INTRODUCTION

Gestational trophoblastic disease is an old pathology. About 2500 years ago, Hippocrates in his theory of the 4 humors described hydatidiform mole as hydrops or fluid retention in the uterus which he attributed to unhealthy water^1,2.

The incidence and prevalence of this disease depends on the geographical area; The Asian continent has the highest incidence 1 out of every 500 pregnancies; Also with greater capacity for malignancy, in western countries the incidence is 1 in 1500 pregnancies where only 5 to 10% persists the disease or becomes malignant, in Latin America the incidence ranges from 4.6 per 1000 pregnancies, in our country the incidence ranges from approximately 2.33 to 4.77 per 1000 pregnancies³.

The term of gestational trophoblastic disease is used to describe a group of tumors that are characterized by abnormal trophoblast proliferation. Trophoblast produces human chorionic gonadotropin, which is why it is important to quantify this peptide for the diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of this disease⁴. From a histological point of view, gestational trophoblastic disease is divided into hydatidiform mole, which is recognized by the presence of villi and non-molar trophoblastic neoplasia, which lacks villi.^5,7.

Hydatidiform moles are excessively immature placentas and edematous. These comprise partial, complete and malignant invasive hydatidiform moles. Non-molar trophoblastic neoplasia include choriocarcinoma, placental trophoblastic tumor, and epithelioid trophoblastic tumor. Gestational trophoblastic neoplasia include invasive mole, choriocarcinoma, placental trophoblastic tumor, and epithelioid trophoblastic tumor^8,9.

In relation to risk factors, the age under 20 years and over 35 are factors associated with the development of the pathology. Multiparity, history of abortion, history of molar pregnancy among others are factors associated with the development of the disease and some find significant association in relation to the occupation of the father¹⁰.

In the past, metastatic tumors had a high mortality rate, but thanks to chemotherapy, most tumors are curable¹¹.

Therefore, our study aimed to evaluate the incidence and factors associated with gestational trophoblastic disease in patients treated at Hipolito Unanue National Hospital.

METHODS

RESULTS

Incidence results were 0.7 % during 2014; In 2015 were 0.6%; In 2016 were 0.8% and in 2017 were 0.8%.

Of the total number of patients studied, the most frequent age range was 20 to 35 years, with 65%, and also the majority (53%) had a low socioeconomic level. On the other hand, about a third were multiparous (32.2%) while the majority were primiparous (38.9%). The other general characteristics are shown intable 1.

As can be seen intable 2, the most frequent histological type was complete hydatidiform mole with 66.6%; Followed by partial hydatidiform mole with 26.7%; The other histological types had smaller proportions.

When performing the bivariate analysis, we found that gestational trophoblastic disease was associated with being younger than 20 years, being multiparous and having a history of abortion.

When performing the multivariate analysis, the only variables that showed significance were history of abortion as a risk factor and age under 20 years as a protective factor..

DISCUSSION

Gestational trophoblastic disease constitutes a diverse group of lesions with specific pathogenesis, morphological characteristics and clinical characteristics¹³. There are few studies whose objectives were to identify possible risk factors associated with the development of gestational trophoblastic disease. Regarding the frequency of gestational trophoblastic disease in our study we found 7 cases per thousand postpartum women, similar to what was described in a study carried out in Mexico in 2016¹³.

Of the factors studied, the most frequent in the study population was history of abortion, which was present in 48.3% of cases and was associated with an increase of more than six times the risk of developing trophoblastic disease compared to women who had no history of abortion. This result is similar to that found by Shamshiri H. et al¹⁴where the risk of developing the disease was 3.17 times, postulating that the woman must have a certain predisposition for the formation, in addition, the presence of recurrent abortions associated with molar pregnancy and multiparity are protective against the whole mole.

Regarding multiparity, which is an important risk factor in pregnancy, childbirth and postpartum for various morbidities. Our study found that 55% of cases had multiparity; However, the relationship found in the bivariate analysis was not found in the multivariate analysis. A study carried out by Garcia L. et al¹⁵found an OR of 5.41 associated with multiparity in agreement with what was found by Sanchez A.¹⁶in his study, associating it to the educational level of the population concerned. In contrast, it is worth mentioning that in a study by Fletcher et al¹⁷the nulliparity associated with the development of gestational trophoblastic disease was analyzed, finding that more than 60% of patients reported a molar pregnancy during their first pregnancy, which agrees with what was found in the present study.

The analysis of the age variable showed that 13.3% of the cases were younger than 20 years and 45% were older than 35 years. It was also found that the age younger than 20 years had an OR lower than 1, behaving as a protective factor for gestational trophoblastic disease, a relationship corroborated in the multivariate analysis. It is worth mentioning that Shamshiri H. et al¹⁴reported that the younger the greater the risk of developing gestational trophoblastic disease, this explains a relationship between the risk of molar pregnancy and maternal age extremes; With an increased risk of 10 times in women over 40 years and 1.3 times in adolescents. While the highest risk in older women is consistently high, due to declining fertility in this age group. While the effect of aging on eggs can cause abnormal gametogenesis and/or fertilization may be part of the explanation in advanced maternal age, this does not explain the data on adolescents¹⁸.

Regarding socioeconomic level, in the present study no significant association was found. No significant association was found with previous molar pregnancy. This is corroborated by Shamshiri et al¹⁴, who associated trophoblastic disease with educational level, observing that this pathology was more frequent in patients with low educational level. These findings are reported in countries of Latin America and Asia where there may be some bias given the high poverty of this region, it is reported that this incidence would decrease through better medical control from the beginning of pregnancy and better access to food sources¹⁸.

In turn, no association was found with the use of contraceptive methods. This contrasts with the findings of Palmer et al.¹⁹; Those who found an association with a history of oral contraceptive use sometime before pregnancy, increasing the risk of trophoblastic disease as the duration of contraceptive use increased. However, Vecchia C. et al²⁰in their study found no association between these variables, which attributed to the use of the intrauterine device that was frequent in their environment; This is in line with the present study. This may be due to the increased use of injectable or depot contraceptive methods.

Likewise, no significant association was found in relation to blood group A and trophoblastic disease, the same was found in other studies, such as that carried out by Sharifi N. et al⁸who observed that there was a positive relationship of molar disease with blood group and raised the need to know the blood group of the father, an element also recommended by WHO.

The present study had the limitations that other factors such as diet or genetic factors were not measured. However, the relevance of the factors evaluated and found shed light to perform the respective interventions in order to prevent this disease.

CONCLUSION

The only risk factor associated with gestational trophoblastic disease in the adjusted analysis was history of abortion, while age under 20 years behaved as a protective factor.