SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.20 issue3Clinical and economic outcomes of laparoscopic versus open surgery in the treatment of hepatic hydatid cyst.Urinary tract infection and threatened preterm delivery in teenage pregnancies of a peruvian hospital author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana

Print version ISSN 1814-5469On-line version ISSN 2308-0531

Rev. Fac. Med. Hum. vol.20 no.3 Lima Jul-Sep 2020

http://dx.doi.org/10.25176/rfmh.v20i3.2900 

Original article

Level of knowledge on risk factors and preventive measures for breast cancer in health science students

Noelia Delgado-Díaz1  , Medical surgeon

Marcia Heredia-Talledo1  , Medical surgeon

Anggy Ramos-Becerra1  , Medical surgeon

Luciana Samillán-Jara1  , Medical surgeon

Maricarla Sánchez-Carranza1  , Medical surgeon

Sebastian Iglesias-Osores2  , Biologist

Zhandra Arce-Gil1  , Magister

1Facultad de Medicina Humana, Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo. Chiclayo, Perú.

2Facultad de Ciencias Biológicas, Universidad Nacional Pedro Ruiz Gallo. Lambayeque, Perú.

ABSTRACT

Introduction:

breast cancer is one of the most common cancers worldwide and in Peru. Health students need to know preventive measures and risk factors.

Objective:

to assess the level of knowledge about risk factors and prevention measures for breast cancer in students of the private medical school, 2019.

Methods:

a quantitative, descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted with a sample of 319 students from the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo in 2019, who have been enrolled in one of the professional schools. We used a questionnaire consisting of 18 questions, 5 items that addressed sociodemographic data, and 13 measured the level of knowledge about risk factors and preventive measures of breast cancer. Descriptive statistics were used.

Results:

After exclusion, there were 292 students, 72% were women. The mean age was 20.5, 23.6% were from the second year. The least known risk factors were drinking alcohol, being over 45 years of age, menarche before 12 years of age, and menopause after 55 years of age, and the least known prevention measures were: correct age for mammography 71% and frequency for self-examination 63% in a higher percentage.

Conclusion:

knowledge about risk factors and breast cancer prevention measures was adequate.

Keywords: Knowledge; Breast cancer; Risk factors; Primary prevention (Source: MeSH NLM)

INTRODUCTION

Breast cancer (BC) is the most common cancer that is distributed worldwide as of 20181. Incidence rates are high in the most developed countries, while rates in the least developed countries are low but increasing2. BC is the most common cancer among women. It affects 2.1 million women each year and also causes the highest number of cancer-related deaths among women. In 2018, an estimated 627,000 women died of BC or about 15% of all cancer deaths among women. While rates are increasing among women in more developed regions, they are increasing in almost all regions of the World3. In Lima, the incidence increased in older women up to 76% in the 1990s, reporting that mortality from breast cancer in older women was 59, 112, and 103 per 100,000, for the years 1990, 1994-1997, and 2010-2012 respectively4. There are inadequate knowledge and inappropriate practices related to mammography as a procedure for the investigation of BC5. It is, therefore, necessary to increase studies on preventive measures among health personnel, especially since they are in contact with patients and make their transmission of knowledge timely6. The lack of knowledge about this cancer means that relevant educational programs are needed to improve the level of knowledge of women on this topic7.

For early detection, mammography is recommended annually, a procedure that in developing countries is not available to everyone, due to the lack of mammograms and the cost of conducting them, therefore, the practice of self-examination becomes a tool for early detection more accessible to the entire population8,9. Prevention remains the cornerstone of the fight against BC worldwide10. Breast self-examination, although not shown to be effective in reducing mortality11, it is still recommended as a general approach to increase breast health awareness and, therefore, allow early detection of any abnormalities12. It is useful to better document the knowledge of women about breast cancer and its prevention, so the objective of this research is to determine the knowledge about risk factors and prevention measures for breast cancer in students of a faculty of Health Sciences of a private university in northern Peru.

METHODS

Design and Setting

A quantitative, descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo.

Population and sample

The population of this study was 319 students from the Faculty of Medicine of the Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo in 2019. These students were enrolled in one of the professional schools, either dentistry, psychology, nursing, and medicine during the study period. There was an approximation of the total population of students of the Faculty of Medicine. Stratified random sampling was performed with proportional affixing, taking as strata each professional school. The sample size was calculated from an expected prevalence of 24% 12, with a margin of error of 5%; obtaining a minimum sample size of 220 participants.

Variables and Instruments

We used a questionnaire consisting of 18 questions, 5 items that addressed the sociodemographic data, and 13 measured the level of knowledge about risk factors and preventive measures of breast cancer. The instrument went through a substantive validation through experts, which consisted of an oncologist, an internist, a general practitioner, a gynecologist, and a public health specialist. According to the sociodemographic aspects, the variables considered were: age, gender, with or without children, professional academic school, and academic cycle. With regard to knowledge about risk factors for BC, the factors evaluated were: drinking alcohol, age, smoking, early menarche, and late menopause, family and personal history, obesity, and gender. It was considered “knowledge " when the answer was correct, and “unfamiliarity” when it was not. With regard to the level of knowledge about preventive measures, questions related to correct age for mammography, the frequency for mammography, the frequency for self-examination, the relationship of menstruation and self-examination, criteria for self-examination and breastfeeding were assessed.

Procedure

Classroom visits were made during class hours, subject to authorization by the teacher in charge of the classroom at the time of the survey. Informed consent was given to students over the age of 18, similarly, students under the age of 18 were given informed consent and informed consent for their parents as soon as the opportunity was given. Surveys were conducted only after the informed consent process. The questionnaire was self-applied in an average time of 20 minutes, after a brief explanation. In the end, they were given an informative diptych on the preventive measures of breast cancer, which encouraged the performance of a breast self-examination regularly.

Statistical Analysis

Descriptive statistics were used, tests of measures of central tendency and dispersion were performed for the analysis of quantitative variables, while absolute and relative frequencies were calculated for qualitative variables. Tabulation and data processing were developed using the STATA statistical software version 14.

Ethical Aspects

The study protocol was reviewed and approved by the Ethics Committee of the School of Medicine of the Universidad Católica Santo Toribio de Mogrovejo. The surveys were completely anonymous and no information was provided regarding data that would allow the identification of individuals.

RESULTS

319 students were surveyed, 27 surveys were discarded because the questionnaire was not properly completed. The sample consisted of 292 students of Health Sciences, 210 were women (72 %), and 82 men (28 %). The age range was between 17 and 29 years, with a mean age of 20.5 with a standard deviation of 2.7 years. 4 % had at least one child, the largest sample was made up of sophomore students (23.63%), sixth cycle (21.58%), and eighth cycle (21.58) (tabla 1).

Table 2shows that the least known risk factors for breast cancer acquisition by medical school students were: drinking alcohol, being over 45 years of age, menarche before 12 years of age, and menopause after 55 years of age. As well as the level of knowledge about risk factors for cancer development of university students according to the academic cycle

Table 3shows the level of knowledge about preventive measures of breast cancer in students Health Sciences according to the academic cycle, it can be seen that there is a higher level of knowledge about the preventive measure of criteria for self-examination (82%), followed by breastfeeding (58%), the frequency for mammography (52%), the relationship of menstruation and self-examination (46%), the frequency for self-examination (37%) and correct age for mammography (29%).

Table 1. Percentage of health science students from a private university in Northern Peru, according to academic cycle. 

Cycle Frequency Percentage
2 69 23.63
4 50 17.12
5 4 1.37
6 63 21.58
8 63 21.58
10 27 9.25
12 16 5.48
Total 292 100

Table 2. Level of knowledge about risk factors for breast cancer in students of health sciences in a private university in Northern Peru, according to an academic school. 

Nursing Medicine Dentistry Psychology Total
know Unknown Meet Unknown Meet Unknown Meet Unknown Meet Unknown
Drinking alcohol 37 44 54 29 17 28 54 56 162 157
% 45% 55% 65% 35% 38% 62% 33% 67% 51% 49%
Age 46 35 55 27 18 26 39 44 158 132
% 57% 43% 67% 33% 41% 59% 47% 53% 54% 46%
Smoking 63 18 68 15 36 9 64 19 231 61
% 78% 22% 82% 18% 80% 20% 77% 23% 79% 21%
Early Menarche and Late Menopause 46 35 52 31 20 25 43 40 161 131
% 57% 43% 63% 37% 44% 56% 52% 48% 55% 45%
Family history and personal 76 5 82 1 39 6 65 18 262 30
% 94% 6% 99% 1% 87% 13% 78% 22% 90% 10%
Obesity 56 25 54 29 6 24 40 43 156 121
% 69% 31% 65% 35% 13% 53% 48% 52% 56% 44%
Gender 76 5 78 5 39 6 78 5 271 21
% 94% 6% 94% 6% 87% 13% 94% 6% 93% 7%
Participants 81 83 45 83 292
% 27.7% 28.4% 15.4% 28.4% 100.0%

Table 3.  Level of knowledge about preventive measures for breast cancer in health science students from a private university in Northern Peru, according to academic school. 

  Nursing Medicine Dentistry Psychology Total
  Know Unknown Know Unknown Know Unknown Know Unknown Know Unknown
Correct age for mammography 19 62 47 36 7 38 11 72 84 208
% 23% 77% 57% 43% 16% 84% 13% 87% 29% 71%
Frequency of mammography 42 39 60 23 19 26 30 53 151 141
% 52% 48% 72% 28% 42% 58% 36% 64% 52% 48%
Frequency for self-examination 33 48 35 48 12 33 27 56 107 185
% 41% 59% 42% 58% 27% 73% 33% 67% 37% 63%
Relationship of menstruation and self-examination 39 42 44 38 21 24 30 53 134 157
  48% 52% 54% 46% 47% 53% 36% 64% 46% 54%
Criteria for practicing self-examination 66 15 77 6 30 15 67 16 240 52
% 81% 19% 93% 7% 67% 33% 81% 19% 82% 18%
Breastfeeding 59 22 60 23 15 30 34 49 168 124
% 73% 27% 72% 28% 33% 67% 41% 59% 58% 42%
Respondents 81 83 45 83 292
% 27.7% 28.4% 15.4% 28.4% 100.0%

DISCUSSION

The Latin American population is diverse in its genetic, cultural, environmental, and ancestral composition13. In this study, family history and being a woman were the risk factors that achieved the highest percentage of knowledge among students in the four schools, with 90 and 94% respectively; compared to a study conducted at the Universidad de Santander, in Colombia it presents as the most known risk factors smoking (76.8 %) and family history (66.8 %), coinciding with this study where these were also the most recognized with 79% and 90% respectively. Among the unknown factors found were those related to hyperestrogenic states such as early menarche and late menopause with 14.4% and 7.6%, respectively in the study conducted in Colombia and 55% in this study14. With regard to the knowledge of prevention measures such as breast self-examination, in a study conducted in Colombia, with students of health professional careers from four universities, it was observed that a large proportion of respondents know how breast self-examination is performed, slightly less than half recognized that it should be performed monthly, while in our study only 37% answered correctly; with regard to the self-examination-post-menstruation relationship, it was observed that in our study a higher knowledge was achieved (46 %), while in the Colombian study knowledge of 31.6% was obtained in the aforementioned study, both results show low levels of knowledge15.

In addition, in a similar study conducted by Gutiérrez Delgadillo et al. to students of the health sciences, it was determined that there is the knowledge (91%) regarding the procedure to perform breast self-examination, while, on the monthly frequency to perform the self-test was obtained, some uncertainty (53,6 %) as in the relationship self-test-post-menstruation (32,4 %), these results are similar to those obtained in the present study, where it was determined that all schools have good knowledge about the procedure to perform the self-exam, medicine with 93%, dentistry with 67%, nursing with 81%, psychology with 81%; and, with respect to the frequency of self-examination, certain ignorance was obtained, with dentistry being the school with the lowest percentage (73%)16.

In Peru, a study was conducted by Vilca Tapullima et al., in students, where the lack of knowledge (40.4 %) about breast cancer risk factors was determined, with the least knowledge: early menarche (24.6%), family history (14.9 %) and drinking alcohol (25.4 %); in addition, it was known that 47.4% did not consider having preventive attitudes to these factors. Our results showed that students know about the risk factors to which they may be exposed, having the greatest knowledge about the risk of having a family and personal history with cancer (90 %) and sex (93 %)17.

The limitations of the study lie in the fact that no stratification has been carried out in years of study, which prevents showing whether there is, in more advanced students, a greater knowledge, unlike in younger students. It is recommended to expand the sample size and expand it to other universities with different types of teaching, as well as apply new data collection methods. Young women should be helped to acquire habits of health that facilitate early diagnosis of BC and develop strategies to raise awareness of the relevance of this problem.

CONCLUSION

Knowledge about risk factors and breast cancer prevention measures was adequate, the least known risk factors were: drinking alcohol 49%, age 46%, early menarche, and late menopause 45%, obesity 44%, smoking 21%, family and personal history 10% and gender 7%. The least known prevention measures were correct age for mammography 71 %, frequency for self-examination 63 %, the relationship of menstruation and self-examination 54%, the frequency for mammography 48%.%, breastfeeding 42% and criteria for self-examination 18%.

REFERENCES

1. Ferlay J, Colombet M, Soerjomataram I, Mathers C, Parkin DM, Piñeros M, et al. Estimating the global cancer incidence and mortality in 2018: GLOBOCAN sources and methods. Int J Cancer 2019;144:1941-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31937. [ Links ]

2. Key TJ, Verkasalo PK, Banks E. Epidemiology of breast cancer. Lancet Oncol 2001;2:133-40. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S1470-2045(00)00254-0. [ Links ]

3. Organization WH. WHO | Breast cancer. Who 2018. (citado el 28 de mayo) Disponible en: https://www.who.int/cancer/prevention/diagnosisscreening/breast-cancer/en/. [ Links ]

4. Luna-Abanto J. Cáncer de mama en mujeres adultas mayores: análisis del Registro de cáncer de base poblacional de Lima Metropolitana. Acta Med Peru. 2019;36(1):72-3. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.pe/ scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1728-59172019000100012&lng=es& nrm=isoLinks ]

5. Elsie KM, Gonzaga MA, Francis B, Michael KG, Rebecca N, Rosemary BK, et al. Current knowledge, attitudes and practices of women on breast cancer and mammography at mulago hospital. Pan Afr Med J 2010;5. DOI: https:// doi.org/10.4314/pamj.v5i1.56186. [ Links ]

6. Ahmed F, Mahmud S, Hatcher J, Khan SM. Breast cancer risk factor knowledge among nurses in teaching hospitals of Karachi, Pakistan: A crosssectional study. BMC Nurs 2006;5:1-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/1472- 6955-5-6. [ Links ]

7. Dandash KF, Al-Mohaimeed A. Knowledge, attitudes, and practices surrounding breast cancer and screening in female teachers of buraidah, saudi arabia. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2007;1(1):61-71.Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3068667/Links ]

8. Abugattas Saba J, Manrique Hinojosa J, Vidaurre Rojas T. Mamografía como instrumento de tamizaje en cáncer de mama. Rev Peru Ginecol Obstet 2015;61:311-9. DOI: https://doi.org/10.31403/rpgo.v61i1862. [ Links ]

9. Suh MAB, Atashili J, Fuh EA, Eta VA. Breast Self-Examination and breast cancer awareness in women in developing countries: A survey of women in Buea, Cameroon. BMC Res Notes 2012;5:627. DOI: https://doi. org/10.1186/1756-0500-5-627. [ Links ]

10. Cuzick J, Powles T, Veronesi U, Forbes J, Edwards R, Ashley S, et al. Overview of the main outcomes in breast-cancer prevention trials. Lancet 2003;361:296-300. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(03)12342-2. [ Links ]

11. Kösters JP, Gøtzsche PC. Regular self-examination or clinical examination for early detection of breast cancer. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2003:CD003373. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/14651858.CD003373. [ Links ]

12. Sandoval JR, Peñafiel JRC. Autoexamen de mamas como método de detección temprana del cáncer mamario en la población femenina de la ciudad de Tulcán. Horizontes de Enfermería, (S.l.), n. 7, p. 40-50, mar. 2018. ISSN 2631-293X. Disponible en: http://181.198.77.142/index.php/ enfermeria/article/view/127Links ]

13. Stern MC, Fejerman L, Das R, Setiawan VW, Cruz-Correa MR, Perez-Stable EJ, et al. Variability in Cancer Risk and Outcomes Within US Latinos by National Origin and Genetic Ancestry. Curr Epidemiol Rep 2016;3:181-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40471-016-0083-7. [ Links ]

14. Páez Esteban Á, Urrea Vega E, Contreras Barrios M, Díaz Urquijo M. Conocimiento y frecuencia de los factores de riesgo para cáncer de mama en las estudiantes del área de la salud. Investig En Enferm Imagen Desarro 2010;12:25-36. Disponible en: https://repositorio.udes.edu.co/ handle/001/3723Links ]

15. Hernández-Escolar J, Castillo-Ávila I, Consuegra-Mayor C, Mejía-Chávez G. Conocimientos, actitudes y prácticas sobre autoexamen de mamas en universitarias del área de la salud. Cartagena (colombia). Arch Med 2019;19:227-37.DOI: https://doi.org/10.30554/archmed.19.2.2788.2019 [ Links ]

16. Gutiérrez Delgadillo Ariel, Gutiérrez Flores Fernando Rupher, Gutierrez Choque Juan Carlos, Guzmán Delgadillo Favio, Santander Lopez Ana. Conocimiento, actitud y práctica del autoexamen mamario en mujeres estudiantes de medicina de la Universidad Mayor de San Simón Gestión 2011. Rev Cient Cienc Méd (Internet). 2012 (citado 2020 Jun 07) ; 15( 2 ): 22-25. Disponible en: http://www.scielo.org.bo/scielo.php?script=sci_ arttext&pid=S1817-74332012000200006&lng=es. [ Links ]

17. Vilca Tapullima C, Quispe Manrique N, Vega Fernandez A, Correa-Lopez LE. Nivel de conocimiento sobre factores de riesgo y prevención del cáncer de mama en los estudiantes del segundo ciclo de la Facultad de Medicina Humana de la Universidad Ricardo Palma en el año 2017. Rev Fac Med Humana 2017;17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.25176/rfmh.v17.n2.831. [ Links ]

Funding sources: Self-financed.

Received: April 17, 2020; Accepted: June 15, 2020

Correspondence: Sebastian Iglesias-Osores. Address: Calle Juan XXIII, Lambayeque-Perú. Telephone number: 991547292 E-mail:sebasiglo@gmail.com

Author's contribution: The authors participated inthe genesis of the idea, project design, data collectionand interpretation, analysis of results and preparationof the manuscript of the present research work.

Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons