41-1)
Daily or almost daily 1.39 (0.76-2.52) 1.11 (0.64-1.90) 2.07 (1.02-4.20) 1.30 (0.57-2.99)
Illicit drug use in the last three months
Yes 1.40 (1.12-1.75) 1.25 (1.02-1.53) 1.16 (0.76-1.77) 1.01 (0.64-1.58)
No/prefer not to answer 1 1 1 1

95% confidence interval: 95%CI; PR: prevalence ratio.

a Adjusted for all the variables in the table.

In the adjusted analysis for the group of men, we found that the use of psychotropic medications was more frequent among those with access to health insurance (PR=1.65; 95%CI: 1.15-2.36), dissatisfied or very dissatisfied with their academic performance (PR=1.77; 95%CI: 1.09-2.87), diagnosis of depression (PR=4.49; 95%CI: 2.81-7.16) and diagnosis of anxiety (PR=7.68; 95%CI: 4.25-13.89) (Table 3).

DISCUSSION

This study identified a 12.0% frequency of psychotropic drug use among students at a public university in Paraná, Brazil. Regarding women, consumption was higher among those who reported having used illicit drugs in the last three months. In men, drug use was higher among students who reported being dissatisfied with their academic performance. As for the overall sample, the highest frequency of psychotropic drug use was found in those who had access to health insurance, diagnosis of depression and diagnosis of anxiety.

The frequency of psychotropic drug use found in this study is similar to that described in psychology students in Brazil (15.1%) 20) and in students from different areas of a university in Portugal (12.7%) 21. A study conducted in students at the University of Lausanne, Switzerland, revealed that 12.1% of the participants reported having used psychotropic substances. In addition, women showed a higher propensity to use psychotropic drugs compared to men, which supports our findings 22. However, other works in Brazilian students from different health-related courses showed slightly higher prevalence rates (16.0%) 23) (19.0%) 24, which is justified by the overload of academic and care activities 2,3,9.

Our study found that women were more likely to use psychotropic medications, a result consistent with previous research showing higher rates of antidepressant use among women compared with men. This gender difference in antidepressant use is a common finding in many studies, with possible implications for public health and clinical practice 10,22,25.

The use of psychotropic medications by women is a multifaceted phenomenon, influenced by a complex interaction of sociocultural, economic and health factors. In Uruguay, research has consistently shown that women are the main consumers of psychotropic medications, with a particular predilection for benzodiazepines and antidepressants. These medications are often used for extended periods of time, which may lead to a higher prevalence of psychotropic use among women. In addition, women are more likely to experience adverse side effects and to develop dependence on these medications, underscoring the need for a more nuanced understanding of the factors contributing to psychotropic use in this population 26.

A study conducted in Brazilian medical students revealed that 30.4% used psychotropic drugs, with anxiety and depression being the main reasons for prescription. A significant correlation was reported between academic progress and prevalence of psychotropic use, with a higher incidence of diagnoses of mental disorders among women. The research highlights the need for institutional interventions to promote mental health among these students, emphasizing the importance of adequate sleep and regular physical activity as protective factors 10.

The higher frequency of psychotropic medication use in women compared to men is justified, since depression, anxiety and stress conditions are more common in women 10,19,27-29. This research also highlights the higher frequency of medical diagnosis of depression and anxiety among female students, as well as the relationship of these diagnoses to psychotropic use. These medications are an important, although not the only, therapeutic strategy for the treatment of common mental disorders 10,28.

In addition, women recognize depressive symptoms better, report physical and psychological symptoms more easily, and seek help for health problems more frequently than men (19.30). According to the National Health Survey (PNS) (2019), women showed a higher rate (82.3%) of medical consultations compared to men (69.4%), making them more likely to use medication 31.

Antidepressants were the most frequently used class of drugs among students, with SSRIs being the most frequent subgroup, similar to what has been described by other studies 3. Regarding the mostly used psychotropic drugs, our results showed a higher frequency of sertraline hydrochloride, escitalopram oxalate and fluoxetine hydrochloride, aligning with the findings of other national and international works in university students 3,21,23,32,33. According to Martins de Oliveira et al. (2020) 34, 60% of university students in Brazil have experienced or are experiencing anxiety during their undergraduate studies. In addition, 32% reported suffering from insomnia, 30% have used or are using some type of psychiatric medication, 20% experience persistent sadness, 10% suffer from fear or panic, 6% have had suicidal ideation, and 4% have had suicidal thoughts. These health conditions reinforce the rationale for the use of antidepressants, which, in addition to treating depression, have also been widely used for anxiety and sleep disorders.

As for other factors associated with the use of psychotropic drugs, we highlight access to private health insurance. This relation is consistent with the Belo Horizonte Health Survey, conducted in the Metropolitan Region of Belo Horizonte, in the state of Minas Gerais, Brazil 35. Having private health insurance facilitates access to health services, particularly consultations with specialists, which contributes to greater use of medications, particularly psychotropic drugs, which cannot be purchased in pharmacies without a prescription 21,35.

Regarding dissatisfaction with academic performance, our study showed that students using psychotropic medications had a high prevalence of previous diagnosis of depression. Depression is considered a disabling condition that can interfere negatively in many spheres of life, including students’ academic performance 3. Berchtold et al. found that students who used psychotropic medications had lower academic performance, poorer health status, and lower life satisfaction compared with those who did not use them. In addition, the study suggests that academic pressure is related to the use of these substances, as drug users reported greater academic difficulties.

Regarding the relation between the use of illicit drugs and psychotropic medications among women, we consider that the overload of activities, more common among women 36, together with higher levels of stress, anxiety, depressive symptoms and the consequent use of medications for the central nervous system, favors the search for other forms of relief, such as the use of illicit drugs 37.

The relationship between illicit substance use and depression and anxiety is complex. Research has shown that illicit substance use can be a contributing factor to depression and anxiety, particularly when combined with other factors such as academic stress and performance pressure 38. In addition, the search for relief from symptoms of anxiety and depression may lead students to engage in substance use, including alcohol, tobacco, illicit drugs, and prescription medications 39.

Recent studies also found a higher prevalence of depressive and anxiety disorders among women, leading to the use of psychotropic medications, in addition to dependence on illicit drugs 40-42. Although drug use is more common among young men 39,43,44, it is possible that the use of these substances is less related to mental health conditions and, therefore, to psychotropic use in this population.

In contrast, weekly alcohol consumption was related to a lower use of psychotropic medications. Alcohol consumption is part of daily entertainment, facilitating social interaction among students. This interaction favors social support among them, thus reducing the chances of developing depressive and anxiety symptoms 45,46, and the consequent need for psychotropics. In contrast, a higher frequency and amount of alcohol consumption is associated with a higher risk of depression 46,47. This association was not identified in our study, but may be related to the fact that the nondrinker group included former drinkers who stopped drinking because of health problems or the need for psychotropic medications, which could confound the association. A study in Sweden found that those who consumed alcohol lightly and moderately were less likely to develop depression, whereas those who did not consume or consumed heavily were more likely to be depressed 46, which partially corroborates the findings of this research.

Our study has some limitations that should be highlighted. The data were collected online and, although widely disseminated, an electronic questionnaire does not allow a detailed explanation at the time of the survey. In this regard, the drug names may be subject to recall bias, despite the fact that this population is considered young and with a greater capacity to retain information. In addition, the response rate of this survey (25.8%) was lower than that reported by other studies with electronic questionnaires 48. It is also important to note that, although the researchers conducted a thorough review of the completed questionnaires, excluding duplicates, triplicates, and responses from graduate students, among others, the risk persists that individuals not affiliated with the undergraduate programs of the surveyed university may have completed the questionnaire. Finally, social desirability bias may occur in the research due to the tendency of participants to provide socially acceptable answers, which could distort their true opinions and behavior 49. As a strength, it should be noted that our study has a larger sample size than other surveys conducted among undergraduate students on medication use. In addition, it covers all areas and courses at UEL.

In conclusion, these results highlight the high frequency of psychotropic medication use among university students, especially among females, as well as among students with access to health insurance, with a diagnosis of depression and a diagnosis of anxiety, regardless of their sex. We also found that male students who reported dissatisfaction with their academic performance had a higher frequency of psychoactive medication use. Among the consumed medications, antidepressants, such as SSRIs, stood out, indicating the importance of investigating aspects related to mental health in this population. These findings demonstrate factors associated with the use of psychotropic medications in students, recognizing the university as an environment of increased susceptibility to mental health problems, which causes a greater need for central nervous system medications. We hope that this evidence can support actions at the local level, promoting not only campaigns for rational use of medications, but also measures to minimize and help students with the stress caused by academic life.

Acknowledgments

The authors thank the UEL Academic Writing Center for assistance in the English translation and editing of the article.

REFERENCES

1. Nogueira MJ, Seabra P, Alves P, Teixeira D, Carvalho JC, Sequeira C. Predictors of positive mental health in higher education students. A cross-sectional predictive study. Perspect Psychiatr Care. 2022;58(4):2942-9. doi: 10.1111/ppc.13145. [ Links ]

2. Castaldelli-Maia JM, Lewis T, Marques dos Santos N, Picon F, Kadhum M, Farrell SM, et al. Stressors, psychological distress, and mental health problems amongst Brazilian medical students. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2019;31(7-8):603-7. doi: 10.1080/09540261.2019.1669335. [ Links ]

3. Sheldon E, Simmonds-Buckley M, Bone C, Mascarenhas T, Chan N, Wincott M, et al. Prevalence and risk factors for mental health problems in university undergraduate students: A systematic review with meta-analysis. J Affect Disord. 2021;287:282-92. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.03.054. [ Links ]

4. Beroíza-Valenzuela F. The challenges of mental health in Chilean university students. Front Public Heal. 2024;12:1297402. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1297402. [ Links ]

5. Lima AMS, Leal R, Fernandes dos Santos V, Leal L, Rocha A, Silva E, et al. Prevalência da Depressão nos Acadêmicos da Área de Saúde. Psicol Ciênc Prof. 2019;39:e187530. doi: 10.1590/1982-3703003187530. [ Links ]

6. Pacheco JPG, Giacomin HT, Tam WW, Ribeiro TB, Arab C, Bezerra IM, et al. Mental health problems among medical students in Brazil: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Rev Bras Psiquiatr. 2017;39(4):369-78. doi: 10.1590/1516-4446-2017-2223. [ Links ]

7. Bojanic I, Sund ER, Bjerkeset O, Sivertsen B, Sletvold H. Psychological Distress and Use of Psychotropic Drugs Among University Students-the SHoT Study, Norway. Front Psychiatry. 2021;12717955. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.717955. [ Links ]

8. Fond G, Bourbon A, Boucekine M, Messiaen M, Barrow V, Auquier P, et al. First-year French medical students consume antidepressants and anxiolytics while second-years consume non-medical drugs. J Affect Disord. 2020;265:71-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2020.01.035. [ Links ]

9. Sobral de Luna I, Augusta Grigoli Dominato A, Ferrari F, Lobo da Costa A, Christhinie Pires A, da Silva Ximendes G. Consumo de psicofármacos entre alunos de medicina do primeiro e sexto ano de uma universidade do estado de São Paulo. Colloq Vitae. 2018;10(1):22-8. doi: 10.5747/cv.2018.v10.n1.v216. [ Links ]

10. Fasanella NA, Custódio CG, Cabo JS, Andrade GS, Almeida FA, Pavan MV. Use of prescribed psychotropic drugs among medical students and associated factors: a cross-sectional study. Sao Paulo Med J. 2022;140(5):697-704. doi: 10.1590/1516-3180.2021.0566.R2.05012022. [ Links ]

11. Scheifes A, Walraven S, Stolker JJ, Nijman HLI, Egberts TCG, Heerdink ER. Adverse events and the relation with quality of life in adults with intellectual disability and challenging behaviour using psychotropic drugs. Res Dev Disabil. 2016;49-50:13-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2015.11.017. [ Links ]

12. SenthilKumar G, Mathieu NM, Freed JK, Sigmund CD, Gutterman DD. Addressing the decline in graduate students' mental well-being. Am J Physiol - Hear Circ Physiol. 2023;325(4):H882-7. doi: 10.1152/ajpheart.00466.2023. [ Links ]

13. Bacigalupe A, Martín U. Gender inequalities in depression/anxiety and the consumption of psychotropic drugs: are we medicalising women's mental health?. Scand J Public Health. 2021;49(3):317-24. doi: 10.1177/1403494820944736. [ Links ]

14. Quintana MI, Andreoli SB, Peluffo MP, Ribeiro WS, Feijo MM, Bressan RA, et al. Psychotropic drug use in São Paulo, Brazil: an epidemiological survey. PLoS One. 2015; 10(8):e0135059. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0135059. [ Links ]

15. Von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, et al. Strengthening the reporting of observational studies in epidemiology (StroBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Ann Intern Med. 2007;147(8):573-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-147-8-200710160-00010. [ Links ]

16. Frazon AG. Síndrome de burnout e o consumo de álcool e de substancias ilícitas por estudantes universitários [Tese]. Londrina: Universidade Estadual de Londrina; 2021. 184 p. [ Links ]

17. World Health Organization. ATC/DDD Index 2022. Geneva: OMS; 2022. [cited 2023 Sept 21]. Available from: https://www.whocc.no/atc_ddd_index/. [ Links ]

18. Liu Y, Zhang N, Bao G, Huang Y, Ji B, Wu Y, et al. Predictors of depressive symptoms in college students: A systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies. J Affect Disord. 2019;244:196-208. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2018.10.084. [ Links ]

19. Bacigalupe A, Martín U. Gender inequalities in depression/anxiety and the consumption of psychotropic drugs: Are we medicalising women's mental health?. Scand J Public Health. 2021;49(3):317-324. doi: 10.1177/1403494820944736. [ Links ]

20. Santos LH, Silveira MM. Uso de psicofármacos por estudantes de psicologia. Cad Bras Saúde Mental. 2019;11(29):1-12. doi: 10.5007/cbsm.v11i29.69801. [ Links ]

21. Câmara H, Rocha C, Balteiro J. Grau de conhecimento e consumo de psicofármacos dos alunos da Escola Superior de Tecnologia da Saúde de Coimbra. Rev Port Saude Publica. 2011;29(2):173-9. doi: 10.1016/S0870-9025(11)70021-9. [ Links ]

22. Berchtold A, Genre N, Panese F. Uses of psychotropic drugs by university students in Switzerland. PLoS One. 2024;19(6):e0305392. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0305392. [ Links ]

23. Marchi KC, Bárbaro AM, Miasso AI, Tirapelli CR. Ansiedade e consumo de ansiolíticos entre estudantes de enfermagem de uma universidade pública. Rev Eletr Enf. 2013;15(3):731-9. doi: 10.5216/ree.v15i3.18924. [ Links ]

24. Istilli PT, Miasso AI, Padovan CM, Crippa JA, Tirapelli CR. Antidepressants: knowledge and use among nursing students. Rev Lat-Am Enfermagem. 2010;18(3):421-8. doi: 10.1590/S0104-11692010000300018. [ Links ]

25. Souza GCRM, Vasques JS, Rodrigues LAC, Komatsu AV, Silva JL, Maniglia FP. Uso de ansiolíticos e antidepressivos entre estudantes de medicina de uma universidade. Psico. 2022;53(1):e38105. doi: 10.15448/1980-8623.2022.1.38105. [ Links ]

26. Bielli A, Bacci P, Bruno G, Calisto N. Cambiar para que todo siga igual: mujeres y psicofármacos en Uruguay. Rev Estud Fem. 2023;31(1): e93197. doi: 10.1590/1806-9584-2023v31n193197. [ Links ]

27. Lun KWC, Chan CK, Ip PKY, Ma SYK, Tsai WW, Wong CS, et al. Depression and anxiety among university students in Hong Kong. Hong Kong Med J. 2018;24(5):466-72. doi: 10.12809/hkmj176915. [ Links ]

28. Parker G, Brotchie H. Gender differences in depression. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2010;22(5):429-36. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2010.492391. [ Links ]

29. Ribeiro AG, da Cruz LP, Marchi KC, Tirapelli CR, Miasso AI. Antidepressivos: uso, adesão e conhecimento entre estudantes de medicina. Ciênc Saude Coletiva. 2014;19(6):1825-33. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232014196.06332013. [ Links ]

30. Assem-Hilger E, Jungwirth S, Weissgram S, Kirchmeyr W, Fischer P, Barnas C. Benzodiazepine use in the elderly: An indicator for inappropriately treated geriatric depression?. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2009;24(6):563-9. doi: 10.1002/gps.2155. [ Links ]

31. Szwarcwald CL, Stopa SR, Damacena GN, Almeida WS, Souza Júnior PRB, Vieira MLFP, et al. Changes in the pattern of health services use in brazil between 2013 and 2019bl health journal. Ciênc Saude Coletiva. 2021;26(suppl1):2515-28. doi: 10.1590/1413-81232021266.1.43482020. [ Links ]

32. Berrouet Mejía MC, Lince Restrepo M, Restrepo Bernal D. Actitudes, conocimientos y prácticas frente a la automedicación con productos herbales y psicofármacos en estudiantes de medicina de Medellín-Colombia. Med UPB. 2018;37(1):17-24. doi: 10.18566/medupb.v37n1.a03. [ Links ]

33. Telles Filho PCP, Pereira Júnior AC. Antidepressivos: Consumo, Orientação E Conhecimento Entre Acadêmicos De Enfermagem. Rev Enferm Cent O Min. 2013;3(3):829-36. doi: 10.19175/recom.v0i0.411. [ Links ]

34. Martins de Oliveira L, Pereira de Menezes Filho AC, Porfiro CA. Uso da Passiflora incarnata L. no tratamento alternativo do transtorno de ansiedade generalizada. Res Soc Dev. 2020;9(11):e2349119487. doi: 10.33448/rsd-v9i11.9487. [ Links ]

35. Abi-Ackel MM, Lima-Costa MF, Castro-Costa E, Loyola Filho AI. Uso de psicofármacos entre idosos residentes em comunidade: prevalência e fatores associados. Rev Bras Epidemiol. 2017;20(1):57-69. doi: 10.1590/1980-5497201700010005. [ Links ]

36. Deus MD, Schmitz MES, Vieira ML. Família, gênero e jornada de trabalho: uma revisão sistemática de literatura. Gerais, Rev Interinst Psicol. 2021;14(1):1-28. doi: 10.36298/gerais202114e15805. [ Links ]

37. Campo-Arias A, Suárez-Colorado YP, Caballero-Domínguez CC. Asociación entre el consumo de Cannabis y el riesgo de suicidio en adolescentes escolarizados de Santa Marta, Colombia. Biomed. 2020;40(3):569-77. doi: 10.7705/biomedica.4988. [ Links ]

38. Rotenstein LS, Ramos MA, Torre M, Bradley Segal J, Peluso MJ, Guille C, et al. Prevalence of depression, depressive symptoms, and suicidal ideation among medical students a systematic review and meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316(21):2214-36. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17324. [ Links ]

39. Candido FJ, Souza R, Stumpf MA, Fernandes LG, Veiga R, Santin M, et al. The use of drugs and medical students: A literature review. Rev Assoc Med Bras. 2018;64(5):462-8. doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.64.05.462. [ Links ]

40. Rabiee R, Lundin A, Agardh E, Hensing G, Allebeck P, Danielsson AK. Cannabis use and the risk of anxiety and depression in women: A comparison of three Swedish cohorts. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2020;216:108332. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108332. [ Links ]

41. Tovani JBE, Santi LJ, Trindade EV. Use of psychotropic drugs by students from the health area: a comparative and qualitative analysis. Rev Bras Educ Med. 2021;45(3):1-10. doi: 10.1590/1981-5271v45.3-20200485.ING. [ Links ]

42. Wang K, Liu Y, Ouedraogo Y, Wang N, Xie X, Xu C, et al. Principal component analysis of early alcohol, drug and tobacco use with major depressive disorder in US adults. J Psychiatr Res. 2018;100:113-20. doi: 10.1016/j.jpsychires.2018.02.022. [ Links ]

43. Amin-Esmaeili M, Rahimi-Movaghar A, Sharifi V, Hajebi A, Radgoodarzi R, Mojtabai R, et al. Epidemiology of illicit drug use disorders in Iran: prevalence, correlates, comorbidity and service utilization results from the Iranian Mental Health Survey. Addiction. 2016;111(10):1836-47. doi: 10.1111/add.13453. [ Links ]

44. Raposo JCDS, Costa ACQ, Valença PAM, Zarzar PM, Diniz AS, Colares V, et al. Binge drinking and illicit drug use among adolescent students. Rev Saude Publica. 2017;51:83. doi: 10.11606/S1518-8787.2017051006863. [ Links ]

45. Bhatti AB, Haq AU. The pathophysiology of perceived social isolation: effects on health and mortality. Cureus. 2017;9(1):e994. doi: 10.7759/cureus.994. [ Links ]

46. Gémes K, Forsell Y, Janszky I, László KD, Lundin A, Ponce De Leon A, et al. Moderate alcohol consumption and depression - a longitudinal population-based study in Sweden. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2019;139(6):526-35. doi: 10.1111/acps.13034. [ Links ]

47. Wium-Andersen MK, Ørsted DD, Tolstrup JS, Nordestgaard BG. Increased alcohol consumption as a cause of alcoholism, without similar evidence for depression: a Mendelian randomization study. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44(2):526-39. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyu220. [ Links ]

48. Blumenberg C, Barros AJD. Response rate differences between web and alternative data collection methods for public health research: a systematic review of the literature. Int J Public Health. 2018;63(6):765-73. doi: 10.1007/s00038-018-1108-4. [ Links ]

49. Bispo Júnior JP. Social desirability bias in qualitative health research. Rev Saude Publica. 2022;56:101. doi: 10.11606/s1518-8787.2022056004164. [ Links ]

Funding. No financial support related to the publication of this article is declared.

11This study is part of the master’s thesis: Gianjacomo TRF. Caracterización del consumo de psicofármacos en estudiantes de universidades públicas [Masterss Degree in Pharmaceutical Sciences]. Londrina: State University of Londrina; 2020. Available from: https://repositorio.uel.br/items/5b88a7cc-b2a7-4034-8a10-afc10e9f23e8.

Cite as. Gianjacomo TRF, Guidoni CM, Rodrigues R, Andrade SM, Rufino JV, Girotto E. Factors associated with the use of psychotropic drugs by students at a brazilian public university. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. 2024;41(4):365-74. doi: 10.17843/rpmesp.2024.414.13858.

Received: May 07, 2024; Accepted: October 16, 2024

Correspondence. Edmarlon Girotto; edmarlon78@gmail.com

Author contributions.

All authors declare that they meet the authorship criteria recommended by the ICMJE.

Conflict of interest.

No conflicts of interest related to the publication of this article are declared.

Roles according to CRediT.

TFG: conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, research, data curation, writing - original draft. EG: conceptualization, methodology, validation, formal analysis, writing - original draft, supervision. CMG: conceptualization, methodology, writing - review and editing, project management. RR: methodology, validation, research, data curation, writing - review and editing. SMA: conceptualization, methodology, writing - review and editing, project management. JVR: methodology, research, data curation, writing - review and editing.

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons