SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.22 número3Relación entre la frecuencia y horario de alimentación con el sobrepeso y obesidad en adultos trujillanosFactores maternos asociados a macrosomía fetal según la encuesta nacional de demografía y salud familiar de 2020 índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana

versión impresa ISSN 1814-5469versión On-line ISSN 2308-0531

Rev. Fac. Med. Hum. vol.22 no.3 Lima jul./set. 2022  Epub 09-Jul-2022

http://dx.doi.org/10.25176/rfmh.v22i3.4929 

Original Article

Neonatal factors maternal factors and invasive procedures associated with late neonatal sepsis in the period 2011-2020 systematic review and meta-analysis.

Allison Poquioma Hernandez1  , Surgeon

Walter Mosquera Saira1  , Surgeon

María Loo Valverde2  , Doctor (a)

Luis Roldán-Arbieto2  3 

Víctor Vera Ponce2  , Doctor (a)

Jhony A. De La Cruz-Vargas2  , Doctor (a)

1Ricardo Palma University. Lima Peru.

2Biomedical Sciences Research Institute (INICIB), Ricardo Palma University, Lima, Peru

3Escuela de Postgrado en Gestión Pública, Universidad Tecnológica del Perú, Lima, Peru

ABSTRACT

Objective:

To review, evaluate and synthesize available literature on neonatal and maternal factors and invasive procedures performed on the neonate associated with late neonatal sepsis during the last ten years.

Methods:

The databases used for the bibliographic search were: Pubmed/Medline, LILACS, SciELO, and Google Scholar. Analytical studies on the research of risk factors for late neonatal sepsis by stages (title, abstract and full text) were selected. The risk of bias was assessed using the Newcastle Ottawa Scale. Heterogeneity was assessed and a random-effects meta-analysis was performed for the following risk factors: gender, gestational age, birth weight, Apgar score at 5 min, premature rupture of membranes, route of delivery, use of a central venous catheter, and ventilation. mechanics. The effect was measured with an odds ratio. The certainty of the evidence was determined using the GRADE methodology. The protocol was registered in PROSPERO.

Results:

Eight studies from 633 records were collected. Heterogeneity was high. 3 male studies OR: 1.97(0.26-14.59) p=0.03; I2 =80%, prematurity 2 studies OR: 2.48 (1.13-5.45); p=0.04; I2 =72%, use of central venous catheter 4 studies - OR: 3.83 (1.07 - 13.71) p<0.01; I2 =89% and mechanical ventilation 4 studies OR: 2.83 (1.42 - 5.68); p<0.01; I2 =86%) were independent factors for the development of late neonatal sepsis. Studies had the lowest comparability assessment score when the risk of bias was applied. The results had low certainty of evidence.

Conclusion:

Male sex, prematurity, use of central venous catheter, and mechanical ventilation are risk factors for late sepsis.

Keywords: Late neonatal sepsis; Risk factors; Neonatal factors; Maternal factors; Invasive procedures; Systematic review. (fuente: MeSH NLM).

INTRODUCTION

Sepsis is the second leading cause of neonatal mortality, after prematurity. Most perinatal mortality occurs in the neonatal period.1Likewise, two-thirds of neonatal mortality occurs in the first week of life. Globally, the death rate from sepsis is 2,202 per 100,000 live births.1In Peru, the national neonatal mortality rate was 10 per 100,000 live births in 2017.2Sepsis generates a morbidity burden with short- and long-term complications, especially at the neurological level, such as cerebral palsy, delayed psychomotor development, and also prolongs hospital stay and increases hospital costs.1

Neonatal sepsis is an infection characterized by bacteremia and is classified according to the time of onset into early and late sepsis.3,4 The most frequent cut-off points are at 72 hours and 7 days of life. There is currently no global consensus to define the cut-off point.1,5,6

Early sepsis is associated with maternal infections such as urinary tract infection (UTI) and chorioamnionitis that are transmitted to the newborn through the birth canal.7,8While late sepsis is associated with medical care, it is even considered a nosocomial infection and a major complication in neonatal intensive care units (NICU).1,9The incidence of late sepsis differs in infants of certain gestational ages, birth weight, and sex, and is associated with invasive procedures such as endotracheal intubation, total parenteral nutrition, venous catheter, necrotizing enterocolitis, among others.

Early-onset sepsis is associated with group B Streptococci.10The pathogens associated with late sepsis vary according to the distribution of each intensive care unit. Therefore, each NICU should study the profile of the pathogens specific to each hospital. Research on the incidence, risk factors, and distribution of pathogens is scarce in Peru.

Applying a risk factor-based approach to guide management decisions is one of the highly effective approaches to reducing neonatal sepsis mortality in high-income countries. It is recommended that in settings with limited resources and a high neonatal mortality rate, a combination of risk factors and clinical signs should serve as a guide for intrapartum and neonatal management. To reduce the burden of disease, it is essential to identify potential risk factors, followed by effective preventive or infection control measures.

For the above reasons, we have the objective of reviewing, evaluating and synthesizing the literature on the risk factors most frequently associated with the development of late neonatal sepsis through a systematic review-type study and subsequent meta-analysis. To our knowledge, this is the first systematic review and meta-analysis addressing risk factors for the development of late neonatal sepsis.

Evidence from reviews of risk factors for late sepsis from this study will be used for the development of prevention strategies.

METHODS

Study design type and área

This systematic review and meta-analysis have been reported according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) guideline.

Information sources and search strategy

An exhaustive literature search was performed in PubMed, SciELO, LILACS, and Google Scholar for studies published in the last 10 years (2011-2020). A comprehensive search strategy was developed that included all possible risk factors for late neonatal sepsis according to the literature review based on MeSH terms and words from the title and abstract involving the following keywords: “late-onset sepsis”, “late onset septicemia”, “late onset bacteremia”, “late onset blood infection”, “infant”, “newborn”, “neonate”, “neonatology”, “risk”, “risk factors”, “risk factor”, “ causality” and “odds ratio”. Search terms within the domain were combined with 'OR' and cross-domain terms with 'AND'. A specific database filter was applied to limit the search to 'last 10 years (2011-2020). No language filter was applied. A search strategy was first developed for PubMed and later adapted for the other databases.

Study

Selection Two authors independently selected studies using three-stage eligibility criteria: title, abstract, and full text. EndNote TM X8 software (Clarivate Analytics, Thomson Reuters, New York) to eliminate duplicates and store the studies for full-text reading. The study selection process was synthesized and outlined using a PRISMA flow diagram in the Shiny web application (https://estech.shinyapps.io/prisma_flowdiagram/) which shows the number of studies included and excluded in each phase of the study selection.

Eligibility

criteria Inclusion criteria:

  • Studies evaluating the risk of one or more neonatal factors, maternal factors or invasive procedures to develop late neonatal sepsis.

  • Analytical studies that report a comparison of two groups: one with late neonatal sepsis and the other without sepsis.

  • Studies that define late neonatal sepsis as that which occurs from 72h of life or more to 28 days of life

  • Studies that define cases of sepsis using laboratory criteria (eg culture, hematological parameters) Studies were published between 2010 and 2020.

Criteria of exclusion

  • Studies not available in their complete versión

  • Case reports, letters to the author or narrative reviews, and systematic reviews

  • Studies that do not have a database

  • Studies with unclear diagnostic criteria or that use clinical criteria exclusively Studies that evaluate early neonatal sepsis or in general

Data extraction

The data was recorded in a data collection form and later digitized in a Microsoft Excel 2016 data sheet (Microsoft, Washington). For the qualitative analysis, the extraction domains included: title, author, year of publication, study period, country of execution, design, case definition, the definition of late neonatal sepsis, risk factors, and results. Dichotomous raw data for events and non-events, where available, were extracted and converted to OR.

Assessment of the Risk of bias and Certainty of the evidence

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale (NOS) for observational studies was used to assess the quality of case-control studies and cohort studies. The NOS evaluates three categories of a given study: selection, comparability, and exposure/outcome. These are scored individually and counted up to a possible total of 9 points. NOS is classified as follows: ≥ 7 for low and 7 for high risk. Risk of bias plots were used to illustrate quality assessment using Review Manager (RevMan) version 5.4.1 software. (The Cochrane Collaboration, 2020).

To assess the certainty of the evidence in this study, the GRADE methodology was used through the GRADE pro online application (https://gradepro.org/), which reports the certainty of the evidence in a summary table. The GRADE methodology assesses four aspects: risk of bias, inconsistency, indirect evidence, and imprecision.

Figure N°1.   Diagrama de ujo PRISMA mostrando la selección de estudios incluidos en el análisiscuantitativo (metaanálisis)Fuente: PageMJ, McKenzie JE, Bossuyt PM, Boutron I, Homann TC, Mulrow CD, et al. The PRISMA 2020statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews. BMJ 2021;372:n71. doi:10.1136/bmj.n71 

Quantitative analysis

For the statistical analysis, a random-effects meta-analysis was performed in the STATA MP v. program. 14.0 (Stata Corp LP, College Station, Texas, USA) to measure the association between risk factors and late neonatal sepsis. The effect size was measured by Odds ratio. (OR). All variables were dichotomous. The adjusted odds ratio was calculated to minimize confounding bias. The confidence interval was 95% and the value p<0.05. Statistical heterogeneity was assessed and reported using Cochran's Q statistic, I2, and Tau2. I2 from 25 to 50% was considered low, 50-75% moderate, and ≥75% high heterogeneity. The results of the meta-analysis were shown with Forest plot type diagrams. Tables were provided for the characteristics of the included studies and for the results of the quality assessment. Publication bias should be developed if and only if there are at least 10 studies in the meta-analysis using Funnel Plot diagrams, which is why publication bias is not assessed in this study.

RESULTS

Characteristics of included studies

A total of 633 studies were found. 8 duplicates were removed and 625 titles were reviewed. Of these, 574 titles were excluded and 51 abstracts were screened. Of these, 35 full-text registries were examined and 8 studies met the inclusion criteria for this review. The reasons for the exclusion of 27 full-text records were: no study of risk factors, another type of sepsis, absence of risk factors studied, and lack of data. The study selection process is illustrated inFigure 1.

Regarding the design, of the 8 studies, 6 were cases and controls, 1 retrospective cohort, and 1 prospective cohort. Six studies were done in term infants and 2 in preterm infants. All studies were carried out in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit. According to the definition of sepsis, 2 studies defined it as that which appears after 7 days, 4 studies took 72h as the cut-off point, and 1 did not specify. Likewise, there were variations in the guidelines used to diagnose neonatal sepsis: 8 studies required positive cultures to confirm neonatal sepsis, and 1 applied clinical criteria. A summary of the characteristics of the included studies can be seen inTable 1.

Risk Factors

Four neonatal factors, 2 maternal factors, and 2 invasive procedures associated with late neonatal sepsis were studied. The most frequently described risk factors are premature rupture of the membranes, use of a central venous catheter, and the need for mechanical ventilation (4 studies each). A meta-analysis was performed for a total of 8 factors. The details of the factors included in the meta-analysis have been provided inTable 2.

For neonatal factors, a meta-analysis was performed for four risk factors (Figure 2) of which, male sex (3 studies - OR: 1.97 (0.26-14.59); p=0.03; I2 =80%), and prematurity (2 studies - OR: 2.48 (1.13-5.45); p=0.04; I2 =72%), significantly increased the odds of late neonatal sepsis.

Factors that increased the probability of late neonatal sepsis but were not significant in the meta-analysis were low birth weight (3 studies - OR: 2.50 (1.20-5.18); p=0.14; I2 =53%) and low Apgar at 5' (2 studies - OR: 1.47 (1.01-2.13); p=0.32; I2 =18%).

For maternal factors, a meta-analysis was performed for 2 factors. Premature rupture of membranes (4 studies - OR: 1.04 (0.76 - 1.42); p=0.16; I2 =0%) increased the incidence of late neonatal sepsis. Vaginal delivery was not associated with late neonatal sepsis (3 studies - OR: 0.94 (0.78 - 1.12); p=0.32; I2 =20%) (Figure N°3).

Invasive procedures that were significantly associated with late neonatal sepsis were the use of a central venous catheter (4 studies - OR: 3.83 (1.07 - 13.71); p<0.01; I2 =89%) and the need for mechanical ventilation (4 studies - OR: 2.83 (1.42 - 5.68), p<0.01, I2 =86%). (Figure 3).

Assessment of risk of bias

When performing a quality assessment using the NOS for cases and controls, four studies were rated good, two fair studies, and two poor studies). The category with the lowest rating was “comparability”. None of the studies reported the use of a reporting checklist to describe their studies.

Table N°1 Characteristics of the included studies. 

Título Diseño Autor Objetivo País Período Pacientes Factores de riesgo Método diagnóstico Definición de SNT Resultados
1 Risk factors of late-onset neonatal sepsis in Taiwan: A matched case-control study Casos y Controles Kung2016 Identificar factores de riesgo para SNT Taiwán 2003 -2006 Neonatos en UCI Maternos: RPM P. invasivos: CVC, VM, NPT Cultivo > 7d NPT (OR 6.07 IC 95% 1.14-32.32, p=0.034)
2 Risk Factors for Late-Onset Sepsis in Preterm Infants: A Multicenter Case-Control Study Casos y Controles El Manouni2019 Identificar factores de riesgo para SNT Países bajos y Bélgica 2014-2017 Neonatos prematuros en UCI Neonatales: sexo. Maternos: RPM, tipo de parto P. invasivos: CVC, VM, NPT Cultivo > 72 h NPT (OR 1.29 IC 95% 1.07-1.55, p=0.006)
3 Risk factors and etiology of neonatal sepsis after hospital delivery: A case-control study in a tertiary care hospital of Rajshahi, Bangladesh. Casos y Controles Rafi2020 Identificar factores de riesgo para SNT Bangladesh 2019 Neonatos en UCI Neonatales: edad, peso, apgar, sexo. Maternos: RPM, tipo de parto, ITU Cultivo > 72 h ITU (OR 5.48 IC95% 1.58-18.99, p<0.05). Sexo masculino (OR 0.33 IC95% 0.13-0.88, p<0.05)
4 Association between birth route and late-onset sepsis in very preterm neonates Cohorte Retrospectiva Olivier2016 Identificar asociacion entre vía de parto y SNT Canadá 2010 -2014 Neonatos prematuros en UCI Maternos: tipo de parto Cultivo > 48 h No asociación de SNT con vía de parto.
5 Late onset sepsis in newborn babies: epidemiology and effect of a bundle to prevent central line associated bloodstream infections in the neonatal intensive care unit Cohorte Retrospectiva Resende2015 Evaluar el efecto de la implementacion de medidas basadas en la evidencia en la SNT Brazil 2010 -2012 Neonatos en UCI Neonatales: edad, peso, apgar. P. invasivos: CVC, VM, NPT Clínica > 7 d Prematuridad (OR 1.83 IC95% 1.03-3.26, p=0.04), Peso <1500 g (OR 2.70 IC95% 1.16-3.74, p=0.01), CVC (OR 5.10 IC95% 2.32-11.26, p<0.001), VM (OR 2.72 IC95% 1.65-2.42, p<0.001)
6 Risk factors and lethality of laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection caused by non-skin contaminant pathogens in neonates Casos y Controles Romanelli2013 Identificar factores de riesgo para SNT Brazil 2008 -2012 Neonatos en UCI Neonatales: edad, peso, apgar. Maternos: RPM. P. invasivos: CVC, VM, NPT Cultivo No especifica CVC (OR 8.99, p=0,047)
7 Nosocomial infections (late onset sepsis) in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) Casos y Controles Joseph2012 Identificar factores de riesgo para SNT Singapur 2005 -2007 Neonatos con muy bajo peso al nacer en UCI P. invasivos: CVC, VM, NPT, tubo toracico Cultivo > 72 h CVC (p=0.02), VM (p=0.001)
8 Late-onset neonatal sepsis, risk factors and interventions: an analysis of recurrent outbreaks of Serratia marcescens, 2006e2011 Casos y Controles Samuelsson2014 Identificar factores de riesgo para SNT Sweden 2006 -2011 Neonatos en UCI Neonatales: edad (continua), peso (continua). Maternos: RPM. P. invasivos: CVC (continua), VM (continua) Cultivo > 72 h Edad gestacional (OR 0.94 IC95% 0.93-0.96), p<0.001), peso al nacer (OR 0.17 IC95% 0.089-0.317, p<0.001), CVC (OR 2.6 IC95% 1.7-2.0, p<0.001), VM (OR 1.6 IC95% 1.2-2.0, p<0.001)

Certainty of the evidence

The GRADE methodology was used to assess the certainty of the evidence for this systematic review. We found that for all risk factors (neonatal, maternal, and invasive procedures), the evidence was of low certainty. This was mainly due to the risk of bias, inconsistency, and imprecision of the evidence.

Table 2 Risk factors included in the meta-analysis for late neonatal sepsis. 

Factores de riesgo Comparación n
Factores neonatales
Sexo Masculino, Femenino 3
Edad gestacional <37 semanas, >37 semanas 2
Peso al nacer <2500 g, >2500 g 3
Apgar 5' <7, =7 2
Factores maternos
Ruptura prematura de membranas Si, No 4
Tipo de parto Vaginal, Cesárea 2
Procedimientos invasivos
Ventilación mecánica Si, No 4
Catéter venoso central Si, No 4

DISCUSSION

This meta-analysis aimed to identify neonatal and maternal risk factors and invasive procedures performed on the newborn, such as central venous catheter placement, mechanical ventilation, parenteral nutrition, and chest tube, associated with the development of late neonatal sepsis described in medical literature for the last ten years. The study showed that male gender, prematurity, the use of a central venous catheter, and the need for mechanical ventilation significantly increased the odds of developing late neonatal sepsis. The results are consistent with other studies.11-15Knowing the risk factors would help in the prevention and early identification of late neonatal sepsis. There was variation in the case definitions as well as in the definition of late neonatal sepsis in the studies included in our review. Similar variability has been found in the world literature on late neonatal sepsis. Most are defined as cases those neonates with symptoms and signs in addition to positive blood culture, and others are defined as cases those neonates with symptoms and signs and with laboratory tests without the need for a positive culture. Another difference between the studies was the cut-off point in time to define neonatal sepsis. Six studies define late sepsis as that which appears after 72 hours of life, which coincides with most antecedents.11,16,17,18While two studies define it as that which appears after 7 days to 28 days of life.9,19,20

We found a higher incidence of sepsis among male neonates, possibly based on the 'male disadvantage hypothesis'. Regarding maternal factors, it was found that premature rupture of membranes increased the incidence of late neonatal sepsis, but it was not an independent risk factor, also described by other authors.10,19,17,20No association was found between the route of delivery and late neonatal sepsis as in other studies.21

Male neonates are more sensitive to adverse perinatal and postnatal environmental conditions and are more likely to be born preterm and with lower birth weight, both of which increase the risk of neonatal sepsis.1Higher initial respiratory support required by male neonates may lead to worse outcomes.22,23-25

Figure 2: Forest plot showing a random-effects meta-analysis in male, preterm, low birth weight or depressed newborns at birth with and without late neonatal sepsis, respectively 

Figura 3:  Forest plot showing a random-effects meta-analysis in newborns who require mechanical ventilation, who have a maternal history of PROM, who were born vaginally, or who have a central venous catheter, respectively, with and without late sepsis 

Figure 4. Graph showing the risk of bias 

Prematurity has also been implicated as a significant risk factor, as in other studies.7,9,26,27In this study, low birth weight and low Apgar at 5' increased the incidence of late neonatal sepsis, although it was not an independent factor. This finding contrasts with some antecedents.16,17,28It is probably due to the low number of compared studies.

Regarding maternal factors, it was found that premature rupture of membranes increased the incidence of late neonatal sepsis, but it was not an independent risk factor, as described by other authors.10,17,19,20No association was found between the route of delivery and late neonatal sepsis as in other studies.(twenty-one)

As found in the medical literature and various studies, we identified that the use of invasive devices such as central venous catheters and endotracheal tubes are independent factors of late neonatal sepsis.16-18,29

The present study presented some limitations. The limited number of studies available, as well as the type of studies included, correspond to cohorts and cases, and controls, which could increase the risk of bias. Likewise, we found high heterogeneity between the studies. As strengths, we have that the present study represents the first meta-analysis on factors associated with late neonatal sepsis, which highlights the need for further research on this topic. This work has followed the guide for systematic reviews PRISMA. and has been subjected to the GRADE evaluation. The level of evidence ranged from very low (4 studies) to low (4 studies).

CONCLUSIONS

In this systematic review of observational studies, it was found that male or premature newborns have a higher risk of developing late neonatal sepsis. Among the invasive procedures, we found that the use of a central venous catheter and the need for mechanical ventilation are independent factors of late neonatal sepsis.

No association was found between birth weight, low Apgar at 5 minutes, maternal history of premature rupture of membranes or vaginal delivery, and the development of late sepsis in newborns. There is a lack of evidence on the risk factors associated with late neonatal sepsis in Peru. Recognition of risk factors should help develop a preventive strategy against neonatal sepsis.

RECOMMENDATIONS

Efforts to reduce the neonatal mortality rate should focus on the management and prevention of prematurity, as well as paying special attention to male newborns because they are more vulnerable. It is recommended to optimize surveillance of nosocomial infections through management protocols for invasive procedures to reduce the incidence of neonatal sepsis. Solid research is required in the country of Peru in this regard to obtain updated statistics.

REFERENCES

1. Murthy S, Godinho MA, Guddattu V, Lewis LES, Nair NS. Risk factors of neonatal sepsis in India: A systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS ONE [Internet]. 25 de abril de 2019 [citado 11 de mayo de 2021];14(4). Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6483350/Links ]

2. Ministerio del Perú. Programa Presupuestal 0002 Salud Materno Neonatal [Internet]. 2019. Disponible en: https://www.minsa.gob.pe/presupuestales/doc2019/pp/anexo/ANEXO2_2.pdfLinks ]

3. Adatara P, Afaya A, Salia SM, Afaya RA, Konlan KD, Agyabeng-Fandoh E, et al. Risk Factors Associated with Neonatal Sepsis: A Case Study at a Specialist Hospital in Ghana. Sci World J [Internet]. 1 de enero de 2019 [citado 11 de mayo de 2021];2019. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6332869/Links ]

4. Adatara P, Afaya A, Salia SM, Afaya RA, Kuug AK, Agbinku E, et al. Risk Factors for Neonatal Sepsis: A Retrospective Case-Control Study among Neonates Who Were Delivered by Caesarean Section at the Trauma and Specialist Hospital, Winneba, Ghana. BioMed Res Int [Internet]. 19 de diciembre de 2018 [citado 11 de mayo de 2021];2018. Disponible en: https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC6313993/Links ]

5. Al-Matary A, Heena H, AlSarheed AS, Ouda W, AlShahrani DA, Wani TA, et al. Characteristics of neonatal Sepsis at a tertiary care hospital in Saudi Arabia. J Infect Public Health. octubre de 2019;12(5):666-72. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jiph.2019.03.007 [ Links ]

6. Alcock G, Liley HG, Cooke L, Gray PH. Prevention of neonatal late-onset sepsis: a randomised controlled trial. BMC Pediatr. diciembre de 2017;17(1):98. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-017-0855-3 [ Links ]

7. Alonso-Ojembarrena A, Marín-Lozano ÁC, Galán-Sánchez F, Rodríguez-Iglesias MA. Etiología y frecuencia de factores de riesgo de sepsis tardía en una unidad de cuidados intensivos neonatales de nivel IIIb. Enfermedades Infecc Microbiol Clínica. febrero de 2018;36(2):144-5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eimc.2017.03.012 [ Links ]

8. Ballot DE, Bandini R, Nana T, Bosman N, Thomas T, Davies VA, et al. A review of -multidrug-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in a neonatal unit in Johannesburg, South Africa. BMC Pediatr. 7 de septiembre de 2019;19(1):320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-019-1709-y [ Links ]

9. Freitas FTM, Araujo AFOL, Melo MIS, Romero G a. S. Late-onset sepsis and mortality among neonates in a Brazilian Intensive Care Unit: a cohort study and survival analysis. Epidemiol Infect. enero de 2019;147:e208. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026881900092X [ Links ]

10. Goldstein ND, Eppes SC, Ingraham BC, Paul DA. Characteristics of late-onset sepsis in the NICU: does occupancy impact risk of infection? J Perinatol Off J Calif Perinat Assoc. septiembre de 2016;36(9):753-7. Disponible en: https://doi.org/10.1017/S095026881900092X [ Links ]

11. Wu I-H, Tsai M-H, Lai M-Y, Hsu L-F, Chiang M-C, Lien R, et al. Incidence, clinical features, and implications on outcomes of neonatal late-onset sepsis with concurrent infectious focus. BMC Infect Dis [Internet]. 3 de julio de 2017 [citado 11 de junio de 2021];17. Disponible en: https://www.nature.com/articles/jp201671Links ]

12. Li Z, Xiao Z, Zhong Q, Zhang Y, Xu F. 116 cases of neonatal early-onset or late-onset sepsis: A single center retrospective analysis on pathogenic bacteria species distribution and antimicrobial susceptibility. :7. Disponible en: https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/24040479/Links ]

13. Shobowale EO, Solarin AU, Elikwu CJ, Onyedibe KI, Akinola IJ, Faniran AA. Neonatal Sepsis in a Nigerian Private Tertiary Hospital: Bacterial Isolates, Risk Factors, and Antibiotic Susceptibility Patterns. Ann Afr Med. 2017;16(2):52-8. DOI: 10.4103/aam.aam_34_16 [ Links ]

14. Tsai M-H, Wu IH, Lee C-W, Chu S-M, Lien R, Huang H-R, et al. Neonatal gram-negative bacillary late-onset sepsis: A case-control-control study on a prospectively collected database of 5,233 admissions. Am J Infect Control. 2016;44(2):146-53. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajic.2015.09.009 . [ Links ]

15. G/Eyesus T, Moges F, Eshetie S, Yeshitela B, Abate E. Bacterial etiologic agents causing neonatal sepsis and associated risk factors in Gondar, Northwest Ethiopia. BMC Pediatr. 6 de junio de 2017;17(1):137. DOI: 10.1186/s12887-017-0892-y [ Links ]

16. Resende DS, Peppe ALG, dos Reis H, Abdallah VOS, Ribas RM, Gontijo Filho PP. Late onset sepsis in newborn babies: epidemiology and effect of a bundle to prevent central line associated bloodstream infections in the neonatal intensive care unit. Braz J Infect Dis. enero de 2015;19(1):52-7. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2014.09.006 [ Links ]

17. Olivier F, Bertelle V, Shah P. Asociación entre la vía del nacimiento y la sepsis de aparición tardía en recién nacidos muy prematuros. J Perinatol. :17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/jp.2016.146. [ Links ]

18. Silva ACB, Anchieta LM, Lopes MF de P, Romanelli RM de C. Inadequate use of antibiotics and increase in neonatal sepsis caused by resistant bacteria related to health care assistance: a systematic review. Braz J Infect Dis Off Publ Braz Soc Infect Dis. agosto de 2018;22(4):328-37. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bjid.2018.07.009 [ Links ]

19. Joseph CJ, Lian WB, Yeo CL. Nosocomial Infections (Late Onset Sepsis) in the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU). Proc Singap Healthc. diciembre de 2012;21(4):238-44. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/201010581202100404 [ Links ]

20. Gudayu TW, Zeleke EG, Lakew AM. The role of the season at admission in neonatal sepsis: a retrospective chart review of a 1-year data at University of Gondar comprehensive specialized hospital. BMC Res Notes. 4 de octubre de 2019;12(1):643. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-019-4685-2. [ Links ]

21. Romanelli RMC, Anchieta LM, Mourão MVA, Campos FA, Loyola FC, Mourão PHO, et al. Risk factors and lethality of laboratory-confirmed bloodstream infection caused by non-skin contaminant pathogens in neonates. J Pediatr (Rio J). marzo de 2013;89(2):189-96. DOI: 10.1016/j.jped.2013.03.002. [ Links ]

22. Cortese F, Scicchitano P, Gesualdo M, Filaninno A, De Giorgi E, Schettini F, et al. Early and Late Infections in Newborns: Where Do We Stand? A Review. Pediatr Neonatol. agosto de 2016;57(4):265-73. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pedneo.2015.09.007. [ Links ]

23. Drassinower D, Friedman AM, Obican SG, Levin H, Gyamfi-Bannerman C. Prolonged latency of preterm premature rupture of membranes and risk of neonatal sepsis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. junio de 2016;214(6):743.e1-6. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajog.2015.12.031. [ Links ]

24. Bulabula ANH, Dramowski A, Mehtar S. Transmission of multidrug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria from colonized mothers to their infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Hosp Infect. enero de 2020;104(1):57-67. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhin.2019.10.001. [ Links ]

25. Arias-Arellano S, Cáceres-Aucatoma F, Geyson D. Factores de riesgo asociados a sepsis neonatal tardía. Rev Médica Inst Mex Seguro Soc. 2019;57:9 Disponible en: https://www.medigraphic.com/cgi-bin/new/resumen.cgi?IDARTICULO=93110#:~:text=Conclusi%C3%B3n%3A%20el%20desequilibrio%20termodin%C3%A1mico%2C%20la,significativos%20asociados%20a%20sepsis%20neonatal.. [ Links ]

26. Kim JK, Chang YS, Sung S, Park WS. Mortality rate-dependent variations in the survival without major morbidities rate of extremely preterm infants. Sci Rep. 14 de mayo de 2019;9(1):7371. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-019-43879-z. [ Links ]

27. Lona-Reyes JC, Pérez-Ramírez RO, Rodríguez-Patiño V, Cordero-Zamora A, Gómez-Ruiz LM, Llamas-Ramos L, et al. Prevalence of extended-spectrum beta-lactamases in enterobacteria of neonatal sepsis and associated factors. Rev Chil Infectol. agosto de 2019;36(4):433-41. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/S0716-10182019000400433. [ Links ]

28. Kayom VO, Mugalu J, Kakuru A, Kiguli S, Karamagi C. Burden and factors associated with clinical neonatal sepsis in urban Uganda: a community cohort study. BMC Pediatr. 13 de noviembre de 2018;18(1):355. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-018-1323-4. [ Links ]

29. El Manouni el Hassani S, Berkhout DJC, Niemarkt HJ, Mann S, de Boode WP, Cossey V, et al. Risk Factors for Late-Onset Sepsis in Preterm Infants: A Multicenter Case-Control Study. Neonatology. julio de 2019;116(1):42-51. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000497781. [ Links ]

Funding sources: Self.

8Article published by the Journal of the faculty of Human Medicine of the Ricardo Palma University. It is an open access article, distributed under the terms of the Creatvie Commons license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0(https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/), that allows non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is duly cited. For commercial use, please contact revista.medicina@urp.edu.pe.

Received: May 06, 2022; Accepted: June 15, 2022

Correspondence: Allison Poquioma Hernandez. Address: Av. Alfredo Benavides 5440, Santiago de Surco. Telephone number: 951209937 E-mail:apoquiomah@gmail.com

Authorship contributions: Allison Poquioma: data collection, study design, statistical interpretation, writing of the protocol and manuscript. Walter Mosquera: data collection. María Loo Valverde: study design, protocol review, manuscript review, Luis Roldán: statistical analysis, Víctor Vera: protocol review, supervision, Dr. Jhony De La Cruz: protocol review, manuscript review and supervision.

Conflicts of interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons