SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 número2Voluntad para el estudio y el trabajo académico en alumnos de una universidad privada de limaLactancia materna exclusiva y factores asociados en madres que asisten a establecimientos de salud de Lima Centro índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana

versão impressa ISSN 1814-5469versão On-line ISSN 2308-0531

Rev. Fac. Med. Hum. vol.20 no.2 Lima abr./jun 2020

http://dx.doi.org/10.25176/rfmh.v20i2.2918 

Original article

Gastroesophageal reflux disease as a factor associated with bronchial asthma in the pediatric population

Rafael Ricra1  , Surgeon

Juan Carlos Roque2  , Surgeon , Master of medicine

Joseph Alburqueque-Melgarejo3  , Medical student

Claudia Saldaña4  , Surgeon , Master of medicine

Pedro Ricra5  , ENT specialist

1San Juan Bautista Private University, Lima- Peru

2Scientific University of the South, Lima- Peru.

3Ricardo Palma University, Lima- Peru

4National Children's Institute Breña headquarters, Lima- Peru

5National Maternal and Perinatal Institute, Lima- Peru

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To determine the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and bronchial asthma in the pediatric population of the National Children's Hospital Breña headquarters between the years 2017-2018.

Methods:

An analytical observational study of cases and controls was not matched, with a ratio of 1 case to 2 controls, with a total of 45 cases and 90 controls, a simple random probability sampling was performed, with a retrospective collection for the variables bronchial asthma, GERD, GERD-induced esophagitis, prematurity, interrupted breastfeeding, sex and age. A bivariate and multiple logistic regression model was performed to obtain the Odds Ratio for the strength of association.

Results:

A statistically significant difference was found for GERD (p = 0.002), being 33.33% and 11.11% for cases and controls, as well as for interrupted lactation (p = 0.013); by multiple logistic regression analysis the variables GERD (OR 4.27, p = 0.003, CI 1.64-10.92) and interrupted breastfeeding (OR 2.74, P = 0.011, CI 1.26-5.97 ) presented a relationship for bronchial asthma.

Conclusion:

A relationship was found between GERD and bronchial asthma which can be extrapolated to the pediatric population of the city of Lima, this is the first article published in this regard at the national level, prospective studies are recommended to determine causality.

Key words: reflux disease; Bronchial asthma; Pediatrics (source: MeSH NLM).

INTRODUCTION

Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) is defined as the flow of gastric contents into the esophagus associated with symptoms and/or complications that may be esophageal or extra-esophageal. GERD represents a frequent gastrointestinal pathology around the globe with estimated prevalence between 10-20% in America and Europe; and 5% in Asia1,2,3,4.

Currently, its diagnosis has increased particularly in the pediatric population, where it occurs more frequently in males. GERD may present physiologically even before the first year of life due to immaturity of the gastroesophageal junction, a condition that decreases after the first year of life3.

Its prevalence is higher in children suffering from obesity, neurological diseases, congenital heart disease, gastrointestinal tract abnormalities, congenital diaphragmatic hernia, and chromosomal abnormalities. Preterm infants are also at risk of developing GERD due to immaturity of the lower esophageal sphincter, alterations in esophageal peristalsis, high milk intake, and delayed gastric emptying3,4. On the other hand, exclusive breastfeeding is a protective factor for GERD3.

Respiratory complications of GERD are common in the pediatric population, asthma being the most widely studied and whose occurrence is mainly attributed to vagal mechanisms, neurogenic inflammation, acid microaspiration, and increased bronchial reactivity5,6,7,8,9.

In recent years, multiple studies have demonstrated the existence of a relationship between asthma and GERD. A systematic review of 18 articles reported an average prevalence of 23.4% of GERD in patients with asthma10. Another systematic review that reviewed a total of 20 articles found a 22.0% prevalence of GERD in patients with asthma with a cumulative OR of 5.6 (95% CI: 4.3-6.9)11. However, many of these studies indicate a bidirectional relationship between these two variables10,11,12,13. Therefore, we assume an association between these variables and present the following study in order to determine the association between gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) and bronchial asthma in pediatric population of the National Institute of Children Health during the period 2017-2018. This is the first national work to mention this association.

METHODS

Design

An observational, analytical, retrospective, unmatched case-control study design of a ratio of 1 case to 2 controls was performed. This study was conducted at The National Children's Institute Breña headquarters in 2018 where a data collection of patients treated between the years 2017-2018 was conducted. The target population were pediatric patients older than 5 years with clinical manifestations of the airways treated in outpatient clinic of the general pediatrics service, where cases were those patients with bronchial asthma and controls those patients without bronchial asthma. The gastroesophageal reflux diagnosed by esophageal PH monitoring test was used as exposure factor.

Procedures and variables

Within the selection criteria for cases and controls were taken as inclusion criteria PH monitoring test, upper endoscopy, clinical history with complete data; The exclusion criteria were: child cerebral palsy, organic abnormalities of the upper respiratory and digestive tract, invasive instruments to the respiratory and digestive tract, neoplasms and rheumatic diseases.

The independent variables in the study were GERD, whose diagnostic tool was PH monitoring test and esophagitis whose diagnostic tool was biopsy obtained by upper digestive endoscopy, which were taken and evaluated by specialists in gastroenterology and pathology respectively. The dependent variable, bronchial asthma spirometer was used as a diagnostic tool according to the recommendations of the Gina guide14. It was given by pediatric outpatient specialists. As other variables, the age in years of the patient, gender, prematurity and interrupted breastfeeding and premature birth were recorded, which were taken from the anamnesis and history present in the secondary information source, the clinical history.

The data of each of the variables mentioned were recorded in a data collection form for each study subject which were stored for later emptying and statistical analysis.

Population and Sample

In order to calculate the sample size we took a confidence interval of 95%, a statistical power of 80%, a ratio of 1:2 for cases and controls respectively, taking the results obtained by Debley et al15with a proportion of exposed cases of 19.3%, proportion of exposed controls 2.5% and an odds ratio of 9.2, we used the OpenEpi open access epidemiological package for the sample calculation where we obtained a total of 135 patients, 45 cases and 135 controls respectively using the Fleiss formula with continuity correction. A probabilistic one-stage sampling was performed, where the population was stratified in patients with bronchial asthma and without bronchial asthma. A simple random sampling was performed in each of the strata, without replacement.

Ethical Issues

This study, respecting the anonymity of each of the study subjects, received approval from the authorities of the institution.

Statistic analysis

The data collection forms were emptied into an EXCEL spreadsheet, where, by means of the Stat-Tranfer program, they were transported to the statistical package STATA version 15 for subsequent statistical analysis.

Descriptive statistics are presented for cases and controls. Reporting the mean and standard deviation for the quantitative variable age, as well as the absolute and relative frequency for each qualitative variable, such as, sex, esophagitis and interrupted breastfeeding.

For the inferential statistics, the non-parametric statistical test chi square was performed to contrast the qualitative variables and a mean contrast test for the quantitative variables with respect to cases and controls. Subsequently, a bivariate logistic regression model was performed to obtain the odds ratio and 95% confidence intervals. To conclude, a multivariate logistic regression model is performed to obtain an adjusted odds ratio with their respective 95% confidence intervals, with those variables that are considered risk factors for bronchial asthma.

RESULTS

Of the total sample of 135 pediatric patients none of the patients studied presented missing data for the variables studied, 45 were patients with asthma and 90 patients did not have asthma, the mean and standard deviation of age for both groups was 10.73 +/- 1.95 and 10.79 +/- 1.76 respectively, with no statistically significant differences. The percentage of males was higher in patients with asthma 60% than in patients without asthma 48.89%, with no statistically significant difference between the groups p= 0.223. The percentage of interrupted breastfeeding was lower in asthmatic patients 44.44% than in non-asthmatic patients 66.67%, with a statistically significant difference between the groups p=.013. The percentage of prematurity was higher in asthmatic patients 15.56% in relation to non-asthmatic patients 8.89%, with no statistically significant difference between the groups with a p= 0.245. The percentage of GERD was higher in patients with asthma 33.33% than in patients without asthma 11.11%, with a statistically significant difference between the groups p=.002. The percentage of esophagitis associated with GERD was higher in patients with asthma 17.78%, compared to non-asthmatic patients 7.78%, with no statistically significant difference between groups with a p= 0.081 (table 1).

A bivariate logistic regression model was performed for the variables sex (OR 1.57, p= 0.244, CI 0.76-3.24) interrupted breastfeeding (OR 2.5, p= 0.014, CI 1.20-5.21), prematurity (OR 1.89, p= 0.251, CI 0.64-5.59), GERD (OR 3.99, p= 0.003, CI 1.62-9.87), esophagitis induced by GERD (OR 2.56, p= 0.089, CI 0.87-7.60), only the variables GERD and interrupted breastfeeding were statistically significant (table 2).

A multiple logistic regression model was performed to adjust the odds ratio of GERD for variables that had a demonstrated effect on bronchial asthma, GERD (OR 4.27, p= 0.003, CI 1.64-10.92), gender (OR 1.61, p= 0.235, CI 0.74-3.50), interrupted breastfeeding (OR 2.74, p= 0.011, CI 1.26-5.97), prematurity (OR 1.92, p= 0.274, CI 0.60-6.18) (table 3). GERD and breastfeeding were the only variables with statistical significance.

Table 1.  Univariate analysis 

  Controls (N:)%(n) Cases (N:)%(n) P Value
GERD 11.11% (10) 11.11% (10) 0.002
Interrupted breastfeeding 33.33% (30) 55.56 (25) 0.013
Premature birth 8.89% (8) 15.56% (7) 0.245
Male sex 48.89% (44) 60% (45) 0.223
Esophagitis induced by GERD 7.78% (7) 17.78% (8) 0.081

* P values obtained from the non-parametric chi square test.

Table 2.  Analysis with bivariate logistic regression. 

Variables Odds Ratio P value Confidence Intervals
GERD 3.99 0.003 1.62 - 9.87
Interrupted breastfeeding 2.50 0.014 1.20 - 5.21
Premature birth 1.89 0.251 0.64 - 5.59
Male sex 1.57 0.224 0.76 - 3.24
Esophagitis induced by GERD 2.56 0.089 0.87 - 7.59

Table 3.  Multiple logistic regression analysis. 

Variables Odds Ratio P value Confidence Intervals
GERD 4.24 0.003 1.64 - 10.93
Interrupted breastfeeding 2.74 0.011 1.26 - 5.97
Premature birth 1.92 0.274 0.60 - 6.18
Male sex 1.57 0.235 0.74 - 3.50

DISCUSSION

The present study demonstrated an association between GERD and bronchial asthma in the pediatric population, as well as a high prevalence of GERD in patients with asthma. However, no statistically significant relationship was found between esophagitis and bronchial asthma. This finding could be explained by the fact that GERD symptomatology may exist without the presence of endoscopic findings and that the severity of these symptoms is also not correlated with endoscopic findings, as indicated in the studies by Zuberi BF et al. and Arul P. et al.16,17On the other hand, there are studies such as that of Ashraf K et al. which suggest that, if there is an association between these variables, our result remains controversial.18The study has design limitations. One of them lies in the fact that it is a single-center study, which affects its external validity. In addition, previously generated information was used and the available source of information did not have sufficient data to assess other variables such as anthropometric measurements and nutritional status of pediatric patients, with obesity being an important risk factor for both asthma and GERD19,20. Nor were other variables evaluated, such as the use of bronchodilators for asthma in children who had been diagnosed with GERD, the use of which has been shown to increase the risk of developing asthma in patients with GERD.8,21,22,23. In addition, our study did not evaluate the correlation between asthma severity and a high prevalence of GERD or the effect of GERD treatment on asthma patients.

This study provides evidence of the association between GERD and asthma in accordance with previously published studies8,23,24. Also, systematic reviews such as those of Thakkar K et al demonstrate a high prevalence of GERD in patients with asthma (22.0%) compared to controls (4.8%)11. Similarly, studies such as those by Havemann B. et al show a statistically significant association with a cumulative OR of 5.5 (95% CI: 1.9-15.8) between GERD and asthma variables.12

There is pathophysiological evidence of this association that maintains that the presence of acid reflux can enter the tracheobronchial tree and alter its functioning by various mechanisms, one of them is stimulating vagal reflexes that increase airway resistance. Others are based on the stimulation of nociceptive afferent fibers that through the release of neurokinins such as substance P or neurokinin A cause bronchospasm and increased mucus secretion at the bronchial level. Another mechanism proposed is the increase in bronchial reactivity induced by the presence of acid.8,9,25Despite the existence of this relationship that postulates GERD as a potential cause of asthma in children, there are also studies that show an inverse relationship, suggesting a possible bidirectional relationship between these variables8,9,21.

CONCLUSIÓN

We concluded that there is a relationship between the variables GERD and interrupted breastfeeding for the variable bronchial asthma. This is the first nationwide study to realize this association. Prospective studies are recommended to determine a risk association.

REFERENCES

1. Rybak, A., Pesce, M., Thapar, N., & Borrelli, O. (2017). Gastro-Esophageal Reflux in Children. International Journal of Molecular Sciences, 18(8), 1671. doi:10.3390/ijms18081671 [ Links ]

2. Gonzalez Ayerbe, J. I., Hauser, B., Salvatore, S., & Vandenplas, Y. (2019). Diagnosis and Management of Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Infants and Children: from Guidelines to Clinical Practice. Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology & Nutrition, 22(2), 107. doi:10.5223/pghn.2019.22.2.107 [ Links ]

3. Leung AK, Hon KL. Gastroesophageal reflux in children: an updated review. Drugs Context. 2019 Jun 17;8:212591. doi: 10.7573/dic.212591 [ Links ]

4. El-Serag, H. B., Sweet, S., Winchester, C. C., & Dent, J. (2013). Update on the epidemiology of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease: a systematic review. Gut, 63(6), 871-880. doi:10.1136/gutjnl-2012-304269 [ Links ]

5. Ozcan C., Erkoçoglu M., Civelek E., Demirkan H., Kirsaçlioglu C.T., Tiryaki H.T., Ginis T., Kocabas C.N. The relationship between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and asthma during childhood. Allergol. Immunopathol. 2014;42:109-114. doi: 10.1016/j.aller.2012.08.009. [ Links ]

6. Del Rosario J.F., Orenstein S.R. Evaluation and management of gastroesophageal reflux and pulmonary disease. Curr. Opin. Pediatr. 1996;8:209-215. doi: 10.1097/00008480-199606000-00003. [ Links ]

7. Borrelli O., Marabotto C., Mancini V., Aloi M., Macri F., Falconieri P., Lindley K.J., Cucchiara S. Role of gastroesophageal reflux in children with unexplained chronic cough. J. Pediatr. Gastroenterol. Nutr. 2011;53:287-292. doi: 10.1097/MPG.0b013e318216e1ad. [ Links ]

8. Ewa Toporowska-Kowalska, Krystyna Wasowska-Królikowska, Aneta Krogulska. Asthma and gastroesophageal reflux in children. Med Sci Monit 2002; 8(3): RA64-71 [ Links ]

9. Scarupa, M. D., Mori, N., & Canning, B. J. (2005). Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Children with Asthma. Pediatric Drugs, 7(3), 177-186. doi:10.2165/00148581-200507030-00004 [ Links ]

10. Tolia, V., Vandenplas, Y. (2009). Systematic review: the extra-oesophageal symptoms of gastro-oesophageal reflux disease in children. Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics, 29(3), 258-272. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2036.2008.03879.x [ Links ]

11. Thakkar, K., Boatright, R. O., Gilger, M. A., & El-Serag, H. B. (2010). Gastroesophageal Reflux and Asthma in Children: A Systematic Review. PEDIATRICS, 125(4), e925-e930. doi:10.1542/peds.2009-2382 [ Links ]

12. Havemann, B. D., Henderson, C. A., & El-Serag, H. B. (2007). The association between gastro-oesophageal reflux disease and asthma: a systematic review. Gut, 56(12), 1654-1664. doi:10.1136/gut.2007.122465 [ Links ]

13. Insight into the relationship between gastroesophageal reflux disease and ashtma - Fehrni Ates MD [ Links ]

14. Global Initiative for Asthma. Global Strategy for Asthma Management and Prevention, 2019. https://ginasthma.org/ [ Links ]

15. Debley, J. S., Carter, E. R., & Redding, G. J. (2006). Prevalence and impact of gastroesophageal reflux in adolescents with asthma: A population-based study. Pediatric Pulmonology, 41(5), 475-481. doi:10.1002/ppul.20399 [ Links ]

16. Zuberi BF, Faisal N, Quraishy MS, Afsar S, Kazi LA, Kazim E. Correlation between clinical endoscopic and histological findings at esophago-gastric junction in patients of gastroesophageal reflux disease. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2005 Dec;15(12):774-7. DOI: 12.2005/JCPSP.774777 [ Links ]

17. Arul P, Vinoth B, Alexander T, Phansalkar M, Padhi S. Correlation of narrow band imaging endoscopy and histopathology in the diagnosis of nonerosive reflux disease. Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology : Official Journal of the Saudi Gastroenterology Association, 31 Aug 2015, 21(5):330-336. DOI: 10.4103/1319-3767.164205 [ Links ]

18. Ashraf Karbasi, Mohammad Emami Ardestani, Mostafa Ghanei, Ali Amini Harandi. The association between reflux esophagitis and airway hyper-reactivity in patients with gastro-esophageal reflux. J Res Med Sci. 2013 Jun; 18(6): 473-476. [ Links ]

19. Lodge, C., Tan, D., Lau, M., Dai, X., Tham, R., Lowe, A., ... Dharmage, S. (2015). Breastfeeding and asthma and allergies: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Acta Paediatrica, 104, 38-53. doi:10.1111/apa.13132 [ Links ]

20. K Stordal, G Johannesdottir, B Bentsen, P Knudsen, K Carlsen et al. Acid suppression does not change respiratory symptoms in children with asthma and gastro-oesophageal reflux disease . Arch Dis Child. 2005 Sep; 90(9): 956-960. doi: 10.1136/adc.2004.068890 [ Links ]

21. Blake, K., & Teague, W. G. (2012). Gastroesophageal reflux disease and childhood asthma. Current Opinion in Pulmonary Medicine, 1. doi:10.1097/mcp.0b013e32835b582b [ Links ]

22. Khoshoo, V., Mohnot, S., Haydel, R., Saturno, E., Edell, D., & Kobernick, A. (2009). Bronchial hyperreactivity in non-atopic children with asthma and reflux: Effect of anti-reflux treatment. Pediatric Pulmonology, 44(11), 1070-1074. doi:10.1002/ppul.21094 [ Links ]

23. Fehmi Ates, Michael F Vaezi. Insight Into the Relationship Between Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease and Asthma. Gastroenterol Hepatol (N Y). 2014 Nov; 10(11): 729-736. [ Links ]

24. Lorenza Di Genova, Laura Penta, Anna Biscarini, Giuseppe Di Cara, Susanna Esposito. Children with Obesity and Asthma: Which Are the Best Options for Their Management? Nutrients. 2018 Nov; 10(11): 1634. doi: 10.3390/nu10111634 [ Links ]

25. Hoda M Malaty, J Kennard Fraley, Suhaib Abudayyeh et al. Obesity and gastroesophageal reflux disease and gastroesophageal reflux symptoms in children. Clin Exp Gastroenterol. 2009; 2: 31-36. doi: 10.2147/ceg.s4715 [ Links ]

26. Solana García Maria José, López-Herce Cid Jesús, Sánchez Sánchez César. Gastroesophageal Reflux in Critically Ill Children: A Review. ISRN Gastroenterol. 2013; 2013: 824320.doi: 10.1155/2013/824320 [ Links ]

Financing: Self-financed

Received: March 19, 2019; Accepted: March 23, 2019

Correspondence: Leonardo Rafael Ricra Fernández. Address: Jr. Agustín de Jáuregui 437 - La Victoria, Lima-Peru. Telephone: 931349975 Email:leonardo_13_92@hotmail.com

Authorship contributions: The authors participated in the genesis of the idea, project design, collection and interpretation of data, analysis of results and preparation of the manuscript of the present work of research.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest in the publication of this article.

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons