SciELO - Scientific Electronic Library Online

 
vol.34 número1Percepciones acerca de la presencia de palomas en espacios públicos y su importancia en la salud pública en un distrito de Lima, PerúResistencia antihelmíntica en granjas ovinas del valle cálido del Alto Magdalena - Tolima índice de autoresíndice de materiabúsqueda de artículos
Home Pagelista alfabética de revistas  

Servicios Personalizados

Revista

Articulo

Indicadores

  • No hay articulos citadosCitado por SciELO

Links relacionados

Compartir


Revista de Investigaciones Veterinarias del Perú

versión impresa ISSN 1609-9117

Resumen

MEDRANO-GALARZA, Catalina et al. Perceptions of producers on the welfare of double purpose cattle in the Eastern plains of Colombia. Rev. investig. vet. Perú [online]. 2023, vol.34, n.1, e23129.  Epub 27-Feb-2023. ISSN 1609-9117.  http://dx.doi.org/10.15381/rivep.v34i1.23129.

The aim of this observational-cross-sectional study was to determine the attitudes of producers regarding cattle welfare (CW) of double-purpose bovine. A face-to-face survey was carried out with 20 DP producers from Meta, Colombia to quantify their perceptions (using 5-point Likert scales) on the level of impact that environmental, health and management aspects have on CW and on the level of importance of indicators (environmental, management, health and affective states) of CW evaluation. The average scores awarded to each aspect and indicator were calculated. The Kruskal-Wallis test was used to assess differences between categories of aspects of impact and between categories of indicators. The health aspects were considered the ones with the greatest impact (4.07/5), while the indicators of affective states were considered the least important (3.82). The key aspects categorized as 'Extreme Impact' factors were external parasiteload (4.65), notchecking colostrum intake (4.65), heat stress (4.55), myiasis (4.25) and disbudding/ dehorning without anesthesia (4.25). Key indicators recognized as 'Essential' were access to shade (4.65), colostrum intake (4.55), staff skills (4.5), calf mortality (4.45) and potable water (4.45). The results highlight the existing consensus between the impact of heat stress and the importance of the presence of shade as an indicator of CW, as well as between colostrum consumption and calf mortality. Likewise, there is evidence of a disagreement between the high impact of disbudding /dehorning without anesthesia and the low level of importance perceived as an essential indicator of CW.

Palabras clave : welfare; consensus; cattle; indicators; opinion.

        · resumen en Español     · texto en Español     · Español ( pdf )