Servicios Personalizados
Revista
Articulo
Indicadores
- Citado por SciELO
Links relacionados
- Similares en SciELO
Compartir
Educación
versión impresa ISSN 1019-9403versión On-line ISSN 2304-4322
Resumen
DASSO VASSALLO, Ana y EVARISTO CHIYONG, Inés. Comparative study: Face-to-face learning and blended learning. Educación [online]. 2020, vol.29, n.57, pp.27-42. ISSN 1019-9403. http://dx.doi.org/10.18800/educacion.202002.002.
This article reviews the comparison of results, grades and students’ perception between two courses in their face-to-face and blended modalities. The courses on which we worked were Descriptive and Probability Statistics, which uses the STEM methodology, and Individual and Environment, which does not. The results show no statistically significant differences between the students’ grades according to modality in any of the two courses and semesters that were reviewed for this study. This is consistent with what was found in the theoretical review. This article aims to help discussions and decision making around the growth of blended learning in Peru, which presents itself as an alternative to traditional lecturing.
Palabras clave : B-Learning; higher education; grades; education and technology.