SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.23 número3Inteligencia emocional y estrategias de afrontamiento al estrés en personal de saludEfecto de Tropaeolum Tuberosum o “Mashua” (tropaeolaceae) sobre la expresión génica relacionada a espermatogénesis en ratón índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • No hay articulos similaresSimilares en SciELO

Compartir


Revista de la Facultad de Medicina Humana

versión impresa ISSN 1814-5469versión On-line ISSN 2308-0531

Rev. Fac. Med. Hum. vol.23 no.3 Lima jul./set. 2023  Epub 21-Sep-2023

http://dx.doi.org/10.25176/rfmh.v23i3.5603 

Original Article

Association between hematological parameters and metabolically unhealthy phenotypes in children and adolescents

Gabriel Horta-Baas1  , PhD

Ma. Luisa Pizano-Zárate2  , MD

Jorge A Núñez-Hernández3  , MD

Álvaro J. Montiel-Jarquín4  , PhD, MD

V De León-Camacho3  , QFB

María del Socorro Romero-Figueroa5  6  , PhD

1Servicio de Reumatología, Hospital General Regional 1 Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

2Departamento de Nutrición y Bioprogramación Instituto Nacional de Perinatología, Secretaría de Salud

3Hospital General Regional 220 Toluca México, Delegación México Poniente Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

4Director de educación e investigación en salud de la Unidad Médica de Alta Especialidad de Puebla, México, Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social

5Universidad Anáhuac México, Centro de Investigación en Ciencias de la Salud Lomas Anáhuac 786, Huixquilucan, México

6Campus Universitario Siglo XXI, Coordinación de Investigación, Facultad de Medicina

ABSTRACT

Introduction:

Metabolic syndrome has been associated with changes in several hematological parameters, such as red blood cells, platelets, and leucocytes. Therefore, hematologic parameters can be used to identify the subjects at risk of metabolically unhealthy phenotypes (MUP). The current study investigated if hematological parameters can serve as biomarkers to distinguish metabolically healthy phenotype (MHP) from MUP in children and adolescents.

Methods:

Two hundred ninety-two children and adolescents were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The MUP was diagnosed using consensus-based criteria. Group comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to determine if sex, age group, nutritional status, puberty, hematological parameters, and insulin resistance were associated with MUP.

Results:

The subject's age mean was 11 years (SD: 2.61). RDW values were significantly lower in children in the metabolically unhealthy normal weight (MUNW) group compared to children with metabolically unhealthy obesity (MUO) group (12.33 ± 0.90 vs. 13.67 ± 0.52; p = 0.01) and in metabolically healthy obesity (MHO) compared to MUO group (13.15 ± 0.53 vs. 13.67 ± 0.52; p = 0.04). In adolescents, the platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio was higher in the MHNW group, with a mean value of 152.60 (SD 62.97) compared to 111.16 (SD 44.12) for the MHO group. However, after adjusting for age, nutritional status, and puberty, hematological indices were not associated with MUP.

Conclusions:

The study demonstrates that hematologic parameters are not independently associated with the MUP, and it is unlikely that they represent reliable biomarkers for screening for the MUP in the pediatric population.

Keywords: Hematological indices; Neutrophils; metabolically unhealthy phenotypes; children; adolescents (Source: MeSH - NLM)

INTRODUCTION

The prevalence of overweight and obesity has increased worldwide in children and adults. Being overweight and obese in childhood is strongly associated with an increased risk of metabolic syndrome in adulthood1-6. Interestingly, despite the excess fat mass, not all obese children and adolescents present metabolic disorders. Indeed, not all normal-weight individuals are metabolically healthy. Consequently, there are two phenotypes namely "metabolically healthy phenotype (MHP)" and "metabolically unhealthy phenotype (MUP)," which are differentiated by the presence or absence of metabolic disturbances. and that in obese patients they generate more intrigue. The pathogenesis of the MUP is not fully understood. and is characterized by hyperglycemia, hypertension, low high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL) levels, or hypertriglyceridemia and can be accompanied by insulin resistance or low-grade inflammation7,8. MHP subjects commonly has a reduced inflammatory profile compared to MUP subjects and shows higher adiponectin levels than their metabolically unhealthy counterparts8. These findings suggest that lower levels of inflammation could play an essential role in the protective profile of the MHP9. In adults, metabolic syndrome has been associated with changes in several hematological parameters, such as red blood cells, platelets, and leucocytes10. The precise mechanism of hematological disturbances remains unclear but may be related to insulin resistance, changes in cytokine concentration, and chronic low-grade inflammation5,11,12. The adipose tissue releases local and systemic bioactive molecules like adipokines (e.g., adiponectin and leptin), and proinflammatory cytokines, mainly tumor necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) and interleukin 6 (IL-6). Which are related to the cardiometabolic risk profile10. Interestingly, chronic low-grade systemic inflammation associated with obesity has been suggested to play a significant role in developing cardiometabolic complications8,13,14.

In children, inflammatory markers are strongly associated with adiposity15. A strong, significant positive correlation has been described between the body mass index (BMI) and the total number of leukocytes in children, which suggests that the percentage of body fat influences the leukocyte count, especially in neutrophils7. Furthermore, obesity in children is related to increased IL-6 and TNF-α, which may contribute to increased circulating leukocytes7. An increase in red blood cell distribution width (RDW) positively correlates with BMI and is associated with a higher risk of metabolic syndrome, unfavorable lipid profile, and cardiovascular disease (CVD)16-19. Therefore, hematologic parameters can identify patients at risk of cardiovascular diseases.

The clinical utility of assessing metabolic status in childhood lies in identifying those children with worse metabolic profiles and a higher risk of developing CVD2,20. In recent years, an increased interest has been focused on biomarkers associated with obesity in children and adolescents. Currently, limited studies are comparing the distributions of hematological parameters between MHP and MUP in the pediatric population. Hematological parameters such as RDW, Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (NLR), Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR), Lymphocyte-to-Monocyte Ratio (LMR), and RDW-to-Platelet Ratio (RPR) has been associated with various inflammatory conditions and can be used for the early detection of individuals at risk of CVD12,14.

Hematologic parameters could constitute an accessible and cost-effective test for screening children and adolescents at risk of presenting the MUP. However, whether they can serve as biomarkers to distinguish MHP from MUP in pediatric populations is unknown. The current study investigated if hematological parameters can differentiate MHP from MUP in children and adolescents. The secondary objective was to explore the correlations of hematological parameters with inflammatory markers, insulin resistance, and adipokines, which could provide insights into the underlying mechanisms of these relationships.

METHODS

A cross-sectional study was conducted from May 2015 to December 2017 using a non-probabilistic sampling of consecutive cases in an outpatient pediatric endocrinology clinic at a secondary care hospital and public schools. The inclusion criteria were age from 5 to 18 years, with presumably good health, without prescription. Participants between 5 and 10 years old were classified into childhood and adolescence between 11 and 18 years21. Subjects with an infectious process a month before the study, secondary obesity, insulin-dependent diabetes, congenital metabolic disease, hormonal disorder, or inflammatory diseases were excluded. This study was in agreement with the Declaration of Helsinki and approved by the Ethics Committee of the Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social (R-2013-785086) and Instituto Nacional de Perinatologia (212250-3310-11402011). Participants and their parents signed a free and informed an assent form and consent form.

Power analysis calculations were based on effect size and power using G*Power software. The power calculation for one-way ANOVA assumed a priori alpha error probability of 0.05, a power of 0.8, a medium effect size (F = 0.25), and the number of groups = 6. According to these assumptions, 216 patients would be required for this study.

Clinical evaluation

Physicians and nutritionists performed physical examinations (height, weight, and waist circumference) standardized according to conventional procedures. Weight was obtained using a SECA portable digital weighing scale, model 803 with 100g accuracy. A SECA portable stadimeter, model 0123, with 0.1 cm accuracy, was used for height. Waist circumference was measured standing at the midpoint between the iliac crest and the last rib with a non-elastic flexible tape to the nearest 0.5 cm. A medical examination assessed the pubertal stage, and participants were classified into two categories: prepubertal (stage I) and pubertal (stages II, III, IV, V) according to Tanner staging22. Arterial blood pressure was taken using a mercury sphygmomanometer and a suitable bracelet for each patient's age and complexion, measuring twice with 5 minutes between both and taking the average value. Weight status was assessed using the World Health Organization (WHO) body mass index (BMI) criteria. BMI for age and sex was determined using Anthro Plus software (http://www.who.int/growthref/tools/en/ ). Children were classified using a BMI z-score as normal (−2 to +1 SD of the population WHO reference), overweight (> +1 to +2 SD), and obesity (> +2SD).

Laboratory analysis

After a 12-hour fast, blood samples were obtained from venous puncture using a vacuum blood collection system. Beckman Coulter model AC-T5diff blood analyzer (Beckman Coulter, Brea, CA) was used to measure hematological parameters. NLR was calculated as the ratio of peripheral blood neutrophil count to lymphocyte count; PLR was calculated as the ratio of peripheral blood platelet count to lymphocyte count; LMR was calculated as the ratio of peripheral blood lymphocyte counts to monocyte count; RPR was calculated by the ratio of RDW to platelet. Insulin and ultrasensitive C-reactive protein (uCRP) were determined by chemiluminescence immunoassay method (Inmunolite 1000 Siemens NY, USA). Plasma adiponectin and leptin levels were measured using specific ELISA kits (R&D Systems, Minneapolis, USA). Serum IL-6, IL-1, and TNF-α were measured using enzyme-chemiluminometric assays on the automated Immulite 1000 analyzer. Fasting blood glucose, triglyceride, and HDL cholesterol, were obtained by enzymatic colorimetric assay (DiaSys Diagnostic Systems GmbH, Germany). All analyses of inflammatory parameters were performed twice. Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance (HOMA-IR) was calculated as (fasting plasma glucose - fasting serum insulin)/22.523. A HOMA-IR value ≥ 3.16 was the criterion for the presence of insulin resistance23.

Metabolic phenotypes

Participants were classified as having MHP or MUP using consensus-based criteria proposed by Damanhoury et al.23. Four cardiometabolic risk factors were considered: high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-c) < 40 mg/dL (< 1.03 mmol/ L), triglycerides > 150 mg/dL (> 1.7 mmol/L), systolic and diastolic blood pressure > 90th percentile, and fasting glucose ≥ 100mg/dL (≥ 5.6 mmol/l). If at least one of the abovementioned risk factors was within the unhealthy range, the subject was classified as MUP. Therefore, each participant was classified into one of the six metabolic phenotypes: metabolically healthy normal weight (MHNW), metabolically unhealthy normal weight (MUNW), metabolically healthy overweight (MHOW), metabolically unhealthy overweight (MUOW), metabolically healthy obese (MHO), and metabolically unhealthy obese (MUO).

Statistical análisis

Categorical variables are presented as frequencies and percentages, and continuous variables are summarized using mean and standard deviation. Missing values were handled using available case analyses. Group comparisons were performed using one-way ANOVA (Bonferroni's test for post-hoc analyses) and Kruskal-Wallis (Dunn's test for post-hoc analyses). Parametric methods gave virtually identical results. For this reason, only ANOVA results are present. Eta-squared was used to measure the effect size; the effect sizes were considered no effect (0 ≤ η2 < 0.01), minimum effect (0.01 ≤ η2< 0.06), a moderate effect (0.06 ≤ η2< 0.14), and strong effect (η2 ≥ 0.14). Unadjusted logistic regression analyses were used to identify explanatory variables of MUP. To examine if sex, age group, nutritional status, hematological parameters, and insulin resistance were associated with MUP, we used multiadjusted logistic regression analysis with metabolic status as the dependent variable. The multiple logistic regression model included parameters showing a p-value < 0.20 in unadjusted logistic regression analyses. The results are presented as odds ratios (OR) with 95% confidence intervals (CI). A Hosmer-Lemeshow post-estimation test assessed the model's performance. A two-tailed p-value < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Subgroup analysis by puberty examined differential associations in prepubertal vs. pubertal. The relationships between hematological parameters, inflammatory biomarkers, insulin resistance, and adipokines insulin resistance were investigated using the Spearman correlation coefficient. The strength of correlation was considered weak (0.1 < rho < 0.20), moderate (0.20 < rho < 0.50), and strong (rho ≥ 0.5) based on guidelines provided by Cohen et al.(24). The Bonferroni correction was used to adjust the significance threshold for multiple comparisons. Spearman's rank correlation coefficient's 95% confidence intervals were computed using the “ci2” command. Statistical analyses were performed using Stata-14 software (StataCorp. 2015. Stata Statistical Software: Release 14. College Station, TX: StataCorp LP).

RESULTS

Participants characteristics

Analysis of 292 children and adolescents included 98 with normal weight (33.56 %), 88 with overweight (30.14 %), and 106 with obesity (36.3 %). The participant's characteristics are summarized in Table 1. The subject's age mean was 11 years (SD: 2.61) and ranged from 6 to 18 years. Sex, nutritional status, and metabolic phenotypes were similar between children and adolescents. Approximately 52 % of the participants were women. Tanner's classification was unavailable in thirty-six participants (12.3 %). Compared with patients in whom Tanner was determined, these patients did not differ in age, sex, nutritional status, or prevalence of the MUP. The percentage of prepubertal patients was 42.2% in the childhood group and 8.28% in the adolescent group.

Table 1 General characteristics of the subjects studied. 

Parameters Childhood (n=135) Adolescent (n=157) Total (n=292) P-value
Women, n(%) 75 (55.5) 77 (49.0) 152 (52.0) 0.26
Nutritional status
Normal 45 (33.3) 53 (33.7) 98 (33.5) 0.94
Overweight 42 (31.1) 46 (29.3) 88 (30.1)
Obesity 48 (35.5) 58 (36.9) 106 (36.3)
Tanner stages
Unkown 16 (11.8) 20 (12.7) 36 (12.3) <0.01
Tanner 1 57 (42.2) 13 (8.28) 70 (23.9)
Tanner ≥ 2 62 (45.9) 124 (78.9) 186 (63.7)
Cardiovascular risk
HDL-c < 40 mg/dL 26 (19.2) 48 (30.57) 74 (25.3) 0.02
Triglycerides > 150 mg/dL 28 (20.7) 35 (22.2) 63 (21.5) 0.74
Systolic blood pressure > 90th percentile 5 (3.7) 6 (3.8) 11 (3.7) 0.95
Diastolic blood pressure > 90th percentile 19 (14.0) 27 (17.2) 46 (15.7) 0.46
Fasting glucose >= 100mg/dL 17 (12.5) 17 (10.8) 34 (11.6) 0.63
Metabolic phenotypes
Metabolic Healthy Normal Weight 28 (62.2) 29 (54.7) 57 (58.1) 0.45
Metabolic Unhealthy Normal Weight 17 (37.7) 24 (45.2) 41 (41.9)
Metabolic Healthy Overweight 22 (52.3) 21 (45.6) 43 (48.3) 0.60
Metabolic Unhealthy Overweight 20 (47.6) 25 (54.3) 45 (51.7)
Metabolic Healthy Obesity 19 (39.5) 15 (25.8) 34 (32.1) 0.13
Metabolic Unhealthy Obesity 29 (60.4) 43 (74.1) 72 (67.9)

Values represent frequencies (percentages). P-values are calculated using the chi-squared test.

Comparison of Hematological parameters between MH phenotype and MU phenotype.

As shown in Figure 1, RDW values were significantly higher in children with MUO compared to children with MUNW (13.67 vs. 12.33; p = 0.01), and in MUO compared to MHO (13.67 vs. 13.15; p = 0.04). In adolescents, the PLR was higher for the MHNW group, with a mean value of 152.60 (SD 62.97) compared to 111.16 (SD 44.12) for the MHO group (Figure 1). The size effect was minimum (η20.02 and 0.03, respectively). There were no differences between groups regarding NLR, LMR, and RPR values. In the analyses of all participants, there was no significant difference in hematological parameters between the six groups (Table 2).

Figure 1.  A. Level of Red blood cell Distribution Width (RDW) in children stratified by metabolic phenotype. B. Level of Platelet-to-Lymphocyte Ratio (PLR) in adolescents stratified by metabolic phenotype. 

Table 2 Hematologic parameters stratified by metabolic phenotype. 

MHNW (n=57) MUNW (n=41) MHOW (n=42) MUOW (n=45) MHO (n=34) MUO (n=72) P value Eta squareda2)
RDW 13.25 (1.00) 13.02 (1.00) 13.25 (1.09) 13.05 (0.95) 13.35 (0.90) 13.39 (1.10) 0.38 0.01
NLR 1.19 (0.69) 1.35 (0.71) 1.35 (0.75) 1.44 (0.75) 1.52 (0.72) 1.51 (0.76) 0.18 0.02
PLR 151.94 (54.99) 140.18 (37.08) 141.30 (57.03) 129.33 (39.99) 131.06 (46.84) 132.23 (49.63) 0.15 0.02
LMR 6.57 (2.60) 5.72 (2.56) 8.99 (15.15) 5.54 (1.59) 6.52 (4.06) 5.83 (4.72) 0.14 0.02
RPR 42.98 (12.35) 45.35 (9.61) 44.43 (11.00) 45.73 (16.33) 46.84 (16.94) 48.02 (16.44) 0.47 0.03

Values represent mean (standard deviation). MHNW: metabolically healthy normal weight. MUNW: metabolically unhealthy normal weight. MHOW: metabolically healthy overweight. MHOW: metabolically unhealthy overweight. MHO: metabolically healthy obese. MUO: metabolically unhealthy obese. RDW: red blood cell distribution width. NLR: neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio. PLR: platelet to lymphocyte ratio. LMR: lymphocyte to monocyte ratio. RPR RDW-to-platelet ratio.aNo effect (0 ≤ η2< 0.01), minimum effect (0.01 ≤ η2< 0.06).

Explanatory variables of unhealthy metabolic phenotype

Table 3 shows results from logistic regression analyses, with metabolic phenotype as the dependent variable. In the unadjusted model, obesity, PLR, and insulin resistance were significantly associated with the MUP. In the multivariate logistic regression analysis, obesity, PLR, and LMR were significantly associated with the MUP. The primary independent factor was obesity (OR 2.45, 95% CI 1.28 to 4.67, p < 0.01). A decrease in PLR was independently associated with a small increased risk of present MUP (OR 0.99; 95% CI, 0.98 to 0.99, p = 0.02). Similarly, a decrease in LMR was associated with a small increased risk of being MUP (OR 0.91; 95% CI 0.84 to 0.99, p = 0.04). Unadjusted and multiadjusted logistic regression analyses suggested no significant association between RDW, NLR, and RPR with MUP.

Table 3 Univariate and multivariate logistic regression analyses of explanatory variables associated with the metabolically unhealthy phenotype (n = 292). 

Univariate Multivariatea
OR (95% CI) P-Value OR (95% CI) P-value
Age group
Childhood 1 -
Adolescent 1.47 (0.93-2.35) 0.09 1.48 (0.88-2.47) 0.13
Sex
Female 1 -
Male 0.90 (0.57-1.43) 0.680 -
Nutritional status
Normal weight 1 1
Overweight 1.45 (0.81-2.59) 0.20 1.41 (0.77-2.60) 0.26
Obesity 2.04 (1.66-2.59) <0.01 2.45 (1.28-4.67) <0.01
Waist circumference 1.00 (0.99-1.002) 0.51 -
RDW 0.94 (0.75-1.17) 0.60 -
NLR 1.15 (0.85-1.55) 0.35 -
PLR 0.99 (0.99-1.00) 0.05 0.99 (0.98-0.99) 0.02
LMR 0.94 (0.88-1.01) 0.10 0.91 (0.84-0.99) 0.04
RPR 1.01 (0.99-1.02) 0.17 0.99 (0.97-1.01) 0.67
Insulin resistance
Absent (HOMA-IR < 3.16) 1 1
Present (HOMA-IR ≥ 3.16) 1.97 (1.19-3.27) <0.01 1.32 (0.73-2.41) 0.35

PLR: Platelet to lymphocyte ratio. LMR: lymphocyte to monocyte ratio. RPR: Red blood cell distribution width to platelet ratio. HOMA-IR: Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance. Variable Y = Phenotype (0 = healthy, 1 = unhealthy). a. Hosmer and Lemeshow test, x2 = 11.90, p = 0.15. McFadden's R2= 0.07. Area under ROC curve = 0.67.

Since puberty may play an essential role in the risk to MUP, we performed stratified analysis by pubertal stage (Table 4). The multi-adjusted model showed that obesity was associated with an increased likelihood of having MUP (OR 2.53, 95% CI 1.26 to 5.09, p < 0.01). The associations between MUP and hematological parameters were not statistically significant (p for all ≥ 0.05) after adjusting for puberty.

Table 4 Multivariate logistic regression analyses of explanatory variables associated with the metabolically unhealthy phenotype (n = 251). 

OR (95% CI) P-value
Age group
Childhood 1
Adolescent 1.48 (0.80-2.71) 0.20
Puberty
Tanner = 1 1
Tanner ≥ 2 0.86 (0.45 - 1.65) 0.66
Nutritional status
Normal weight 1
Overweight 1.20 (0.62-2.29) 0.57
Obesity 2.53 (1.26-5.09) <0.01
PLR 0.99 (0.98-1.002) 0.19
LMR 0.92 (0.85-1.007) 0.07
RPR 0.99 (0.97-1.02) 0.96
Insulin resistance
Absent (HOMA-IR < 3.16) 1
Present (HOMA-IR ≥ 3.16) 1.23 (0.65-2.34) 0.51

PLR: Platelet-to-Lymphocyte ratio. LMR: lymphocyte to monocyte ratio. RPR: Red blood cell distribution width to platelet ratio. HOMA-IR: Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance. Variable Y = Phenotype (0 = healthy, 1 = unhealthy). Hosmer and Lemeshow test, x2 = 9.25, p = 0.32. McFadden's R2= 0.06. Area under ROC curve = 0.66.

Correlates of hematological indices and inflammatory biomarkers, cytokines, and insulin resistance

Among the hematologic indices and inflammatory biomarkers, NLR showed positive but low correlations with IL-6 (rho = 0.24, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.34) and uCRP (rho= 0.23, 95% CI: 0.11 to 0.33). Similarly, the LMR showed negative and low correlations with the uCRP (rho = 0.22, 95% CI: -0.32 to -0.10). Positive and low correlations were found between NLR and leptin (rho = 0.26, 95% CI: 0.16 to 0.37) and HOMA-IR (rho = 0.22, 95% CI: 0.12 to 0.34). As shown in Table 5, correlation coefficients revealed no correlation between RDW, RPR, PLR, inflammatory biomarkers, adipokines, and HOMA-IR.

Table 5 Spearman's rank correlation coefficients between hematologic parameters, inflammatory biomarkers, adipokines, and insulin resistance. 

RDW NLR PLR LMR PRP
Interleukin-1β 0.06 -0.02 -0.02 -0.10 -0.01
Interleukin-6 -0.13 0.24* -0.01 -0.13 0.01
Ultrasensitive C-reactive protein 0.05 0.23* 0.02 -0.22* -0.01
TNF-α 0.12 -0.12 -0.05 -0.03 0.04
Adiponectin -0.16 -0.04 0.03 0.02 -0.05
Leptin 0.05 0.26* -0.09 -0.10 0.01
HOMA-IR 0.02 0.22* -0.12 -0.09 0.10

TNF-α: tumor necrosis factor-alpha. HOMA-IR: Homeostatic Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance. (*) p < 0.05 after Bonferroni correction.

DISCUSSION

Although RDW was increased in MUO in childhood and PLR was reduced in MHO in adolescence, our results did not support the usefulness of hematologic parameters as tests for screening of MUP. After adjusting for age, nutritional status, and puberty, hematologic parameters were not associated with MUP. Therefore, hematologic indices are unreliable biomarkers of MUP in children and adolescents. The confounding effect of obesity and insulin resistance may partly explain this lack of association.

Barazzoni et al. suggested that the association between BMI and hematological parameters is mediated by their associations with insulin resistance markers and abdominal fat25. In this study, Waist Circumference (WC) was not an independent variable for MUP. However, It is essential to acknowledge that WC may not always reflect visceral fat as it cannot differentiate between subcutaneous fat in the abdominal area and visceral fat accumulation26.

Hematologic parameters in obese children are often disturbed. The high RDW and NLR values in obese subjects in this study are consistent with those reported by other researchers5,11,18. Although RDW is seemingly increased in obese subjects, our results showed that this parameter does not explain the presence of MUP. The mechanisms linking RDW and obesity remain to be elucidated. Several mechanisms have been proposed to increase RDW in obesity, including inflammation, oxidative stress, or iron deficiency18,27,28. Although it has been proposed that proinflammatory cytokines may produce an increase in RDW by inhibiting erythrocyte maturation15, our results do not support an association of RDW with three proinflammatory cytokines (IL-1b, IL-6, TNF-α).

The association between NLR and metabolic syndrome in adults presents conflicting results. Two studies showed that the NLR was significantly associated with presence and severity of metabolic syndrome10,29. Opposite, Wang et al.19showed no significant differences in the counts of neutrophils between MHO and MUO phenotypes. Similarly, Bahadir et al. reported that the NLR was not associated with metabolic syndrome30.

In children, a study performed in Turkey with 187 children and adolescents (aged 6 to 15 years) showed that NLR was significantly higher in obese adolescents compared with healthy controls5. In contrast, three studies showed that NLR did not differ significantly between overweight/obesity and normal weight children and adolescents14,31,32. Our results revealed that NLR values were similar in subjects with MHP and MUP. Similarly, a study conducted in Italy with 552 obese children and adolescents has shown that the average NLR value did not differ significantly between the obese group with metabolic syndrome compared to the obese group without metabolic syndrome10.

PLR has been identified as a potential biomarker of inflammation, insulin resistance, the severity of obesity, and a predictor of metabolic syndrome (MetS)33-35. In our study, PLR was significantly lower than the normal weight group. These findings are different and contradictory to previous studies. In adults, PLR was significantly higher in morbidly obese adult patients than normal-weight patients. In another study, PLR could not predict newly diagnosed MetS33.In pediatric populations, there was no difference in PLR in obese subjects compared to healthy control groups5,14. Additionally, the association between PLR and MUP was blurred after adjusting for the age group, puberty, HOMA-IR, and nutritional status in our study. Taking together, these findings indicate that PLR cannot be suggested as a biomarker of MUP in the pediatric population.

In our study, NLR levels correlated positively, although weak, with IL-6, leptin, CRP, and HOMA-IR. This finding might indicate that the increase in NLR in obese children could be an expression of low-grade inflammation and an insulin-resistant state19. A study in healthy young adults showed that the correlation between NLR, CRP, and fibrinogen was highly significant in obese individuals, reflecting the subclinical inflammation in this group13. In addition, Zaldivar et al.7reported increased neutrophils in children with obesity. Interestingly, there was a significant positive correlation between NLR and leptin, which can be related to the chemotaxis of neutrophils induced by leptin3. Adipose tissue neutrophils produce chemokines and cytokines, facilitating macrophage infiltration, which could contribute to the development of insulin resistance3.

An unexpected result of this study was the high prevalence of the MUNW phenotype (41.9 %). Our results show that risk factors for cardiovascular disease are present even in childhood and adolescence, regardless of the nutritional status of these subjects. Currently, there is limited data on the prevalence of MUNOW in pediatric populations. Previous studies reported that 14 to 22 % of normal-weight children and adolescents were metabolically unhealthy36.

Damanhoury et al.26reported that approximately 30% of children with overweight/obesity were classified as having the MUP. Marín-Echeverri et al.37evaluated the association between abdominal obesity (AO) and cardiovascular risk factors in 232 children (2-5 years), of whom 50 % had AO, and 88 % of these were overweight or obese. The authors reported that 75.8 % of children with AO had ≥ 1 risk factors for metabolic syndrome. Shashaj et al.38reported at least one metabolic abnormality in 86 (39.3 %) of children who manifested new-onset overweight or obesity, of which dyslipidemia (25.1 %) and hypertension (13.2 %) were the most prevalent alterations38. Guzzetti et al.39showed that dyslipidemia is frequent in children and adolescents with obesity, while hypertension is rare39. These findings agree with our results.

Limitations in this study need to be noted. First, the cross-sectional design does not allow for establishing causal relationships between the variables studied, and the duration of obesity could not be determined. Second, a direct measurement of body fat distribution was not performed (for example, using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry). Although confounding variables are considered in the study, there are other confounders (e.g., diet and exercise) that were not included, which could influence the results. Finally, the findings in this study could not be generalized to all pediatric patients since most of the participants included in this study were recruited from one reference hospital.

In conclusion, the study demonstrates that hematological parameters are not independently associated with the MUP, and they are unlikely to represent reliable biomarkers of MUP in the pediatric population.

REFERENCES

1. Genovesi S, Antolini L, Orlando A, et al. Cardiovascular Risk Factors Associated With the Metabolically Healthy Obese (MHO) Phenotype Compared to the Metabolically Unhealthy Obese (MUO) Phenotype in Children. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:27. Doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.00027. [ Links ]

2. Chiesa C, Pacifico L, Xi B, et al. Editorial: Metabolically Healthy and Unhealthy Obese Children and Adolescents. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2020;11:613703. Doi: 10.3389/fendo.2020.613703. [ Links ]

3. Makki K, Froguel P, Wolowczuk I. Adipose tissue in obesity-related inflammation and insulin resistance: cells, cytokines, and chemokines. ISRN Inflamm. 2013;2013:139239. Doi: 10.1155/2013/139239. [ Links ]

4. Aleksandrova K, Mozaffarian D, Pischon T. Addressing the Perfect Storm: Biomarkers in Obesity and Pathophysiology of Cardiometabolic Risk. Clin Chem. 2018;64(1):142-53. Doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2017.275172. [ Links ]

5. Aydin M, Yilmaz A, Donma MM, et al. Neutrophil/lymphocyte ratio in obese adolescents. North Clin Istanb. 2015;2(2):87-91. Doi: 10.14744/nci.2015.25238. [ Links ]

6. Aygun AD, Gungor S, Ustundag B, et al. Proinflammatory cytokines and leptin are increased in serum of prepubertal obese children. Mediators Inflamm. 2005;2005(3):180-3. Doi: 10.1155/MI.2005.180. [ Links ]

7. Zaldivar F, McMurray RG, Nemet D, et al. Body fat and circulating leukocytes in children. Int J Obes (Lond). 2006;30(6):906-11. Doi: 10.1038/sj.ijo.0803227. [ Links ]

8. Phillips CM, Perry IJ. Does inflammation determine metabolic health status in obese and nonobese adults? J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2013;98(10):E1610-9. Doi: 10.1210/jc.2013-2038. [ Links ]

9. Zhang SS, Yang XJ, Ma QH, et al. Leukocyte related parameters in older adults with metabolically healthy and unhealthy overweight or obesity. Sci Rep. 2021;11(1):4652. Doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-84367-7. [ Links ]

10. Marra A, Bondesan A, Caroli D, et al. The neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) positively correlates with the presence and severity of metabolic syndrome in obese adults, but not in obese children/adolescents. BMC Endocr Disord. 2023;23(1):121. Doi: 10.1186/s12902-023-01369-4. [ Links ]

11. Fujita B, Strodthoff D, Fritzenwanger M, et al. Altered red blood cell distribution width in overweight adolescents and its association with markers of inflammation. Pediatric obesity. 2013;8(5):385-91. Doi: 10.1111/j.2047-6310.2012.00111.x. [ Links ]

12. Huang LL, Dou DM, Liu N, et al. Association of erythrocyte parameters with metabolic syndrome in the Pearl River Delta region of China: a cross sectional study. BMJ Open. 2018;8(1):e019792. Doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019792. [ Links ]

13. Osadnik T, Bujak K, Osadnik K, et al. Novel inflammatory biomarkers may reflect subclinical inflammation in young healthy adults with obesity. Endokrynol Pol. 2019;70(2):135-42. Doi: 10.5603/EP.a2019.0002. [ Links ]

14. Marginean CO, Melit LE, Ghiga DV, et al. Early Inflammatory Status Related to Pediatric Obesity. Front Pediatr. 2019;7:241. Doi: 10.3389/fped.2019.00241. [ Links ]

15. Singer K, Lumeng CN. The initiation of metabolic inflammation in childhood obesity. J Clin Invest. 2017;127(1):65-73. Doi: 10.1172/JCI88882. [ Links ]

16. Laufer Perl M, Havakuk O, Finkelstein A, et al. High red blood cell distribution width is associated with the metabolic syndrome. Clinical hemorheology and microcirculation. 2015;63(1):35-43. Doi: 10.3233/CH-151978. [ Links ]

17. Vuong J, Qiu Y, La M, et al. Reference intervals of complete blood count constituents are highly correlated to waist circumference: should obese patients have their own &raquo;,» &reg;,® &sect;,§ &shy;,­ &sup1;,¹ &sup2;,² &sup3;,³ &szlig;,ß &THORN;,Þ &thorn;,þ &times;,× &Uacute;,Ú &uacute;,ú &Ucirc;,Û &ucirc;,û &Ugrave;,Ù &ugrave;,ù &uml;,¨ &Uuml;,Ü &uuml;,ü &Yacute;,Ý &yacute;,ý &yen;,¥ &yuml;,ÿ &para;,¶ normal values? &raquo;,» &reg;,® &sect;,§ &shy;,­ &sup1;,¹ &sup2;,² &sup3;,³ &szlig;,ß &THORN;,Þ &thorn;,þ &times;,× &Uacute;,Ú &uacute;,ú &Ucirc;,Û &ucirc;,û &Ugrave;,Ù &ugrave;,ù &uml;,¨ &Uuml;,Ü &uuml;,ü &Yacute;,Ý &yacute;,ý &yen;,¥ &yuml;,ÿ &para;,¶ . American journal of hematology. 2014;89(7):671-7. Doi: 10.1002/ajh.23713. [ Links ]

18. Vaya A, Alis R, Hernandez-Mijares A, et al. Red blood cell distribution width is not related with inflammatory parameters in morbidly obese patients. Clinical biochemistry. 2014;47(6):464-6. Doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.01.020. [ Links ]

19. Wang YY, Lin SY, Liu PH, et al. Association between hematological parameters and metabolic syndrome components in a Chinese population. J Diabetes Complications. 2004;18(6):322-7. Doi: 10.1016/S1056-8727(04)00003-0. [ Links ]

20. Aguilar-Gomez FJ, Bueno-Lozano G, Leis R, et al. Metabolic syndrome before puberty: Myth or reality? Curr Opin Endocr Metab Res. 2020;14:97-103. Doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.coemr.2020.06.006. [ Links ]

21. Hardin AP, Hackell JM, Committee On P, et al. Age Limit of Pediatrics. Pediatrics. 2017;140(3). Doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-2151. [ Links ]

22. Vinciguerra F, Tumminia A, Baratta R, et al. Prevalence and Clinical Characteristics of Children and Adolescents with Metabolically Healthy Obesity: Role of Insulin Sensitivity. Life (Basel). 2020;10(8). Doi: 10.3390/life10080127. [ Links ]

23. Damanhoury S, Newton AS, Rashid M, et al. Defining metabolically healthy obesity in children: a scoping review. Obes Rev. 2018;19(11):1476-91. Doi: 10.1111/obr.12721. [ Links ]

24. Cohen J. Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum; 1988. [ Links ]

25. Barazzoni R, Gortan Cappellari G, Semolic A, et al. The association between hematological parameters and insulin resistance is modified by body mass index - results from the North-East Italy MoMa population study. PLoS One. 2014;9(7):e101590. Doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0101590. [ Links ]

26. Damanhoury S, Morrison KM, Mian R, et al. Metabolically healthy obesity in children enrolled in the CANadian Pediatric Weight management Registry (CANPWR): An exploratory secondary analysis of baseline data. Clin Obes. 2021:e12490. Doi: 10.1111/cob.12490. [ Links ]

27. Vaya A, Alis R, Hernandez-Mijares A, et al. Reply to &raquo;,» &reg;,® &sect;,§ &shy;,­ &sup1;,¹ &sup2;,² &sup3;,³ &szlig;,ß &THORN;,Þ &thorn;,þ &times;,× &Uacute;,Ú &uacute;,ú &Ucirc;,Û &ucirc;,û &Ugrave;,Ù &ugrave;,ù &uml;,¨ &Uuml;,Ü &uuml;,ü &Yacute;,Ý &yacute;,ý &yen;,¥ &yuml;,ÿ &para;,¶ The association of red blood cell distribution width and morbid obesity &raquo;,» &reg;,® &sect;,§ &shy;,­ &sup1;,¹ &sup2;,² &sup3;,³ &szlig;,ß &THORN;,Þ &thorn;,þ &times;,× &Uacute;,Ú &uacute;,ú &Ucirc;,Û &ucirc;,û &Ugrave;,Ù &ugrave;,ù &uml;,¨ &Uuml;,Ü &uuml;,ü &Yacute;,Ý &yacute;,ý &yen;,¥ &yuml;,ÿ &para;,¶ by Aydin et al. Clinical biochemistry. 2014;47(13-14):1350. Doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2014.07.006. [ Links ]

28. Abdel-Moneim A, Zanaty MI, El-Sayed A, et al. Relation Between Oxidative Stress and Hematologic Abnormalities in Children With Type 1 Diabetes. Can J Diabetes. 2020;44(3):222-8. Doi: 10.1016/j.jcjd.2019.07.153. [ Links ]

29. Syauqy A, Hsu CY, Rau HH, et al. Association of dietary patterns, anthropometric measurements, and metabolic parameters with C-reactive protein and neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio in middle-aged and older adults with metabolic syndrome in Taiwan: a cross-sectional study. Nutr J. 2018;17(1):106. Doi: 10.1186/s12937-018-0417-z. [ Links ]

30. Bahadir A, Baltaci D, Turker Y, et al. Is the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio indicative of inflammatory state in patients with obesity and metabolic syndrome? Anatol J Cardiol. 2015;15(10):816-22. Doi: 10.5152/akd.2014.5787. [ Links ]

31. Anik A, Celik E, Anik A. The Relation of Complete Blood Count Parameters with Metabolic and Clinical Parameters in Overweight and Obese Children. J Pediatr Res. 2021;8(2):161-70. Doi: 10.4274/jpr.galenos.2020.74824. [ Links ]

32. Türkkan E, Dag NÇ, Arabaci Ç, et al. Evaluation of Inflammatory Hematological Ratios (NLR, PLR, MLR and Monocyte/HDL-Cholesterol Ratio) in Obese Adolescents. Iberoam J Med. 2022;4(1):11-7. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.53986/ibjm.2022.0002. [ Links ]

33. Santos C, Picoito J, Teixeira AL, et al. Platelet to Lymphocyte Ratio and Homeostasis Model Assessment of Insulin Resistance in Pediatric Obesity and Overweight. Rev Port Endocrinol Diabetes Metab. 2017;12(2):177-82. Doi: https://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.rpedm.2016.10.041. [ Links ]

34. Erdal E, Inanir M. Platelet-to-lymphocyte ratio (PLR) and Plateletcrit (PCT) in young patients with morbid obesity. Rev Assoc Med Bras (1992). 2019;65(9):1182-7. Doi: 10.1590/1806-9282.65.9.1182. [ Links ]

35. Akboga MK, Canpolat U, Yuksel M, et al. Platelet to lymphocyte ratio as a novel indicator of inflammation is correlated with the severity of metabolic syndrome: A single center large-scale study. Platelets. 2016;27(2):178-83. Doi: 10.3109/09537104.2015.1064518. [ Links ]

36. Pizano-Zarate ML, Horta-Baas G, Nunez-Hernandez JA, et al. Prevalence and characteristics of the metabolically healthy obese phenotype in children and adolescents in a Mexican state. Endocrinol Diabetes Nutr (Engl Ed). 2020;67(10):625-35. Doi: 10.1016/j.endinu.2020.03.015. [ Links ]

37. Marin-Echeverri C, Aristizabal JC, Gallego-Lopera N, et al. Cardiometabolic risk factors in preschool children with abdominal obesity from Medellin, Colombia. J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab. 2018;31(11):1179-89. Doi: 10.1515/jpem-2018-0140. [ Links ]

38. Shashaj B, Bedogni G, Graziani MP, et al. Origin of cardiovascular risk in overweight preschool children: a cohort study of cardiometabolic risk factors at the onset of obesity. JAMA Pediatr. 2014;168(10):917-24. Doi: 10.1001/jamapediatrics.2014.900. [ Links ]

39. Guzzetti C, Ibba A, Casula L, et al. Cardiovascular Risk Factors in Children and Adolescents With Obesity: Sex-Related Differences and Effect of Puberty. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019;10:591. Doi: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00591. [ Links ]

Funding: This study was funded by the Instituto Nacional de Perinatología ''Isidro Espinosa de los Reyes'' (SSA 212250-3310-11402011) and the Fondo Sectorial de Investigación en Salud y Seguridad social SSA/IMSS/ISSSTE-CONACYT number 115403.

6Article published by the Journal of the faculty of Human Medicine of the Ricardo Palma University. It is an open access article, distributed under the terms of the Creatvie Commons license: Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International, CC BY 4.0 (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/1.0/), that allows non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided that the original work is duly cited. For commercial use, please contact revista.medicina@urp.edu.pe.

Received: April 19, 2023; Accepted: September 09, 2023

Correspondence author: María del Socorro Romero Figueroa. PhD. Coordinación de Investigación, Facultad de Medicina Campus Universitario Siglo XXI Address: Ex Hacienda Barbabosa 36 A Zinacantepec, México. CP 51356. Phone: +52 7224745083 E-mail:sromero61@hotmail.com

Declaration of conflict of interest: The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest regarding the publication of this paper.

Creative Commons License Este es un artículo publicado en acceso abierto bajo una licencia Creative Commons