SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número2Factores asociados a la realización de actividades de autocuidado en pacientes diabéticos en tres Hospitales de UcayaliAlbumina e índice neutrófilo-linfocito como predictores de estadío tumoral en pacientes con cáncer gástrico índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana

versão impressa ISSN 1814-5469versão On-line ISSN 2308-0531

Rev. Fac. Med. Hum. vol.20 no.2 Lima abr./jun 2020

http://dx.doi.org/10.25176/rfmh.v20i2.2899 

Original article

Knowledge and habits of solar exposure in street traders of a market in Chiclayo, Peru

Sherly RaquelSempértegui-Ruiz1 

Carol Jennifer del Milagro Nuñez-Campos1 

Maxi Andrea Bustios-Ahumada1 

Andrés Eduardo Arenas-Piscoya1 

Cynthia Lizeth Estela-Moreto2 

Winston Maldonado-Gómez1 

Sebastian Iglesias-Osores3 

Alain Monsalve-Mera1 

1Escuela de Medicina, Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo. Chiclayo, Perú.

2Hospital Regional Lambayeque. Lambayeque, Perú.

3Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo. Lambayeque, Perú.

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To determine the knowledge and habits of solar exposure in street vendors around a Chiclayo market.

Methods:

A questionnaire were applied to 291 street vendors located around the Chiclayo Model market, who evaluated the habits of sun exposure, photo protection measures, a history of sunburn and skin cancer, as well as knowledge of ultraviolet radiation and sources of information.

Results:

The ages were, 18-25 (42.3%), 36-54 (38.1%), 55 -78 (19.6%). At the educational level, 13.1% have a complete primary, 32.6% have a complete secondary and 8.2% have a complete superior. At the time of the study, 71.9% had been working as street vendors for more than 3 years. The phototypes of the participants were phototype I (0.3%), phototype II (4.5%), phototype III (24.7%), phototype IV (48.8%), phototype V (19.6%) , phototype VI (2.15). 90 ± 3.5% recognize that it causes skin cancer, 53.6% acknowledge that a characteristic of skin aging by radiation is spots and warts, 56% answered that solar radiation causes cataracts, 52.92% He replied that white-skinned people are more sensitive to the sun's rays. 48.5% of them declared that they were exposed to sunlight for more than 6 hours, 24.7% were exposed to 3-6 hours a day, while 8.6% had the shortest time of sun exposure (0 - 2 hours). 75.3% do not use sunscreen.

Conclusion:

The knowledge and habits of sun exposure in street traders are from fair to adequate and poor habits.

Key words: Radiation exposure; Ultraviolet rays; Sunscreening agents. (source: MeSH NLM).

INTRODUCCIÓN

Ultraviolet radiation is the main risk factor in the development of skin cancer1. Lifestyles lead to higher exposures to ultraviolet radiation, increases the risk of developing skin cancer as is the case with street vendors2. Skin cancers are defined as malignant or benign cells3, skin cancer is the most common malignancy in the world, and its prevalence has risen globally in recent years4. It is estimated that one in five Americans will develop skin cancer during their lifetime and that one person will die of melanoma every hour of the day3. In Peru, skin cancer ranks fourth in newly diagnosed cases (2010-2012)5. According to data from the Epidemiological Surveillance of Cancer carried out in Peru in 2016, skin cancer was the second most frequent in men and the third in women (MINSA). Sunlight is responsible for many biological effects essential to life. However, when excessive, it can pose risks to human health by causing sunburn, photo aging, and photo carcinogenesis6. Sun exposure is related to the development of all types of SC, both melanoma and nonmelanoma.7

Solar radiation consists of visible, infrared and ultraviolet (UV) light. The chronic undesirable effects of solar radiation are primarily due to the spectrum between 290 and 400 nm in length (UV). These include burns, carcinogenesis, immunosuppression, ocular cataracts and photo aging. Epidemiological studies have shown that solar exposure and UV sensitivity in the population are the main risk factors for the development of skin neoplasms5,8-12.

Everyday activities are carried out outdoors, such as informal trade in street vendors, which is a reality in all Latin American cities13. The importance of the practice of sunscreen measures in these people exposed to prolonged periods of UV radiation decreases the morbidity of suffering some type of injuries and diseases mentioned14.

The behaviour of skin cancer morbidity and mortality observed in these studies does not mean that it is a major public health problem, although its real prevalence and incidence are not known, new cases of cancer have been systematically increased. This highlights the need for primary prevention campaigns to reduce sun exposure, the main modifiable risk factor, and the promotion of early detection of skin cancer8,14. LThe objectives of the work were to assess the degree of knowledge and habits that street traders in a market in Lambayeque, Peru have about solar exposure and its relationship with skin cancer, as well as knowledge of the different forms of sun protection. Concepts and misconduct related to sunscreen were also evaluated.

METHODS

Design

Prospective cross-sectional study.

Population, sample size

291 street vendors located around the Chiclayo Modelo Market. We worked with the entire population located in the geographic data collection site at the time of data collection.

Procedures, variables and instruments

The instrument used by the authors was applied to street traders who sell their products outside the Modelo market from Chiclayo, Lambateque during the first week of September 2017. The time of data collection was between 10:00 am and 2:00 pm, which guaranteed the need to use sunscreen material. In the field, the surveyor verified the information concerning the mentioned means of sun protection, being cross-examined if it does not coincide. All ambulants present on the day set for data collection were interviewed. The ambulants were located around the market, delimiting the space around up to two blocks from the market perimeter. Sun exposure habits, photo protection measures, a history of sunburn and skin cancer, knowledge of ultraviolet radiation and sources of information were evaluated. The instrument used was adapted from another instrument used in a study carried out in the Historic Center of Trujillo15. This adaptation, in turn, has been accompanied by expert judgement validation.

Statistical analysis

Descriptive statistics were used, representing qualitative variables using absolute and relative frequencies; likewise, for quantitative variables, measurements of central tendency and dispersion were used, after assessment of normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test. All statistical analyses were executed using the statistical software Infostat.

Ethical Issues

The project was approved by the Ethics and Research Committee of the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo, and an informed consent was applied and signed by the participants.

RESULTS

A total of 291 street vendors from the Chiclayo Model Market were surveyed. Age ranges were distributed from 18-25 (42.3%), 36-54 (38.1%), 55-78 (19.6%). According to the level of education, 13.1% have full primary education, 32.6% have full secondary education and 8.2% complete upper secondary education. At the time of the study, 71.9% had been working as street traders for more than three years.

Table 1.  Sociodemographic Characteristics of Street Vendors in a Market in Lambayeque, Chiclayo - September, 2017 

SOCIODEMOGRAPHIC CHARACTERISTICS   n %
Gender Men 149 48,8% Women 142 51,2%
Education level Incomplete primary 39 13,4% Complete primary 38 13,1% Incomplete secondary 65 22,3% Complete secondary 95 32,6% Incomplete Superior 30 10,3% Complete Superior 24 8,2%
Working time 1 - 2 weeks 4 1,4% 3 weeks - 1 month 5 1,7% 2 - 12 months 32 11% 1 year - 3 years 41 14,1% More tan 3 years 209 71,9%
Age 18 - 35 years 123 42,3% 36 - 54 years 111 38,1% 55 - 78 years 67 19,6%
Total   291 100%

We also studied the skin phototype of ambulants working around a market, in which the following frequency was observed: phototype I (0.3%), phototype II (4.5%), phototype III (24.7%), phototype IV (48.8%), phototype V (19.6%), phototype VI (2.15%).

Table 2shows the results of questions addressed on the notions of traders regarding the effects caused by solar radiation. The most relevant responses in the item disease by prolonged sun exposure are that 90 ± 3.5% recognize that it causes skin cancer, 53.6% recognize that a characteristic of skin aging by radiation are spots and warts, in the item of damage to the eyes by sun exposure 56% responded that solar radiation causes cataracts, also 52.92% responded that white skin people are more sensitive to sun rays as well as skin cancer (90%).

Table 2.  Knowledge of the street traders of a market in Lambayeque, Chiclayo - September, 2017. 

    Correct % Incorrect %
Illness from prolonged sun exposure Stretch marks 12 4,12% 279 95,88% Skin cáncer 262 90,03% 17 9,07% Scabies 11 3,78% 268 96,22% Cellulitis 6 2,06% 273 97,94%
Skin aging characteristic Warts, moles 39 13,4% 240 86,6% Acne, hives 33 11,3% 246 88,7% Spots, wrinkles 156 53,6% 135 46,3% Itching, rash 63 21,6% 228 78,4%
Damage to the eyes from sun exposure Squint 7 2,4% 284 97,6% Bleeding in the eyes 21 7,2% 270 92,8% Myopia 100 34,36% 191 65,64% Waterfalls 163 56,01% 128 43,99%
Hours when the sun’s rays are strongest Between 10 am and 3 pm 234 80,41% 57 19,59% Before 7 am 6 2,06% 285 97,94% Between 3 pm and 6 pm 27 9,27% 264 90,73% Between 7 am and 10 am 24 8,24% 267 91,76%
The truth about sun rays On a cloudy day you can’t burn 48 16,49% 243 83,51% White-skinned people are more sensitive to the sun’s rays 154 52,92% 137 47,08% White-skinned people are more sensitive to the sun’s rays 40 13,74% 251 86,26% The sun in the Winter is not dangerous 49 16.83% 242 83,17%

59.5% of traders (173/291) reported working from Monday to Sunday, 39.4% worked 5-6 days a week, and 4.1% worked 4 or less days a week. Where approximately one (48,5 %) of them reported exposure for more than 6 hours, 24,7 % were exposed to sunlight for 3 - 6 hours a day, while 8,6 % reported the lowest solar exposure time (0 - 2 hours). Most traders do not use sunscreen (75.3%), only 72 traders used sunscreen at the time of the survey. Only 24.7% of the respondents (72) said they used this product as a photoprotection measure; of these, 63.9% (68) said that a family member recommended its use, 94.4% used it 1-2 times a day, 38.9% used it only when going to work, 52.8% (38) uses it on face, neck, ears and hands, and half of them (50%) get it from a catalog (Table 3).

Table 3.  Solar exposure habits of street vendors using sunscreen. 

    n %
Who recommended its use to you? Doctor 15 20,8% Nurse 3 4,2% Family 46 63,9% Pharmacist / Apothecary 5 6,9% Other 3 4,2%
How many times do you apply it? De 1 to 2 times 68 4,2% De 3 to 4 times 1 1.4% De 5 to 6 times 3 4,2%
When do you use it? Only sunny days 24 33,3% Only when I go to work at the market 28 38,9% Everyday 20 27,8%
Everyday Only in the face 17 23,6% Face and neck 17 23,6% Face, neck, ears and hands 38 52,8%
Where do you get sunscreen? Where do you get sunscreen? 35 48,6% Supermarket 1 1,4% Catalogue 36 50,0%

The most common habits used as a photo protection practice were the use of umbrellas (45%) and trousers (61%), while the least used were the use of lenses (60%) and caps (27%) (Table 4).

Table 4.  Photo protection practices, according to Likert’s scale in street vendors. 

  Always Usually Sometimes Almost never Never
  n % n % n % n % n %
WEAR AN UMBRELLA 132 45% 25 9% 52 18% 23 8% 59 20%
WEAR SUNGLASSES 32 11% 14 5% 48 16% 21 7% 176 60%
WEAR A CAP 105 36% 39 13% 63 22% 4 1% 80 27%
WEAR LONG SLEEVE 65 22% 40 14% 114 39% 31 11% 41 14%
WEAR PANTS 177 61% 42 14% 56 19% 4 1% 12 4%
WEAR CLEAR CLOTHING 61 21% 74 25% 119 41% 31 11% 6 2%

DISCUSSION

Many agents affect the transmission of ultraviolet light to human skin. These include natural photoprotective agents (ozone, pollutants, clouds and fog), natural biological agents (epidermal chromophores), physical photoprotective agents (clothing, hats, make-up, sunglasses and window glasses) and ultraviolet light filters (sun protection ingredients and tanning agents without sun). In addition, there are agents that can modulate the effects of ultraviolet light on the skin (antioxidants and others). All the above is revised in this article16, applied to street vendors or street vendors.

We found that traders answered some correct questions about the damage caused by solar exposure. About half of the respondents answered correctly at least four questions out of a total of five correctly, corresponding to the knowledge section, this relationship with sun exposure which is the main cause of photocarcinogenesis, photoaging and photosensitivity14, our results show that a large majority of sellers know that prolonged sun exposure causes skin cancer, this is corroborated by other studies2,4, also known to cause spots and wrinkles called photoaging18.

For questions about long-term exposure illness and higher solar radiation schedules, most answered correctly, while for the other three questions, just over half answered correctly. Rosso et al. mentions that intermittent and intense sun exposure, such as during beach holidays, increases the risk of malignant melanoma (CMM) and basal cell carcinoma (BCC), while prolonged sun exposure, such as during outdoor occupations, was not associated with CMM or BCC15.

At the time of the study 71.9% had been working as street traders for more than 3 years. No street vendors were found between the ages of 24-36. The results of the questions addressed on the notions of traders regarding the effects caused by solar radiation, the most relevant answers in the item disease by prolonged sun exposure are that 90% recognize that it causes skin cancer, this result is consistent with the study of Montserrat et al. and Castanedo-Cazares et al. states that most of the respondents recognized the relationship between ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer6,7, 53.6% recognize that a characteristic of the aging of the skin by radiation are spots and warts that are consistent with the Castanedo-Cazares study7, in the item of damage to the eyes by sun exposure 56% responded that solar radiation causes cataracts, in which also concludes a study evaluating carcinogenesis by ultraviolet radiation9, 52.92% also replied that white-skinned people are more sensitive to the sun’s rays, this was studied in the phototype of skin of ambulants working around a market, in which it was observed that the following frequency: phototype I (0.3%) that always burns and never sunbathes, phototype II (4.5%) that burns easily and is minimally bronzed, phototype III (24.7%), phototype IV (48.8%), phototype V (19.6%) that burns rarely and sunbathes intensely, phototype VI (2.15%). In contrast, a Spanish study by Peña Ortega indicates that phototype III (37.23%) represents the majority and is followed by phototype IV, which burns very little and tan easily (31.08%)10. Solorzano in a study in the southern cone of Lima, Peru found phototype IV in 77.9%, phototype III in 11.3%, phototype V in 9.9%, and phototype I, II and VI in 0.9% that resemble the results found in this study16. 59.5% of traders (173/291) reported working from Monday to Sunday, 39.4% work 5-6 days a week, and 4.1% work 4 or less days a week. Where approximately one (48.5%) of them reported to be exposed more than 6 hours, 24.7% were exposed to solar rays of 3 - 6 hours a day, while 8.6% recorded the lowest solar exposure time (0 - 2 hours). The concept of skin phototype is practical and useful for predicting the individual’s sensitivity to UV rays, risk and preventative factors, and choosing sunscreen even with limitation17. Most merchants do not use sunscreen (75.3%), this represents a serious health risk since according to Castanedo-Cazares phototype III will present sunburn with 22-33 min exposure on a summer day, While V requires more than 1 h of exposure8, it was also found that only 72 traders used sunscreen at the time of survey. Regular use of sunscreen prevents the development of solar keratosis and, by implication, possibly reduces the risk of long-term skin cancer18.

Only 24.7% of respondents (72) reported using this product as a photoprotection measure; of these, 63.9% (68) reported that a relative recommended its use, this is contrasted with the Molgó study where 72% of the population acknowledged having received information on skin cancer prevention, the main source of information being television (57.7%), while family members (5.7%)6. 94.4% use it 1-2 times a day, 38.9% only apply it when going to work, 52.8% (38/72) use it on face, neck, ears and hands, this behavior is risky since according to Sordo apply a photoprotector 30 minutes before leaving and re-apply every one or two hours, depending on the sporting or work activity19, this should be minimal with SPF 30+(24). protectors. and half of them (50%) get it from a catalog. The most common habits used as a photoprotection practice were using umbrellas and trousers, while the least used were wearing glasses and caps. Behavioural measures, for example, wearing sun protection clothing and a hat and minimising sun exposure, should be preferred to sun protectors14. Our work mainly contributes to the identification of who should be the main targets of the campaigns, especially people who have a low knowledge of solar radiation in health, because they are the most exposed and suffer from the effects of acute solar toxicity. However, even with sufficient prevention methods, lack of education and promotion of a practice will not lead to favourable results1.

The limitations of the study were affected by the sampling days as the work of the ambulants is very variable, attending to the vicinity of the market not on a daily basis, if not interdaily or having their own schedules which did not allow to survey the majority of ambulants. The sample size was reduced, being able to add the street vendors from other markets such as shopping centers and different streets of the city. We conclude that the knowledge and habits of solar exposure in street traders are to regulate to adequate and poor habits.

CONCLUSION

Our work contributes mainly to the identification of those who should be the main recipients of the campaigns, especially people who have a low knowledge of solar radiation in health, since they are the ones who are most exposed and suffer from the effects of solar toxicity. acute. However, even with sufficient prevention methods, lack of education and promotion of a practice will not lead to favorable results1.

REFERENCES

1. Narayanan DL, Saladi RN, Fox JL. Ultraviolet radiation and skin cancer [Internet]. Vol. 49, International Journal of Dermatology. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2010 [citado 25 de marzo de 2020]. p. 978-86. Disponible en: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/j.1365-4632.2010.04474.x [ Links ]

2. Tran H, Chen K, Shumack S. Epidemiology and aetiology of basal cell carcinoma. En: British Journal of Dermatology, Supplement. John Wiley & Sons, Ltd; 2003. p. 50-2. [ Links ]

3. Queen L. Skin Cancer: Causes, Prevention, and Treatment. Senior Honors Theses. 2017. [ Links ]

4. Lake E. Trends of skin cancer mortality after transplantation in the United States: 1987 to 2013. J Am Acad Dermatol. diciembre de 2018; [ Links ]

5. Piñeros M, Ramos W, Antoni S, Abriata G, Medina LE, Miranda JJ, et al. Cancer patterns, trends, and transitions in Peru: a regional perspective. Lancet Oncol. octubre de 2017;18(10):e573-86. [ Links ]

6. Sandby-Møller J, Poulsen T, Wulf HC. Epidermal Thickness at Different Body Sites: Relationship to Age, Gender, Pigmentation, Blood Content, Skin Type and Smoking Habits. Acta Derm Venereol. 2003;83(6):410-3. [ Links ]

7. Borschmann RD, Cottrell D. Developing the readiness to alter sun-protective behaviour questionnaire (RASP-B). Cancer Epidemiol. diciembre de 2009;33(6):451-62. [ Links ]

8. Montserrat Molgó N, Celso Castillo A, Valdés F R, Romero G W, Jeanneret M V, Cevo E T, et al. Conocimientos y hábitos de exposición solar de la población chilena. Rev Med Chil. junio de 2005;133(6):662-6. [ Links ]

9. Castanedo-Cazares JP, Torres-Álvarez B, Medellín-Pérez ME, Aguilar-Hernández GA, Moncada B. Conocimientos y actitudes de la población mexicana con respecto a la radiación solar. Gac Med Mex. 2006;142(6):451-5. [ Links ]

10. Cázares JPC, Álvarez BT, Ondarza SS, Pérez AE, Moscoso AG. Estimación del tiempo de exposición solar para quemadura en población mexicana. Gac Med Mex. 2012;148(3):343-7. [ Links ]

11. Nishigori C, Yarosh DB, Donawho C, Kripke ML. The immune system in ultraviolet carcinogenesis. J Investig dermatology Symp Proc. abril de 1996;1(2):143-6. [ Links ]

12. Peña Ortega M, Buendía Eisman A, Ortega del Olmo R, Serrano Ortega S. Hábitos de fotoprotección en la Facultad de Ciencias de la Educación Física y el Deporte de la Universidad de Granada. Piel. enero de 2013;19(4):179-83. [ Links ]

13. Bazzazi N, Heydarian S, Vahabi R, Akbarzadeh S, Fouladi DF. Quality of sunglasses available in the Iranian market; A study with emphasis on sellers' license. Indian J Ophthalmol. 1 de febrero de 2015;63(2):152-6. [ Links ]

14. Fajre X, Barría K, Muñoz C. Exposición solar y Fotoprotección. Rev Chil Med Fam. agosto de 2017;3(3):113-8. [ Links ]

15. Llican C, Armas E. Nivel de conocimiento sobre cáncer de piel y la práctica de medidas preventivas en vendedores ambulantes. Centro histórico de Trujillo, 2014. Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego. Universidad Privada Antenor Orrego - UPAO; 2015. [ Links ]

16. Kullavanijaya P, Lim HW. Photoprotection. J Am Acad Dermatol. junio de 2005;52(6):937-58. [ Links ]

17. Lautenschlager S, Wulf HC, Pittelkow MR. Photoprotection. Vol. 370, Lancet. Elsevier; 2007. p. 528-37. [ Links ]

18. Ichihashi M, Ando H, Yoshida M, Niki Y, Matsui M. Photoaging of the skin. ANTI-AGING Med [Internet]. 2009 [citado 25 de marzo de 2020];6(6):46-59. Disponible en: https://www.jstage.jst.go.jp/article/jaam/6/6/6_6_46/_article. [ Links ]

19. Rosso S, Zanetti R, Pippione M, Sancho-Garnier H. Parallel risk assessment of melanoma and basal cell carcinoma: Skin characteristics and sun exposure. Melanoma Res. diciembre de 1998;8(6):573-83. [ Links ]

20. Solórzano S, Contreras G, Pérez C. Aspectos epidemiológicos y percepciones del acné vulgar en escolares de secundaria del Cono Sur de Lima - Perú. Folia dermatol. 2005;16(3):113-8 [ Links ]

21. Kawada A. Risk and preventive factors for skin phototype. J Dermatol Sci. marzo de 2000;23(SUPPL. 1):S27-9. [ Links ]

22. Thompson SC, Jolley D, Marks R. Reduction of Solar Keratoses by Regular Sunscreen Use. N Engl J Med. octubre de 1993;329(16):1147-51. [ Links ]

23. Sordo C, Gutiérrez C. Skin cancer and sun radiation: Peruvian experience in the prevention and early detection of skin cancer and melanoma. Rev Peru Med Exp Salud Publica. marzo de 2013;30(1):113-7. [ Links ]

24. Gies PH, Roy CR, Toomey S, McLennan A. Protection against solar ultraviolet radiation. En: Mutation Research - Fundamental and Molecular Mechanisms of Mutagenesis. Elsevier; 1998. p. 15-22. [ Links ]

Financing: Self-financed

Received: March 09, 2020; Accepted: March 30, 2020

Correspondence: Sebastian Iglesias-Osores. Address: Huamachuco, Lambayeque 14013. Telephone: (074) 283146 Email:sebasiglo@gmail.com,siglesias@unprg.edu.pe

Authorship contributions: The authors participated in the genesis of the idea, project design, data collection and interpretation, analysis of results and preparation of the manuscript of this research work.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in the publication of this article.

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons