SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 número2El sentimiento de soledad en la población adulta mayor participante en centros de día en Bogotá, ColombiaPercepciones de los estudiantes de ciencias de la salud sobre el aprendizaje cooperativo en la modalidad virtual índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Horizonte Médico (Lima)

versão impressa ISSN 1727-558X

Horiz. Med. vol.23 no.2 Lima abr./jun. 2023  Epub 30-Maio-2023

http://dx.doi.org/10.24265/horizmed.2023.v23n2.02 

Original article

Clinical and echocardiographic predictors of low cardiac output syndrome after heart valve surgery

Yudeikis de la C. Granda Gámez1  , First-degree specialist in Intensive Care and Emergency Medicine, master’s degree in Medical Diagnostics, instructor
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2481-5699

Yoandro Rosabal García1  , First-degree specialist in Cardiology, assistant professor
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1261-5494

Lisanet Copa Córdova, First-degree specialist in Anesthesiology and Resuscitation, assistant professor, master’s degree in Urgent Care, Diploma Course in Cardiovascular Intensive Care
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5062-7029

1 University of Ciencias Médicas. Santiago de Cuba, Cuba.

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To determine the possible clinical and echocardiographic predictors associated with the onset of low cardiac output syndrome.

Materials and methods:

An analytical case-control study was conducted in patients with postoperative low cardiac output syndrome treated at Centro de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular of Hospital Provincial Docente Saturnino Lora in Santiago de Cuba from January 2019 to December 2021. Both study groups were part of the same population of patients who underwent a cardiovascular surgery but differed in the fact that, at admission, some suffered from postoperative low cardiac output syndrome and others did not. The dependent variable was the presence of low cardiac output and the independent variables were clinical, hemodynamic and echocardiographic factors.

Results:

In the series, patients under 65 years of age prevailed in both case and control groups (51.2 % and 73.5 %, respectively). Atrial fibrillation, right ventricular systolic function and perioperative bleeding (p = 0.008) were statistically significant (p < 0.05). Most patients (102 [91.10 %; p = 0.047]) showed a left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) > 50 % and a large number of patients (76 [45.24 %; p ≤ 0.05; OR: 2.14]) had undergone emergency surgeries. A logistic regression analysis determined that the clinical and echocardiographic variables, such as age over 65 years, depressed right ventricular function, extracorporeal circulation ≥ 90 minutes and elevated pulmonary artery systolic pressure, had a statistically significant association. The area under the curve (AUC) showed that variables including age, extracorporeal circulation time and perioperative bleeding had predictive capability.

Conclusions:

It was observed that some clinical and echocardiographic elements, such as age, atrial fibrillation, depressed right ventricular systolic function and emergency surgery, were associated as predictors of low cardiac output syndrome.

Keywords: Cardiac Output, Low; Thoracic Surgery; Echocardiography

Introduction

Low cardiac output syndrome (LCOS), a clinical manifestation of decreased cardiac output and peripheral tissue perfusion, was first proposed by Rao et al. 1 Previous studies have shown that all-cause mortality in LCOS ranges from 14.8 to 62.5 % in the short term (one month after its onset) and from 21.4 to 36.6 % in the long term (two months to one year after its onset) 2. LCOS after heart surgery leads not only to poor tissue perfusion but also to multiple organ dysfunction of the brain, lungs, liver, kidneys and gastrointestinal tract, which increases the use of health care resources and associated costs 3. More importantly, LCOS may cause reversible decrease in cardiac output (CO) after heart surgery. The early detection and appropriate treatment of LCOS can prevent its progression to refractory cardiogenic shock and improve clinical outcomes, so its early detection is extremely important 4.

According to studies conducted in North America (USA and Canada), 45 % of worldwide surgical activity decreased between March and April 2020 compared to that performed in 2019. There was an increase of up to 7 % in coronary artery surgeries, probably at the expense of urgent surgeries, with significant decreases in heart valve surgeries of up to 7.5 % 5.

In 2020 6, in Spain, heart valve replacement and coronary artery surgeries showed a mortality rate of 13.61 %. Polyvalvular and coronary artery surgeries also showed similar figures (12.07 %), which is associated with intraand postoperative complications such as low cardiac output (LCO).

According to Vera-Rivero et al. 7, Cuba is one of the few developing countries capable of cooperating in the cardiovascular surgery field, and the specialty got started with the creation of heart centers in different regions of the country.

Statistical data 8 shows that between 2019 and 2020 a total of 3,004 patients underwent surgical treatment due to a cardiovascular pathology.

Bertini et al. 9 state that perioperative morbidity and mortality remain two of the main limitations of heart surgery with extracorporeal circulation, despite they have progressively been reduced over the last decades.

Based on the foregoing, this research was conceived to determine the possible clinical and electrocardiographic predictors associated with the onset of LCOS and how they can influence on its progression.

Materials and methods

Study design and population

An analytical case-control study was conducted in patients with preoperative LCOS after undergoing cardiovascular surgery and extracorporeal circulation at Centro de Cardiología y Cirugía Cardiovascular (Cardiology and Cardiovascular Surgery Center) of Hospital Provincial Docente Saturnino Lora in Santiago de Cuba from January 2019 to December 2021.

For that purpose, two study groups were formed and the members thereof were selected as follows:

Shoonen et al. 10 defined a case as a patient who had oliguria (diuresis under 0.5 ml/kg/h), central venous oxygen saturation < 60 % (with normal arterial oxygen saturation) and/or lactate > 3 mmol/l (without relative hypovolemia). The administration of inotropes continued in patients who underwent surgery in order to achieve an adequate hemodynamic state.

Both study groups (cases and controls) were part of the same population of patients who underwent cardiovascular surgery (360 patients) but differed in the fact that, at admission, some suffered from postoperative LCOS and others did not. The case group consisted of all the patients with LCOS (56 patients) and the control group of those without LCOS selected by 1:1 simple random sampling (56 patients).

The study excluded those controls that showed, during the medical record review, lack of information to meet the objectives of the research.

Variables and measurements

Dependent variable: postoperative LCOS.

Independent variables: clinical, hemodynamic and echocardiographic factors.

The following variables were defined and operationalized

in order to meet the objectives of the research:

  • 1. Age: over 65 years, under 65 years.

  • 2. Sex: male, female.

  • 3. Comorbidities of interest in the research: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), diabetes mellitus (DM), ischemic heart disease, atrial fibrillation (if the medical record shows evidence that the patient had a history of such condition).

  • 4. Echocardiographic variables.

Echocardiograms were performed using Philips iE33 xMATRIX ultrasound system 48 hours before the surgery in patients scheduled for elective surgery, and the day of the surgery in those who required urgency surgery.

  • I. Left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF): LVEF ≥ 50 % LVEF < 50 %

  • II. Tricuspid annular plane systolic excursion (TAPSE): it allows the evaluation of the right ventricular systolic function. Values over 17 mm are considered normal. RVEF ≥ 17 mm (conserved right ventricular systolic function) RVEF < 17 mm (depressed right ventricular systolic function)

  • III. Pulmonary artery systolic pressure (PASP): it is estimated by calculating the systolic pressure gradient between the right atrium and ventricle from the peak tricuspid regurgitation velocity. Values under 30 mmHg are considered normal. PASP Yes (for values over 30 mmHg) PASP No (for values under 30 mmHg)

Statistical analysis

Data on the epidemiological, clinical and echocardiographic variables of interest was obtained from the medical records. It was entered in a collection sheet designed for that purpose, which ensured its preservation in the event of irreversible damage to the digital media, since the data was collected in a Microsoft Excel spreadsheet.

The Microsoft Excel spreadsheet containing the primary information, both on cases and controls, was imported using IBM SPSS Statistics V22, with which all the statistical processing was carried out. Numbers and percentages were calculated as summary measures for the qualitative variables; the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test was used to examine the normality of the variables for the quantitative variables.

A chi-square test was carried out. All the statistical analyses were two-tailed (two-sided) and p values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. To determine the association strength, the odds ratio (OR) with a 95 % confidence interval (CI), as well as the population attributable risk percent (PARP) and the attributable risk percent for the exposed (ARPE), were calculated.

The tables were analyzed and discussed by means of inductive and deductive scientific methods. The results were compared to similar studies, thus allowing us to come to conclusions and give recommendations.

Ethical considerations

The authors state their commitment to confidentiality and protection of the information collected during the research. Authorization of the Center’s management and approval of the Research Ethics Committee and the Scientific Board were also requested to conduct the research.

Results

Table 1 shows the prevalence of patients under 65 years of age (51.81 %), a larger number of patients in the case group (60.71 %) and a p value = 0.008, which corresponds to a highly significant association. Furthermore, it shows that 96 (85.68 %) patients had atrial fibrillation, with a smaller number in both study groups, though an extremely high statistical association (p = 0.007) was found. Concerning the echocardiographic parameters, a high prevalence of patients with LVEF > 50 % (91.10 % [p = 0.047]) was observed, with a larger number in both groups of patients. Moreover, a larger number of patients with RVEF > 17 mm (88.40 % [p = 0.008]) was evidenced. Both variables were statistically significant; other variables such as sex, DM, COPD, ischemic heart disease and PASP were not statistically significant (Table 1).

Table 1 Multivariate analysis by study group 

Clinical and echocardiographic variables Study group
Cases Controls Total p
n % n % N %
Age < 65 years 22 39.29 36 64.24 58 51.81 0.008
> 65 years 34 60.71 20 35.76 54 48.19
Sex Female 31 55.45 25 44.53 56 50.15 0.257
Male 25 44.55 31 55.47 56 49.85
DM No 44 78.61 39 69.62 83 74.10 0.281
Yes 12 21.39 17 30.38 29 25.90
COPD No 40 71.28 45 80.23 85 75.88 0.269
Yes 16 28.72 11 19.77 27 24.12
Atrial fibrillation No 43 76.83 53 94.62 96 85.68 0.007
Yes 13 23.17 3 5.38 16 14.31
Ischemic heart disease No 40 71.42 41 73.15 81 72.27 0.833
Yes 16 28.58 15 26.75 31 27.72
LVEF < 50 % 8 14.32 2 3.65 10 8.90 0.047
> 50 % 48 85.68 54 96.35 102 91.10
RVEF < 17 mm 11 19.60 2 3.55 13 11.60 0.008
> 17 mm 45 80.40 54 96.45 99 88.40
PASP No 39 69.61 42 75.25 81 72.30 0.526
Yes 17 30.39 14 25.75 31 27.70

Chi-square: p ≤ 0.05; COPD: chronic obstructive pulmonary disease; LVEF: left ventricular systolic function; RVEF: right ventricular

Emergency surgery was one of the parameters evaluated in this research. As shown in Table 2, a large number of patients (45.24 % [p ≤ 0.05; OR: 2.14]) underwent emergency surgery, thus showing statistical significance, and LCO posed a risk factor for those patients.

Measures of public health impact such as ARPE and PARP showed that 33 % of the cases, i.e., patients with LCO, were the result of non-elective surgeries. In the event that adequate elective surgeries were performed, these sequelae would be reduced by 51.7 % (Table 2).

Table 2 Patients by emergency surgery and study group 

Emergency surgery Study group
Cases Controls Total p OR
n % n % n % n %
Yes 34 60.71 % 42 37.50 % 76 45.24 % 0.004 2.14
No 22 39.29 % 70 62.50 % 92 54.76 %

ARPE = 33 %; PARP = 51.7 %

Chi-square: p ≤ 0.05; OR: odds ratio; ARPE: attributable risk percent for the exposed; PARP: population attributable risk percent. Source: medical records.

As for parameters such as extracorporeal circulation time, data from 50 patients (29.76 % [p = 0.000; OR: 1.54; LL: 0.73; UL: 3.24]) demonstrated that it is a predisposing factor in patients whose time exceeds 90 minutes. Concerning the perioperative bleeding, a small number of patients (12.50 % [p = 0.013; OR: 3.12; LL: 1.22; UL: 7.93]) showed an extremely high statistical significance; moreover, bleeding more than 500 ml posed a risk factor for the onset of LCOS (Table 3).

Table 3 Multivariate analysis according to the study group 

Periprocedural variables Study group
Cases Controls Total
n % n % N % p OR LL UL
ECC time ≥ 90 minutes 31 55.36 19 16.96 50 29.76 0 1.54 0.73 3.24
< 90 minutes 25 44.64 93 83.04 118 70.24 0.013 3.12 1.22 7.93
Perioperative bleeding ≥ 500 ml 12 21.43 9 8.04 21 12.5
< 500 ml 44 78.57 103 91.96 147 87.5

ECC time: extracorporeal circulation time; chi-square: p ≤ 0.05; OR: odds ratio; LL: lower limit; UL: upper limit. Source: medical records.

A logistic regression analysis was used to determine how the clinical and echocardiographic variables affect the probability of presenting LCOS. A total of 112 cases were used in the analysis. The model explained 78.9 % of LCOS cases in surgical patients. Variables such as age, RVEF, EEC and PASP showed p values ≤ 0.05, which allows us to conclude that they have a statistically significant association with complications. Variables such as LVEF and perioperative bleeding did not have statistical significance (p > 0.05) (Table 4).

Table 4 Logistic regression analysis according to the study variables 

Variables B Wald Sig. Exp(B) 95 % CI for Exp(B)
Lower Upper
Age -2.039 23.317 0.000 0.130 0.057 0.298
Perioperative bleeding -1.028 3.246 0.072 0.358 0.117 1.095
ECC time 1.639 12.574 0.000 5.150 2.082 12.744
LVEF -0.826 2.021 0.155 0.438 0.140 1.368
RVEF 1.894 10.566 0.001 6.644 2.121 20.812
PASP -1.089 4.137 0.042 0.337 0.118 0.961
Constant 0.952 0.246 0.620 2.592

Chi-square: p ≤ 0.05; LVEF: left ventricular systolic function; RVEF: right ventricular systolic function; PASP: pulmonary artery systolic pressure. Source: medical records.

When analyzing the area under the curve (AUC) (Table 5) and the receiver operating characteristics (ROC) curve (Figure 1), based on sensitivity and specificity, it was found that the AUC had a range of 0.452−0.762. Thus, variables such as LVEF, extracorporeal circulation time and perioperative bleeding can predict LCOS risk.

Table 5 AUC analysis 

AUC 95 % CI
Variable(s) Area Asymptotic significance LL UL
Age 0.699 0 0.614 0.784
LVEF 0.574 0.106 0.493 0.654
RVEF 0.452 0.293 0.358 0.546
ECC time 0.762 0 0.683 0.84
Perioperative bleeding 0.66 0 0.574 0.746

Chi-square: p ≤ 0.05; LVEF: left ventricular systolic function; RVEF: right ventricular systolic function; ECC time: extracorporeal circulation time; ; LL: lower limit; UL: upper limit. Source: medical records.

Figure 1 AUC of predictor variables 

Discussion

LOCS is a frequent and serious complication in heart surgery patients. However, both the incidence and response to treatment and later progression have been highly variable in different publications to date.

Age is an independent cardiovascular risk factor; therefore, the probability of death increases with age, which has been validated in different risk scales. Although the risk of death increases exponentially, some studies show that the probability of dying triples in people over 75 years of age 11.

Lorenzo 12, in a review article, claimed that being older than 65 years is one predisposing factor for complications and LCO in heart surgery patients.

Pérez Vela et al., in a multicenter study published in 2018, stated that 68.3 ± 9.3 years of age was one of the factors mostly associated with the onset of postoperative low output and that 65.2 % were males 13. A study conducted by Fernández Mesa et al. 14, which included 156 patients who underwent surgery due to left valvular heart diseases in 2018, reported that 46 of them had LCO and patients over 65 prevailed in this group.

The abovementioned authors’ statements agree with what is shown in this study.

Zhao et al. 15, in a study conducted at Guangdong Provincial People’s Hospital, showed the prevalence of males (69.8 %) compared to females (30.2 %). Males did not have the highest scores in the research results, which disagrees with the literature and this research results.

The presence of comorbidities such as DM, high blood pressure and COPD, among others, is also associated with complications, including LCO. According to Cubides Núñez, the most frequent comorbidity in his study was high blood pressure, followed by COPD 16.

In the previously mentioned study conducted by Fernández Mesa et al. 14, COPD and chronic atrial fibrillation were the most frequent comorbidities in the group of patients with LCO.

Pérez Vela et al. 13 reported in their study that high blood pressure and dyslipidemia were found in patients that developed LCOS in their series, with 70.8 % and 63.5 %, respectively.

The research on atrial fibrillation conducted by Gómez Núñez et al. 17 showed that one of the most frequent complications was LCO, which was observed in 23 % of the patients.

When comparing such evidence to this research, there are similar aspects in the description of atrial fibrillation by the aforementioned authors. In this research, fibrillation had high statistical significance, which agrees with what has been stated.

Perioperative left ventricular systolic dysfunction has been considered a predisposing factor for postoperative LCOS, as shown in the literature. Sepúlveda et al. 18 reported segmental contraction abnormalities in 273 patients (58.6 %), out of which 208 (59.4 %) required intraoperative inotropic support. Moreover, they stated that 35 (83.3 %) out of 42 patients with reduced ejection fraction or ejection fraction under 40 % had LCO. This agrees with a study conducted by Li et al. 19, where an ejection fraction under 40 % was considered a predictor. Burstein et al. 20 found ejection fraction values of approximately 47.3 % with a standard deviation of ± 16.2 %. Our study showed the onset of LCO in patients with an ejection fraction > 50 %, which demonstrates the varying nature of this condition.

The evaluation of the right ventricular (RV) function is a key aspect in heart surgery patients, not only before surgery but also in the early postoperative period. This is evidenced in studies such as those conducted by Fernández et al. 14, who claimed that patients with LCO had lower RVEF, higher mean pulmonary arterial and right atrial pressure, and higher pulmonary arterial systolic pressure, all of them showing significant differences (p < 0.0001). This is consistent with the findings of this research.

Fernández Mesa et al. 14, in their multivariate analysis, found that the main predictors of the onset of LCO were prolonged extracorporeal circulation time (OR: 4.89; p = 0.001), age over 65 years, sex and LVEF ≤ 40 %, which agrees with this research.

Additionally, González Kadashinskaia et al. 21 mentioned that extracorporeal circulation was one of the most common procedures in surgical operations, with almost 55 %, which indicates that this is a widely used technique. Likewise, Fernández Mesa et al. 14 pointed out in their study that prolonged extracorporeal circulation time is associated with a higher probability of suffering such complication, which is consistent to the results of this study.

In another article by Fernández Mesa et al. 22, they concluded that patients with LCO were 3.5 times more likely to die in the five-year period after surgery than those who did not had this condition.

Lorenzo 12, in his review article, mentioned that a singlecenter study published by Ding et al. included 1,524 heart surgery patients, out of which 205 developed LCOS. Then, a multivariate analysis led to conclude that age over 65 years, LVEF < 50 % and surgery with extracorporeal circulation were independent factors for LCO. In this regard, Jiménez Hernández et al. 23 drew similar conclusions.

Aslan et al. 24 reported that markedly prolonged aortic clamp time and total cardiopulmonary bypass time are predictors of the onset of LCO.

Maganti et al. 25 claimed in a study that 7 % of the cases presented postoperative LCO, which was associated with urgency surgery and low ejection fraction.

Kochar et al. 26 stated in a multivariate and multicenter research that the factors mostly associated with a higher risk of LCO were preoperative ejection fraction and age, thus resulting in patients with the worst results. In this regard, Lui et al. 27 showed evidence of a predictive model based on variables such as age, and preoperative factors such as low LVEF and aortic clamp time.

Elhenawy et al. 28 associated mitral valve surgery with a higher prevalence of postoperative LCOS when factors such as age, urgency surgery and preoperative left ventricular function were involved. In turn, Seguel et al. 29 reported low incidence of LCO.

Additionally, De Lima et al. 30 described in their research that the conditions that exacerbate complications during the immediate postoperative period after heart surgery are perioperative bleeding and atrial fibrillation, the former with an incidence of up to 50 %.

The main limitation of this research was basically not having an adequate sample size to determine the behavior of postsurgical complications. It should be noted that this data was collected from a center of cardiovascular medicine, which allows-in any case-reflecting its strengths and obvious limitations.

In conclusion, clinical and echocardiographic elements such as age, atrial fibrillation, LVEF and PASP were independently associated with the onset of LCO.

REFERENCES

1. Rao V, Ivanov J, Weisel RD, Ikonomidis JS, Christakis GT, David TE. Predictors of low cardiac output syndrome after coronary artery bypass. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1996;112(1):38ï¿1/251. Disponible en: doi: 10.1016/s0022-5223(96)70176-99 [ Links ]

2. Uhlig K, Efremov L, Tongers J, Frantz S, Mikolajczyk R, Sedding D, et al. Inotropic agents and vasodilator strategies for the treatment of cardiogenic shock or low cardiac output syndrome. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020;11(11):CD009669. Disponible en: doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009669.pub4 [ Links ]

3. Duncan AE, Kartashov A, Robinson SB, Randall D, Zhang K, Luber J, et al. Risk factors, resource use, and cost of postoperative low cardiac output syndrome. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2022;163(5):1890ï¿1/28.e10. Disponible en: doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.125 [ Links ]

4. Hong L, Xu H, Ge C, Tao H, Shen X, Song X, et al. Prediction of low cardiac output syndrome in patients following cardiac surgery using machine learning. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:973147. Disponible en: doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.973147 [ Links ]

5. Ad N, Luc JGY, Nguyen TC. Cardiac surgery in North America and coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): Regional variability in burden and impact. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2020;162(3):893-903. e4. Disponible en: doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2020.06.077 [ Links ]

6. Cuerpo Caballero G, Carnero Alcazar M, Lopez Menendez J, Centella Hernandez T, Polo Lopez L, Garcia Fuster R, et al. Cirugia cardiovascular en Espana en el ano 2020. Registro de intervenciones de la Sociedad Espanola de Cirugia Cardiovascular y Endovascular. Cir Cardiovasc. 2022;29(4):207ï¿1/220. Disponible en: doi: 10.1016/j.circv.2022.03.023 [ Links ]

7. Vera-Rivero DA, Chirino-Sanchez L, Yanes GR. Origenes y desarrollo historico de la cirugia cardiovascular en Cuba durante el siglo XX. Acta Med Cent. 2020;14(1):133-41. Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumenI.cgi?IDARTICULO=92230Links ]

8. Ministerio de Salud Publica. Anuario Estadistico de Salud 2021. La Habana: Direccion de Registros Medicos y Estadisticas de Salud; 2022. Disponible en: https://temas.sld.cu/ estadisticassalud/2022/10/18/anuario-estadistico-de-salud-2021/ [ Links ]

9. Bertini P, Guarracino F. Anticoagulation in extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: still a challenge. Minerva Anestesiol. 2020;86(1):7-8. Disponible en: doi: 10.23736/S03759393.19.14265-4 [ Links ]

10. Schoonen A, van Klei WA, van Wolfswinkel L, van Loon K. Definitions of low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac surgery and their effect on the incidence of intraoperative LCOS: A literature review and cohort study. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:926957. Disponible en: doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.926957 [ Links ]

11. Kacila M, K Tiwari K, Granov N, Omerbasic E, Straus S. Assessment of the Initial and Modified Parsonnet score in mortality prediction of the patients operated in the Sarajevo Heart center. Bosn J Basic Med Sci. 2010;10(2):165ï¿1/28. Disponible en: http://dx.doi. org/10.17305/bjbms.2010.2717 [ Links ]

12. Lorenzo S. Sindrome de bajo gasto cardiaco en el posoperatorio de cirugia cardiaca. Rev Urug Cardiol. 2020;35(3):385-94. Disponible en: doi: 10.29277/cardio.35.3.18 [ Links ]

13. Perez Vela JL, Jimenez Rivera JJ, Alcala Llorente MA, Gonzalez de Marcos B, Torrado H, Garcia Laborda C, et al. Sindrome de bajo gasto cardiaco en el postoperatorio de cirugia cardiaca. Perfil, diferencias en evolucion clinica y pronostico. Estudio ESBAGA. Med Intensiva. 2018;42(3):159-67. Disponible en: http://www.medintensiva.org/es-sindrome-bajo-gastocardiaco-el-articulo-S0210569117301997Links ]

14. Fernandez Mesa JE, Padron Garcia KM, Paredes Cordero AM, Diaz Vazquez E, Gonzalez Greck O, Gonzalez Trujillo A. Predictores de bajo gasto cardiaco perioperatorio en pacientes operados de cirugia cardiaca valvular. CorSalud. 2018;10(4):286-93. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2078-71702018000400286Links ]

15. Zhao X, Gu B, Li Q, Li J, Zeng W, Li Y, et al. Machine learning approach identified clusters for patients with low cardiac output syndrome and outcomes after cardiac surgery. Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022;9:962992. Disponible en: doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.962992 [ Links ]

16. Cubides Nunez RA. Complicaciones en pacientes intervenidos por reemplazo valvular aortico en el Hospital Universitario Mayor Mederi 2015 ï¿1/2 2018 tesis de posgrado. Colombia: Universidad del Rosario; 2020. Recuperado a partir de: https://repository.urosario.edu.co/items/8f352580-ffcc-4d85-990d-fc1b46b9e737 [ Links ]

17. Gomez Nunez K, Hechavarria Pouymiro S, Perez Lopez H, Arazoza Hernandez A, Napoles Sierra I. Fibrilacion Auricular post operatoria en cirugia valvular. Rev Cuban Cardiol. 2020;26(3). Disponible en: https://revcardiologia.sld.cu/index.php/revcardiologia/article/view/933Links ]

18. Sepulveda FA, Jimenez LM, Castro HD, Castro JA, Canas EM, Hidalgo JE, et al. Predictores de requerimiento intraoperatorio de soporte inotropico y/o vasopresor en cirugia de revascularizacion miocardica. Rev Chil Anest. 2021;50(6):851-6. Disponible en: doi: 10.25237/revchilanestv5005101106 [ Links ]

19. Li Z, Zhang GB, Li TW, Zhang Y, Li MD, Wu Y. Risk factors of low cardiac output syndrome after cardiac valvular surgery in elderly patients with valvular disease complicated with giant left ventricle. Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi. 2021;49(4):368-73. Disponible en: doi: 10.3760/cma.j.cn112148-20210302-00187 [ Links ]

20. Burstein B, Anand V, Ternus B, Tabi M, Anavekar NS, Borlaug BA, et al. Noninvasive echocardiographic cardiac power output predicts mortality in cardiac intensive care unit patients. Am Heart J. 2022;245:149ï¿1/259. Disponible en: doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.12.007 [ Links ]

21. Gonzalez Kadashinskaia GO, Bello Carrasco LM, Anchundia Alvia DA. Cirugia cardiaca, complicaciones inmediatas post operatorias. Universidad y Sociedad. 2020;12(2):293-300. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2218-36202020000200293Links ]

22. Fernandez Mesa JE, Padron Garcia KM, Paredes Cordero AM, Gonzalez Greck O, Gonzalez Trujillo A, Diaz Vazquez E, et al. Supervivencia a los cinco anos en pacientes con valvulopatias izquierdas operados de cirugia cardiaca valvular. CorSalud. 2020;12(1):38-45. Disponible en: http://scielo.sld.cu/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S207871702020000100038&lng=esLinks ]

23. Jimenez Hernandez LR, Sainz Escarrega V, Hernandez Mejia I, Victorica Guzman O, Gonzalez Vargas AP. Resultados clinicos y quirurgicos de pacientes sometidos a cambio valvular aortico con FEVI 35%. Acta med Grupo Angeles. 2019;17(4):350-3. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.mx/scielo.php?script=sci_ arttext&pid=S1870-72032019000400350&lng=esLinks ]

24. Aslan N, Yildizdas D, Gocen U, Erdem S, Demir F, Yontem A, et al. Low cardiac output syndrome score to evaluate postoperative cardiac surgery patients in a pediatric intensive care unit. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2020;48(5):504ï¿1/213. Disponible en: doi: 10.5543/tkda.2020.13844 [ Links ]

25. Maganti M, Badiwala M, Sheikh A, Scully H, Feindel C, David TE, et al. Predictors of low cardiac output syndrome after isolated mitral valve surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2010;140(4):790-6. Disponible en: doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2009.11.022 [ Links ]

26. Kochar A, Zheng Y, van Diepen S, Mehta RH, Westerhout CM, Mazer DC, et al. Predictors and associated clinical outcomes of low cardiac output syndrome following cardiac surgery: insights from the LEVO-CTS trial. Eur Heart J Acute Cardiovasc Care. 2022;11(11):818-25. Disponible en: doi: 10.1093/ehjacc/zuac114 [ Links ]

27. Liu Y, Xiao J, Duan X, Lu X, Gong X, Chen J, et al. The multivariable prognostic models for severe complications after heart valve surgery. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2021;21(1):491. Disponible en: doi: 10.1186/s12872-021-02268-z [ Links ]

28. Elhenawy AM, Algarni K, Rao V, Yau TM. Predictors of hospital mortality after surgery for ischemic mitral regurgitation: the Toronto General Hospital experience. J Card Surg. 2020;35(12):3334-9. Disponible en: doi: 10.1111/jocs.15064 [ Links ]

29. Seguel E, Rubilar H, Vera-Calzaretta A, Stockins A, Gonzalez R, Ramirez S. Resultados de la cirugia de reparacion valvular mitral en el Hospital Guillermo Grant Benavente de Concepcion (20092020). Rev Chil Cardiol. 2021;40(1):37-46. Disponible en: doi: 10.4067/s0718-85602021000100037 [ Links ]

30. De Lima Neto AV, De Melo VL, Vieira Dantas D, Fernandes Costa IK. Complicacoes no pos-operatorio de cirurgias cardiacas em pacientes adultos: revisao de escopo. Cienc Enferm. 2021;27:34. Disponible en: doi: 10.29393/ce2734coai40034 [ Links ]

4Author contributions: YRG conceived the idea of drafting an original article, as well as its conceptualization, data curation, project administration; performed the primary data collection from patients’ medical records, tabulation, bibliographic search, statistical analysis and table creation; and participated in the group discussion of the final version. YGG participated in the statistical analysis, bibliographic search, formal analysis, methodology and supervision; wrote the discussion and conclusions sections; and participated in the group discussion of the final version. LCC assisted with the bibliographic search, display, writing and group discussion of the final version.

Funding sources: This article was funded by the authors.

Received: December 14, 2022; Revised: January 30, 2023; Accepted: March 01, 2023

Corresponding author: Yoandro Rosabal García Address: Carretera Central S/N Reparto Sueño entre calle 4.a y 6.a, Municipio Santiago de Cuba. Provincia Santiago de Cuba, Cuba. Telephone:(+53) 535 04202 E-mail: yoandrorg@gmail.com

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons