SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.4 número3Impacto del pretratamiento con inhibidores P2Y12 en pacientes con síndromes coronarios agudos sin elevación del ST. Análisis de dos registros multicéntricosMultimodal imaging in constrictive pericarditis: a case report of cardiac cirrhosis índice de autoresíndice de assuntospesquisa de artigos
Home Pagelista alfabética de periódicos  

Serviços Personalizados

Journal

Artigo

Indicadores

  • Não possue artigos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

  • Não possue artigos similaresSimilares em SciELO

Compartilhar


Archivos peruanos de cardiología y cirugía cardiovascular

versão On-line ISSN 2708-7212

Arch Peru Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc vol.4 no.3 Lima jul./set. 2023  Epub 30-Set-2023

http://dx.doi.org/10.47487/apcyccv.v4i3.306 

Artículos de revisión

Challenges and Insights in Aggregatibacter aphrophilus endocarditis: a review of literature

Desafíos e ideas en la endocarditis por Aggregatibacter aphrophilus: una revisión de la literatura

Nathalie Victoria Zacarías Mendoza1  , Medical student
http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0343-1466

Norma Nicole Gamarra Valverde1  , Medical student
http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9299-8872

Víctor Justo Robles Velarde2  , Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgeon, Assistant Professor
http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7610-3722

1 Facultad de Medicina Alberto Hurtado, Universidad Peruana Cayetano Heredia. Lima, Perú.

2 Servicio de Cirugía Cardiovascular, Instituto Nacional de Cardiología. Lima, Perú.

ABSTRACT

Infective endocarditis is a serious disease associated with high mortality despite recent advances in diagnosis and treatment. Aggregatibacter aphrophilus is a fastidious Gram-negative member of the HACEK organisms (Haemophilus spp., Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, and Kingella kingae). A. aphrophilus is associated with dental infections but has also been implicated in cases of infective endocarditis. We highlight the importance of a high index of suspicion in symptomatic patients with an initial negative blood culture, particularly in high-risk groups such as patients with congenital valve disease and prosthetic valve. The knowledge of this rare entity may lead to early diagnosis and appropriate management. We review the main characteristics of Aggregatibacter aphrophilus endocarditis reported in the medical literature.

Keywords: Bacterial Endocarditis; Gram-negative Bacteria; Aggregatibacter aphrophilus

RESUMEN

La endocarditis infecciosa es una enfermedad grave que está asociada con una alta mortalidad a pesar de los avances recientes en el diagnóstico y tratamiento. Aggregatibacter aphrophilus es un miembro Gram-negativo de los organismos HACEK (Haemophilus spp., Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens y Kingella kingae). A. aphrophilus está relacionado con infecciones dentales, pero también ha estado implicado en casos de endocarditis infecciosa. Se destaca la importancia de tener un alto índice de sospecha en pacientes sintomáticos con un cultivo sanguíneo inicial negativo, especialmente en grupos de alto riesgo como pacientes con enfermedad valvular congénita y válvula protésica. El conocimiento de esta entidad poco común puede llevar a un diagnóstico temprano y un manejo adecuado. Revisamos las principales características de la endocarditis por Aggregatibacter aphrophilus reportadas en la literatura médica.

Palabras clave: Endocarditis Bacteriana; Bacterias Gramnegativas; Aggregatibacter aphrophilus

Introduction

Aggregatibacter aphrophilus is a member of the HACEK organisms (Haemophilus spp., Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans, Cardiobacterium hominis, Eikenella corrodens, and Kingella kingae). A. aphrophilus is a fastidious Gram-negative associated with dental infections but has also been implicated in cases of infective endocarditis 1.

HACEK endocarditis is a rare disease with an excellent prognosis and simple management if the organism is properly identified. Due to the difficulty of Aggregatibacter aphrophilus isolation, this bacterium is rarely seen in blood cultures 2. In this paper, we review the main characteristics of Aggregatibacter aphrophilus endocarditis reported in the medical literature.

Literature review

We reviewed PubMed® for cases of Aggregatibacter aphrophilus endocarditis. We used the MeSH database to search the terms “infective endocarditis” and “Aggregatibacter aphrophilus” in order to increase the sensibility and specificity of the search. The 20 cases with the most significant data are summarized in Table 1. The articles were reviewed to gather information about patient demographics, preexisting heart diseases, and treatment options. In total, 91 studies were identified, of which 20 met the inclusion criteria, describing a total of 20 patients (Table 1). The identified studies were performed between 2002 and 2021.

Table 1 Main characteristics of patients at hospital admission from the 20 cases of Aggregatibacter aphrophilus endocarditis reported in the medical literature. (Continues on next page

Case No. (Reference citation) Age(y)/sex Initial clinical presentation Risk factors Extra-cardiac Complications Diagnostic test Images Antibiotics and duration Surgery Death
Exams Images findings Type of Valve infected Size of Veg Veg localization
1 (3) 2013 22/M Nausea, headache and exhaustion - - Blood culture (+) TTE (-) TEE (+) Veg on MV Native 5×4 mm MV CRO, 4 weeks. No No
2 (4) 2016 71/M Fever for 2 weeks. History of 2 AVR due to IE and a subsequent fail bioprosthetic valve. No Blood culture (+) 2D-TEE (-), 2D- TTE (-), 3D-TTE (+) Veg on prosthetic AV Biological p. 15 mm Prosthetic AV NA, 2 weeks. AVR No
3 (5) 2021 32/M Pyrexia, dyspnea and HF History of AVR due to BAV. No 16S rRNA gene sequencing (+), Blood culture (-), Valve culture (-) TEE (+) Severe AR with ARA complicated by perforation into the RV. Biological p. No - CRO, NA. Debridement, AVR, annular reconstruction and graft replacement of the ascending aorta. No
4 (6) 2017 47/M Intermittent fever, chills, and decreased urine output for 2 weeks. Systolic murmur IV/VI No Roth’s spots 16S rRNA polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and sequencing, Blood culture (-) TEE (+) Veg on MV Native NA MV CRO + VAN + CIP + teicoplanin + daptomycin + ertapenem, NA. MVR and ring annuloplasty No
5 (7) 2021 51/M General malaise, vomiting, diarrhea, fever, sweats and myalgia for 2 weeks. No Embolic stroke and digital infarction. 16S rRNA sequencing, Blood culture (-) TTE (+) Moderate AR Native No No CRO, 6 weeks. No No
6 (8) 2017 72/F Persistent high fever and acute renal failure No Glomerulonephritis, positive PR3-ANCA, cerebral embolism and hemorrhage br-PCR and sequencing (+), Blood culture (-) TTE (+) Severe MR and veg on MV Native 1 cm MV CRO, 4 weeks MVR No
7 (9) 2014 62/M Fever, chills, night sweats, fatigue, and ten-pound weight loss over a four-month period. Systolic murmur and JVD Dual-chamber pacemaker placement in 1996 for complete heart block with subsequent lead manipulation in 2007 No Blood culture (+) TEE (+) Veg on TV and on the RV pacemaker lead Native TV (1.2 cm × 0.7 cm) and pacemaker lead (NA) Native and right ventricular pacemaker lead. CRO, 6 weeks. Device removal and temporary jugular venous pacing wires were placed No
8 (10) 2021 25/M Fever, myalgia and a non-productive cough. Congenital heart disease with a true BAV and ascending aortopathy No Blood culture (+) TTE (+) ARA No No No CRO + GEN, NA Debridement and redo Bentall operation with a mechanical AV and replacement of the RV to PA conduit No
9 (11) 2017 65/F Left hemiparesis, frontal and nasal headaches, rotational vertigo when getting up, afebrile. Grade 2/6 systolic murmur. 15 years: rheumatic fever. 51 years: 2 AVR and MVR Cerebral embolism Blood culture (+) 3/6 TTE (-) TEE (+) PET/CT (+) Veg on MV, Veg on AV Mechanical p. 6 x 5 mm Prosthetic MV and Prosthetic AV CRO, 6 weeks No No
10 (12) 2022 74/M Persistent pain in the right shoulder, general weakness, chills, palpitations and lack of appetite. 98.6° F temperature. No No Blood culture (+) 1/6 TEE (+) TTE (+) Severe MR and veg on MV Native NA MV CRO, 3 weeks No No
11 (13) 2013 61/M Lethargy, night sweats, fever of 100° F, decreased appetite, and erratic low blood glucose without weight loss. History of AVR due to BAV. Diabetes Splinter hemorrhage in one finger Blood culture (+) 7/8 TEE (+) TTE (+) Veg on MV Protease valve No Anterior mitral leaflet CRO, 4 weeks + GEN, 2 weeks No No
12 14 2019 53/M Confusion, fever, night sweats, chills, and an unintentional twenty-pound weight loss over the past two months. No No Blood culture (-) TEE (+) TTE (+) Large weakly echogenic MV veg. Native 1.5 x 1.0 cm Posterior mitral valve CRO, 6 weeks MVR with bioprosthetic valve No
13 (15 2016 56/M Headache, acute decrease in psychomotor function, and fever of 40° C. 9 years: closure of ASDs by patent foramen ovale with surgical patch. Cerebral abscess Blood culture (-) TTE (-) TEE (+) High right left shunt confirming dehiscence of the surgical patch closure of ASDs. NA NA No CRO, 8 weeks + RF, 8 weeks. Surgical patch removal No
14 16 2018 12/F Fatigue, weight loss, intermittent fever, chills, cough and night sweats. Pan-systolic II/VI heart murmur. Perimembranous VSD. No Blood culture (+) 2/2 TTE (+) Large irregularly bordered echogenic mass attached to the right atrial side of TV. MVR. Native 3 cm x 2.5 cm TV MEM + DO + GEN, NA. - NA
15 (17 2017 42/M Fever and jaundice. 17 years: MVR due to rheumatic fever. Cerebral embolism Blood culture (+) 1/1, 16S rRNA sequencing (+) TTE (-) TEE (+) Thrombus and veg in mechanical MV. Protease valve NA No CRO, 8 weeks. The infected mitral valve prosthesis and the left upper pulmonary vein thrombus were removed No
16 18 2009 42/F Fatigue and discomfort on the left side of the chest, vomiting, and increasing lethargy. Reduced level of consciousness and urinary incontinence. Fever of 40.2° C Nicotine and alcohol abuse Bilateral infarction of the cerebral arteries Blood culture (-) TEE (+) Mobile veg on the noncoronary cusp of the aortic valve. Native NA No CRO + VA. No No
17 (19 2015 4/F Signs of heart failure 2 years: Contegra D-valved conduit (CVC) placement - transposition of the great arteries with VSD and PS. No Blood culture (-) TTE (+) Veg on the pulmonary side of the prosthetic valved conduit Protease valve 4 × 5 mm No CRO No No
18 20 2012 58/M Left flank pain followed by fever with chills for 2 weeks. Systolic murmur (Grade 3) Congenital valvular heart disease Spleen abscess Blood culture (+) 2/2 TTE (+) Severe AR and a flail Mv with severe MR. Native No No CRO, 2 weeks No No
19 (21 2002 62/M Fevers lasting 1 week with rigors and diaphoresis. A grade 3/6 systolic crescendo-decrescendo ejection murmur and a soft 1/4 blowing diastolic murmur Calcific aortic stenosis due to a congenital BAV. Poor dentition No Blood culture (+) 2/3 TTE (+) TEE (+) BAV with moderate AS with mild AR. Native No No CRO + GEN, 5 days. No No
20 22) 2002 25/M Aortic valvuloplasty at 8 years for correction of congenital AS. Previous dental work with endocarditis prophylaxis. Pierced tongue (2 months before). No Blood culture (+) 2/2 No No Native No No No AVR No

MV: Mitral valve; AV: Aortic valve; AR: Aortic regurgitation; ARA: Aortic Root Abscess; RV: Right ventricle; ASDs: Atrial septal defects; TTE: transthoracic echocardiogram; TEE: Transesophageal echocardiogram; 2D-TEE: 2D Transesophageal echocardiogram; 2D-TTE: 2D transthoracic echocardiogram; 3D-TTE: 3D transthoracic echocardiogram; PET-CT: Positron emission tomography; TV: Tricuspid valve; MR: Mitral regurgitation; MVR: Mitral valve replacement; AVR: Aortic valve replacement; BAV: Balloon aortic valvuloplasty; VSD: Ventricular septal defect; PS: Pulmonic stenosis; AS: Aortic stenosis; JVD: Jugular venous distension; HF: heart failure; CRO: Ceftriaxone; CIP: Ciprofloxacin; VAN: Vancomycin; GEN: Gentamycin; FOF: Fosfomycin; AMP: ampicillin; MEM: Meropenem; DO: Doxycycline.

Demographics

We have reviewed 20 cases (15 men (75%) and 5 women (25%)); median age: 46,8 years old (range 5-74 years) of Aggregatibacter aphrophilus endocarditis reported in the medical literature 3-22. The data on gender, age, clinical features, diagnostic tests, surgical treatment, and survival are summarized in Table 1.

Underlying diseases and risk factors

A combination of the previous medical history of prosthetic valve, pacemaker placement, congenital heart disease, congenital valvular disease, prior rheumatic fever, poor dentition, chronic disease, drug abuse, and tongue piercings has been reported in the majority of the cases. Only six patients (30%) did not present risk factors.

According to previous reports, five patients (25%) had received a prosthetic valve. One patient had undergone aortic valve replacement (AVR) twice due to infective endocarditis (IE) and a subsequent failed bioprosthetic valve; a second patient had a bioprosthetic aortic valve replacement at the age of 17 for bicuspid aortic stenosis; a third patient had undergone AVR twice and a mitral valve replacement (MVR) at 51 years old, also, the patient presented rheumatic fever at 15 years old; he was being treated with beta-blocker (atenolol) and a vitamin K antagonist (acenocoumarol); the fourth patient had undergone AVR due to a bicuspid aortic stenosis, also the patient presented diabetes mellitus; and the fifth patient had rheumatic fever.

Only one case (5%) received a dual-chamber pacemaker placement for complete heart block. A 25% of the patients presented with congenital valvulopathy: true bicuspid aortic valve and ascending aortopathy were reported in one of the patients; while the second patient had a calcific aortic stenosis due to a congenital bicuspid aortic valve and a poor dentition. The third patient had a pierced tongue two months before onset of illness and a history of aortic valvuloplasty at eight years of age for correction of congenital aortic stenosis. Also, the patient had previous dental work with endocarditis prophylaxis. Among other reported conditions, one of the patients had a calcific aortic stenosis due to a congenital bicuspid aortic valve and a poor dentition.

Three cases (15%) had congenital heart disease. One patient had a perimembranous ventricular septal defect (PMVSD); a second patient had a Contegra D-valved conduit (CVC) placement due to a D-transposition of the great arteries with ventricular septal defect and pulmonary stenosis at two years old; a third patient underwent a surgical patch closure of patent foramen ovale at the age of 9 and dental care at five months before his admission. Only one case (5%) had a history of nicotine and alcohol abuse.

Clinical presentation and physical examination

The initial presentations of 20 patients with endocarditis due to Aggregatibacter aphrophilus were detailed. The mean duration of symptoms before diagnosis in 16 patients was 10 days (range, 5 - 14 days). The clinical presentation was available for 19 patients. The most common symptoms were fever in 16 (80%), fatigue/general malaise in 5 (25%), weight loss in 5 (25%), and headache in 3 (15%) patients. On the physical examination, cardiac murmurs were found in 6 patients (30%). A total of seven patients (35%) showed embolic complications as initial presentation, neurological involvement being the most common. Four patients (25%) had an ischemic stroke; 1 patient presented a brain abscess; 1 splenic abscess and 1 ANCA-positive glomerulonephritis were also described. Two patients (10%) were admitted with the initial diagnosis of heart failure.

Diagnosis

In 20 cases for which data were recorded, the mean positive blood culture was 0.59 (range: 1-8 taken) with a mean incubation time of 5 days (range: 3-7 days). In 8 patients, blood cultures yielded no organisms, but a definitive diagnosis of endocarditis was established by PCR/sequencing (Br-PCR) of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene in the resected valve or arterial embolus or by culture of the valve in surgery. In 1 case, Aggregatibacter aphrophilus was identified in the cerebrospinal fluid culture.

An echocardiogram was performed on 19 patients, of whom 6 underwent Trans thoracic echocardiogram (TTE) and 4 Trans-esophageal echocardiogram (TEE). In one patient, 2D-TEE, 2D-TTE and 3D-TTE were performed, of which only a positive result was obtained through 3D-TTE; 8 patients had both a TTE, and a TEE. In five patients, the vegetations were visible on the TEE, but not on the TTE. The size of the vegetations, determined by echocardiography, was described in only 8 cases. The mitral valve was involved in 8 of the 20 (40%) patients, the aortic valve in 1 (5%) patient, and both valves in 1 (5%) patient. One case of ventricular pacemaker lead infection was presented. In 9 patients (45%) the valve involved was not identified.

Treatment and susceptibility

The treatment of the 20 patients was detailed, all of whom received cephalosporins at some point during the course of therapy. The therapy was almost always administered intravenously. The most frequently administered therapy was cephalosporin monotherapy (10 patients, 47.6%) followed by dual cephalosporin and aminoglycoside therapy (3 patients, 15%). One patient received the combination of a cephalosporin plus a glycopeptide, while other regimens included tetracyclines, rifamycins, and penicillins. One patient received a cephalosporin, a fluoroquinolone, a glycopeptide, and 3 other antimicrobial agents. Cephalosporins were part of the antimicrobial therapy in 17 (89.5%) cases. The mean duration of treatment in 12 patients was 4.9 ± 6 weeks (range: 2 weeks to 8 weeks). The median duration of treatment for native valve endocarditis was 2.6 weeks and for prosthetic valve endocarditis 3.6 weeks; 50% of the patients (10) underwent valve replacement surgery.

Outcome

Complications included ischemic stroke in 4 patients (20%), glomerulonephritis in 1 patient (5%), brain abscess in 1 patient (5%), and splenic abscess in 1 patient (5%). Nineteen of twenty patients (95%) were cured; the outcome was not specified for 1 case. In cases related to native valves, valve replacement was required in 4 (20%) patients; 2 (33.33%) of the 6 patients with involvement of the prosthetic valve required valve replacement. Of the 4 cases of native valve endocarditis, the aortic valve was replaced in 1 and the mitral valve in 3 patients. Of the 6 cases of prosthetic valve endocarditis, 2 (33.33%) required aortic valve replacement.

Discussion

Aggregatibacter aphrophilus is a member of the group of HACEK organisms. Typically, Aggregatibacter aphrophilus is part of the normal oropharyngeal flora and is frequently found in dental plaques and gingival scrapings 1. Khiarat et al. described the first case of valvular Aggregatibacter aphrophilus infection in 1940 23. Aggregatibacter aphrophilus is an uncommon cause of EI (1-3%). The highest incidence of A. aphrophilus endocarditis is among middle-aged adults and preferentially infects males 2. It is believed that the microorganism located in the oropharynx, enters the vascular chamber at the time of dental work or in the context of periodontal disease, normally in patients with poor dentition or recent dental work 1.

Therefore, the literature data suggest that the microorganism is generally considered to be low virulence and structurally damaged, or prosthetic cardiac valves seem to be the predisposing conditions most strongly associated with the incidence of Aggregatibacter aphrophilus endocarditis. Other groups at risk include those with pacemaker placement, congenital heart disease, prior rheumatic fever, poor dentition, chronic disease, drug abuse, and those with tongue piercings 1.

Aggregatibacter aphrophilus endocarditis is remarkably insidious in its presentation 8. The course of symptoms before the diagnosis has been reported to be prolonged, with a mean of 10 days, compared to endocarditis caused by traditional organisms 24,25. Systemic symptoms, fever, weight loss, and anorexia were reported in most cases; however, embolic complications stood out as the initial clinical presentation. Embolic neurological involvement is the most common. The most reported conditions were cerebrovascular accidents and brain abscesses, patients can also have splenic infarction and other extracardiac emboli complications. The mitral valve is the most commonly infected valve, with a tendency to infect normal valves more often than other microorganisms do 7. The presence of factor V on its structure is necessary for the infection of the native valve 26.

The diagnosis is extraordinarily challenging 27. Knowing that the identification of the pathogen is the key to the success of the treatment of the endocarditis with HACEK organisms the problem is that they are well known as culture negative. It is currently suggested that the PCR/sequencing study (Br-PCR) of the 16S ribosomal RNA gene overcomes the difficulty of finding this microorganism in a blood culture. The diagnosis of Aggregatibacter aphrophilus endocarditis with the modified Duke criteria has limitations 28. The median number of cultures taken was 2.1 (range, 1-8 taken), of which 47% were positive for Aggregatibacter aphrophilus with a mean incubation time of 5 days (range, 3-7 days). In 8 patients, no organisms were isolated in the blood cultures, even though despite the fact that serial samples of more than 3 blood cultures were taken, separated by 24 hours each with an interval between samples of 60 minutes. Aggregatibacter aphrophilus needs to be considered as difficult organisms to culture and, therefore, they are classified within the group of “culture-negative endocarditis” 3.

For the diagnosis of endocarditis, the identification of vegetation on the heart valve was made principally by a transesophageal echocardiogram. Most patients who had an TEE report a previous negative transthoracic echocardiogram. Normally the first exam is the TTE, but in cases where vegetation cannot be observed, the primary second-line examination is a TEE. In our review, we identified that the vegetation was identified in 13 (65%) of the 20 patients using transesophageal echocardiography; of which 8 presented a negative initial transthoracic echocardiography.

The American Heart Association (AHA) and European Society of Cardiology (ESC) recommend as a first-line treatment with intravenous third or fourth-generation cephalosporins and fluoroquinolones 27. Of the 20 cases presented, 17 used ceftriaxone as central treatment, 8 of which used only monotherapy with a third-generation cephalosporin for a mean of 4 weeks (range 2-8 weeks). Eight patients used double therapy where fluoroquinolones were used in 60%. In 10 of the 20 patients, the condition resolved after 6 weeks of antibiotic therapy without the need for surgical intervention. The routine duration of treatment is four-weeks for non-valvular endocarditis (NVE) and six-weeks for prosthetic-valve endocarditis (PVE). Patients with endocarditis due to Aggregatibacter aphrophilus achieve resolution of the condition through antibiotic therapy, valve replacement surgery is not frequent. Valve replacement surgery was necessary for 5 patients (25%), the aortic valve was replaced in 2 patients, and the mitral valve in 3 patients. No perioperative complications were reported.

Endocarditis secondary to HACEK organisms generally has an excellent prognosis with a significantly lower mortality rate at one year compared to IE due to EGV 13. Most of the patients did not report complications, death, or recurrence of a new episode at follow-up for 1 year.

The review highlights the importance of a high index of suspicion in symptomatic patients with an initial negative blood culture as a Aggregatibacter aphrophilus endocarditis, particularly in high-risk groups such as patients with congenital valve disease and prosthetic valve. The knowledge of this rare entity may lead to early diagnosis and appropriate management.

References

1. Khaledi M, Sameni F, Afkhami H, Hemmati J, Asareh Zadegan Dezfuli A, Sanae M-J, et al. Infective endocarditis by HACEK: a review. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2022;17(1):185. doi: 10.1186/s13019-022-01932-5. [ Links ]

2. Sharara SL, Tayyar R, Kanafani ZA, Kanj SS. HACEK endocarditis: a review. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2016;14(6):539-45. doi: 10.1080/14787210.2016.1184085. [ Links ]

3. Ghanem H, Hagel S, Keller P, Prochnau D, Stallmach A, Pletz MW. Fieber und erniedrigte CD4-Zellzahl bei einem 22-jährigen Patienten aus Ghana [A 22-year-old patient from Ghana with fever and reduced CD4 T-cell count]. Internist (Berl). 2013 Jan;54(1):100-4. German. doi: 10.1007/s00108-012-3159-6. PMID: 23318543. [ Links ]

4. Mitsui M, Kataoka A, Konno K, Kitasawa T, Yokoyama N, Shimokawa T, et al. A case of prosthetic aortic valve endocarditis with massive vegetation underestimated by conventional two-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography: efficacy of three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography. J Echocardiogr. 2017;15(1):46-47. doi: 10.1007/s12574-016-0311-7. [ Links ]

5. Wassef N, Sarkar D, Viswanathan G, Hughes GM, Salisbury T, Kuo J, de Silva R. A rare cause of culture negative bioprosthetic valve endocarditis: a case report of Aggregatibacter aphrophilus infection. Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2021;5(2):ytab003. doi: 10.1093/ehjcr/ytab003. Erratum in: Eur Heart J Case Rep. 2022;6(2):ytac072. [ Links ]

6. Liao Y, Luo CY, Ko WC, Chen PL. Aggregatibacter aphrophilus culture-negative endocarditis diagnosed by 16S rRNA gene sequencing in excised mitral valve - A case report. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2017;50(4):557-558. doi: 10.1016/j.jmii.2016.10.002. [ Links ]

7. Wright P, Keane C, Ricketts HC, McKay A. Aggregatibacter aphrophilus endocarditis: a case report. Scott Med J. 2012;57(4):247. doi: 10.1258/smj.2012.012112. PMID: 23138585. [ Links ]

8. Hirano K, Tokui T, Inagaki M, Fujii T, Maze Y, Toyoshima H. Aggregatibacter aphrophilus infective endocarditis confirmed by broad-range PCR diagnosis: A case report. Int J Surg Case Rep. 2017;31:150-153. doi: 10.1016/j.ijscr.2017.01.041. [ Links ]

9. Patel SR, Patel NH, Borah A, Saltzman H. Aggregatibacter aphrophilus pacemaker endocarditis: a case report. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7:885. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-885. [ Links ]

10. Al-Sakini N, Bruce C, Seitler S, Ibrahim W, Nicholas V, Loup O, et al. Back to basics: a rare and aggressive case of Aggregatibacter aphrophilusendocarditis. Oxf Med Case Reports. 2021;2021(6):omab043. doi: 10.1093/omcr/omab043. [ Links ]

11. Deleixhe B, Frippiat F, Léonard P, Withofs N, Meex C, Piérard L, et al. Le cas clinique du mois. Endocardite à Aggregatibacter aphrophilus sur prothèses valvulaires [Endocarditis of mitral and aortic prosthetic heart valves caused by Aggregatibacter aphrophilus]. Rev Med Liege. 2017;72(12):522-528. French. [ Links ]

12. Bagheri S, Takahashi N, Ramirez VR, Jayasekara DK. Exploration of Shoulder Abscess Association with Prompt Aggregatibacter aphrophilus Growth in Infective Endocarditis. Cureus. 2022;14(3):e23107. doi: 10.7759/cureus.23107. [ Links ]

13. Wassef N, Rizkalla E, Shaukat N, Sluka M. HACEK-induced endocarditis. BMJ Case Rep. 2013;2013:bcr2012007359. doi: 10.1136/bcr-2012-007359. [ Links ]

14. Daoud H, Abugroun A, Olanipekun O, Garrison D. Infective endocarditis and brain abscess secondary to Aggregatibacter aphrophilus. IDCases. 2019;17:e00561. doi: 10.1016/j.idcr.2019.e00561. [ Links ]

15. Honnorat E, Seng P, Riberi A, Habib G, Stein A. Late infectious endocarditis of surgical patch closure of atrial septal defects diagnosed by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose gated cardiac computed tomography (18F-FDG-PET/CT): a case report. BMC Res Notes. 2016;9(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s13104-016-2223-z. [ Links ]

16. Das A, Geever DL. A teenager with prolonged fever. Pediatr Infect Dis J. 2009;28(8):756, 760. doi: 10.1097/INF.0b013e31819f1fb1. [ Links ]

17. Choi HN, Park KH, Park S, Kim JM, Kang HJ, Park JH, et al. Prosthetic Valve Endocarditis caused by HACEK Organisms: a Case Reports and Systematic Review of the Literature. Infect Chemother. 2017;49(4):282-285. doi: 10.3947/ic.2017.49.4.282. [ Links ]

18. Jung GW, Parkins MD, Church D. Pyogenic ventriculitis complicating Aggregatibacter aphrophilus infective endocarditis: A case report and literature review. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol. 2009;20(3):e107-9. doi: 10.1155/2009/971735. [ Links ]

19. Hidalgo-García L, Hurtado-Mingo A, Olbrich P, Moruno-Tirado A, Neth O, Obando I. Recurrent infective endocarditis due to Aggregatibacter aphrophilus and Staphylococcus lugdunensis. Klin Padiatr. 2015;227(2):89-92. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1398536. [ Links ]

20. Tien YC, Chang CC, Liu YM. Haemophilus aphrophilus associated spleen abscess: an unusual presentation of subacute endocarditis. J Clin Med Res. 2012;4(3):209-11. doi: 10.4021/jocmr803w. [ Links ]

21. Almeda FQ, Tenorio AR, Barkatullah S, Parrillo JE, Simon DM. Infective endocarditis due to Haemophilus aphrophilus treated with levofloxacin. Am J Med. 2002;113(8):702-4. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9343(02)01220-2. [ Links ]

22. Akhondi H, Rahimi AR. Haemophilus aphrophilus endocarditis after tongue piercing. Emerg Infect Dis. 2002;8(8):850-1. doi: 10.3201/eid0808.010458. [ Links ]

23. Khairat O. Endocarditis due to a new species of Hæmophilus. J Pathol Bacteriol. 1940;50(3):497-505. doi: 10.1002/path.1700500312. [ Links ]

24. Broa AL, Cruz I, Cotrim C, Diogo J. Aggregatibacter aphrophilus aortic valve infective endocarditis. Infectio. 2017;21(2):126-128. doi: 10.22354/in.v21i2.656. [ Links ]

25. Huang ST, Lee HC, Lee NY, Liu KH, Ko WC. Clinical characteristics of invasive Haemophilus aphrophilus infections. J Microbiol Immunol Infect. 2005;38(4):271-6. [ Links ]

26. Darras-Joly C, Lortholary O, Mainardi JL, Etienne J, Guillevin L, Acar J. Haemophilus endocarditis: report of 42 cases in adults and review. Clin Infect Dis. 1997;24(6):1087-94. doi: 10.1086/513624. [ Links ]

27. Habib G, Lancellotti P, Antunes MJ, Bongiorni MG, Casalta JP, Del Zotti F, et al. 2015 ESC Guidelines for the management of infective endocarditis: The Task Force for the Management of Infective Endocarditis of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC). Endorsed by: European Association for Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS), the European Association of Nuclear Medicine (EANM). Eur Heart J. 2015;36(44):3075-3128. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehv319. [ Links ]

28. Gould FK, Denning DW, Elliot TSJ, Foweraker J, Perry JD, Prendergast PD, et al. Guidelines for the diagnosis and antibiotic treatment of endocarditis in adults: report of the Working Party of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(2):269-89. doi: 10.1093/jac/dkr450. Erratum in: J Antimicrob Chemother. 2012;67(5):1304 [ Links ]

Source of funding: This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors

Cite as: Zacarías Mendoza NV, Gamarra NN, Valverde Robles Velarde VJ. Challenges and Insights in Aggregatibacter aphrophilus endocarditis: A review of literature. Arch Peru Cardiol Cir Cardiovasc. 2023;4(3):102-108. doi: 10.47487/apcyccv.v4i3.306

Received: July 15, 2023; Accepted: September 18, 2023

Correspondence: Nathalie Victoria Zacarías Mendoza Calle Anthon Van Dyck 137, Lima, Perú. E-mail nathalie.zacarias@upch.pe

Author’s contributions: NVZM: Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing. NNGV: Writing - Original Draft, Writing - Review & Editing. VJRV: Supervision

Conflicts of interest: None declared

Creative Commons License This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License