SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.28 issue1Work of Art and Nature in the Transcendental of Freudian Metapsychology in Paul RicoeurThe Doctrine of Incommensurability in Paul Feyerabend: An Objection Against a Particular Conception of Scientific Rationality author indexsubject indexarticles search
Home Pagealphabetic serial listing  

Services on Demand

Journal

Article

Indicators

  • Have no cited articlesCited by SciELO

Related links

  • Have no similar articlesSimilars in SciELO

Share


Areté

Print version ISSN 1016-913X

Abstract

CORSICO, Luciano. Fichte and Heidegger: the Problematic Ontological Meaning of the Wissenschaftslehre. arete [online]. 2016, vol.28, n.1, pp.31-60. ISSN 1016-913X.

The aim of this article is to point out the limitations of an ontological interpretation of Fichte’s philosophy. During the period of Jena (17941799), Fichte clearly attributes a secondary role to the concept of being. That is to say, Fichte’s transcendental philosophy starts by excluding any ontological significance from his own reflection. However, Martin Heidegger’s ontological-existential interpretation of Fichte’s philosophy has achieved an enormous influence in the recent scholarly literature. Heidegger’s interpretation emphasizes excessively the ontological significance of Fichte’s philosophy and forgets its practical significance and its corresponding methodological standards.

Keywords : Being; transcendental philosophy; ontological meaning; method; practical reason.

        · abstract in Spanish     · text in Spanish     · Spanish ( pdf )

 

Creative Commons License All the contents of this journal, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License