Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
Links relacionados
- Similares en SciELO
Compartir
Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana
versión impresa ISSN 1814-5469versión On-line ISSN 2308-0531
Rev. Fac. Med. Hum. vol.20 no.3 Lima jul./sep 2020
http://dx.doi.org/10.25176/rfmh.v20i3.3055
Original article
Factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders in cleaning workers of the emergency service of a tertiary hospital
1Departamento de Obstetricia, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Lima, Perú.
2 Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Nacional Mayor de San Marcos. Lima, Perú.
3Hospital Edgardo Rebagliati Martins. Lima, Perú.
Objective:
To determine the factors associated with the presence of musculoskeletal disorders in cleaning workers in the emergency service of the Edgardo Rebagliati Martins National Hospital, 2019.
Methods:
Descriptive, observational, cross-sectional retrospective with a quantitative approach. The survey technique was used and the instrument was the Standard Nordic Questionnaire. Descriptive and inferential statistics were applied.
Results:
129 participants, female (82.95%); median age 43 years, height 1.55m, overweight or obese (57.37%), secondary or higher education (93.80%), originating in the interior of the country (37.21%) and from Lima; 32 years lived in Lima, the median working time was 18 months, 43.41% worked in the morning and 9.30% worked in more than one place (9.30%). They presented musculoskeletal pain 93.02%, pain in more than one area 75.97%, low back pain 65.12%, back pain 47.29%, neck pain (37.21%) and elbow / forearm pain 13, 18%. Only in the bivariate analysis, the working time was significant for the presence of pain (p value=0.009).
Conclusion:
After performing the adjusted analysis, no factors associated with musculoskeletal disorders were found.
Keywords: Musculoskeletal Physiological Phenomena; Musculoskeletal Pain; Low Back Pain; Surveillance of the Workers Health (Source: MeSH NLM)
INTRODUCTION
According to the World Health Organization (WHO) and the International Labour Organization (ILO), "occupational health is the science of anticipating, recognizing and evaluating harmful risks in the workplace, as well as developing strategies for prevention and control, with the aim of protecting and promoting the health and well-being of workers. At the same time safeguarding the community and the environment in general "1.
There is a latency period between the onset of symptoms caused by the activity performed by the worker and the diagnosis of the occupational disease, which remains silent and only becomes evident with the passage of months or years. The burden of personal illness or the inadequate habits of the worker in his work area not only contribute, but also make it more difficult to link the illness to a specific type of work.
According to ILO estimates, "Every day people die from work-related accidents or illnesses more than 2.78 million deaths per year. In addition, some 374 million Nonfatal work-related injuries occur annually, resulting in more than 4 days of absenteeism. The cost of this daily adversity is enormous and the economic burden of poor safety and safety practices is estimated at 3.94 percent of the global Gross Domestic Product each year"2.
In Latin America and Peru, the magnitude of occupational diseases is still unknown. The ILO estimates that, in developing countries, the annual cost of occupational accidents and diseases is between 2% and 11% of the Gross Domestic Product (GDP)3.
In the most developed countries "occupational health is considered a fundamental pillar in the development of a country, is a strategy to fight poverty. Its actions are aimed at promoting and protecting workers' health and preventing occupational accidents and diseases caused by working conditions and occupational risks in various economic activities"3.
On the other hand, the effects of chemical products or new technologies determine new risks that only become evident over time. They obviously represent potential and real problems for both the workers and the team that has to deal with them, also having relevance to the risks they represent for the environment4.
Cleaning workers more frequently suffer from pathologies such as musculoskeletal disorders, the main symptom of which is localized osteoarticular and muscular pain. Although on many occasions they may have a non-work-related origin, they may even be due to personal factors. It is the working conditions that usually trigger a large number of them, mainly those related to forced postures, repetitive movements, efforts, manual handling of loads, and others such as cold, heat, stress, etc.5
The study is aimed at expanding the incipient scientific knowledge produced by Peruvian medicine in this area in order to favor changes in work practices, especially in the prevention of musculoskeletal injuries, by implementing continuous improvement programs.
The purpose of this study is to determine the factors associated with the presence of musculoskeletal disorders in cleaning workers of the emergency unit of the Edgardo Rebagliati Martins National Hospital, 2019.
METHODS
Design and setting
Descriptive, observational, retrospective cross-sectional with a quantitative approach. It was performed in the adult emergency unit of the Hospital Nacional Edgardo Rebagliati Martins (HNERM - EsSalud, during the months of May to July of 2019.
Population and sample
The population consisted of 141 cleaning workers from the adult emergency unit of HNERM and the sample by 129 workers since 4 cleaning workers resigned and 8 were on vacation at the time of the study.
Variables and instruments
Independent variables were considered: age, gender, marital status, place of origin, place of provenance, time living in Lima, level of education, currently studying, nutritional status, medical-surgical background, time at work, work shift, hours per shift, extra work and as a dependent variable musculoskeletal pain.
The survey technique was used in the study and the instrument was the Standard Nordic Questionnaire (SNQ)6, a version translated into Spanish and validated with consistency and reliability coefficients, 0.727 and 0.816, the validity of the instrument was performed by calculating the coefficient from Kuder Richardson7.
The SNQ detects musculoskeletal symptoms in the last 12 months up to 07 days prior to the survey application, such as pain, discomfort, numbness, etc. It has two parts, one that identifies the areas of the body where the symptoms appear and using a body figure to locate the anatomical sites, and the second part identifies the functional impact of the mentioned symptoms and the evaluation that the patient may have received. The SNQ was adapted to the objectives of the present study, because of its validity, reliability, and its nationally and internationally use in various investigations.
Procedures
After information on the research work and signing of the informed consent form, a validated and anonymous survey was used by the cleaning personnel of the adult emergency unit, the time of application of the survey was 15 minutes for each worker.
Statistical analysis
The data was processed according to the SPSS 23.0 package. For the univariate analysis, the frequencies and percentages of the qualitative variables were calculated. For the bivariate analysis, the chi-square was estimated, Odds Ratio (OR) were calculated with their respective confidence interval as a measure of association, Fisher's exact test, and Mann Whitney U test was also calculated. A significance level of 95% was used; Likewise, the multivariate analysis was performed with logistic regression.
Ethical aspects
This research has the authorization of the head of the adult emergency unit of HNERM-EsSalud; In addition, the cleaning workers who participated in the survey signed the informed consent form, their dignity, integrity, privacy, and confidentiality were preserved by protecting the personal data of the patients (Declaration of Helsinki)8.
RESULTS
In the sample of 129 cleaning workers, predominated by women (82.95%), the median age was 43 years (RIC = 15 years) and height 1.55m (RIC = 0.09m), more than half were overweight or obese (57.37%), most had completed secondary or higher education (93.80%), living in Lima on average 32 years (RIC = 24 years), more than 1/3 of workers originated from areas outside of Lima (37.21%) and came from the districts of San Juan de Lurigancho, San Martín de Porres and Comas (34.12%).
Regarding the workplace, the participants had a median of 18 months (RIC = 27 months) of seniority in their work, worked in the morning shift (43.41%), 8 hours per shift (96.90%) and only 9.30% reported working in more than one place (Table 1).
Sociodemographic and health variables | n | % | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Gender | |||||
Female | 107 | 82.9 | |||
Male | 22 | 17.1 | |||
Age (years) * | 43 (15) | ||||
Marital status | |||||
Single | 57 | 44.2 | |||
Married | 56 | 43.4 | |||
Divorced | 10 | 7.8 | |||
Widower | 6 | 4.7 | |||
Size (meters) * | 1.55 (0.09) | ||||
Nutritional status | |||||
Low weight | 2 | 1.6 | |||
Normal weight | 53 | 41.1 | |||
Overweight | 52 | 40.3 | |||
Obesity 1 | 19 | 14.7 | |||
Obesity 2 | 2 | 1.6 | |||
Obesity 3 | 1 | 0.8 | |||
Degree of instruction | |||||
Primary | 8 | 6.2 | |||
Secondary | 93 | 72.1 | |||
Technical superior | 19 | 14.7 | |||
University superior | 9 | 6.9 | |||
Currently studying | |||||
Yes | 29 | 22.5 | |||
No | 100 | 77.5 | |||
Place of origin | |||||
Lima | 77 | 59.7 | |||
Iquitos | 8 | 6.2 | |||
Lambayeque | 6 | 4.7 | |||
San Martin | 5 | 3.8 | |||
Ayacucho | 4 | 3.1 | |||
Callao | 4 | 3.1 | |||
Others | 25 | 19.4 | |||
Place of provenance | |||||
San Juan de Lurigancho | 17 | 13.2 | |||
San Martin de Porres | 14 | 10.8 | |||
Comas | 13 | 10.1 | |||
Los Olivos | 11 | 8.5 | |||
Cercado de Lima | 10 | 7.8 | |||
Others | 64 | 49.6 | |||
Time spent in Lima (years) * | 32 (24) | ||||
Medical/surgical history | |||||
Yes | 30 | 23.3 | |||
No | 99 | 76.7 | |||
Work variables | |||||
Time at work (months) * | 18 (27) | ||||
Work shift | |||||
Day | 56 | 43.4 | |||
Afternoon | 45 | 34.9 | |||
Night | 28 | 21.7 | |||
Hours per shift | |||||
8 hours | 125 | 96.9 | |||
12 hours | 4 | 3.1 | |||
Extra work | |||||
Yes | 12 | 9.3 | |||
No | 117 | 90.7 |
* Median interquartile range (RIC).
93.02% of the interviewees presented musculoskeletal pain of some kind, the majority (75.9%) presented pain in more than one area, mainly lumbar pain (65.1%), dorsal back pain (47.3%) and neck pain (37.2%). On the other hand, the least reported pain was that of the elbow/forearm (13.2%) (Table 2).
Musculoskeletal pain | n | % |
---|---|---|
Present pain | ||
Yes | 120 | 93,1 |
No | 9 | 6,9 |
Number of painful areas | ||
None | 9 | 6,1 |
One | 22 | 17,5 |
More than one | 98 | 75,9 |
Neck pain | ||
Yes | 48 | 37,2 |
No | 81 | 62,8 |
Shoulder Pain | ||
Right Shoulder | 17 | 13,2 |
Left Shoulder | 15 | 11,6 |
Both shoulders | 12 | 9,3 |
No pain | 85 | 65,9 |
Pain from back (dorsal) | ||
Yes | 61 | 47,3 |
No | 68 | 52,7 |
Lumbar pain | ||
Yes | 84 | 65,1 |
No | 45 | 34,9 |
Pain in elbow / forearm | ||
Elbow / right forearm | 9 | 6,9 |
Elbow / left forearm | 5 | 3,9 |
Both elbows / forearms | 3 | 2,3 |
No pain | 112 | 86,8 |
Wrist / hand pain | ||
Right wrist hand | 24 | 18,6 |
Left wrist hand | 7 | 5,4 |
Both wrists / hands | 12 | 9,3 |
No pain | 86 | 66,7 |
Hip / leg pain | ||
Right hip / leg | 19 | 14,7 |
Left hip / leg | 9 | 6,9 |
Both hips / legs | 4 | 3,1 |
No pain | 97 | 75,3 |
Knee pain | ||
Right Knee | 21 | 16,3 |
Left knee | 10 | 7,7 |
Both knees | 12 | 9,3 |
No pain | 86 | 66,7 |
Ankle/foot painankle / footankle / foot | ||
Right ankle/ foot | 12 | 9,3 |
Left ankle/ foot | 8 | 6,2 |
Both ankles / feet | 15 | 11,6 |
No pain | 94 | 72,9 |
By analyzing the factors associated with the presence of pain, in the bivariate analysis, we found statistical significance only for the variable time at work (p = 0.009) (Table 3); however, when performing the multivariate analysis, with the logistic regression method, between the dependent variable, musculoskeletal pain and the independent variables work time, age and nutritional status, we found no association, seeTable 4.
Associated factors | Musculoskeletal pain | p* | OR | IC OR | |||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Present | Absent | LI | LS | ||||||
n | % | n | % | ||||||
Gender | Female | 101 | 94.4 | 6 | 5.6 | 0.181 | 2.66 | 0.51 | 4.61 |
Male | 19 | 86.4 | 3 | 13.6 | |||||
Marital Status | Married | 53 | 94.6 | 3 | 5.4 | 0.887 | 1.58 | 0.43 | 3.48 |
Single / widowed / divorced | 67 | 91.8 | 6 | 8.2 | |||||
Studying | YesSi | 26 | 89.7 | 3 | 10.3 | 0.42 | 0.55 | 0.26 | 2.27 |
No | 94 | 94.0 | 6 | 6.0 | |||||
Nutritional status | Low weight / normal weight | 49 | 88.9 | 6 | 11.1 | 0.17 | 0.35 | 0.22 | 1.77 |
Overweight / obesity | 71 | 96.0 | 3 | 4.0 | |||||
Work shift | Morning | 52 | 92.9 | 4 | 7.1 | 1.00 | 0.96 | 0.38 | 2.53 |
Afternoon / night | 68 | 93.2 | 5 | 6.8 | |||||
Place of origin | San Juan de Lurigancho/ San Martin de Porres | 29 | 93.5 | 2 | 6.5 | 1.000 | 1.12 | 0.22 | 5.67 |
Other Districts | 91 | 92.9 | 7 | 7.1 | |||||
Place of providence | Lima / Callao | 74 | 91.4 | 7 | 8.6 | 0.483 | 0.46 | 0.09 | 2.31 |
Other regions of the country | 46 | 95.8 | 2 | 4.2 | |||||
Medical history | Yes | 29 | 96.7 | 1 | 3.3 | 0.68 | 2.55 | 0.15 | 14.89 |
No | 91 | 91.9 | 8 | 8.1 | |||||
Level of education | Primary / Secondary level | 93 | 92.1 | 8 | 7.9 | 0.683 | 0.43 | 0.05 | 3.60 |
Superior | 27 | 96.4 | 1 | 3.6 | |||||
Extra work | Yes | 11 | 91.7 | 1 | 8.3 | 0.597 | 0.81 | 0.09 | 7.07 |
No | 109 | 93.2 | 8 | 6.8 | |||||
Age † | - | - | - | 0.094 | - | - | - | ||
Time at work † | - | - | - | 0.009 | - | - | - | ||
Time living in Lima † | - | - | - | 0.382 | - | - | - |
* Test exacto de Fisher / † Prueba de U de Mann Whitney.
DISCUSSION
The work of the cleaning staff involves the performance of changes in posture, rapid and abrupt movements of flexion, the use of excessive force in the upper extremities, especially in the arms and hands, lower back, etc. Sometimes posture adoption becomes permanent. The aforementioned personnel works for long periods of time using incorrect postures, handling brooms, mops, pulling heavy material, pushing waste transport carts, etc. The use of repetitive movements and the adoption of various postures may imply a risk for musculoskeletal disorders4,6,9.
82.9% of female cleaning workers express the tendency towards occupational segregation that has been oriented towards both men and women, having an important cultural component. Thus, cleaning work has traditionally been directed at women. Socioeconomic and cultural factors, as well as gender stereotypes, have affected occupational segregation, which is the underlying reason for so many gender inequalities10.
In 2004, in the “Guide for the improvement of working conditions”, it is mentioned that despite the fact that our society has made progress in the rights of women, there is still a differentiation of gender roles (women are expected to be caregivers unlike men) and a situation of preponderance and social power for men. It should also be noted that women have entered the labor market without substantial changes in how and who performs domestic work; This social reality also determines the conditions of wage and health work and causes the appearance of risks that mainly affect women11.
The average height was 1.55m and 57.37% were overweight or obese. In a study that related body mass index (BMI) and musculoskeletal disorders, they found overweight in the cleaning staff of a Police Health Hospital, being the spine the most affected when carrying out its activities, in addition to the higher BMI, the greater incidence of musculoskeletal disorders12. In another study in relation to BMI and waist circumference, they found that "11.4% of the surveyed population was not suitable for moderate physical activity" and that 26.6% of respondents had an increased BMI13. Contrary to this association, it was reported in a systematic review of 65 epidemiological studies where only 32% of these obtained a positive association between lumbar pain and obesity14.
Weight, height, and body mass index have been identified by different studies as potential risks of musculoskeletal disorders, especially for carpal tunnel syndrome and lumbar herniated disc. The increase in body weight and musculoskeletal disorders are related since they would cause prolonged microtrauma to the muscles, tendons, and joints of the musculoskeletal system, especially those that bear the greatest load. In relation to the lumbar herniation disc, a relationship of the disease was found with weight and height; some studies have observed that taller people have greater back pain13.
It should be noted that despite being considered a job that does not require much preparation and studies, most with 93.7% of the respondents have a complete secondary education and even higher. No association was found with musculoskeletal symptoms. In another study, it was evidenced that there was no significant statistical association between the level of education and the presence of symptoms in a construction company; the highest prevalence of symptoms was observed in workers who reported primary education. It is thought that individuals with a low level of education and little training access to low-skilled jobs where there are various and greater occupational risk factors, which favor the appearance of musculoskeletal pathologies15.
93.10% reported musculoskeletal pain of some kind, the majority (75.94%) in more than one area, mainly low back pain (65.12%), back pain (47.29%) and neck pain (37.21 %). The type of work has ergonomic risks such as posture, strength, and movement, which would contribute to the presumption that all musculoskeletal disorders have their biomechanical origin13,16,17. The longer the exposure time, the greater the symptoms expected, such as those found in the study, which, however, adjusted for age and time, did not show significance.
37.21% of the respondents manifested neck pain, is the third most reported body region with pain. Various jobs often find neck pain4, because cleaning work is prone to maintain the body in postures that force and keep in tension the body structure thus producing musculoskeletal injuries over time18.
Lumbar pain was the most commonly reported painful symptom. Crespo19refers that there are work factors that predispose to the presence of low back pain in workers, such as the non-application of work breaks, ignorance of the elements of personal protection, and poor postures in job performance. Regarding the latter, it was reported that 76% of the population does not lift objects to chest height, 52% do not keep their backs straight when lifting a load, and 54% state that they do not flex their legs to lift a weight. A great influence of the body mass index was found with respect to low back pain since 71% of the overweight and 60% obese cleaning staff presented moderate or severe low back pain. Proper ergonomics, not only in the workday but in the activities of daily life, can prevent pathologies such as herniated disc20.
In a study of cleaning workers in Taiwan with musculoskeletal symptoms, they were found to experience various types of psychosocial stress, and time pressure was found to be a risk factor associated with discomfort in various parts of the body21.
Symptoms in upper limbs occur when handling cleaning tools, because with their manipulation a great number of flexions and extensions of arms and wrists occur, frequently the arms and shoulders are raised and force is used when sweeping, cleaning, and polishing, also in mop draining. Thus, symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome, epicondylitis, and painful shoulder occur with significant frequency. The alternation of tasks and breaks are the most appropriate measures to prevent them. Among the limitations of the study is insufficient statistical power, due to the fact that the size of the study population was limited.
REFERENCES
1. Sánchez, M., Pérez, G., González, G. (2011) Enfermedades potenciales derivadas de factores de riesgo presentes en la industria de producción de alimentos. Med Segur Trab (Internet); 57 (225) 300-312. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/pdf/mesetra/v57n225/original3.pdf 25 Abril 2019 [ Links ]
2. Organización Internacional del Trabajo (2019) Seguridad y salud en el trabajo. Internet. Disponible en: https://www.ilo.org/global/topics/safety-and-health-at-work/lang--es/index.htm Abril 2019 [ Links ]
3. Manual de Salud Ocupacional / Ministerio de Salud. Dirección General de Salud Ambiental. Dirección Ejecutiva de Salud Ocupacional. - Lima: Dirección General de Salud Ambiental, 2005 Disponible en: http://www.digesa.minsa.gob.pe/publicaciones/descargas/manual_deso.PDF [ Links ]
4. Souza R., Cortez A., Do Carmo, Th., Santana, R. Enfermedades profesionales de los trabajadores de limpieza en los hospitales: propuesta educativa para minimizar la exposición. Enfermería Global 2016 Nº 42 abril; 522-536(fecha de acceso 16 de Diciembre de 2019). Disponible en: http://pesquisa.bvsalud.org/portal/resource/es/ibc-150818 [ Links ]
5. Agencia Europea para la seguridad y la salud en el trabajo. (2003) La inclusión de los aspectos de género en la evaluación de riesgos Factsnº 43 Disponible en: https://osha.europa.eu/es/tools-and-publications/publications/factsheets/43/view 12 Mayo 2019 [ Links ]
6. Kuorinka, B., Jonsson, A. Kilbom, H. Vinterberg, F. Biering-Sørensen, G. Andersson, K. Standardised Nordic Questionnaires for the Analysis of Musculoskeletal Symptoms. Applied Ergonomics 1987, 18.3,233-237. DOI: 10.1016/0003-6870(87)90010-x. [ Links ]
7. Martinez B, Santo S, Bolea M, Casalod Y, Andres E. Validación del cuestionario nórdico musculoesquelético estandarizado en población española (Internet). 12 th International ConferenceonOccupationalRiskPrevention. Disponible en: https://www.prevencionintegral.com/canal-orp/papers/orp-2014/validacion-cuestionario-nordico-musculoesqueletico-estandarizado-en-poblacion-espanola [ Links ]
8. Declaracion de Helsinki de la Asociacion Médica Mundial Principios éticos para las investigaciones médicas en seres humanos (59a Asamblea General, Seúl,Corea, octubre 2008) Punto 32. Disponible en: https://www.wma.net/es/policies-post/declaracion-de-helsinki-de-la-amm-principios-eticos-para-las-investigaciones-medicas-en-seres-humanos/ [ Links ]
9. Estudio de las lesiones musculoesqueléticas en el ámbito laboral de las pimes. Riesgos y medidas preventivas por oficios Disponible en: : http://www.exyge.eu/blog/wp-content/uploads/2014/12/prl_TMEoficios.pdf [ Links ]
10. Sorrentino E, Vona R, Monterosso D, Giammarioli AM. Gender issues on occupational safety and health. Annali dell'Istituto superiore di sanita. 2016 Apr-Jun;52(2):190-197. DOI: 10.4415/ann_16_02_10. [ Links ]
11. Brunel S & Moreno N. Salud, mujeres y trabajos. Guía para la mejora de las condiciones de salud y trabajo de las mujeres (guía en Internet). España: Secretaría Confederal de la Mujer de cc.oo.; 2004 (acceso: 16 Dic 2019). Disponible en: http://istas.net/descargas/saludmujeres.pdf [ Links ]
12. Choquegonza Ccapa Beatriz Sandra. Relación entre el índice de masa corporal y los trastornos musculoesqueléticos en el personal de limpieza del hospital de la sanidad, Arequipa. 2016. Tesis de grado. Universidad Alas Peruanas. Lima Perú. 2016. Disponible en: http://repositorio.uap.edu.pe/bitstream/uap/6482/1/T59_45210033_T.pdf [ Links ]
13. Castro-Castro Gissela C., Ardila-Pereira Laura C., Orozco-Muñoz Yaneth del Socorro, Sepulveda-Lazaro Eliana E., Molina-Castro Carmen E. Factores de riesgo asociados a desordenes musculo esqueléticos en una empresa de fabricación de refrigeradores. Rev. Salud Pública. 20 (2): 182-188, 2018 DOI: http://doi.org/10.15446/rsap.v20n2.57015. [ Links ]
14. G. Benavides Fernando, Maqueda Jerónimo, Rodrigo Fernando, Pinilla Javier, García Ana M., Ronda Elena et al. Prioridades de investigación en salud laboral en España. Med. segur. trab. Madrid 54: 211 2008 25-27. Disponible en: http://scielo.isciii.es/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0465-546X2008000200004 [ Links ]
15. Bellorín, Monika, Sirit, Yadira, Rincón, Carina, Amortegui, Martha, Síntomas Músculo Esqueléticos en Trabajadores de una Empresa de Construcción Civil. Salud de los Trabajadores (Internet). 2007;15(2):89-98. Disponible en: https://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=375839287003 [ Links ]
16. Kumar, Rupesh, Kumar, Shrawan. Musculoskeletalriskfactors in cleaningoccupation-A literaturereview. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 38(2), 158-170. 2008 DOI: 10.1016/j.ergon.2006.04.004 [ Links ]
17. Aguirre Moreno A. V. Relación entre las condiciones de trabajo y los trastornos musculoesqueléticos en trabajadores de una empresa de limpieza en un aeropuerto de ecuador. Tesis. Ecuador. Universidad Internacional SEK 2017 Disponible en: http://repositorio.uisek.edu.ec/handle/123456789/2566 [ Links ]
18. Malaver R., Medina D., Pérez T. I. Estudio sobre la relación entre el riesgo de lesiones músculo esqueléticas basado en posturas forzadas y síntomas músculo esqueléticos en el personal de limpieza pública de dos municipalidades de lima norte. Tesis. Lima. Universidad Católica 2017. Disponible en: http://repositorio.ucss.edu.pe/handle/UCSS/204 [ Links ]
19. Crespo, Mariano. La ergonomía en el personal de limpieza de hotelería. Tesis de pregrado. 2015. Universidad Fasta. Argentina. Disponible en: http://redi.ufasta.edu.ar:8080/xmlui/handle/123456789/962. [ Links ]
20. Pataro Silvana Maria Santos, Fernandes Rita de Cássia Pereira. Heavy physicalwork and low back pain: thereality in urbancleaning. Rev. bras. epidemiol. (Internet). 2014 Mar (citado el 10 de abril de 2020); 17(1):17-30. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1590/1809-4503201400010003ENG. [ Links ]
21. Chang, J.H., Wu, J.D., Liu, C.Y., Hsu, D.J. Prevalence of musculoskeletaldisorders and ergonomicassessments of cleaners. American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 55(7), 593-604. 2012 DOI: 10.1002/ajim.22064 [ Links ]
Received: April 10, 2020; Accepted: June 17, 2020